Avaliação de sistemas de inseminação artificial com observação de estro ou em tempo fixo em vacas de corte azebuadas
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
Texto Completo: | http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/6233 |
Resumo: | The objective of this experiment was to compare the results of the pregnancy obtained by the association of conventional Artificial Insemination (AI) with synchronized estrus together with GnRH in TAI with those of classical TAI in zebu cows. A total of 677 cows were synchronized with a progesterone vaginal device (P4) and 2 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB) on D1, D7 all cows received 530 μg of PGF2α and D9 implants were removed and all animals received 400 IU of eCG and were evaluated in three experiments divided as follows. In first experiment, 190 cows, without temporarily calf weaning and after removal of devices were divided into three groups: control group called EC received 0.4 mg of estradiol cypionate (EC) and TAI were inseminated 48 hours after removal of devices. The second and third groups did not receive ovulation inductor in removal of devices and were named ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 48 HOURS and ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 54 HOURS. These cows were observed for onset of estrus four times (12, 24, 36 and 48 hours) and those that showed estrus during this period were inseminated by the AM / PM method where estrus in the morning AI late afternoon and estrus in the afternoon with AI on the morning of next day; cows who have not appearing in estrus during this period of 48 hours after devices were removed, received 25 μg of GnRH and were inseminated immediately in the group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 48 HOURS and 6 hours after application of GnRH cows from ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 54 HOURS were inseminated. In the 2nd experiment 242 cows were subjected to similar protocol, but was held temporarily weaned calves after removal of the implants. At the 3rd experiment 245 cows were subjected to two experimental protocols but using P4 devices previously used. Cows were examined by 5 MHz transrectal ultrasonography 45 days after insemination to detect pregnancy in experiments 1 and 2 and 35 days in experiment 3. In experiment 1, cows received the following pregnancy rates: group EC 58.18%, group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 48 HOURS 56.21% and group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 54 HOURS 61.97%. In experiment 2 pregnancy rates were: group EC 57.83%, group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 48 HOURS 57.50% and group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 54 HOURS 53.16%. In experiment 3 pregnancy rates were: group EC 57.14%, group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 48 HOURS 56.10% and group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 54 HOURS 54.43%. No significant difference were seen (p > 0,05) between the groups. In spite of the protocols showing equivalent results, its costs and labor hamper its use, and the use of classic TAI is simpler and more economically viable. |
id |
URPE_4c421082a68987cea91e4bdebfcee0cf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2:tede2/6233 |
network_acronym_str |
URPE |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
CARNEIRO, Gustavo FerrerVIEIRA, Rômulo JoséCÂMARA, Diogo RibeiroSILVA, Sildivane Valcáciahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6310937318529014BURGOS, Daniel de Castro2017-02-08T12:21:58Z2012-02-16BURGOS, Daniel de Castro. Avaliação de sistemas de inseminação artificial com observação de estro ou em tempo fixo em vacas de corte azebuadas. 2012. 58 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sanidade e Reprodução de Ruminantes) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Garanhuns.http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/6233The objective of this experiment was to compare the results of the pregnancy obtained by the association of conventional Artificial Insemination (AI) with synchronized estrus together with GnRH in TAI with those of classical TAI in zebu cows. A total of 677 cows were synchronized with a progesterone vaginal device (P4) and 2 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB) on D1, D7 all cows received 530 μg of PGF2α and D9 implants were removed and all animals received 400 IU of eCG and were evaluated in three experiments divided as follows. In first experiment, 190 cows, without temporarily calf weaning and after removal of devices were divided into three groups: control group called EC received 0.4 mg of estradiol cypionate (EC) and TAI were inseminated 48 hours after removal of devices. The second and third groups did not receive ovulation inductor in removal of devices and were named ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 48 HOURS and ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 54 HOURS. These cows were observed for onset of estrus four times (12, 24, 36 and 48 hours) and those that showed estrus during this period were inseminated by the AM / PM method where estrus in the morning AI late afternoon and estrus in the afternoon with AI on the morning of next day; cows who have not appearing in estrus during this period of 48 hours after devices were removed, received 25 μg of GnRH and were inseminated immediately in the group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 48 HOURS and 6 hours after application of GnRH cows from ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 54 HOURS were inseminated. In the 2nd experiment 242 cows were subjected to similar protocol, but was held temporarily weaned calves after removal of the implants. At the 3rd experiment 245 cows were subjected to two experimental protocols but using P4 devices previously used. Cows were examined by 5 MHz transrectal ultrasonography 45 days after insemination to detect pregnancy in experiments 1 and 2 and 35 days in experiment 3. In experiment 1, cows received the following pregnancy rates: group EC 58.18%, group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 48 HOURS 56.21% and group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 54 HOURS 61.97%. In