Bladder cancer recurrence patterns after robotic radical cystectomy with completely intracorporeal urinary diversion : a contemporary comparison with open radical cystectomy at a high-volume academic center

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Berger, André Kives
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/234595
Resumo: Background: There is some debate about patterns of recurrence after robotic radical cystectomy (RARC) for bladder cancer compared to open radical cystectomy (ORC). Objective: To compare rates and patterns of recurrence after RARC with completely intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) and ORC. Design, Setting and Participants: Between August 2009 and June 2016, 837 consecutive patients underwent RARC with ICUD or ORC for localized BC at a single high-volume academic cancer center. Intervention: RARC and ICUD was performed in 237 patients, while ORC was performed in 598 patients. Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: The outcomes of interest were recurrencefree survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and distrubtion of local and distant recurrence. The patterns of local and distant recurrences within 2 years were tabulated. Kaplan-Meier analysis, the log rank test, and Cox regression analyses were used to compare RFS and OS between the two groups. All data was collected prospectively within an IRB-approved database and analysed retrospectively. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software. Results and limitations: Both groups were comparable with respect to age, BMI, ASA, neoadjuvant chemotherapy status, CIS, LVI, positive soft-tissue margins and node-positive disease. RARC and ICUD patients were more likely to have an ileal conduit (64% vs 29%, p<0.05) and extravesical disease (38% vs 30%, p<0.05). There was no difference in recurrence-free survival for the entire cohort, and by pathological stage: organ-confined disease (pT0-pT2, n=565), extra-vesical disease (pT3-pT4, n=270) and node-positive disease (pN+, n=183, all p>0.05). Median time to recurrence was 6.9 months in RARC arm and 7.7 months in the ORC arm. On multivariable regression analysis, RARC was not an independent predictor of recurrence after adjusting for confounders (HR 1.05, 95%CI 0.75–1.48; p=0.8). There were no differences in the number or patterns of recurrences, in particular, with respect to peritoneal carcinomatosis and extra-pelvic lymph node metastasis. The main limitation of this study is the retrospective analysis. Conclusions: These contemporary data show no differences in the rates or patterns of local or distant bladder cancer recurrence between ORC and RARC with ICUD. Patient summary: Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer using the robotic platform is not associated with differences in the rates or patterns of recurrence compared to traditional open surgical techniques.
id URGS_a07a67b8e1200f52330c0f1b40580ba5
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/234595
network_acronym_str URGS
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS
repository_id_str 1853
spelling Berger, André KivesSchwartzman, Gilberto2022-01-29T04:51:53Z2021http://hdl.handle.net/10183/234595001136171Background: There is some debate about patterns of recurrence after robotic radical cystectomy (RARC) for bladder cancer compared to open radical cystectomy (ORC). Objective: To compare rates and patterns of recurrence after RARC with completely intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) and ORC. Design, Setting and Participants: Between August 2009 and June 2016, 837 consecutive patients underwent RARC with ICUD or ORC for localized BC at a single high-volume academic cancer center. Intervention: RARC and ICUD was performed in 237 patients, while ORC was performed in 598 patients. Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: The outcomes of interest were recurrencefree survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and distrubtion of local and distant recurrence. The patterns of local and distant recurrences within 2 years were tabulated. Kaplan-Meier analysis, the log rank test, and Cox regression analyses were used to compare RFS and OS between the two groups. All data was collected prospectively within an IRB-approved database and analysed retrospectively. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software. Results and limitations: Both groups were comparable with respect to age, BMI, ASA, neoadjuvant chemotherapy status, CIS, LVI, positive soft-tissue margins and node-positive disease. RARC and ICUD patients were more likely to have an ileal conduit (64% vs 29%, p<0.05) and extravesical disease (38% vs 30%, p<0.05). There was no difference in recurrence-free survival for the entire cohort, and by pathological stage: organ-confined disease (pT0-pT2, n=565), extra-vesical disease (pT3-pT4, n=270) and node-positive disease (pN+, n=183, all p>0.05). Median time to recurrence was 6.9 months in RARC arm and 7.7 months in the ORC arm. On multivariable regression analysis, RARC was not an independent predictor of recurrence after adjusting for confounders (HR 1.05, 95%CI 0.75–1.48; p=0.8). There were no differences in the number or patterns of recurrences, in particular, with respect to peritoneal carcinomatosis and extra-pelvic lymph node metastasis. The main limitation of this study is the retrospective analysis. Conclusions: These contemporary data show no differences in the rates or patterns of local or distant bladder cancer recurrence between ORC and RARC with ICUD. Patient summary: Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer using the robotic platform is not associated with differences in the rates or patterns of recurrence compared to traditional open surgical techniques.application/pdfengCistectomiaNeoplasias da bexiga urináriaBladder cancerCystectomyMuscle-invasiveRecurrence patternsRoboticsBladder cancer recurrence patterns after robotic radical cystectomy with completely intracorporeal urinary diversion : a contemporary comparison with open radical cystectomy at a high-volume academic centerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulFaculdade de MedicinaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Medicina: Ciências MédicasPorto Alegre, BR-RS2021doutoradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001136171.pdf.txt001136171.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain39590http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/234595/2/001136171.pdf.txt544d33bdcf8cf9c9d87f637cbb334ce4MD52ORIGINAL001136171.pdfTexto completoapplication/pdf428220http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/234595/1/001136171.pdf04f952e0176de7e51d81930491146cf6MD5110183/2345952022-02-22 05:05:51.316026oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/234595Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/2PUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestlume@ufrgs.br||lume@ufrgs.bropendoar:18532022-02-22T08:05:51Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Bladder cancer recurrence patterns after robotic radical cystectomy with completely intracorporeal urinary diversion : a contemporary comparison with open radical cystectomy at a high-volume academic center
