Pasture characterization and animal performance on silvopastoral systems using tree legumes or grass monoculture

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: SILVA, Izabela Aline Gomes da
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
Texto Completo: http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8952
Resumo: The world population is expected to grow by 2050 and also demand for food will increase, it is necessary to find alternatives for a sustainable livestock production. Silvopastoral systems-SPS with tree legumes are promising choices to adapt Agriculture to climate change and provide welfare for cattle, also increase forage nutritive value when the management is applied correctly. This 2-yr study evaluated animal performance and herbage responses in C4-grass monoculture or in SPS in the sub-humid tropical region of Brazil and evaluate productivity and nutritive value of signalgrass [Urochloa decumbens (Stapf.) R. Webster] subjected to shading from the tree legumes gliricidia [Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Steud] or mimosa (Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth.) under different tree canopy management (harvesting or not one of the rows in the double-row tree planting). The experimental design was randomized complete block with three replications. Treatments were: Urochloa decumbens (Stapf.) R. Webster (Signalgrass) + Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth (SPS-Mimosa); Signalgrass + Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Kunth ex Walp (SPS-Gliricidia); and Signalgrass monoculture (SM). Response variables included herbage and livestock responses. Cattle were managed under continuous stocking with variable stocking rate. There was interaction between treatment × month for herbage mass. Green herbage accumulation rate ranged from 20 to 80 kg DM ha- 1d-1 across months, with SPS-Mimosa presenting lower rates. Average daily gain was greater in SPS-Gliricidia, followed by SM, and SPS-Mimosa, respectively (0.77; 0.56; 0.23 kg d-1), varying across months. Stocking rate ranged from 0.86 to 1.6 AU ha-1. Total gain per area during the experimental period was greater for SPS-Gliricidia (423 kg BW ha-1), followed by signalgrass in monoculture (347 kg BW ha-1), and SPS-Mimosa (50 kg BW ha-1). The responses variables for different management included canopy height, herbage mass (green leaf blade, green stem, senescent leaves, and senescent stem), herbage accumulation rate, canopy bulk density, and soil moisture, bare soil and botanical composition. Total herbage mass, green herbage mass, and green leaf mass were affected by treatment × evaluation date and harvest management × evaluation date interactions. Herbage accumulation rate in SPS-Gliricidia was greater (55 kg DM ha-1d-1) than SPS-Mimosa (32 kg DM ha-1d-1). Soil moisture was lower at the Mimosa sites (16.2%) compared with the Gliricidia ones (17.2%), and it was greater between tree rows (21.9%) compared with full sun (11.5%), varying across the season. There were significant differences between harvest management for bare soil and litter percentage (P≤0.05). The botanical composition found 36 weed species, distributed in 19 botanical families and 36 of these species were dicotyledonous (53%) and 17 were monocotyledonous (47%). The silvopastoral systems have benefits for the environment, such as the increase of the carbon stock in the biomass and provide more comfort to the animal raised on pasture.
id URPE_a5f8dadcf235faf6d2061d7658651baf
oai_identifier_str oai:tede2:tede2/8952
network_acronym_str URPE
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
repository_id_str
spelling DUBEUX JUNIOR, José Carlos BatistaMELLO, Alexandre Carneiro Leão deCUNHA, Márcio Vieira daSAMPAIO, Everardo Valadares de Sá BarretoMUIR, James PierreSILVA, Valdson José daAPOLINÁRIO, Valéria Xavier de Oliveirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5504838398651551SILVA, Izabela Aline Gomes da2023-05-16T12:20:02Z2020-02-28SILVA, Izabela Aline Gomes da. Pasture characterization and animal performance on silvopastoral systems using tree legumes or grass monoculture. 2020. 144 f. Tese (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8952The world population is expected to grow by 2050 and also demand for food will increase, it is necessary to find alternatives for a sustainable livestock production. Silvopastoral systems-SPS with tree legumes are promising choices to adapt Agriculture to climate change and provide welfare for cattle, also increase forage nutritive value when the management is applied correctly. This 2-yr study evaluated animal performance and herbage responses in C4-grass monoculture or in SPS in the sub-humid tropical region of Brazil and evaluate productivity and nutritive value of signalgrass [Urochloa decumbens (Stapf.) R. Webster] subjected to shading from the tree legumes