Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dias, Natália Martins
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: León, Camila Barbosa Riccardi, Pazeto, Talita de Cassia Batista, Martins, Gabriela Lamarca Luxo, Pereira, Ana Paula Prust, Seabra, Alessandra Gotuzo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online)
Texto Completo: http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/6981
Resumo: Mastering reading instruction is relevant to the individual’s participation in society. Studies have identified the components of competent reading, such as word recognition, comprehension and fluency. All aspects should be considered in the evaluation of reading. This study conducted a literature review in the 2009-2013 period, in order to identify the reading assessment instruments in national productions. We used the BVS-Psi, SciELO, and Pepsic bases. After applying the eligibility criteria, 86 articles from journals focused on psychopedagogy/education, speech therapy, and psychology were selected. Most investigations used samples of typical development, with a predominance of studies with children. We identified 52 assessment instruments. From them, only 12 are published. There was a predominance of tests that measure word recognition and appropriate for children assessment. Some identified gaps are related to the assessment of adolescents and adults, as well as other competent reading components.
id UPM-1_fdd69026d531c48d5353d94b837d7fc2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/6981
network_acronym_str UPM-1
network_name_str Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013Evaluación de la Lectura en Brasil: Revisión de la Literatura en lo Recorte 2009-2013Avaliação da Leitura no Brasil: Revisão da Literatura no Recorte 2009-2013written languageassessmentlearningeducationinterdisciplinaryenguaje escritoevaluaciónaprendizajeeducacióninterdisciplinarlinguagem escritaavaliaçãoaprendizagemeducação interdisciplinarMastering reading instruction is relevant to the individual’s participation in society. Studies have identified the components of competent reading, such as word recognition, comprehension and fluency. All aspects should be considered in the evaluation of reading. This study conducted a literature review in the 2009-2013 period, in order to identify the reading assessment instruments in national productions. We used the BVS-Psi, SciELO, and Pepsic bases. After applying the eligibility criteria, 86 articles from journals focused on psychopedagogy/education, speech therapy, and psychology were selected. Most investigations used samples of typical development, with a predominance of studies with children. We identified 52 assessment instruments. From them, only 12 are published. There was a predominance of tests that measure word recognition and appropriate for children assessment. Some identified gaps are related to the assessment of adolescents and adults, as well as other competent reading components.El dominio de la lectura es relevante para la participación del individuo en la sociedad. Los estudios han identificado los componentes de la lectura competente; entre ellos, el reconocimiento de palabras y la comprensión y fluidez que deben ser considerados en la evaluación de la lectura. En este estudio se llevó a cabo una revisión de la literatura en el recorte 2009-2013, con la finalidad de identificar los instrumentos de evaluación de lectura en las producciones nacionales. Se utilizaron las bases BVS-Psi, Pepsic y SciELO. Después de haber aplicado los criterios de elegibilidad, fueron seleccionados 86 artículos publicados en revistas de psicopedagogía/educación, fonoaudiología y psicología. La mayoría de las investigaciones utilizaron muestras de desarrollo típico, con un predominio de estudios en niños. Se identificaron 52 instrumentos de evaluación, de los cuales, sólo 12 de ellos se habían publicado. Hubo un predominio de los test que miden el reconocimiento de palabras y que son apropiados para la evaluación infantil. Algunas lacunas identificadas se refieren a la evaluación de los adolescentes y los adultos, así como de otros componentes de la lectura competente.O domínio da leitura é relevante para a participação do indivíduo na sociedade. Estudos têm identificado os componentes da leitura competente, entre eles, reconhecimento de palavras, compreensão e fluência, aspectos que devem ser considerados na avaliação da leitura. Este estudo realizou uma revisão da literatura no recorte 2009‑2013 com o objetivo de levantar instrumentos de avaliação da leitura nas produções nacionais. Utilizaram‑se as bases BVS‑Psi, Pepsic e SciELO. Aplicados os critérios de elegibilidade, foram selecionados 86 artigos, concentrados em periódicos de psicopedagogia/educação, fonoaudiologia e psicologia. A maioria das investigações utilizou amostras de desenvolvimento típico, com predomínio de estudos com crianças. Foram identificados 52 instrumentos de avaliação, dos quais somente 12 encontram‑se publicados. Houve predomínio de testes que mensuram reconhecimento de palavras e apropriados para avaliação infantil. Algumas lacunas identificadas referem‑se à avaliação de  adolescentes e adultos, bem como de outros componentes da leitura competente.Editora