Power asymmetry in the democratic transition and the design of Brazilian judicial review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/12290 |
Resumo: | This article discusses the causality between the power asymmetry verified in the 1988’s constituent and the design of the Brazilian judicial review. The article begins with the debate about political transition process and the explanatory hypotheses for the relationship between democratization and constitutionalism. Then, analyses the constitutional jurisdiction as a central institution of the Democratic Constitutional State, considering the factors of tension and conciliation between democracy and constitution. It concludes with the defense of the thesis that the 1988 National Constituent Assembly was characterized by low power asymmetry, which resulted in the decisive expansion of judicial review and its establishment as a normative pillar of Brazilian democracy. |
id |
UPF-4_f5f3792e0012e51fdd1c0022def1988b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.upf.br:article/12290 |
network_acronym_str |
UPF-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Power asymmetry in the democratic transition and the design of Brazilian judicial reviewAssimetria de poder na transição democrática e o desenho da jurisdição constitucional brasileiraThis article discusses the causality between the power asymmetry verified in the 1988’s constituent and the design of the Brazilian judicial review. The article begins with the debate about political transition process and the explanatory hypotheses for the relationship between democratization and constitutionalism. Then, analyses the constitutional jurisdiction as a central institution of the Democratic Constitutional State, considering the factors of tension and conciliation between democracy and constitution. It concludes with the defense of the thesis that the 1988 National Constituent Assembly was characterized by low power asymmetry, which resulted in the decisive expansion of judicial review and its establishment as a normative pillar of Brazilian democracy.O artigo discute a causalidade existente entre a assimetria de poder verificada no momento constituinte de 1988 e o desenho do modelo de jurisdição constitucional brasileiro. Inicialmente, compreende-se o processo de transição política e as hipóteses explicativas para a relação entre democratização e constitucionalismo. Após, analisa-se a jurisdição constitucional enquanto instituição central do Estado Constitucional Democrático, analisando-se os fatores de tensão e conciliação entre os fenômenos democrático e constitucional. Conclui-se com a defesa da tese que a Assembleia Nacional Constituinte de 1988 se caracterizou pela baixa assimetria de poder, o que resultou na ampliação decisiva da jurisdição constitucional e sua fixação como pilar normativo da democracia brasileira.Universidade de Passo Fundo2020-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/1229010.5335/rjd.v34i3.12290Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 34 n. 3 (2020): Justiça do Direito; 272-301Law of Justice Journal; Vol 34 No 3 (2020): Justiça do Direito; 272-3012238-32121413-7038reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)instacron:UPFporhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/12290/114115578Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Justiça do Direitohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLorencini, Bruno César2021-02-23T22:53:08Zoai:seer.upf.br:article/12290Revistahttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjdPUBhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/oairevistajusticadodireito@gmail.com2238-32121413-7038opendoar:2021-02-23T22:53:08Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Power asymmetry in the democratic transition and the design of Brazilian judicial review Assimetria de poder na transição democrática e o desenho da jurisdição constitucional brasileira |
title |
Power asymmetry in the democratic transition and the design of Brazilian judicial review |
spellingShingle |
Power asymmetry in the democratic transition and the design of Brazilian judicial review Lorencini, Bruno César |
title_short |
Power asymmetry in the democratic transition and the design of Brazilian judicial review |
title_full |
Power asymmetry in the democratic transition and the design of Brazilian judicial review |
title_fullStr |
Power asymmetry in the democratic transition and the design of Brazilian judicial review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Power asymmetry in the democratic transition and the design of Brazilian judicial review |
title_sort |
Power asymmetry in the democratic transition and the design of Brazilian judicial review |
author |
Lorencini, Bruno César |
author_facet |
Lorencini, Bruno César |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lorencini, Bruno César |
description |
This article discusses the causality between the power asymmetry verified in the 1988’s constituent and the design of the Brazilian judicial review. The article begins with the debate about political transition process and the explanatory hypotheses for the relationship between democratization and constitutionalism. Then, analyses the constitutional jurisdiction as a central institution of the Democratic Constitutional State, considering the factors of tension and conciliation between democracy and constitution. It concludes with the defense of the thesis that the 1988 National Constituent Assembly was characterized by low power asymmetry, which resulted in the decisive expansion of judicial review and its establishment as a normative pillar of Brazilian democracy. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/12290 10.5335/rjd.v34i3.12290 |
url |
http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/12290 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5335/rjd.v34i3.12290 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/12290/114115578 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Justiça do Direito http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Justiça do Direito http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Passo Fundo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Passo Fundo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 34 n. 3 (2020): Justiça do Direito; 272-301 Law of Justice Journal; Vol 34 No 3 (2020): Justiça do Direito; 272-301 2238-3212 1413-7038 reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF) instacron:UPF |
instname_str |
Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF) |
instacron_str |
UPF |
institution |
UPF |
reponame_str |
Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) |
collection |
Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistajusticadodireito@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1776750980977655808 |