Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/6981 |
Resumo: | Mastering reading instruction is relevant to the individual’s participation in society. Studies have identified the components of competent reading, such as word recognition, comprehension and fluency. All aspects should be considered in the evaluation of reading. This study conducted a literature review in the 2009-2013 period, in order to identify the reading assessment instruments in national productions. We used the BVS-Psi, SciELO, and Pepsic bases. After applying the eligibility criteria, 86 articles from journals focused on psychopedagogy/education, speech therapy, and psychology were selected. Most investigations used samples of typical development, with a predominance of studies with children. We identified 52 assessment instruments. From them, only 12 are published. There was a predominance of tests that measure word recognition and appropriate for children assessment. Some identified gaps are related to the assessment of adolescents and adults, as well as other competent reading components. |
id |
UPM-1_fdd69026d531c48d5353d94b837d7fc2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/6981 |
network_acronym_str |
UPM-1 |
network_name_str |
Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013Evaluación de la Lectura en Brasil: Revisión de la Literatura en lo Recorte 2009-2013Avaliação da Leitura no Brasil: Revisão da Literatura no Recorte 2009-2013written languageassessmentlearningeducationinterdisciplinaryenguaje escritoevaluaciónaprendizajeeducacióninterdisciplinarlinguagem escritaavaliaçãoaprendizagemeducação interdisciplinarMastering reading instruction is relevant to the individual’s participation in society. Studies have identified the components of competent reading, such as word recognition, comprehension and fluency. All aspects should be considered in the evaluation of reading. This study conducted a literature review in the 2009-2013 period, in order to identify the reading assessment instruments in national productions. We used the BVS-Psi, SciELO, and Pepsic bases. After applying the eligibility criteria, 86 articles from journals focused on psychopedagogy/education, speech therapy, and psychology were selected. Most investigations used samples of typical development, with a predominance of studies with children. We identified 52 assessment instruments. From them, only 12 are published. There was a predominance of tests that measure word recognition and appropriate for children assessment. Some identified gaps are related to the assessment of adolescents and adults, as well as other competent reading components.El dominio de la lectura es relevante para la participación del individuo en la sociedad. Los estudios han identificado los componentes de la lectura competente; entre ellos, el reconocimiento de palabras y la comprensión y fluidez que deben ser considerados en la evaluación de la lectura. En este estudio se llevó a cabo una revisión de la literatura en el recorte 2009-2013, con la finalidad de identificar los instrumentos de evaluación de lectura en las producciones nacionales. Se utilizaron las bases BVS-Psi, Pepsic y SciELO. Después de haber aplicado los criterios de elegibilidad, fueron seleccionados 86 artículos publicados en revistas de psicopedagogía/educación, fonoaudiología y psicología. La mayoría de las investigaciones utilizaron muestras de desarrollo típico, con un predominio de estudios en niños. Se identificaron 52 instrumentos de evaluación, de los cuales, sólo 12 de ellos se habían publicado. Hubo un predominio de los test que miden el reconocimiento de palabras y que son apropiados para la evaluación infantil. Algunas lacunas identificadas se refieren a la evaluación de los adolescentes y los adultos, así como de otros componentes de la lectura competente.O domínio da leitura é relevante para a participação do indivíduo na sociedade. Estudos têm identificado os componentes da leitura competente, entre eles, reconhecimento de palavras, compreensão e fluência, aspectos que devem ser considerados na avaliação da leitura. Este estudo realizou uma revisão da literatura no recorte 2009‑2013 com o objetivo de levantar instrumentos de avaliação da leitura nas produções nacionais. Utilizaram‑se as bases BVS‑Psi, Pepsic e SciELO. Aplicados os critérios de elegibilidade, foram selecionados 86 artigos, concentrados em periódicos de psicopedagogia/educação, fonoaudiologia e psicologia. A maioria das investigações utilizou amostras de desenvolvimento típico, com predomínio de estudos com crianças. Foram identificados 52 instrumentos de avaliação, dos quais somente 12 encontram‑se publicados. Houve predomínio de testes que mensuram reconhecimento de palavras e apropriados para avaliação infantil. Algumas lacunas identificadas referem‑se à avaliação de adolescentes e adultos, bem como de outros componentes da leitura competente.Editora Mackenzie2016-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAPapplication/pdfhttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/698110.15348/1980-6906/psicologia.v18n1p113-128The Journal Of Psychology: Theory and Practice ; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2016); 113-128Revista