Tratamento de sementes de algodão contra pragas sugadoras iniciais e interação com insetos predadores
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
Texto Completo: | http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/9218 |
Resumo: | The seed treatment with insecticides is usually made with non-selective products as a recommended tactic to protect and∕or to reduce early-season insect infestation in cotton. In theory, this insecticide deployment is considered selective by making insecticide available in plant tissues, which is acquired by insect pests and not by natural enemies. However, non-target insects such as zoophytophagous natural enemies and pollinators can become contaminated when using plant products such as pollen, nectar and sap highlighting the importance of using selective insecticides. We assessed the cotton early-season sucking insect control and selectivity of cyantraniliprole (a selective diamide) and thiamethoxam (a non-selective neonicotinoid) through seed treatment (ST) and foliar application (FA). The insecticide residues on the plants were quantified at 12, 22, and 32 days after emergence (DAE) to assess the survival of the predators Orius insidiosus (Say) (zoophytophagous) and Eriopis connexa (Germar) (chewing) when confined on fresh plant surfaces treated either with insecticides used in FA or ST. Both insecticides had residues detected on plants but significantly reduced between 12 DAE and 22 DAE and, they were not detected at 32 DAE. Ciantraniliprole and thiamethoxam offered aphid suppression but with a more lasting effect with thiamethoxam. Both were not effective against high thrips infestation. Whitefly densities were variable across experiments, with economic threshold observed in all treatments after the expected plant protection with ST, including the untreated controls. The abundance of predators was higher in the control treatment, while treatments with thiamethoxam either ST or FA showed lower predator abundance. Cyantraniliprole ST and FA were compatible with O. insidiosus and E. connexa (>92% survival). Thiamethoxam was not toxic to E. connexa but highly toxic to O. insidiosus through dried residues from FA to ST (1.2% vs. 27.6% survival). Orius insidiosus still showed lower survival when exposed to thiamethoxam in FA compared to ST (51.4% vs. 89.3%) at 22 DAE. Regardless of the insecticides used and mode of use, there was no statistical difference in raw cotton yield across treatments. |
id |
URPE_72959defd451dd3b10f8644aedbfbf30 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2:tede2/9218 |
network_acronym_str |
URPE |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
TORRES, Jorge BrazBASTOS, Cristina SchetinoSIQUEIRA, Herbert Álvaro Abreu deROLIM, Guilherme Gomeshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9386297238296514CAMPOS, Karolayne Lopes2023-07-12T20:52:05Z2022-02-16CAMPOS, Karolayne Lopes. Tratamento de sementes de algodão contra pragas sugadoras iniciais e interação com insetos predadores. 2022. 77 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia Agrícola) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/9218The seed treatment with insecticides is usually made with non-selective products as a recommended tactic to protect and∕or to reduce early-season insect infestation in cotton. In theory, this insecticide deployment is considered selective by making insecticide available in plant tissues, which is acquired by insect pests and not by natural enemies. However, non-target insects such as zoophytophagous natural enemies and pollinators can become contaminated when using plant products such as pollen, nectar and sap highlighting the importance of using selective insecticides. We assessed the cotton early-season sucking insect control and selectivity of cyantraniliprole (a selective diamide) and thiamethoxam (a non-selective neonicotinoid) through seed treatment (ST) and foliar application (FA). The insecticide residues on the plants were quantified at 12, 22, and 32 days after emergence (DAE) to assess the survival of the predators Orius insidiosus (Say) (zoophytophagous) and Eriopis connexa (Germar) (chewing) when confined on fresh plant surfaces treated either with insecticides used in FA or ST. Both insecticides had residues detected on plants but significantly reduced between 12 DAE and 22 DAE and, they were not detected at 32 DAE. Ciantraniliprole and thiamethoxam offered aphid suppression but with a more lasting effect with thiamethoxam. Both were not effective against high thrips infestation. Whitefly densities were variable across experiments, with economic threshold observed in all treatments after the expected plant protection with ST, including the untreated controls. The abundance of predators was higher in the control treatment, while treatments with thiamethoxam either ST or FA showed lower predator abundance. Cyantraniliprole ST and FA were compatible with O. insidiosus and E. connexa (>92% survival). Thiamethoxam was not toxic to E. connexa but highly toxic to O. insidiosus through dried residues from FA to ST (1.2% vs. 27.6% survival). Orius insidiosus still showed lower survival when exposed to thiamethoxam in FA compared to ST (51.4% vs. 