Potencialidade de variedades viníferas para produção de vinhos finos na microrregião de Garanhuns-PE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
Texto Completo: | http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/7113 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to evaluate the agronomic and quality characteristics of the must in varieties of Vitis vinifera L., as well as the genetic divergence between them. The varieties are: Chardonnay, Muscat Petit Grain, Sauvignon Blanc and Viognier (white wines) and Cabernet Sauvignon, Malbec, Merlot Noir, Petit Verdot, Pinot Noir and Syrah (red wines), grafted on Paulsen 1103 rootstock were. The experiment was conducted at the Experimental Station of the Agronomic Institute of Pernambuco (IPA) in Brejão-PE, and data from the second productive cycle were analyzed (August 2016 to January 2017). The design was randomized blocks with five replications and eight plants per plot. The phenotypic variability was evaluated for agronomic and must quality variables. It was evaluated: phenology (days) and thermal requirements (Day-degrees); bud sprouting (%) and bud fertility (bud sprout-1); (ha-1), number of bunches (bunch plant-1), bunch mass (g), bunch length and width (cm), volume of 100 berries (%), soluble solids (SS, ° Brix), pH, titratable acidity (AT,% tartaric acid) and SS/TA ratio. The results were submitted to analysis of variance and Tukey averages comparison test (p≤0.05). As a method of grouping, UPGMA and the analysis of canonical variables were used. Sprouting varied from 13.68 (Petit Verdot) to 81.6% (Sauvignon Blanc) and the fertility of 0.1 (Chardonnay) buds to 0.67 cherry bud-1 (Sauvignon Blanc). The length of the pruning cycle ranged from 133 days (Muscat Petit Grain) to 167 days (Merlot Noir), and the cumulative Degrees ranged from 1,684 GD (Muscat Petit Grain) to 2,070 GD (Merlot Noir). The bunch number ranged from five (Merlot Noir) to 29 plant-1 bunches (Sauvignon Blanc). 'Muscat Petit Grain' (160.2 g) stood out from the others for mass of curls, not differing from 'Syrah' and 'Malbec'. The varieties showed no difference in the length and width of bunches. For volume of 100 berries, 'Malbec' (216.0 ml) and 'Muscat Petit Grain' (213.6 ml) stood out. For the 'Sauvignon Blanc' (70.87%) yield, it stood out, not differing from 'Muscat Petiit Grain' (70,22%), 'Malbec' (64,31%) and 'Viognier' (69,79%). 'Muscat Petit Grain', 'Sauvignon Blanc', 'Viognier' (white wine), 'Cabernet Sauvignon', 'Malbec', 'Merlot Noir' and 'Syrah', PH (3.73, 3.90, 3.97, 3.68, 3.75, 3, 4, 6, 8, 50 and 3.86), AT (0.60, 0.57, 0.64, 0.77, 0.71, 0.59 and 0.54% tartaric acid) and the SS/AT ratio (36, 68, 40.29, 35.48, 29.31, 34.39, 39.42 and 42.28), respectively. The Muscat Petit Grain, Sauvignon Blanc (white wines) and Cabernet Sauvignon and Syrah (red wines) varieties stood out in agronomic analysis and grape quality. From the analyzes of genetic divergence for the characteristics analyzed, it was possible to identify that the varieties are divergent. |
id |
URPE_af86f70b0f381810f8ef52f31e1fe7d0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2:tede2/7113 |
network_acronym_str |
URPE |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