gliricidia [Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Steud] or mimosa (Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth.) under different tree canopy management (harvesting or not one of the rows in the double-row tree planting). The experimental design was randomized complete block with three replications. Treatments were: Urochloa decumbens (Stapf.) R. Webster (Signalgrass) + Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth (SPS-Mimosa); Signalgrass + Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Kunth ex Walp (SPS-Gliricidia); and Signalgrass monoculture (SM). Response variables included herbage and livestock responses. Cattle were managed under continuous stocking with variable stocking rate. There was interaction between treatment × month for herbage mass. Green herbage accumulation rate ranged from 20 to 80 kg DM ha- 1d-1 across months, with SPS-Mimosa presenting lower rates. Average daily gain was greater in SPS-Gliricidia, followed by SM, and SPS-Mimosa, respectively (0.77; 0.56; 0.23 kg d-1), varying across months. Stocking rate ranged from 0.86 to 1.6 AU ha-1. Total gain per area during the experimental period was greater for SPS-Gliricidia (423 kg BW ha-1), followed by signalgrass in monoculture (347 kg BW ha-1), and SPS-Mimosa (50 kg BW ha-1). The responses variables for different management included canopy height, herbage mass (green leaf blade, green stem, senescent leaves, and senescent stem), herbage accumulation rate, canopy bulk density, and soil moisture, bare soil and botanical composition. Total herbage mass, green herbage mass, and green leaf mass were affected by treatment × evaluation date and harvest management × evaluation date interactions. Herbage accumulation rate in SPS-Gliricidia was greater (55 kg DM ha-1d-1) than SPS-Mimosa (32 kg DM ha-1d-1). Soil moisture was lower at the Mimosa sites (16.2%) compared with the Gliricidia ones (17.2%), and it was greater between tree rows (21.9%) compared with full sun (11.5%), varying across the season. There were significant differences between harvest management for bare soil and litter percentage (P≤0.05). The botanical composition found 36 weed species, distributed in 19 botanical families and 36 of these species were dicotyledonous (53%) and 17 were monocotyledonous (47%). The silvopastoral systems have benefits for the environment, such as the increase of the carbon stock in the biomass and provide more comfort to the animal raised on pasture.A população mundial deverá crescer até 2050 e também a demanda por alimentos aumentará, é necessário encontrar alternativas para uma produção pecuária sustentável. Os sistemas silvipastoris-SPS com leguminosas arbóreas são escolhas promissoras para adaptar a agricultura às mudanças climáticas e proporcionar bem-estar ao gado, além de aumentar o valor nutritivo da forragem quando o manejo é aplicado corretamente. Este estudo de 2 anos avaliou o desempenho animal e as respostas da forragem em monocultivo de capim C4 ou em SPS na região tropical subúmida do Brasil e avaliou a produtividade e o valor nutritivo do capim-braquiária [Urochloa decumbens (Stapf.) R. Webster] submetido ao sombreamento das leguminosas arbóreas gliricídia [Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Steud] ou mimosa (Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth.) sob diferentes manejos da copa (colheita ou não de uma das fileiras no plantio em fileira dupla). O delineamento experimental foi em blocos casualizados com três repetições. Os tratamentos foram: Urochloa decumbens (Stapf.) R. Webster (Signalgrass) + Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth (SPS-Mimosa); capim sinalizador + Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Kunth ex Walp (SPS-Gliricidia); e monocultura de capim-braquiária (SM). As variáveis de resposta incluíram respostas de forragem e gado. O gado foi manejado sob lotação contínua com taxa de lotação variável. Houve interação entre o tratamento × mês para massa de forragem. A taxa de acúmulo de forragem verde variou de 20 a 80 kg MS ha-1d-1 ao longo dos meses, com SPS-Mimosa apresentando taxas mais baixas. O ganho médio diário foi maior em SPS-Gliricidia, seguido de SM e SPS-Mimosa, respectivamente (0,77; 0,56; 0,23 kg d-1), variando entre os meses. A taxa de lotação variou de 0,86 a 1,6 UA ha-1. O ganho total por área durante o período experimental foi maior para SPS-Gliricidia (423 kg PV ha-1), seguido de braquiária em monocultivo (347 kg PV ha-1) e SPS-Mimosa (50 kg PV ha-1). As variáveis de resposta para diferentes manejos incluíram altura da copa, massa de forragem (folha verde, caule verde, folhas senescentes e caule senescente), taxa de acúmulo de forragem, densidade do dossel e umidade do solo, solo nu e composição botânica. Massa de forragem total, massa de forragem verde e massa de folha verde foram afetadas pelo tratamento × data de avaliação