Abertura e intelecto são construtos válidos e confiáveis? : uma investigação psicométrica

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fabretti, Rodrigo Rodrigues
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/236104
Resumo: Openness and Intellect have been proposed as two distinct personality constructs located between the broad Openness/Intellect domain and its facets. Although they have shown to be useful in clarifying the associations between Openness/Intellect and different variables, their factor structure has not been empirically supported. This study a) adapted the Openness and Intellect scales for the Brazilian context and b) tested the factor structure of these scales using robust statistical techniques in two Brazilian samples (n = 750 and n = 612). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) did not support the original second-order model. Instead, a bifactor model with a general and two specific factors presented the best fit to the data. Evidence of validity and reliability for the Openness and Intellect aspects is presented and theoretical implications of these results are discussed.
id URGS_665bbdf8301f43e403de75a051cd3f24
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/236104
network_acronym_str URGS
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS
repository_id_str 1853
spelling Fabretti, Rodrigo RodriguesZanon, Cristian2022-03-23T04:35:43Z2021http://hdl.handle.net/10183/236104001138521Openness and Intellect have been proposed as two distinct personality constructs located between the broad Openness/Intellect domain and its facets. Although they have shown to be useful in clarifying the associations between Openness/Intellect and different variables, their factor structure has not been empirically supported. This study a) adapted the Openness and Intellect scales for the Brazilian context and b) tested the factor structure of these scales using robust statistical techniques in two Brazilian samples (n = 750 and n = 612). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) did not support the original second-order model. Instead, a bifactor model with a general and two specific factors presented the best fit to the data. Evidence of validity and reliability for the Openness and Intellect aspects is presented and theoretical implications of these results are discussed.application/pdfengValidade do testePsicometriaTraços de personalidadeTraduçõesTest adaptationOpenness to experienceIntellectIntelligenceVividnesRuminationReflectionPsychometricsAbertura e intelecto são construtos válidos e confiáveis? : uma investigação psicométricaAre openness and intellect valid and reliable constructs? : a psychometric investigationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulInstituto de PsicologiaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em PsicologiaPorto Alegre, BR-RS2021mestradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001138521.pdf.txt001138521.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain75406http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/236104/2/001138521.pdf.txt09ae29a677a21e43145f439ffb7d2149MD52ORIGINAL001138521.pdfTexto parcialapplication/pdf918086http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/236104/1/001138521.pdf7af53aafefa57a94517c61e491deeca7MD5110183/2361042022-03-26 05:00:54.065463oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/236104Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/2PUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestlume@ufrgs.br||lume@ufrgs.bropendoar:18532022-03-26T08:00:54Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Abertura e intelecto são construtos válidos e confiáveis? : uma investigação psicométrica
dc.title.alternative.en.fl_str_mv Are openness and intellect valid and reliable constructs? : a psychometric investigation
title Abertura e intelecto são construtos válidos e confiáveis? : uma investigação psicométrica
spellingShingle Abertura e intelecto são construtos válidos e confiáveis? : uma investigação psicométrica
Fabretti, Rodrigo Rodrigues
Validade do teste
Psicometria
Traços de personalidade
Traduções
Test adaptation
Openness to experience
Intellect
Intelligence
Vividnes
Rumination
Reflection
Psychometrics
title_short Abertura e intelecto são construtos válidos e confiáveis? : uma investigação psicométrica
title_full Abertura e intelecto são construtos válidos e confiáveis? : uma investigação psicométrica
title_fullStr Abertura e intelecto são construtos válidos e confiáveis? : uma investigação psicométrica
title_full_unstemmed Abertura e intelecto são construtos válidos e confiáveis? : uma investigação psicométrica
title_sort Abertura e intelecto são construtos válidos e confiáveis? : uma investigação psicométrica
author Fabretti, Rodrigo Rodrigues
author_facet Fabretti, Rodrigo Rodrigues
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fabretti, Rodrigo Rodrigues
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Zanon, Cristian
contributor_str_mv Zanon, Cristian
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Validade do teste
Psicometria
Traços de personalidade
Traduções
topic Validade do teste
Psicometria
Traços de personalidade
Traduções
Test adaptation
Openness to experience
Intellect
Intelligence
Vividnes
Rumination
Reflection
Psychometrics
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Test adaptation
Openness to experience
Intellect
Intelligence
Vividnes
Rumination
Reflection
Psychometrics
description Openness and Intellect have been proposed as two distinct personality constructs located between the broad Openness/Intellect domain and its facets. Although they have shown to be useful in clarifying the associations between Openness/Intellect and different variables, their factor structure has not been empirically supported. This study a) adapted the Openness and Intellect scales for the Brazilian context and b) tested the factor structure of these scales using robust statistical techniques in two Brazilian samples (n = 750 and n = 612). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) did not support the original second-order model. Instead, a bifactor model with a general and two specific factors presented the best fit to the data. Evidence of validity and reliability for the Openness and Intellect aspects is presented and theoretical implications of these results are discussed.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2022-03-23T04:35:43Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/236104
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001138521
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/236104
identifier_str_mv 001138521
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/236104/2/001138521.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/236104/1/001138521.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 09ae29a677a21e43145f439ffb7d2149
7af53aafefa57a94517c61e491deeca7
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv lume@ufrgs.br||lume@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1810085579261476864

Registros relacionados