title Bladder cancer recurrence patterns after robotic radical cystectomy with completely intracorporeal urinary diversion : a contemporary comparison with open radical cystectomy at a high-volume academic center
spellingShingle Bladder cancer recurrence patterns after robotic radical cystectomy with completely intracorporeal urinary diversion : a contemporary comparison with open radical cystectomy at a high-volume academic center
Berger, André Kives
Cistectomia
Neoplasias da bexiga urinária
Bladder cancer
Cystectomy
Muscle-invasive
Recurrence patterns
Robotics
title_short Bladder cancer recurrence patterns after robotic radical cystectomy with completely intracorporeal urinary diversion : a contemporary comparison with open radical cystectomy at a high-volume academic center
title_full Bladder cancer recurrence patterns after robotic radical cystectomy with completely intracorporeal urinary diversion : a contemporary comparison with open radical cystectomy at a high-volume academic center
title_fullStr Bladder cancer recurrence patterns after robotic radical cystectomy with completely intracorporeal urinary diversion : a contemporary comparison with open radical cystectomy at a high-volume academic center
title_full_unstemmed Bladder cancer recurrence patterns after robotic radical cystectomy with completely intracorporeal urinary diversion : a contemporary comparison with open radical cystectomy at a high-volume academic center
title_sort Bladder cancer recurrence patterns after robotic radical cystectomy with completely intracorporeal urinary diversion : a contemporary comparison with open radical cystectomy at a high-volume academic center
author Berger, André Kives
author_facet Berger, André Kives
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Berger, André Kives
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Schwartzman, Gilberto
contributor_str_mv Schwartzman, Gilberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cistectomia
Neoplasias da bexiga urinária
topic Cistectomia
Neoplasias da bexiga urinária
Bladder cancer
Cystectomy
Muscle-invasive
Recurrence patterns
Robotics
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Bladder cancer
Cystectomy
Muscle-invasive
Recurrence patterns
Robotics
description Background: There is some debate about patterns of recurrence after robotic radical cystectomy (RARC) for bladder cancer compared to open radical cystectomy (ORC). Objective: To compare rates and patterns of recurrence after RARC with completely intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) and ORC. Design, Setting and Participants: Between August 2009 and June 2016, 837 consecutive patients underwent RARC with ICUD or ORC for localized BC at a single high-volume academic cancer center. Intervention: RARC and ICUD was performed in 237 patients, while ORC was performed in 598 patients. Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: The outcomes of interest were recurrencefree survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and distrubtion of local and distant recurrence. The patterns of local and distant recurrences within 2 years were tabulated. Kaplan-Meier analysis, the log rank test, and Cox regression analyses were used to compare RFS and OS between the two groups. All data was collected prospectively within an IRB-approved database and analysed retrospectively. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software. Results and limitations: Both groups were comparable with respect to age, BMI, ASA, neoadjuvant chemotherapy status, CIS, LVI, positive soft-tissue margins and node-positive disease. RARC and ICUD patients were more likely to have an ileal conduit (64% vs 29%, p<0.05) and extravesical disease (38% vs 30%, p<0.05). There was no difference in recurrence-free survival for the entire cohort, and by pathological stage: organ-confined disease (pT0-pT2, n=565), extra-vesical disease (pT3-pT4, n=270) and node-positive disease (pN+, n=183, all p>0.05). Median time to recurrence was 6.9 months in RARC arm and 7.7 months in the ORC arm. On multivariable regression analysis, RARC was not an independent predictor of recurrence after adjusting for confounders (HR 1.05, 95%CI 0.75–1.48; p=0.8). There were no differences in the number or patterns of recurrences, in particular, with respect to peritoneal carcinomatosis and extra-pelvic lymph node metastasis. The main limitation of this study is the retrospective analysis. Conclusions: These contemporary data show no differences in the rates or patterns of local or distant bladder cancer recurrence between ORC and RARC with ICUD. Patient summary: Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer using the robotic platform is not associated with differences in the rates or patterns of recurrence compared to traditional open surgical techniques.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2022-01-29T04:51:53Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/234595
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001136171
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/234595
identifier_str_mv 001136171
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/234595/2/001136171.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/234595/1/001136171.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 544d33bdcf8cf9c9d87f637cbb334ce4
04f952e0176de7e51d81930491146cf6
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv lume@ufrgs.br||lume@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1810085575270596608