MUSSER, Rosimar dos SantosSILVA, Mairon Moura daLEÃO, Patrícia Coelho de SouzaCARVALHO FILHO, José Luiz Sandes dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0277232807283106SILVA, Flávia Gomes da2017-12-18T12:36:35Z2017-07-20SILVA, Flávia Gomes da. Potencialidade de variedades viníferas para produção de vinhos finos na microrregião de Garanhuns-PE. 2017. 84 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Melhoramento Genético de Plantas) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/7113The objective of this study was to evaluate the agronomic and quality characteristics of the must in varieties of Vitis vinifera L., as well as the genetic divergence between them. The varieties are: Chardonnay, Muscat Petit Grain, Sauvignon Blanc and Viognier (white wines) and Cabernet Sauvignon, Malbec, Merlot Noir, Petit Verdot, Pinot Noir and Syrah (red wines), grafted on Paulsen 1103 rootstock were. The experiment was conducted at the Experimental Station of the Agronomic Institute of Pernambuco (IPA) in Brejão-PE, and data from the second productive cycle were analyzed (August 2016 to January 2017). The design was randomized blocks with five replications and eight plants per plot. The phenotypic variability was evaluated for agronomic and must quality variables. It was evaluated: phenology (days) and thermal requirements (Day-degrees); bud sprouting (%) and bud fertility (bud sprout-1); (ha-1), number of bunches (bunch plant-1), bunch mass (g), bunch length and width (cm), volume of 100 berries (%), soluble solids (SS, ° Brix), pH, titratable acidity (AT,% tartaric acid) and SS/TA ratio. The results were submitted to analysis of variance and Tukey averages comparison test (p≤0.05). As a method of grouping, UPGMA and the analysis of canonical variables were used. Sprouting varied from 13.68 (Petit Verdot) to 81.6% (Sauvignon Blanc) and the fertility of 0.1 (Chardonnay) buds to 0.67 cherry bud-1 (Sauvignon Blanc). The length of the pruning cycle ranged from 133 days (Muscat Petit Grain) to 167 days (Merlot Noir), and the cumulative Degrees ranged from 1,684 GD (Muscat Petit Grain) to 2,070 GD (Merlot Noir). The bunch number ranged from five (Merlot Noir) to 29 plant-1 bunches (Sauvignon Blanc). 'Muscat Petit Grain' (160.2 g) stood out from the others for mass of curls, not differing from 'Syrah' and 'Malbec'. The varieties showed no difference in the length and width of bunches. For volume of 100 berries, 'Malbec' (216.0 ml) and 'Muscat Petit Grain' (213.6 ml) stood out. For the 'Sauvignon Blanc' (70.87%) yield, it stood out, not differing from 'Muscat Petiit Grain' (70,22%), 'Malbec' (64,31%) and 'Viognier' (69,79%). 'Muscat Petit Grain', 'Sauvignon Blanc', 'Viognier' (white wine), 'Cabernet Sauvignon', 'Malbec', 'Merlot Noir' and 'Syrah', PH (3.73, 3.90, 3.97, 3.68, 3.75, 3, 4, 6, 8, 50 and 3.86), AT (0.60, 0.57, 0.64, 0.77, 0.71, 0.59 and 0.54% tartaric acid) and the SS/AT ratio (36, 68, 40.29, 35.48, 29.31, 34.39, 39.42 and 42.28), respectively. The Muscat Petit Grain, Sauvignon Blanc (white wines) and Cabernet Sauvignon and Syrah (red wines) varieties stood out in agronomic analysis and grape quality. From the analyzes of genetic divergence for the characteristics analyzed, it was possible to identify that the varieties are divergent.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar as características agronômicas e de qualidade da uva em variedades de Vitis vinifera L., bem como a divergência genética entre elas. As variedades são: Chardonnay, Muscat Petit Grain, Sauvignon Blanc e Viognier (vinhos brancos) e Cabernet Sauvignon, Malbec, Merlot Noir, Petit Verdot, Pinot Noir e Syrah (vinhos tintos), enxertadas sobre o porta-enxerto Paulsen 1103. O experimento foi conduzido na Estação Experimental do Instituto Agronômico de Pernambuco (IPA) em Brejão-PE, sendo analisado os dados do segundo ciclo produtivo (agosto de 2016 a janeiro de 2017). O delineamento foi em blocos casualizados com