e colheita gestão × interações data de avaliação. A taxa de acúmulo de forragem no SPS-Gliricidia foi maior (55 kg MS ha-1d-1) do que no SPS-Mimosa (32 kg MS ha-1d-1). A umidade do solo foi menor nos sítios de Mimosa (16,2%) em comparação com os de Gliricídia (17,2%), e foi maior entre as fileiras de árvores (21,9%) em comparação com pleno sol (11,5%), variando ao longo da estação. Houve diferenças significativas entre o manejo de colheita para solo nu e porcentagem de serapilheira (P≤0,05). A composição botânica encontrou 36 espécies de plantas daninhas, distribuídas em 19 famílias botânicas, sendo 36 destas espécies dicotiledôneas (53%) e 17 monocotiledôneas (47%). Os sistemas silvipastoris trazem benefícios para o meio ambiente, como o aumento do estoque de carbono na biomassa e proporcionam mais conforto ao animal criado a pasto.Submitted by Mario BC (mario@bc.ufrpe.br) on 2023-05-16T12:20:02Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Izabela Aline Gomes da Silva.pdf: 2952341 bytes, checksum: 9a5daf6a9f0ea5ba370c6c51c1dade8f (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2023-05-16T12:20:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Izabela Aline Gomes da Silva.pdf: 2952341 bytes, checksum: 9a5daf6a9f0ea5ba370c6c51c1dade8f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-02-28application/pdfengUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em ZootecniaUFRPEBrasilDepartamento de ZootecniaSistema silvipastorilPastagemLeguminosa arbóreaMonocultura de gramíneaNutrição animalCIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIAPasture characterization and animal performance on silvopastoral systems using tree legumes or grass monocultureinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis-3881065194686295060600600600-76856541506829724321346858981270845602info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPEinstname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)instacron:UFRPEORIGINALIzabela Aline Gomes da Silva.pdfIzabela Aline Gomes da Silva.pdfapplication/pdf2952341http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8952/2/Izabela+Aline+Gomes+da+Silva.pdf9a5daf6a9f0ea5ba370c6c51c1dade8fMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8952/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede2/89522023-05-16 09:20:02.094oai:tede2: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede/PUBhttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/oai/requestbdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.bropendoar:2024-05-28T12:37:38.064863Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Pasture characterization and animal performance on silvopastoral systems using tree legumes or grass monoculture
title Pasture characterization and animal performance on silvopastoral systems using tree legumes or grass monoculture
spellingShingle Pasture characterization and animal performance on silvopastoral systems using tree legumes or grass monoculture
SILVA, Izabela Aline Gomes da
Sistema silvipastoril
Pastagem
Leguminosa arbórea
Monocultura de gramínea
Nutrição animal
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
title_short Pasture characterization and animal performance on silvopastoral systems using tree legumes or grass monoculture
title_full Pasture characterization and animal performance on silvopastoral systems using tree legumes or grass monoculture
title_fullStr Pasture characterization and animal performance on silvopastoral systems using tree legumes or grass monoculture
title_full_unstemmed Pasture characterization and animal performance on silvopastoral systems using tree legumes or grass monoculture
title_sort Pasture characterization and animal performance on silvopastoral systems using tree legumes or grass monoculture
author SILVA, Izabela Aline Gomes da
author_facet SILVA, Izabela Aline Gomes da
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv DUBEUX JUNIOR, José Carlos Batista
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv MELLO, Alexandre Carneiro Leão de
dc.contributor.advisor-co2.fl_str_mv CUNHA, Márcio Vieira da
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv SAMPAIO, Everardo Valadares de Sá Barreto
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv MUIR, James Pierre
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv SILVA, Valdson José da
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv APOLINÁRIO, Valéria Xavier de Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/5504838398651551
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SILVA, Izabela Aline Gomes da
contributor_str_mv DUBEUX JUNIOR, José Carlos Batista
MELLO, Alexandre Carneiro Leão de
CUNHA, Márcio Vieira da
SAMPAIO, Everardo Valadares de Sá Barreto
MUIR, James Pierre
SILVA, Valdson José da
APOLINÁRIO, Valéria Xavier de Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sistema silvipastoril
Pastagem
Leguminosa arbórea