89.3%) at 22 DAE. Regardless of the insecticides used and mode of use, there was no statistical difference in raw cotton yield across treatments.O tratamento de sementes com inseticidas, usualmente não seletivos, é uma prática recomendada visando à proteção e/ou redução do ataque de pragas iniciais na cultura. Esta prática é considerada seletiva, em teoria, por disponibilizar o inseticida nos tecidos das plantas, o qual pode ser adquirido pelas pragas e não pelos inimigos naturais. Contudo, insetos não alvos, como predadores e parasitoides zoofitófagos e polinizadores, podem se contaminar ao utilizarem os subprodutos como néctar, pólen e seiva das plantas, sendo importante a utilização de inseticidas seletivos. O objetivo com este trabalho foi testar o ciantraniliprole (uma diamida considerada seletiva) comparado ao tiametoxam (um neonicotinoide não seletivo), quanto ao controle de pragas iniciais do algodoeiro e a seletividade, empregando os inseticidas em tratamento de sementes (TS) e pulverização (PV). O resíduo dos inseticidas na planta foi quantificado aos 12, 22 e 32 dias após a emergência (DAE) para inferir sobre a sobrevivência dos predadores Orius insidiosus (Say) (zoofitófago) e Eriopis connexa (Germar) (mastigador), confinados sobre material vegetal de plantas tratadas com esses inseticidas. Os resíduos de ambos os inseticidas foram detectados nas plantas aos 12 DAE e 22 DAE, mas significativamente reduzido entre estes, não sendo detectados aos 32 DAE. Ciantraniliprole e tiametoxam ofereceram supressão de pulgões, embora o efeito foi mais prolongado com o tiametoxam. Nenhum deles foi eficaz contra alta infestação de tripes. A densidade de mosca-branca foi variável entre os experimentos, com nível de controle observado em todos os tratamentos após o período esperado de proteção das plantas com TS. As maiores densidades de predadores foram observadas na testemunha, enquanto as menores foram observadas nos tratamentos tiametoxam TS e PV. O ciantraniliprole TS e PV foi compatível com ambos O. insidiosus e E. connexa (>92% de sobrevivência). O tiametoxam não foi tóxico para E. connexa, mas altamente tóxico para O. insidiosus via resíduo da PV comparado ao TS (1,2% vs 27,6% de sobrevivência). Orius insidiosus apresentou ainda menor sobrevivência com tiametoxam utilizado em PV comparado ao TS (51,4% vs 89,3%) aos 22 DAE. Independente dos inseticidas utilizados e da modalidade de uso, não houve diferença estatística na produtividade entre os tratamentos.Submitted by (ana.araujo@ufrpe.br) on 2023-07-12T20:52:05Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Karolayne Lopes Campos.pdf: 1301662 bytes, checksum: 072c558d16a669b039334afbe679a0b9 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2023-07-12T20:52:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Karolayne Lopes Campos.pdf: 1301662 bytes, checksum: 072c558d16a669b039334afbe679a0b9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022-02-16Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPqapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia AgrícolaUFRPEBrasilDepartamento de AgronomiaAlgodãoSementeInseticidaPraga agrícolaFITOSSANIDADE::ENTOMOLOGIA AGRICOLATratamento de sementes de algodão contra pragas sugadoras iniciais e interação com insetos predadoresCotton seed treatment against early-season sucking insects and interaction with predatory insectsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis1292500575037930971600600600600-68005538799722292051908015300823841400-2555911436985713659info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPEinstname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)instacron:UFRPEORIGINALKarolayne Lopes Campos.pdfKarolayne Lopes Campos.pdfapplication/pdf1301662http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/9218/2/Karolayne+Lopes+Campos.pdf072c558d16a669b039334afbe679a0b9MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/9218/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede2/92182023-07-12 17:52:05.587oai:tede2: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede/PUBhttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/oai/requestbdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.bropendoar:2024-05-28T12:37:59.520303Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Tratamento de sementes de algodão contra pragas sugadoras iniciais e interação com insetos predadores |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Cotton seed treatment against early-season sucking insects and interaction with predatory insects |
title |
Tratamento de sementes de algodão contra pragas sugadoras iniciais e interação com insetos predadores |
spellingShingle |
Tratamento de sementes de algodão contra pragas sugadoras iniciais e interação com insetos predadores CAMPOS, Karolayne Lopes Algodão Semente Inseticida Praga agrícola FITOSSANIDADE::ENTOMOLOGIA AGRICOLA |
title_short |
Tratamento de sementes de algodão contra pragas sugadoras iniciais e interação com insetos predadores |
title_full |
Tratamento de sementes de algodão contra pragas sugadoras iniciais e interação com insetos predadores |
title_fullStr |