cinco repetições e oito plantas por parcela. A variabilidade fenotípica foi avaliada para variáveis agronômicas e de qualidade do mosto. Avaliouse: fenologia (dias) e exigências térmicas (Graus-dia); brotação (%) e fertilidade de gemas (cacho broto-1); produção (kg planta-1) e produtividade (t ha-1), número de cachos (cacho planta-1), massa do cacho (g), comprimento e largura do cacho (cm), volume de 100 bagas (mL), rendimento de mosto (%), sólidos solúveis (SS, °Brix), pH, acidez titulável (AT, % de ácido tartárico) e a relação SS/AT. Os resultados foram submetidos a análise de variância e teste de comparação de médias de Tukey (p≤0,05). Como método de agrupamento, foram empregados UPGMA e a análise de variáveis canônicas. A brotação variou de 13,68 (Petit Verdot) a 81,6% (Sauvignon Blanc) e a fertilidade de gemas de 0,1 (Chardonnay) a 0,67 cacho broto-1 (Sauvignon Blanc). A duração do ciclo da poda a colheita variou de 133 dias (Muscat Petit Grain) a 167 dias (Merlot Noir), e os Graus-dia acumulados variaram de 1.684 GD (Muscat Petit Grain) a 2.070 GD (Merlot Noir). O número de cacho variou de cinco (Merlot Noir) a 29 cachos planta-1 (Sauvignon Blanc). ‘Muscat Petit Grain’ (160,2 g) se destacou das demais para massa de cachos, não diferindo da ‘Syrah’ e ‘Malbec’. As variedades não apresentaram diferença no comprimento e largura de cachos. Para volume de 100 bagas, ‘Malbec’ (216,0 ml) e ‘Muscat Petit Grain’ (213,6 ml) se sobressaíram. Para o rendimento de mosto ‘Sauvignon Blanc’ (70,87%) se destacou, não diferindo da ‘Muscat Petiit Grain’ (70,22%), ‘Malbec’ (64,31%) e ‘Viognier’ (69,79%). ‘Muscat Petit Grain’, ‘Sauvignon Blanc’, ‘Viognier’ (vinho branco), ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ ‘Malbec’, ‘Merlot Noir’ e ‘Syrah’ (vinho tinto) obtiveram valores aceitáveis de SS (21,9; 22,6; 22,7; 22,3; 22,2; 21,0 e 22,9°Brix), pH (3,73; 3,90; 3,97; 3,68; 3,75; 3,50 e 3,86), AT (0,60; 0,57; 0,64; 0,77; 0,71; 0,59 e 0,54% de ácido tartárico) e na relação SS/AT (36,68; 40,29; 35,48; 29,31; 34,39; 39,42 e 42,28), respectivamente. As variedades Muscat Petit Grain, Sauvignon Blanc (vinhos brancos) e Cabernet Sauvignon e Syrah (vinhos tintos) destacaram-se nas análises agronômicas e na qualidade da uva. A partir das análises de divergência genética para as características analisadas, foi possível identificar que as variedades são divergentes.Submitted by Mario BC (mario@bc.ufrpe.br) on 2017-12-18T12:36:35Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Flavia Gomes da Silva.pdf: 1179327 bytes, checksum: db99f0969d6e76ec0106dc4eeed57e4f (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2017-12-18T12:36:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Flavia Gomes da Silva.pdf: 1179327 bytes, checksum: db99f0969d6e76ec0106dc4eeed57e4f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-07-20application/pdfporUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Melhoramento Genético de PlantasUFRPEBrasilDepartamento de AgronomiaVitis viniferaCaracterística agronômicaDiversidade genéticaProdução de vinhoFITOTECNIA::MELHORAMENTO VEGETALPotencialidade de variedades viníferas para produção de vinhos finos na microrregião de Garanhuns-PEinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-6234655866848882505600600600-68005538799722292052615607299470131967info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPEinstname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)instacron:UFRPEORIGINALFlavia Gomes da Silva.pdfFlavia Gomes da