The Stroop Paradigm in Brazilian Studies: A Scope Review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/14766 |
Resumo: | The Stroop paradigm is widely used in neuropsychological assessments of executive functions. This study investigated the use of tasks based on the Stroop paradigm in national studies published between 2000 and 2020, by doing a scope review. Empirical studies were selected in the following databases: Pubmed, Scielo Brazil, LILACS, Pepsic, Index Psi Periódicos, Index-Psi teses, BDTD and Portal CAPES de Teses e Dissertações. From the initial 1295 studies found, 145 were selected (90 theses/dissertations and 55 articles). Most articles were published in psychology and psychiatry journals, and the construct most targeted by the tasks was inhibitory control. Four versions were identified, and the classic Stroop Color and Word test was the most used one (122 studies). Different scores were reported. There were few psychometric studies and few studies with task norms. Computerized versions are still little used. The review helps to spot the versions used at the national level. |
id |
UPM-1_54cb1408b8fd0d77f7c161b8cd5845ef |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/14766 |
network_acronym_str |
UPM-1 |
network_name_str |
Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Stroop Paradigm in Brazilian Studies: A Scope ReviewEl Paradigma de Stroop en los Estudios Brasileños: Una Revisión del AlcanceO Paradigma de Stroop nos Estudos Brasileiros: Uma Revisão de Escopo Stroop inhibitory controlneuropsychological assessmentexecutive functionsneuropsychologyStroopcontrol inhibitorioevaluación neuropsicológicafunciones ejecutivas neuropsicologíaThe Stroop paradigm is widely used in neuropsychological assessments of executive functions. This study investigated the use of tasks based on the Stroop paradigm in national studies published between 2000 and 2020, by doing a scope review. Empirical studies were selected in the following databases: Pubmed, Scielo Brazil, LILACS, Pepsic, Index Psi Periódicos, Index-Psi teses, BDTD and Portal CAPES de Teses e Dissertações. From the initial 1295 studies found, 145 were selected (90 theses/dissertations and 55 articles). Most articles were published in psychology and psychiatry journals, and the construct most targeted by the tasks was inhibitory control. Four versions were identified, and the classic Stroop Color and Word test was the most used one (122 studies). Different scores were reported. There were few psychometric studies and few studies with task norms. Computerized versions are still little used. The review helps to spot the versions used at the national level.El paradigma de Stroop se usa ampliamente. Este estudio investigó el uso de tareas basadas en esto paradigma en estudios nacionales publicados entre 2000 y 2020, haciendo una revisión de alcance. Los estudios empíricos fueron seleccionados en las bases de datos: Pubmed, Scielo Brasil, LILACS, Pepsic, Index Psi Periódicos, Index-Psi teses, BDTD y Portal CAPES de Teses e Dissertações. De los 1295 estudios iniciales encontrados, se seleccionaron 145 (90 tesis / disertaciones y 55 artículos). La mayoría de los artículos se publicaron en revistas de psicología y psiquiatría, y el constructo más citado de las tareas fue el control inhibitorio. Se identificaron cuatro versiones, siendo la prueba clásica Stroop Colores y Palavras la más utilizada (122 estudios). Se informaron diferentes puntuaciones. Hubo pocos estudios psicométricos y pocos estudios con normas de tareas. Las versiones computarizadas todavía se utilizan poco. La revisión ayuda a identificar las versiones utilizadas a nivel nacional.O paradigma do Stroop é amplamente utilizado em neuropsicolgia das funções executivas. Este estudo investigou o uso de tarefas baseadas no paradigma de Stroop em estudos nacionais publicados entre 2000 e 2020, por meio de uma revisão de escopo. Buscaram-se estudos empíricos nas bases de dados: Pubmed, Scielo Brazil, LILACS, Pepsic, Index Psi Periódicos, Index-Psi teses, BDTD e Portal CAPES de Teses e Dissertações. Do montante inicial de 1295 estudos, 145 foram selecionados (90 teses/dissertações e 55 artigos). A maioria dos artigos foi publicada em revistas de psicologia e psiquiatria, e o controle inibitório foi o constructo mais mencionado como alvo das tarefas. Quatro versões foram identificadas, sendo a mais utilizada o Stroop de cores e palavras clássico (122 estudos). Diferentes escores/índices foram relatados. Houve poucos estudos psicométricos e com normas das tarefas. Versões computadorizas ainda são pouco utilizadas. A revisão colabora para mapeamento das versões utilizadas no âmbito nacional.Editora Mackenzie2023-05-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextoapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/1476610.5935/1980-6906/ePTPCP14766.enThe Journal Of Psychology: Theory and Practice ; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2023); ePTPCP14766Revista Psicología: Teoría y Práctica; Vol. 25 Núm. 2 (2023); ePTPCP14766Revista Psicologia: Teoria e Prática; v. 25 n. 2 (2023); ePTPCP147661980-69061516-3687reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online)instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)instacron:UPMporenghttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/14766/11792http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/14766/11793Copyright (c) 2023 Maria Eduarda Oliveira Martins, Luiz Henrique Toresan, Caio Marcos Garcia Tosi, Bernardo Peressoni Luz, Luiz Henrique Toresan, Chrissie Ferreira de Carvalho, Natália Martins Diashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartins, Maria Eduarda OliveiraTosi, Caio Marcos GarciaLuz, Bernardo PeressoniToresan, Luiz HenriqueCarvalho, Chrissie Ferreira deDias, Natália Martins2023-05-09T22:02:17Zoai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/14766Revistahttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/indexPRIhttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/oairevistapsico@mackenzie.br1980-69061516-3687opendoar:2023-05-09T22:02:17Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Stroop Paradigm in Brazilian Studies: A Scope Review El Paradigma de Stroop en los Estudios Brasileños: Una Revisión del Alcance O Paradigma de Stroop nos Estudos Brasileiros: Uma Revisão de Escopo |
title |
The Stroop Paradigm in Brazilian Studies: A Scope Review |
spellingShingle |
The Stroop Paradigm in Brazilian Studies: A Scope Review Martins, Maria Eduarda Oliveira Stroop inhibitory control neuropsychological assessment executive functions neuropsychology Stroop control inhibitorio evaluación neuropsicológica funciones ejecutivas neuropsicología |
title_short |
The Stroop Paradigm in Brazilian Studies: A Scope Review |
title_full |
The Stroop Paradigm in Brazilian Studies: A Scope Review |
title_fullStr |
The Stroop Paradigm in Brazilian Studies: A Scope Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Stroop Paradigm in Brazilian Studies: A Scope Review |
title_sort |
The Stroop Paradigm in Brazilian Studies: A Scope Review |
author |
Martins, Maria Eduarda Oliveira |
author_facet |
Martins, Maria Eduarda Oliveira Tosi, Caio Marcos Garcia Luz, Bernardo Peressoni Toresan, Luiz Henrique Carvalho, Chrissie Ferreira de Dias, Natália Martins |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tosi, Caio Marcos Garcia Luz, Bernardo Peressoni Toresan, Luiz Henrique Carvalho, Chrissie Ferreira de Dias, Natália Martins |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martins, Maria Eduarda Oliveira Tosi, Caio Marcos Garcia Luz, Bernardo Peressoni Toresan, Luiz Henrique Carvalho, Chrissie Ferreira de Dias, Natália Martins |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Stroop inhibitory control neuropsychological assessment executive functions neuropsychology Stroop control inhibitorio evaluación neuropsicológica funciones ejecutivas neuropsicología |
topic |
Stroop inhibitory control neuropsychological assessment executive functions neuropsychology Stroop control inhibitorio evaluación neuropsicológica funciones ejecutivas neuropsicología |
description |
The Stroop paradigm is widely used in neuropsychological assessments of executive functions. This study investigated the use of tasks based on the Stroop paradigm in national studies published between 2000 and 2020, by doing a scope review. Empirical studies were selected in the following databases: Pubmed, Scielo Brazil, LILACS, Pepsic, Index Psi Periódicos, Index-Psi teses, BDTD and Portal CAPES de Teses e Dissertações. From the initial 1295 studies found, 145 were selected (90 theses/dissertations and 55 articles). Most articles were published in psychology and psychiatry journals, and the construct most targeted by the tasks was inhibitory control. Four versions were identified, and the classic Stroop Color and Word test was the most used one (122 studies). Different scores were reported. There were few psychometric studies and few studies with task norms. Computerized versions are still little used. The review helps to spot the versions used at the national level. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-05-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/14766 10.5935/1980-6906/ePTPCP14766.en |
url |
http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/14766 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5935/1980-6906/ePTPCP14766.en |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/14766/11792 http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/14766/11793 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Mackenzie |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Mackenzie |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
The Journal Of Psychology: Theory and Practice ; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2023); ePTPCP14766 Revista Psicología: Teoría y Práctica; Vol. 25 Núm. 2 (2023); ePTPCP14766 Revista Psicologia: Teoria e Prática; v. 25 n. 2 (2023); ePTPCP14766 1980-6906 1516-3687 reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM) instacron:UPM |
instname_str |
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM) |
instacron_str |
UPM |
institution |
UPM |
reponame_str |
Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) |
collection |
Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistapsico@mackenzie.br |
_version_ |
1797051378943655936 |