THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURY

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Montes Netto, Carlos Eduardo
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Martin Piovesan de Oliveira, Sérgio, Vianna Alves Ferreira, Olavo Augusto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direitos Culturais
Texto Completo: https://san.uri.br/revistas/index.php/direitosculturais/article/view/1090
Resumo: The article analyzes, by the analytical-deductive method, the obligation provided for in art. 17, § 20, of Law nº 8.429, of 1992, included by Law nº 14.230, of 2021, of judicial defense of the public administrator in administrative improbity suits, until the final and unappealable decision, by the same legal counsel that issued the opinion attesting to the prior legality of the administrative acts practiced. It was decided to carry out an exploratory research using the literature review and qualitative analysis of the data for the purpose of achieving this objective, or that it is possible, in the end, that the legal counsel of the entity cannot assume a self-defense of the public administrator prosecuted for an act of administrative improbity, considering that the defense of the legality of the administrative act does not confuse or authorize the personal defense of the public agent, from an administrative offense or from a criminal offense.
id URI-3_b4d4ed213e8e08df94d092119afa9325
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.san.uri.br:article/1090
network_acronym_str URI-3
network_name_str Revista Direitos Culturais
repository_id_str
spelling THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURYA DEFESA JUDICIAL DO DESONESTO PELA FAZENDA PÚBLICALei nº 14.230/2021improbidade administrativadefesa judicialAdvocacia PúblicaLaw n. 14.230/2021The article analyzes, by the analytical-deductive method, the obligation provided for in art. 17, § 20, of Law nº 8.429, of 1992, included by Law nº 14.230, of 2021, of judicial defense of the public administrator in administrative improbity suits, until the final and unappealable decision, by the same legal counsel that issued the opinion attesting to the prior legality of the administrative acts practiced. It was decided to carry out an exploratory research using the literature review and qualitative analysis of the data for the purpose of achieving this objective, or that it is possible, in the end, that the legal counsel of the entity cannot assume a self-defense of the public administrator prosecuted for an act of administrative improbity, considering that the defense of the legality of the administrative act does not confuse or authorize the personal defense of the public agent, from an administrative offense or from a criminal offense.O presente artigo analisa a obrigatoriedade prevista no art. 17, § 20, da Lei nº 8.429, de 1992, incluído pela Lei nº 14.230, de 2021, de defesa judicial do administrador público em ação por improbidade administrativa, até o trânsito em julgado, pela mesma assessoria jurídica que emitiu o parecer atestando a legalidade prévia dos atos administrativos praticados. Optou-se pela realização de uma pesquisa exploratória com a utilização de revisão bibliográfica e da análise qualitativa dos dados a fim de se cumprir esse objetivo, o que possibilitou inferir, ao final, que a assessoria jurídica do ente público não poderá assumir a defesa pessoal do administrador público processado por ato de improbidade administrativa, tendo em vista que a defesa da legalidade do ato administrativo não se confunde e nem autoriza a defesa pessoal do agente público, de ilícito administrativo ou de ilícito penal.Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões2023-05-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://san.uri.br/revistas/index.php/direitosculturais/article/view/109010.31512/rdc.v18i44.1090Revista Direitos Culturais; v. 18 n. 44 (2023); 137-1582177-14991980-7805reponame:Revista Direitos Culturaisinstname:Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões (URI)instacron:URIporhttps://san.uri.br/revistas/index.php/direitosculturais/article/view/1090/593Copyright (c) 2023 Carlos Eduardo Montes Netto, Sérgio Martin Piovesan de Oliveira, Olavo Augusto Vianna Alves Ferreirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMontes Netto, Carlos EduardoMartin Piovesan de Oliveira, SérgioVianna Alves Ferreira, Olavo Augusto2023-05-30T14:33:48Zoai:ojs2.san.uri.br:article/1090Revistahttps://san.uri.br/revistas/index.php/direitosculturais/PUBhttps://san.uri.br/revistas/index.php/direitosculturais/oaifabiocesarjunges@san.uri.br || thamicovatti@san.uri.br2177-14991980-7805opendoar:2023-05-30T14:33:48Revista Direitos Culturais - Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões (URI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURY
A DEFESA JUDICIAL DO DESONESTO PELA FAZENDA PÚBLICA
title THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURY
spellingShingle THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURY
Montes Netto, Carlos Eduardo
Lei nº 14.230/2021
improbidade administrativa
defesa judicial
Advocacia Pública
Law n. 14.230/2021
title_short THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURY
title_full THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURY
title_fullStr THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURY
title_full_unstemmed THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURY
title_sort THE JUDICIAL DEFENSE OF THE DISHONEST BY THE TREASURY
author Montes Netto, Carlos Eduardo
author_facet Montes Netto, Carlos Eduardo
Martin Piovesan de Oliveira, Sérgio
Vianna Alves Ferreira, Olavo Augusto
author_role author
author2 Martin Piovesan de Oliveira, Sérgio
Vianna Alves Ferreira, Olavo Augusto
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Montes Netto, Carlos Eduardo
Martin Piovesan de Oliveira, Sérgio
Vianna Alves Ferreira, Olavo Augusto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Lei nº 14.230/2021
improbidade administrativa
defesa judicial
Advocacia Pública
Law n. 14.230/2021
topic Lei nº 14.230/2021
improbidade administrativa
defesa judicial
Advocacia Pública
Law n. 14.230/2021
description The article analyzes, by the analytical-deductive method, the obligation provided for in art. 17, § 20, of Law nº 8.429, of 1992, included by Law nº 14.230, of 2021, of judicial defense of the public administrator in administrative improbity suits, until the final and unappealable decision, by the same legal counsel that issued the opinion attesting to the prior legality of the administrative acts practiced. It was decided to carry out an exploratory research using the literature review and qualitative analysis of the data for the purpose of achieving this objective, or that it is possible, in the end, that the legal counsel of the entity cannot assume a self-defense of the public administrator prosecuted for an act of administrative improbity, considering that the defense of the legality of the administrative act does not confuse or authorize the personal defense of the public agent, from an administrative offense or from a criminal offense.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-05-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://san.uri.br/revistas/index.php/direitosculturais/article/view/1090
10.31512/rdc.v18i44.1090
url https://san.uri.br/revistas/index.php/direitosculturais/article/view/1090
identifier_str_mv 10.31512/rdc.v18i44.1090
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://san.uri.br/revistas/index.php/direitosculturais/article/view/1090/593
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direitos Culturais; v. 18 n. 44 (2023); 137-158
2177-1499
1980-7805
reponame:Revista Direitos Culturais
instname:Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões (URI)
instacron:URI
instname_str Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões (URI)
instacron_str URI
institution URI
reponame_str Revista Direitos Culturais
collection Revista Direitos Culturais
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direitos Culturais - Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões (URI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv fabiocesarjunges@san.uri.br || thamicovatti@san.uri.br
_version_ 1798045707754536960

Registros relacionados