Silva.pdfapplication/pdf1179327http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/7113/2/Flavia+Gomes+da+Silva.pdfdb99f0969d6e76ec0106dc4eeed57e4fMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/7113/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede2/71132017-12-18 09:36:35.888oai:tede2:tede2/7113Tk9UQTogQ09MT1FVRSBBUVVJIEEgU1VBIFBSw5NQUklBIExJQ0VOw4dBCkVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EgZGUgZXhlbXBsbyDDqSBmb3JuZWNpZGEgYXBlbmFzIHBhcmEgZmlucyBpbmZvcm1hdGl2b3MuCgpMSUNFTsOHQSBERSBESVNUUklCVUnDh8ODTyBOw4NPLUVYQ0xVU0lWQQoKQ29tIGEgYXByZXNlbnRhw6fDo28gZGVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EsIHZvY8OqIChvIGF1dG9yIChlcykgb3UgbyB0aXR1bGFyIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBkZSBhdXRvcikgY29uY2VkZSDDoCBVbml2ZXJzaWRhZGUgClhYWCAoU2lnbGEgZGEgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlKSBvIGRpcmVpdG8gbsOjby1leGNsdXNpdm8gZGUgcmVwcm9kdXppciwgIHRyYWR1emlyIChjb25mb3JtZSBkZWZpbmlkbyBhYmFpeG8pLCBlL291IApkaXN0cmlidWlyIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyAoaW5jbHVpbmRvIG8gcmVzdW1vKSBwb3IgdG9kbyBvIG11bmRvIG5vIGZvcm1hdG8gaW1wcmVzc28gZSBlbGV0csO0bmljbyBlIAplbSBxdWFscXVlciBtZWlvLCBpbmNsdWluZG8gb3MgZm9ybWF0b3Mgw6F1ZGlvIG91IHbDrWRlby4KClZvY8OqIGNvbmNvcmRhIHF1ZSBhIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBwb2RlLCBzZW0gYWx0ZXJhciBvIGNvbnRlw7pkbywgdHJhbnNwb3IgYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIApwYXJhIHF1YWxxdWVyIG1laW8gb3UgZm9ybWF0byBwYXJhIGZpbnMgZGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gY29uY29yZGEgcXVlIGEgU2lnbGEgZGUgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlIHBvZGUgbWFudGVyIG1haXMgZGUgdW1hIGPDs3BpYSBhIHN1YSB0ZXNlIG91IApkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIHBhcmEgZmlucyBkZSBzZWd1cmFuw6dhLCBiYWNrLXVwIGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIGRlY2xhcmEgcXVlIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyDDqSBvcmlnaW5hbCBlIHF1ZSB2b2PDqiB0ZW0gbyBwb2RlciBkZSBjb25jZWRlciBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBjb250aWRvcyAKbmVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EuIFZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgbyBkZXDDs3NpdG8gZGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBuw6NvLCBxdWUgc2VqYSBkZSBzZXUgCmNvbmhlY2ltZW50bywgaW5mcmluZ2UgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGUgbmluZ3XDqW0uCgpDYXNvIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBjb250ZW5oYSBtYXRlcmlhbCBxdWUgdm9jw6ogbsOjbyBwb3NzdWkgYSB0aXR1bGFyaWRhZGUgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzLCB2b2PDqiAKZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgb2J0ZXZlIGEgcGVybWlzc8OjbyBpcnJlc3RyaXRhIGRvIGRldGVudG9yIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcyBwYXJhIGNvbmNlZGVyIMOgIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSAKb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXByZXNlbnRhZG9zIG5lc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLCBlIHF1ZSBlc3NlIG1hdGVyaWFsIGRlIHByb3ByaWVkYWRlIGRlIHRlcmNlaXJvcyBlc3TDoSBjbGFyYW1lbnRlIAppZGVudGlmaWNhZG8gZSByZWNvbmhlY2lkbyBubyB0ZXh0byBvdSBubyBjb250ZcO6ZG8gZGEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIG9yYSBkZXBvc2l0YWRhLgoKQ0FTTyBBIFRFU0UgT1UgRElTU0VSVEHDh8ODTyBPUkEgREVQT1NJVEFEQSBURU5IQSBTSURPIFJFU1VMVEFETyBERSBVTSBQQVRST0PDjU5JTyBPVSAKQVBPSU8gREUgVU1BIEFHw4pOQ0lBIERFIEZPTUVOVE8gT1UgT1VUUk8gT1JHQU5JU01PIFFVRSBOw4NPIFNFSkEgQSBTSUdMQSBERSAKVU5JVkVSU0lEQURFLCBWT0PDiiBERUNMQVJBIFFVRSBSRVNQRUlUT1UgVE9ET1MgRSBRVUFJU1FVRVIgRElSRUlUT1MgREUgUkVWSVPDg08gQ09NTyAKVEFNQsOJTSBBUyBERU1BSVMgT0JSSUdBw4fDlUVTIEVYSUdJREFTIFBPUiBDT05UUkFUTyBPVSBBQ09SRE8uCgpBIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBzZSBjb21wcm9tZXRlIGEgaWRlbnRpZmljYXIgY2xhcmFtZW50ZSBvIHNldSBub21lIChzKSBvdSBvKHMpIG5vbWUocykgZG8ocykgCmRldGVudG9yKGVzKSBkb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvLCBlIG7Do28gZmFyw6EgcXVhbHF1ZXIgYWx0ZXJhw6fDo28sIGFsw6ltIGRhcXVlbGFzIApjb25jZWRpZGFzIHBvciBlc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLgo=Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede/PUBhttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/oai/requestbdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.bropendoar:2024-05-28T12:35:13.711811Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Potencialidade de variedades viníferas para produção de vinhos finos na microrregião de Garanhuns-PE |
title |
Potencialidade de variedades viníferas para produção de vinhos finos na microrregião de Garanhuns-PE |
spellingShingle |
Potencialidade de variedades viníferas para produção de vinhos finos na microrregião de Garanhuns-PE SILVA, Flávia Gomes da Vitis vinifera Característica agronômica Diversidade genética Produção de vinho FITOTECNIA::MELHORAMENTO VEGETAL |
title_short |
Potencialidade de variedades viníferas para produção de vinhos finos na microrregião de Garanhuns-PE |
title_full |
Potencialidade de variedades viníferas para produção de vinhos finos na microrregião de Garanhuns-PE |
title_fullStr |
Potencialidade de variedades viníferas para produção de vinhos finos na microrregião de Garanhuns-PE |
title_full_unstemmed |
Potencialidade de variedades viníferas para produção de vinhos finos na microrregião de Garanhuns-PE |
title_sort |
Potencialidade de variedades viníferas para produção de vinhos finos na microrregião de Garanhuns-PE |
author |
SILVA, Flávia Gomes da |
author_facet |
SILVA, Flávia Gomes da |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
MUSSER, Rosimar dos Santos |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
SILVA, Mairon Moura da |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
LEÃO, Patrícia Coelho de Souza |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
CARVALHO FILHO, José Luiz Sandes de |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0277232807283106 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
SILVA, Flávia Gomes da |
contributor_str_mv |
MUSSER, Rosimar dos Santos SILVA, Mairon Moura da LEÃO, Patrícia Coelho de Souza CARVALHO FILHO, José Luiz Sandes de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Vitis vinifera Característica agronômica Diversidade genética Produção de vinho |
topic |
Vitis vinifera Característica agronômica Diversidade genética Produção de vinho FITOTECNIA::MELHORAMENTO VEGETAL |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
FITOTECNIA::MELHORAMENTO VEGETAL |
description |
The objective of this study was to evaluate the agronomic and quality characteristics of the must in varieties of Vitis vinifera L., as well as the genetic divergence between them. The varieties are: Chardonnay, Muscat Petit Grain, Sauvignon Blanc and Viognier (white wines) and Cabernet Sauvignon, Malbec, Merlot Noir, Petit Verdot, Pinot Noir and Syrah (red wines), grafted on Paulsen 1103 rootstock were. The experiment was conducted at the Experimental Station of the Agronomic Institute of Pernambuco (IPA) in Brejão-PE, and data from the second productive cycle were analyzed (August 2016 to January 2017). The design was randomized blocks with five replications and eight plants per plot. The phenotypic variability was evaluated for agronomic and must quality variables. It was evaluated: phenology (days) and thermal requirements (Day-degrees); bud sprouting (%) and bud fertility (bud sprout-1); (ha-1), number of bunches (bunch