Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/8796 |
Resumo: | Abstract: Sustainability has become a protective parameter of human rights, with the aim of avoiding alterations or mutations such that they end up harming the human being both of current generations and, mainly, of future generations. In this context, the question that arises is: what risks does the new advances in genetics imply for the future of humanity? The present study analyzes the topic, starting with terminological clarifications about sustainability. Next, the principle of sustainability is analyzed in the specific areas of Bioethics - and Biolaw and Biomedicine. Ethics in the era of genetic engineering deserves reflection. This allows us to examine the feasibility of projecting sustainability in the areas mentioned. The application of the results of scientific research in such fields is producing changes that can be expected to improve health and, in turn, will be screened in several of the Human Rights. The human genome, transgenic organisms, organ transplantation, gene therapies, the production of drugs and treatments are affected by ethical and legal debates. Based on the question of whether there is a right or duty - obligation - to improve future generations, it is examined whether it is possible to configure a sustainable Biolaw, for which two assumptions are raised that are the respective exponents of a therapeutic treatment and a perfective eugenics. Sustainability leads one to question whether everything that can be scientifically done to improve the human race must be done, because the decisions that are adopted in the present will determine future generations.Keywords: Bioethics. Duty. Human rights. Moral. Genetics. Sustainability. |
id |
UPF-4_881896bd2782e4752e76fcc71a0f0c10 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.upf.br:article/8796 |
network_acronym_str |
UPF-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros?Abstract: Sustainability has become a protective parameter of human rights, with the aim of avoiding alterations or mutations such that they end up harming the human being both of current generations and, mainly, of future generations. In this context, the question that arises is: what risks does the new advances in genetics imply for the future of humanity? The present study analyzes the topic, starting with terminological clarifications about sustainability. Next, the principle of sustainability is analyzed in the specific areas of Bioethics - and Biolaw and Biomedicine. Ethics in the era of genetic engineering deserves reflection. This allows us to examine the feasibility of projecting sustainability in the areas mentioned. The application of the results of scientific research in such fields is producing changes that can be expected to improve health and, in turn, will be screened in several of the Human Rights. The human genome, transgenic organisms, organ transplantation, gene therapies, the production of drugs and treatments are affected by ethical and legal debates. Based on the question of whether there is a right or duty - obligation - to improve future generations, it is examined whether it is possible to configure a sustainable Biolaw, for which two assumptions are raised that are the respective exponents of a therapeutic treatment and a perfective eugenics. Sustainability leads one to question whether everything that can be scientifically done to improve the human race must be done, because the decisions that are adopted in the present will determine future generations.Keywords: Bioethics. Duty. Human rights. Moral. Genetics. Sustainability.Resumen: La sustentabilidad se ha convertido en un parámetro protector de los Derechos humanos, con el ánimo de evitar alteraciones o mutaciones tales que acaben dañando al ser humano tanto de las generaciones actuales como, y principalmente, de las generaciones venideras. En este contexto, el interrogante al que se plantea es: ¿qué riesgos implica, para el futuro de la humanidad, los nuevos avances en genética? El presente estudio analiza el tema, iniciando con unas aclaraciones terminológicas sobre la sostenibilidad. Seguidamente, se examina el principio de sostenibilidad en las áreas concretas de la Bioética – y del Bioderecho y de la Biomedicina. La ética en la era de la ingeniería genética merece una reflexión. Ello permite examinar la viabilidad de la proyección de la sostenibilidad en las áreas citadas. La aplicación de los resultados de la investigación científica en tales campos está produciendo cambios de los que cabe esperar mejorarán la salud y, a su vez, se proyectarán en varios de los Derechos humanos. El genoma humano, los organismos transgénicos, el transplante de órganos, terapias génicas, la producción de medicamentos y de tratamientos quedan afectados por debates éticos y jurídicos. Con base en el interrogante de si hay derecho o deber – obligación – de mejorar las generaciones futuras, se examina si es posible configurar un Bioderecho sostenible, para lo que se plantean dos supuestos que son exponentes respectivos de un tratamiento terapéutico y de una eugenesia perfectiva. La sostenibilidad lleva a cuestionarse si todo lo que científicamente pueda hacerse para mejorar la raza humana, debe de hacerse, porque las decisiones que se adopten en el presente determinarán a las generaciones futuras.Palabras-clave: Bioética. Derecho Humanos. Deber. Moral. Genética. Sustentabilidad.Universidade de Passo Fundo2018-10-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/879610.5335/rjd.v32i2.8796Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 32 n. 2 (2018); 318-346Law of Justice Journal; Vol 32 No 2 (2018); 318-3462238-32121413-7038reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)instacron:UPFspahttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/8796/114114326Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Justiça do Direitohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBelloso Martín, Nuria2018-10-26T18:33:37Zoai:seer.upf.br:article/8796Revistahttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjdPUBhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/oairevistajusticadodireito@gmail.com2238-32121413-7038opendoar:2018-10-26T18:33:37Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros? |
title |
Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros? |
spellingShingle |
Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros? Belloso Martín, Nuria |
title_short |
Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros? |
title_full |
Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros? |
title_fullStr |
Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros? |
title_sort |
Las proyecciones de la sustentabilidad en la bioética: ¿derecho o deber – moral – de mejorar a los seres humanos futuros? |
author |
Belloso Martín, Nuria |
author_facet |
Belloso Martín, Nuria |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Belloso Martín, Nuria |
description |
Abstract: Sustainability has become a protective parameter of human rights, with the aim of avoiding alterations or mutations such that they end up harming the human being both of current generations and, mainly, of future generations. In this context, the question that arises is: what risks does the new advances in genetics imply for the future of humanity? The present study analyzes the topic, starting with terminological clarifications about sustainability. Next, the principle of sustainability is analyzed in the specific areas of Bioethics - and Biolaw and Biomedicine. Ethics in the era of genetic engineering deserves reflection. This allows us to examine the feasibility of projecting sustainability in the areas mentioned. The application of the results of scientific research in such fields is producing changes that can be expected to improve health and, in turn, will be screened in several of the Human Rights. The human genome, transgenic organisms, organ transplantation, gene therapies, the production of drugs and treatments are affected by ethical and legal debates. Based on the question of whether there is a right or duty - obligation - to improve future generations, it is examined whether it is possible to configure a sustainable Biolaw, for which two assumptions are raised that are the respective exponents of a therapeutic treatment and a perfective eugenics. Sustainability leads one to question whether everything that can be scientifically done to improve the human race must be done, because the decisions that are adopted in the present will determine future generations.Keywords: Bioethics. Duty. Human rights. Moral. Genetics. Sustainability. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/8796 10.5335/rjd.v32i2.8796 |
url |
http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/8796 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5335/rjd.v32i2.8796 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/8796/114114326 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Justiça do Direito http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Justiça do Direito http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Passo Fundo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Passo Fundo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 32 n. 2 (2018); 318-346 Law of Justice Journal; Vol 32 No 2 (2018); 318-346 2238-3212 1413-7038 reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF) instacron:UPF |
instname_str |
Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF) |
instacron_str |
UPF |
institution |
UPF |
reponame_str |
Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) |
collection |
Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistajusticadodireito@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1776750980454416384 |