Tratamento de sementes de algodão contra pragas sugadoras iniciais e interação com insetos predadores |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tratamento de sementes de algodão contra pragas sugadoras iniciais e interação com insetos predadores |
title_sort |
Tratamento de sementes de algodão contra pragas sugadoras iniciais e interação com insetos predadores |
author |
CAMPOS, Karolayne Lopes |
author_facet |
CAMPOS, Karolayne Lopes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
TORRES, Jorge Braz |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
BASTOS, Cristina Schetino |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
SIQUEIRA, Herbert Álvaro Abreu de |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
ROLIM, Guilherme Gomes |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9386297238296514 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
CAMPOS, Karolayne Lopes |
contributor_str_mv |
TORRES, Jorge Braz BASTOS, Cristina Schetino SIQUEIRA, Herbert Álvaro Abreu de ROLIM, Guilherme Gomes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Algodão Semente Inseticida Praga agrícola |
topic |
Algodão Semente Inseticida Praga agrícola FITOSSANIDADE::ENTOMOLOGIA AGRICOLA |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
FITOSSANIDADE::ENTOMOLOGIA AGRICOLA |
description |
The seed treatment with insecticides is usually made with non-selective products as a recommended tactic to protect and∕or to reduce early-season insect infestation in cotton. In theory, this insecticide deployment is considered selective by making insecticide available in plant tissues, which is acquired by insect pests and not by natural enemies. However, non-target insects such as zoophytophagous natural enemies and pollinators can become contaminated when using plant products such as pollen, nectar and sap highlighting the importance of using selective insecticides. We assessed the cotton early-season sucking insect control and selectivity of cyantraniliprole (a selective diamide) and thiamethoxam (a non-selective neonicotinoid) through seed treatment (ST) and foliar application (FA). The insecticide residues on the plants were quantified at 12, 22, and 32 days after emergence (DAE) to assess the survival of the predators Orius insidiosus (Say) (zoophytophagous) and Eriopis connexa (Germar) (chewing) when confined on fresh plant surfaces treated either with insecticides used in FA or ST. Both insecticides had residues detected on plants but significantly reduced between 12 DAE and 22 DAE and, they were not detected at 32 DAE. Ciantraniliprole and thiamethoxam offered aphid suppression but with a more lasting effect with thiamethoxam. Both were not effective against high thrips infestation. Whitefly densities were variable across experiments, with economic threshold observed in all treatments after the expected plant protection with ST, including the untreated controls. The abundance of predators was higher in the control treatment, while treatments with thiamethoxam either ST or FA showed lower predator abundance. Cyantraniliprole ST and FA were compatible with O. insidiosus and E. connexa (>92% survival). Thiamethoxam was not toxic to E. connexa but highly toxic to O. insidiosus through dried residues from FA to ST (1.2% vs. 27.6% survival). Orius insidiosus still showed lower survival when exposed to thiamethoxam in FA compared to ST (51.4% vs. 89.3%) at 22 DAE. Regardless of the insecticides used and mode of use, there was no statistical difference in raw cotton yield across treatments. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-16 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-12T20:52:05Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
CAMPOS, Karolayne Lopes. Tratamento de sementes de algodão contra pragas sugadoras iniciais e interação com insetos predadores. 2022. 77 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia Agrícola) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/9218 |
identifier_str_mv |
CAMPOS, Karolayne Lopes. Tratamento de sementes de algodão contra pragas sugadoras iniciais e interação com insetos predadores. 2022. 77 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia Agrícola) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife. |
url |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/9218 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
1292500575037930971 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-6800553879972229205 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
1908015300823841400 |
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv |
-2555911436985713659 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia Agrícola |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFRPE |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Agronomia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) instacron:UFRPE |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
instacron_str |
UFRPE |
institution |
UFRPE |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/9218/2/Karolayne+Lopes+Campos.pdf http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/9218/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
072c558d16a669b039334afbe679a0b9 bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.br |
_version_ |
1810102273074790400 |