Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Belloso Martín, Nuria
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
Texto Completo: http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/8796
Resumo: Abstract: Sustainability has become a protective parameter of human rights, with the aim of avoiding alterations or mutations such that they end up harming the human being both of current generations and, mainly, of future generations. In this context, the question that arises is: what risks does the new advances in genetics imply for the future of humanity? The present study analyzes the topic, starting with terminological clarifications about sustainability. Next, the principle of sustainability is analyzed in the specific areas of Bioethics - and Biolaw and Biomedicine. Ethics in the era of genetic engineering deserves reflection. This allows us to examine the feasibility of projecting sustainability in the areas mentioned. The application of the results of scientific research in such fields is producing changes that can be expected to improve health and, in turn, will be screened in several of the Human Rights. The human genome, transgenic organisms, organ transplantation, gene therapies, the production of drugs and treatments are affected by ethical and legal debates. Based on the question of whether there is a right or duty - obligation - to improve future generations, it is examined whether it is possible to configure a sustainable Biolaw, for which two assumptions are raised that are the respective exponents of a therapeutic treatment and a perfective eugenics. Sustainability leads one to question whether everything that can be scientifically done to improve the human race must be done, because the decisions that are adopted in the present will determine future generations.Keywords: Bioethics. Duty. Human rights. Moral. Genetics. Sustainability.
id UPF-4_881896bd2782e4752e76fcc71a0f0c10
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.upf.br:article/8796
network_acronym_str UPF-4
network_name_str Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros?Abstract: Sustainability has become a protective parameter of human rights, with the aim of avoiding alterations or mutations such that they end up harming the human being both of current generations and, mainly, of future generations. In this context, the question that arises is: what risks does the new advances in genetics imply for the future of humanity? The present study analyzes the topic, starting with terminological clarifications about sustainability. Next, the principle of sustainability is analyzed in the specific areas of Bioethics - and Biolaw and Biomedicine. Ethics in the era of genetic engineering deserves reflection. This allows us to examine the feasibility of projecting sustainability in the areas mentioned. The application of the results of scientific research in such fields is producing changes that can be expected to improve health and, in turn, will be screened in several of the Human Rights. The human genome, transgenic organisms, organ transplantation, gene therapies, the production of drugs and treatments are affected by ethical and legal debates. Based on the question of whether there is a right or duty - obligation - to improve future generations, it is examined whether it is possible to configure a sustainable Biolaw, for which two assumptions are raised that are the respective exponents of a therapeutic treatment and a perfective eugenics. Sustainability leads one to question whether everything that can be scientifically done to improve the human race must be done, because the decisions that are adopted in the present will determine future generations.Keywords: Bioethics. Duty. Human rights. Moral. Genetics. Sustainability.Resumen: La sustentabilidad se ha convertido en un parámetro protector de los Derechos humanos, con el ánimo de evitar alteraciones o mutaciones tales que acaben dañando al ser humano tanto de las generaciones actuales como, y principalmente, de las generaciones venideras. En este contexto, el interrogante al que se plantea es: ¿qué riesgos implica, para el futuro de la humanidad, los nuevos avances en genética? El presente estudio analiza el tema, iniciando con unas aclaraciones terminológicas sobre la sostenibilidad. Seguidamente, se examina el principio de sostenibilidad en las áreas concretas de la Bioética – y del Bioderecho y de la Biomedicina. La ética en la era de la ingeniería genética merece una reflexión. Ello permite examinar la viabilidad de la proyección de la sostenibilidad en las áreas citadas. La aplicación de los resultados de la investigación científica en tales campos está produciendo cambios de los que cabe esperar mejorarán la salud y, a su vez, se proyectarán en varios de los Derechos humanos. El genoma humano, los organismos transgénicos, el transplante de órganos, terapias génicas, la producción de medicamentos y de tratamientos quedan afectados por debates éticos y jurídicos. Con base en el interrogante de si hay derecho o deber – obligación – de mejorar las generaciones futuras, se examina si es posible configurar un Bioderecho sostenible, para lo que se plantean dos supuestos que son exponentes respectivos de un tratamiento terapéutico y de una eugenesia perfectiva. La sostenibilidad lleva a cuestionarse si todo lo que científicamente pueda hacerse para mejorar la raza humana, debe de hacerse, porque las decisiones que se adopten en el presente determinarán a las generaciones futuras.Palabras-clave: Bioética. Derecho Humanos. Deber. Moral. Genética. Sustentabilidad.Universidade de Passo Fundo2018-10-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/879610.5335/rjd.v32i2.8796Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 32 n. 2 (2018); 318-346Law of Justice Journal; Vol 32 No 2 (2018); 318-3462238-32121413-7038reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)instacron:UPFspahttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/8796/114114326Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Justiça do Direitohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBelloso Martín, Nuria2018-10-26T18:33:37Zoai:seer.upf.br:article/8796Revistahttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjdPUBhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/oairevistajusticadodireito@gmail.com2238-32121413-7038opendoar:2018-10-26T18:33:37Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros?
title Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros?
spellingShingle Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros?
Belloso Martín, Nuria
title_short Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros?
title_full Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros?
title_fullStr Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros?
title_full_unstemmed Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros?
title_sort Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros?
author Belloso Martín, Nuria
author_facet Belloso Martín, Nuria
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Belloso Martín, Nuria
description Abstract: Sustainability has become a protective parameter of human rights, with the aim of avoiding alterations or mutations such that they end up harming the human being both of current generations and, mainly, of future generations. In this context, the question that arises is: what risks does the new advances in genetics imply for the future of humanity? The present study analyzes the topic, starting with terminological clarifications about sustainability. Next, the principle of sustainability is analyzed in the specific areas of Bioethics - and Biolaw and Biomedicine. Ethics in the era of genetic engineering deserves reflection. This allows us to examine the feasibility of projecting sustainability in the areas mentioned. The application of the results of scientific research in such fields is producing changes that can be expected to improve health and, in turn, will be screened in several of the Human Rights. The human genome, transgenic organisms, organ transplantation, gene therapies, the production of drugs and treatments are affected by ethical and legal debates. Based on the question of whether there is a right or duty - obligation - to improve future generations, it is examined whether it is possible to configure a sustainable Biolaw, for which two assumptions are raised that are the respective exponents of a therapeutic treatment and a perfective eugenics. Sustainability leads one to question whether everything that can be scientifically done to improve the human race must be done, because the decisions that are adopted in the present will determine future generations.Keywords: Bioethics. Duty. Human rights. Moral. Genetics. Sustainability.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/8796
10.5335/rjd.v32i2.8796
url http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/8796
identifier_str_mv 10.5335/rjd.v32i2.8796
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/8796/114114326
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Justiça do Direito
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Justiça do Direito
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Passo Fundo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Passo Fundo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 32 n. 2 (2018); 318-346
Law of Justice Journal; Vol 32 No 2 (2018); 318-346
2238-3212
1413-7038
reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
instacron:UPF
instname_str Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
instacron_str UPF
institution UPF
reponame_str Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
collection Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistajusticadodireito@gmail.com
_version_ 1776750980454416384