Mackenzie2016-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAPapplication/pdfhttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/698110.15348/1980-6906/psicologia.v18n1p113-128The Journal Of Psychology: Theory and Practice ; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2016); 113-128Revista Psicología: Teoría y Práctica; Vol. 18 Núm. 1 (2016); 113-128Revista Psicologia: Teoria e Prática; v. 18 n. 1 (2016); 113-1281980-69061516-3687reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online)instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)instacron:UPMporhttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/6981/5711Copyright (c) 2016 Natália Martins Dias, Camila Barbosa Riccardi León, Talita de Cassia Batista Pazeto, Gabriela Lamarca Luxo Martins, Ana Paula Prust Pereira, Alessandra Gotuzo Seabrahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDias, Natália MartinsLeón, Camila Barbosa RiccardiPazeto, Talita de Cassia BatistaMartins, Gabriela Lamarca LuxoPereira, Ana Paula PrustSeabra, Alessandra Gotuzo2023-07-11T19:07:32Zoai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/6981Revistahttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/indexPRIhttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/oairevistapsico@mackenzie.br1980-69061516-3687opendoar:2023-07-11T19:07:32Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013
Evaluación de la Lectura en Brasil: Revisión de la Literatura en lo Recorte 2009-2013
Avaliação da Leitura no Brasil: Revisão da Literatura no Recorte 2009-2013
title Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013
spellingShingle Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013
Dias, Natália Martins
written language
assessment
learning
education
interdisciplinary
enguaje escrito
evaluación
aprendizaje
educación
interdisciplinar
linguagem escrita
avaliação
aprendizagem
educação
interdisciplinar
title_short Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013
title_full Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013
title_fullStr Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013
title_sort Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013
author Dias, Natália Martins
author_facet Dias, Natália Martins
León, Camila Barbosa Riccardi
Pazeto, Talita de Cassia Batista
Martins, Gabriela Lamarca Luxo
Pereira, Ana Paula Prust
Seabra, Alessandra Gotuzo
author_role author
author2 León, Camila Barbosa Riccardi
Pazeto, Talita de Cassia Batista
Martins, Gabriela Lamarca Luxo
Pereira, Ana Paula Prust
Seabra, Alessandra Gotuzo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dias, Natália Martins
León, Camila Barbosa Riccardi
Pazeto, Talita de Cassia Batista
Martins, Gabriela Lamarca Luxo
Pereira, Ana Paula Prust
Seabra, Alessandra Gotuzo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv written language
assessment
learning
education
interdisciplinary
enguaje escrito
evaluación
aprendizaje
educación
interdisciplinar
linguagem escrita
avaliação
aprendizagem
educação
interdisciplinar
topic written language
assessment
learning
education
interdisciplinary
enguaje escrito
evaluación
aprendizaje
educación
interdisciplinar
linguagem escrita
avaliação
aprendizagem
educação
interdisciplinar
description Mastering reading instruction is relevant to the individual’s participation in society. Studies have identified the components of competent reading, such as word recognition, comprehension and fluency. All aspects should be considered in the evaluation of reading. This study conducted a literature review in the 2009-2013 period, in order to identify the reading assessment instruments in national productions. We used the BVS-Psi, SciELO, and Pepsic bases. After applying the eligibility criteria, 86 articles from journals focused on psychopedagogy/education, speech therapy, and psychology were selected. Most investigations used samples of typical development, with a predominance of studies with children. We identified 52 assessment instruments. From them, only 12 are published. There was a predominance of tests that measure word recognition and appropriate for children assessment. Some identified gaps are related to the assessment of adolescents and adults, as well as other competent reading components.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
AP
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/6981
10.15348/1980-6906/psicologia.v18n1p113-128
url http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/6981
identifier_str_mv 10.15348/1980-6906/psicologia.v18n1p113-128
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/6981/5711
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv The Journal Of Psychology: Theory and Practice ; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2016); 113-128
Revista Psicología: Teoría y Práctica; Vol. 18 Núm. 1 (2016); 113-128
Revista Psicologia: Teoria e Prática; v. 18 n. 1 (2016); 113-128
1980-6906
1516-3687
reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online)
instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)
instacron:UPM
instname_str Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)
instacron_str UPM
institution UPM
reponame_str Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online)
collection Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistapsico@mackenzie.br
_version_ 1797051376379887616