THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURY
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direitos Culturais |
Texto Completo: | https://san.uri.br/revistas/index.php/direitosculturais/article/view/1090 |
Resumo: | The article analyzes, by the analytical-deductive method, the obligation provided for in art. 17, § 20, of Law nº 8.429, of 1992, included by Law nº 14.230, of 2021, of judicial defense of the public administrator in administrative improbity suits, until the final and unappealable decision, by the same legal counsel that issued the opinion attesting to the prior legality of the administrative acts practiced. It was decided to carry out an exploratory research using the literature review and qualitative analysis of the data for the purpose of achieving this objective, or that it is possible, in the end, that the legal counsel of the entity cannot assume a self-defense of the public administrator prosecuted for an act of administrative improbity, considering that the defense of the legality of the administrative act does not confuse or authorize the personal defense of the public agent, from an administrative offense or from a criminal offense. |
id |
URI-3_b4d4ed213e8e08df94d092119afa9325 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.san.uri.br:article/1090 |
network_acronym_str |
URI-3 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direitos Culturais |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURYA DEFESA JUDICIAL DO DESONESTO PELA FAZENDA PÚBLICALei nº 14.230/2021improbidade administrativadefesa judicialAdvocacia PúblicaLaw n. 14.230/2021The article analyzes, by the analytical-deductive method, the obligation provided for in art. 17, § 20, of Law nº 8.429, of 1992, included by Law nº 14.230, of 2021, of judicial defense of the public administrator in administrative improbity suits, until the final and unappealable decision, by the same legal counsel that issued the opinion attesting to the prior legality of the administrative acts practiced. It was decided to carry out an exploratory research using the literature review and qualitative analysis of the data for the purpose of achieving this objective, or that it is possible, in the end, that the legal counsel of the entity cannot assume a self-defense of the public administrator prosecuted for an act of administrative improbity, considering that the defense of the legality of the administrative act does not confuse or authorize the personal defense of the public agent, from an administrative offense or from a criminal offense.O presente artigo analisa a obrigatoriedade prevista no art. 17, § 20, da Lei nº 8.429, de 1992, incluído pela Lei nº 14.230, de 2021, de defesa judicial do administrador público em ação por improbidade administrativa, até o trânsito em julgado, pela mesma assessoria jurídica que emitiu o parecer atestando a legalidade prévia dos atos administrativos praticados. Optou-se pela realização de uma pesquisa exploratória com a utilização de revisão bibliográfica e da análise qualitativa dos dados a fim de se cumprir esse objetivo, o que possibilitou inferir, ao final, que a assessoria jurídica do ente público não poderá assumir a defesa pessoal do administrador público processado por ato de improbidade administrativa, tendo em vista que a defesa da legalidade do ato administrativo não se confunde e nem autoriza a defesa pessoal do agente público, de ilícito administrativo ou de ilícito penal.Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões2023-05-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://san.uri.br/revistas/index.php/direitosculturais/article/view/109010.31512/rdc.v18i44.1090Revista Direitos Culturais; v. 18 n. 44 (2023); 137-1582177-14991980-7805reponame:Revista Direitos Culturaisinstname:Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões (URI)instacron:URIporhttps://san.uri.br/revistas/index.php/direitosculturais/article/view/1090/593Copyright (c) 2023 Carlos Eduardo Montes Netto, Sérgio Martin Piovesan de Oliveira, Olavo Augusto Vianna Alves Ferreirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMontes Netto, Carlos EduardoMartin Piovesan de Oliveira, SérgioVianna Alves Ferreira, Olavo Augusto2023-05-30T14:33:48Zoai:ojs2.san.uri.br:article/1090Revistahttps://san.uri.br/revistas/index.php/direitosculturais/PUBhttps://san.uri.br/revistas/index.php/direitosculturais/oaifabiocesarjunges@san.uri.br || thamicovatti@san.uri.br2177-14991980-7805opendoar:2023-05-30T14:33:48Revista Direitos Culturais - Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões (URI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURY A DEFESA JUDICIAL DO DESONESTO PELA FAZENDA PÚBLICA |
title |
THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURY |
spellingShingle |
THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURY Montes Netto, Carlos Eduardo Lei nº 14.230/2021 improbidade administrativa defesa judicial Advocacia Pública Law n. 14.230/2021 |
title_short |
THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURY |
title_full |
THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURY |
title_fullStr |
THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURY |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURY |
title_sort |
THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURY |
author |
Montes Netto, Carlos Eduardo |
author_facet |
Montes Netto, Carlos Eduardo Martin Piovesan de Oliveira, Sérgio Vianna Alves Ferreira, Olavo Augusto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martin Piovesan de Oliveira, Sérgio Vianna Alves Ferreira, Olavo Augusto |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Montes Netto, Carlos Eduardo Martin Piovesan de Oliveira, Sérgio Vianna Alves Ferreira, Olavo Augusto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Lei nº 14.230/2021 improbidade administrativa defesa judicial Advocacia Pública Law n. 14.230/2021 |
topic |
Lei nº 14.230/2021 improbidade administrativa defesa judicial Advocacia Pública Law n. 14.230/2021 |
description |
The article analyzes, by the analytical-deductive method, the obligation provided for in art. 17, § 20, of Law nº 8.429, of 1992, included by Law nº 14.230, of 2021, of judicial defense of the public administrator in administrative improbity suits, until the final and unappealable decision, by the same legal counsel that issued the opinion attesting to the prior legality of the administrative acts practiced. It was decided to carry out an exploratory research using the literature review and qualitative analysis of the data for the purpose of achieving this objective, or that it is possible, in the end, that the legal counsel of the entity cannot assume a self-defense of the public administrator prosecuted for an act of administrative improbity, considering that the defense of the legality of the administrative act does not confuse or authorize the personal defense of the public agent, from an administrative offense or from a criminal offense. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-05-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://san.uri.br/revistas/index.php/direitosculturais/article/view/1090 10.31512/rdc.v18i44.1090 |
url |
https://san.uri.br/revistas/index.php/direitosculturais/article/view/1090 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31512/rdc.v18i44.1090 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://san.uri.br/revistas/index.php/direitosculturais/article/view/1090/593 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direitos Culturais; v. 18 n. 44 (2023); 137-158 2177-1499 1980-7805 reponame:Revista Direitos Culturais instname:Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões (URI) instacron:URI |
instname_str |
Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões (URI) |
instacron_str |
URI |
institution |
URI |
reponame_str |
Revista Direitos Culturais |
collection |
Revista Direitos Culturais |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direitos Culturais - Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões (URI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
fabiocesarjunges@san.uri.br || thamicovatti@san.uri.br |
_version_ |
1798045707754536960 |