Psicología: Teoría y Práctica; Vol. 18 Núm. 1 (2016); 113-128Revista Psicologia: Teoria e Prática; v. 18 n. 1 (2016); 113-1281980-69061516-3687reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online)instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)instacron:UPMporhttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/6981/5711Copyright (c) 2016 Natália Martins Dias, Camila Barbosa Riccardi León, Talita de Cassia Batista Pazeto, Gabriela Lamarca Luxo Martins, Ana Paula Prust Pereira, Alessandra Gotuzo Seabrahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDias, Natália MartinsLeón, Camila Barbosa RiccardiPazeto, Talita de Cassia BatistaMartins, Gabriela Lamarca LuxoPereira, Ana Paula PrustSeabra, Alessandra Gotuzo2023-07-11T19:07:32Zoai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/6981Revistahttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/indexPRIhttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/oairevistapsico@mackenzie.br1980-69061516-3687opendoar:2023-07-11T19:07:32Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013 Evaluación de la Lectura en Brasil: Revisión de la Literatura en lo Recorte 2009-2013 Avaliação da Leitura no Brasil: Revisão da Literatura no Recorte 2009-2013 |
title |
Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013 |
spellingShingle |
Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013 Dias, Natália Martins written language assessment learning education interdisciplinary enguaje escrito evaluación aprendizaje educación interdisciplinar linguagem escrita avaliação aprendizagem educação interdisciplinar |
title_short |
Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013 |
title_full |
Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013 |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013 |
title_sort |
Assessment of Reading in Brazil: Literature Review in the 2009-2013 |
author |
Dias, Natália Martins |
author_facet |
Dias, Natália Martins León, Camila Barbosa Riccardi Pazeto, Talita de Cassia Batista Martins, Gabriela Lamarca Luxo Pereira, Ana Paula Prust Seabra, Alessandra Gotuzo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
León, Camila Barbosa Riccardi Pazeto, Talita de Cassia Batista Martins, Gabriela Lamarca Luxo Pereira, Ana Paula Prust Seabra, Alessandra Gotuzo |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dias, Natália Martins León, Camila Barbosa Riccardi Pazeto, Talita de Cassia Batista Martins, Gabriela Lamarca Luxo Pereira, Ana Paula Prust Seabra, Alessandra Gotuzo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
written language assessment learning education interdisciplinary enguaje escrito evaluación aprendizaje educación interdisciplinar linguagem escrita avaliação aprendizagem educação interdisciplinar |
topic |
written language assessment learning education interdisciplinary enguaje escrito evaluación aprendizaje educación interdisciplinar linguagem escrita avaliação aprendizagem educação interdisciplinar |
description |
Mastering reading instruction is relevant to the individual’s participation in society. Studies have identified the components of competent reading, such as word recognition, comprehension and fluency. All aspects should be considered in the evaluation of reading. This study conducted a literature review in the 2009-2013 period, in order to identify the reading assessment instruments in national productions. We used the BVS-Psi, SciELO, and Pepsic bases. After applying the eligibility criteria, 86 articles from journals focused on psychopedagogy/education, speech therapy, and psychology were selected. Most investigations used samples of typical development, with a predominance of studies with children. We identified 52 assessment instruments. From them, only 12 are published. There was a predominance of tests that measure word recognition and appropriate for children assessment. Some identified gaps are related to the assessment of adolescents and adults, as well as other competent reading components. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion AP |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/6981 10.15348/1980-6906/psicologia.v18n1p113-128 |
url |
http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/6981 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15348/1980-6906/psicologia.v18n1p113-128 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/6981/5711 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Mackenzie |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Mackenzie |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
The Journal Of Psychology: Theory and Practice ; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2016); 113-128 Revista Psicología: Teoría y Práctica; Vol. 18 Núm. 1 (2016); 113-128 Revista Psicologia: Teoria e Prática; v. 18 n. 1 (2016); 113-128 1980-6906 1516-3687 reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM) instacron:UPM |
instname_str |
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM) |
instacron_str |
UPM |
institution |
UPM |
reponame_str |
Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) |
collection |
Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistapsico@mackenzie.br |
_version_ |
1797051376379887616 |