experiment 2 pregnancy rates were: group EC 57.83%, group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 48 HOURS 57.50% and group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 54 HOURS 53.16%. In experiment 3 pregnancy rates were: group EC 57.14%, group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 48 HOURS 56.10% and group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 54 HOURS 54.43%. No significant difference were seen (p > 0,05) between the groups. In spite of the protocols showing equivalent results, its costs and labor hamper its use, and the use of classic TAI is simpler and more economically viable.O objetivo deste experimento foi comparar os resultados de prenhez da associação de Inseminação Artificial (IA) convencional com estro sincronizado acompanhado de IATF utilizando GnRH com os da IATF clássica em vacas azebuadas. Um total de 677 vacas foram sincronizadas com dispositivo de progesterona (P4) e 2 mg de benzoato de estradiol (BE) no D1, no D7 todas receberam 530 μg de PGF2α e no D9 foram retirados os implantes e todos os animais receberam 400 UI de eCG e foram avaliadas em três experimentos divididos da seguinte forma. No 1º experimento 190 vacas, conduzidas sem apartação temporária dos bezerros após a retirada dos dispositivos, foram divididas em três grupos: O grupo controle chamado de CE recebeu 0,4 mg de cipionato de estradiol (CE) e foram inseminadas na IATF 48 horas após a retirada dos dispositivos. O segundo e o terceiro grupos não receberam indutor de ovulação na retirada dos dispositivos e foram chamados de estro mais GnRH 48 horas e estro mais GnRH 54 horas. Essas vacas foram observadas para apresentação de estro por quatro vezes (12, 24, 36 e 48 horas) e as que apresentaram estro neste período foram inseminadas pelo método AM/PM com estro pela manhã inseminação a tarde e estro pela tarde com inseminação na manhã do dia seguinte; as vacas que não apresentaram estro neste período receberam 48 horas após a retirada dos dispositivos, aplicação de 25 μg de GnRH e foram inseminadas imediatamente no grupo estro mais GnRH 48 horas e após 6 horas da aplicação do GnRH foram inseminadas as vacas do lote estro mais GnRH 54 horas. No 2º experimento 242 vacas foram submetidas a protocolo semelhante, porém realizou-se o desmame temporário dos bezerros após a retirada dos implantes. No 3º experimento 245 vacas foram submetidas ao protocolo do experimento 2 porém utilizando dispositivos de P4 anteriormente utilizados. As vacas foram examinadas por ultrasonografia transretal de 5 MHz em 45 dias após as inseminações para detecção de prenhez nos experimentos 1 e 2 e 35 dias no experimento 3. No experimento 1 as vacas obtiveram as seguintes taxas de prenhez: grupo CE 58,18%; grupo estro mais GnRH 48 horas 56,21% e grupo estro mais GnRH 54 horas 61,97%. No experimento 2 os números de gestação foram: grupo CE 57,83%; grupo estro mais GnRH 48 horas 57,50% e grupo estro mais GnRH 54 horas 53,16%. No experimento 3 os números de gestação foram: grupo CE 57,14%; grupo estro mais GnRH 48 horas 56,10% e grupo estro mais GnRH 54 horas 54,43%. Não houve diferença significativa (p > 0,05) entre os grupos. Apesar dos protocolos se mostrarem equivalentes nos resultados, o aumento do custo e da mão-de-obra dificultam sua utilização, sendo a IATF clássica mais simples e economicamente viável.Submitted by (lucia.rodrigues@ufrpe.br) on 2017-02-08T12:21:58Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Daniel de Castro Burgos.pdf: 962079 bytes, checksum: 7910c72572139941c836e667e046d328 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2017-02-08T12:21:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Daniel de Castro Burgos.pdf: 962079 bytes, checksum: 7910c72572139941c836e667e046d328 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-02-16Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Sanidade e Reprodução de RuminantesUFRPEBrasilUnidade Acadêmica de GaranhunsEstrus synchronizationGado de corteSincronização de estrosBeef cattleMEDICINA VETERINARIA::REPRODUCAO ANIMALAvaliação de sistemas de inseminação artificial com observação de estro ou em tempo fixo em vacas de corte azebuadasEvaluation of systems for artificial insemination with observation of estrus or timed artificial insemination in zebu-crossed beef cowsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis4491839560916886239600600600600772051418241127941110983457506962624122075167498588264571info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPEinstname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)instacron:UFRPELICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/6233/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALDaniel de Castro Burgos.pdfDaniel de Castro Burgos.pdfapplication/pdf962079http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/6233/2/Daniel+de+Castro+Burgos.pdf7910c72572139941c836e667e046d328MD52tede2/62332017-02-13 13:12:16.104oai:tede2: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede/PUBhttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/oai/requestbdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.bropendoar:2024-05-28T12:34:05.040287Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação de sistemas de inseminação artificial com observação de estro ou em tempo fixo em vacas de corte azebuadas |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of systems for artificial insemination with observation of estrus or timed artificial insemination in zebu-crossed beef cows |
title |
Avaliação de sistemas de inseminação artificial com observação de estro ou em tempo fixo em vacas de corte azebuadas |
spellingShingle |
Avaliação de sistemas de inseminação artificial com observação de estro ou em tempo fixo em vacas de corte azebuadas BURGOS, Daniel de Castro Estrus synchronization Gado de corte Sincronização de estros Beef cattle MEDICINA VETERINARIA::REPRODUCAO ANIMAL |
title_short |
Avaliação de sistemas de inseminação artificial com observação de estro ou em tempo fixo em vacas de corte azebuadas |
title_full |
Avaliação de sistemas de inseminação artificial com observação de estro ou em tempo fixo em vacas de corte azebuadas |
title_fullStr |