plant-1), bunch mass (g), bunch length and width (cm), volume of 100 berries (%), soluble solids (SS, ° Brix), pH, titratable acidity (AT,% tartaric acid) and SS/TA ratio. The results were submitted to analysis of variance and Tukey averages comparison test (p≤0.05). As a method of grouping, UPGMA and the analysis of canonical variables were used. Sprouting varied from 13.68 (Petit Verdot) to 81.6% (Sauvignon Blanc) and the fertility of 0.1 (Chardonnay) buds to 0.67 cherry bud-1 (Sauvignon Blanc). The length of the pruning cycle ranged from 133 days (Muscat Petit Grain) to 167 days (Merlot Noir), and the cumulative Degrees ranged from 1,684 GD (Muscat Petit Grain) to 2,070 GD (Merlot Noir). The bunch number ranged from five (Merlot Noir) to 29 plant-1 bunches (Sauvignon Blanc). 'Muscat Petit Grain' (160.2 g) stood out from the others for mass of curls, not differing from 'Syrah' and 'Malbec'. The varieties showed no difference in the length and width of bunches. For volume of 100 berries, 'Malbec' (216.0 ml) and 'Muscat Petit Grain' (213.6 ml) stood out. For the 'Sauvignon Blanc' (70.87%) yield, it stood out, not differing from 'Muscat Petiit Grain' (70,22%), 'Malbec' (64,31%) and 'Viognier' (69,79%). 'Muscat Petit Grain', 'Sauvignon Blanc', 'Viognier' (white wine), 'Cabernet Sauvignon', 'Malbec', 'Merlot Noir' and 'Syrah', PH (3.73, 3.90, 3.97, 3.68, 3.75, 3, 4, 6, 8, 50 and 3.86), AT (0.60, 0.57, 0.64, 0.77, 0.71, 0.59 and 0.54% tartaric acid) and the SS/AT ratio (36, 68, 40.29, 35.48, 29.31, 34.39, 39.42 and 42.28), respectively. The Muscat Petit Grain, Sauvignon Blanc (white wines) and Cabernet Sauvignon and Syrah (red wines) varieties stood out in agronomic analysis and grape quality. From the analyzes of genetic divergence for the characteristics analyzed, it was possible to identify that the varieties are divergent. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-18T12:36:35Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017-07-20 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
SILVA, Flávia Gomes da. Potencialidade de variedades viníferas para produção de vinhos finos na microrregião de Garanhuns-PE. 2017. 84 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Melhoramento Genético de Plantas) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/7113 |
identifier_str_mv |
SILVA, Flávia Gomes da. Potencialidade de variedades viníferas para produção de vinhos finos na microrregião de Garanhuns-PE. 2017. 84 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Melhoramento Genético de Plantas) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife. |
url |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/7113 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-6234655866848882505 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-6800553879972229205 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
2615607299470131967 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Melhoramento Genético de Plantas |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFRPE |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Agronomia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) instacron:UFRPE |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
instacron_str |
UFRPE |
institution |
UFRPE |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/7113/2/Flavia+Gomes+da+Silva.pdf http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/7113/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
db99f0969d6e76ec0106dc4eeed57e4f bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.br |
_version_ |
1810102246231244800 |