Monocultura de gramínea
Nutrição animal
topic Sistema silvipastoril
Pastagem
Leguminosa arbórea
Monocultura de gramínea
Nutrição animal
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
description The world population is expected to grow by 2050 and also demand for food will increase, it is necessary to find alternatives for a sustainable livestock production. Silvopastoral systems-SPS with tree legumes are promising choices to adapt Agriculture to climate change and provide welfare for cattle, also increase forage nutritive value when the management is applied correctly. This 2-yr study evaluated animal performance and herbage responses in C4-grass monoculture or in SPS in the sub-humid tropical region of Brazil and evaluate productivity and nutritive value of signalgrass [Urochloa decumbens (Stapf.) R. Webster] subjected to shading from the tree legumes gliricidia [Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Steud] or mimosa (Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth.) under different tree canopy management (harvesting or not one of the rows in the double-row tree planting). The experimental design was randomized complete block with three replications. Treatments were: Urochloa decumbens (Stapf.) R. Webster (Signalgrass) + Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth (SPS-Mimosa); Signalgrass + Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Kunth ex Walp (SPS-Gliricidia); and Signalgrass monoculture (SM). Response variables included herbage and livestock responses. Cattle were managed under continuous stocking with variable stocking rate. There was interaction between treatment × month for herbage mass. Green herbage accumulation rate ranged from 20 to 80 kg DM ha- 1d-1 across months, with SPS-Mimosa presenting lower rates. Average daily gain was greater in SPS-Gliricidia, followed by SM, and SPS-Mimosa, respectively (0.77; 0.56; 0.23 kg d-1), varying across months. Stocking rate ranged from 0.86 to 1.6 AU ha-1. Total gain per area during the experimental period was greater for SPS-Gliricidia (423 kg BW ha-1), followed by signalgrass in monoculture (347 kg BW ha-1), and SPS-Mimosa (50 kg BW ha-1). The responses variables for different management included canopy height, herbage mass (green leaf blade, green stem, senescent leaves, and senescent stem), herbage accumulation rate, canopy bulk density, and soil moisture, bare soil and botanical composition. Total herbage mass, green herbage mass, and green leaf mass were affected by treatment × evaluation date and harvest management × evaluation date interactions. Herbage accumulation rate in SPS-Gliricidia was greater (55 kg DM ha-1d-1) than SPS-Mimosa (32 kg DM ha-1d-1). Soil moisture was lower at the Mimosa sites (16.2%) compared with the Gliricidia ones (17.2%), and it was greater between tree rows (21.9%) compared with full sun (11.5%), varying across the season. There were significant differences between harvest management for bare soil and litter percentage (P≤0.05). The botanical composition found 36 weed species, distributed in 19 botanical families and 36 of these species were dicotyledonous (53%) and 17 were monocotyledonous (47%). The silvopastoral systems have benefits for the environment, such as the increase of the carbon stock in the biomass and provide more comfort to the animal raised on pasture.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020-02-28
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2023-05-16T12:20:02Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv SILVA, Izabela Aline Gomes da. Pasture characterization and animal performance on silvopastoral systems using tree legumes or grass monoculture. 2020. 144 f. Tese (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8952
identifier_str_mv SILVA, Izabela Aline Gomes da. Pasture characterization and animal performance on silvopastoral systems using tree legumes or grass monoculture. 2020. 144 f. Tese (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.
url http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8952
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv -3881065194686295060
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv -7685654150682972432
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 1346858981270845602
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFRPE
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Departamento de Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
instacron:UFRPE
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
instacron_str UFRPE
institution UFRPE
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8952/2/Izabela+Aline+Gomes+da+Silva.pdf
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8952/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 9a5daf6a9f0ea5ba370c6c51c1dade8f
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.br
_version_ 1810102270008754176