Avaliação de sistemas de inseminação artificial com observação de estro ou em tempo fixo em vacas de corte azebuadas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Avaliação de sistemas de inseminação artificial com observação de estro ou em tempo fixo em vacas de corte azebuadas |
title_sort |
Avaliação de sistemas de inseminação artificial com observação de estro ou em tempo fixo em vacas de corte azebuadas |
author |
BURGOS, Daniel de Castro |
author_facet |
BURGOS, Daniel de Castro |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
CARNEIRO, Gustavo Ferrer |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
VIEIRA, Rômulo José |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
CÂMARA, Diogo Ribeiro |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
SILVA, Sildivane Valcácia |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6310937318529014 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
BURGOS, Daniel de Castro |
contributor_str_mv |
CARNEIRO, Gustavo Ferrer VIEIRA, Rômulo José CÂMARA, Diogo Ribeiro SILVA, Sildivane Valcácia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Estrus synchronization Gado de corte Sincronização de estros |
topic |
Estrus synchronization Gado de corte Sincronização de estros Beef cattle MEDICINA VETERINARIA::REPRODUCAO ANIMAL |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Beef cattle |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
MEDICINA VETERINARIA::REPRODUCAO ANIMAL |
description |
The objective of this experiment was to compare the results of the pregnancy obtained by the association of conventional Artificial Insemination (AI) with synchronized estrus together with GnRH in TAI with those of classical TAI in zebu cows. A total of 677 cows were synchronized with a progesterone vaginal device (P4) and 2 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB) on D1, D7 all cows received 530 μg of PGF2α and D9 implants were removed and all animals received 400 IU of eCG and were evaluated in three experiments divided as follows. In first experiment, 190 cows, without temporarily calf weaning and after removal of devices were divided into three groups: control group called EC received 0.4 mg of estradiol cypionate (EC) and TAI were inseminated 48 hours after removal of devices. The second and third groups did not receive ovulation inductor in removal of devices and were named ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 48 HOURS and ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 54 HOURS. These cows were observed for onset of estrus four times (12, 24, 36 and 48 hours) and those that showed estrus during this period were inseminated by the AM / PM method where estrus in the morning AI late afternoon and estrus in the afternoon with AI on the morning of next day; cows who have not appearing in estrus during this period of 48 hours after devices were removed, received 25 μg of GnRH and were inseminated immediately in the group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 48 HOURS and 6 hours after application of GnRH cows from ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 54 HOURS were inseminated. In the 2nd experiment 242 cows were subjected to similar protocol, but was held temporarily weaned calves after removal of the implants. At the 3rd experiment 245 cows were subjected to two experimental protocols but using P4 devices previously used. Cows were examined by 5 MHz transrectal ultrasonography 45 days after insemination to detect pregnancy in experiments 1 and 2 and 35 days in experiment 3. In experiment 1, cows received the following pregnancy rates: group EC 58.18%, group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 48 HOURS 56.21% and group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 54 HOURS 61.97%. In experiment 2 pregnancy rates were: group EC 57.83%, group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 48 HOURS 57.50% and group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 54 HOURS 53.16%. In experiment 3 pregnancy rates were: group EC 57.14%, group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 48 HOURS 56.10% and group ESTRUS PLUS GnRH 54 HOURS 54.43%. No significant difference were seen (p > 0,05) between the groups. In spite of the protocols showing equivalent results, its costs and labor hamper its use, and the use of classic TAI is simpler and more economically viable. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2012-02-16 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2017-02-08T12:21:58Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
BURGOS, Daniel de Castro. Avaliação de sistemas de inseminação artificial com observação de estro ou em tempo fixo em vacas de corte azebuadas. 2012. 58 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sanidade e Reprodução de Ruminantes) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Garanhuns. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/6233 |
identifier_str_mv |
BURGOS, Daniel de Castro. Avaliação de sistemas de inseminação artificial com observação de estro ou em tempo fixo em vacas de corte azebuadas. 2012. 58 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sanidade e Reprodução de Ruminantes) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Garanhuns. |
url |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/6233 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
4491839560916886239 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
7720514182411279411 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
1098345750696262412 |
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv |
2075167498588264571 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sanidade e Reprodução de Ruminantes |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFRPE |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Unidade Acadêmica de Garanhuns |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) instacron:UFRPE |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
instacron_str |
UFRPE |
institution |
UFRPE |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/6233/1/license.txt http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/6233/2/Daniel+de+Castro+Burgos.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 7910c72572139941c836e667e046d328 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.br |
_version_ |
1810102235181350912 |