Ação de inimigos naturais em presas sentinelas no agrossistema algodoeiro em função do inseticida recomendado
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
Texto Completo: | http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8368 |
Resumo: | Cotton ecosystem in Brazil hosts an array species of herbivores. Some of these regularly reach population densities requiring curative control decisions. Nonethless, a large diversity of natural is associated with these herbivores and brings contribution to the integrated pest management (IPM). To furnish the cotton IPM is recommended the use of selective insecticides, but few data show how this decision bring benefits relative to the action of conserved natural enemies. Thus, the impact of recommending selective and non-selective insecticides against cotton pests on the action of naturally occurring natural enemies was measured: (i) using sentinel prey set up in the field; and (ii) impact of dried residues of field recommended insecticides on survival of four key predatory insects representing different feeding habits and prey attacked (Chrysoperla externa, Eriopis connexa, Orius insidiosus and Podisus nigrispinus). The mortality of the sentinel prey itens was higher in the field under selective recommendation relative to the non-selective, and most of time, similar to the untreated fields. Further, non-selective insecticides maintained the impact between spray decisions depending on the insecticide recommended and time between sprays. Seasonal abundance of predatory insects from cotton plants was 2x greater in the fields under selective and non-spray decisions, despite the variation observed across the 15 weeks surveyed. The survival of assayed predators exposed to the dried insecticide residues within the intervals 0, 5, 10 and 15 days after spray supports the field outcome. The selective insecticides pymetrozin, chlorantraniliprole, pyripoxifen and cyantraniliprole promoted greater predator survival relative to the non-selectives lambda-cyhalothrin, malathion, dimethoate and thiamethoxam. In general, among the non-selective insecticides, malathion and dimethoate exhibited shorter residual compared to the thiamethoxam and lambda+thiamethoxam. Therefore, we can conclude that the recommendation of selective insecticides brings benefits for cotton IPM by conserving the action of the natural enemy community in the local. |
id |
URPE_dbddd34a9a50fdb84942aeb45a3a0d33 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2:tede2/8368 |
network_acronym_str |
URPE |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
TORRES, Jorge BrazTORRES, Christian Sherley Araújo da SilvaBARBOSA, Paulo Roberto RamosTORRES, Christian Sherley Araújo da Silvahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9673024022810693MACHADO, Anderson Vinnicius de Arruda2019-11-25T15:07:04Z2019-02-28MACHADO, Anderson Vinnicius de Arruda. Ação de inimigos naturais em presas sentinelas no agrossistema algodoeiro em função do inseticida recomendado. 2019. 72 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia Agrícola) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8368Cotton ecosystem in Brazil hosts an array species of herbivores. Some of these regularly reach population densities requiring curative control decisions. Nonethless, a large diversity of natural is associated with these herbivores and brings contribution to the integrated pest management (IPM). To furnish the cotton IPM is recommended the use of selective insecticides, but few data show how this decision bring benefits relative to the action of conserved natural enemies. Thus, the impact of recommending selective and non-selective insecticides against cotton pests on the action of naturally occurring natural enemies was measured: (i) using sentinel prey set up in the field; and (ii) impact of dried residues of field recommended insecticides on survival of four key predatory insects representing different feeding habits and prey attacked (Chrysoperla externa, Eriopis connexa, Orius insidiosus and Podisus nigrispinus). The mortality of the sentinel prey itens was higher in the field under selective recommendation relative to the non-selective, and most of time, similar to the untreated fields. Further, non-selective insecticides maintained the impact between spray decisions depending on the insecticide recommended and time between sprays. Seasonal abundance of predatory insects from cotton plants was 2x greater in the fields under selective and non-spray decisions, despite the variation observed across the 15 weeks surveyed. The survival of assayed predators exposed to the dried insecticide residues within the intervals 0, 5, 10 and 15 days after spray supports the field outcome. The selective insecticides pymetrozin, chlorantraniliprole, pyripoxifen and cyantraniliprole promoted greater predator survival relative to the non-selectives lambda-cyhalothrin, malathion, dimethoate and thiamethoxam. In general, among the non-selective insecticides, malathion and dimethoate exhibited shorter residual compared to the thiamethoxam and lambda+thiamethoxam. Therefore, we can conclude that the recommendation of selective insecticides brings benefits for cotton IPM by conserving the action of the natural enemy community in the local.No Brasil, grande diversidade de herbírovos ocorrem no agroecossistema algodoeiro, com várias atingindo densidades que requerem decisões de controle curativo, sendo o controle químico o mais utilizado. Diversos inimigos naturais estão associados a esses herbívoros e contribuem para o manejo integrado de pragas (MIP). Assim, é preconizado no MIP algodoeiro, o uso de inseticidas seletivos; porém, pouco é demonstrado o resultado da ação dos inimigos naturais preservados. O impacto da recomendação de inseticidas para o controle de pragas do algodoeiro sobre a ação de inimigos naturais foi estudado empregando presas sentinelas, em campo, e a sobrevivência de quatro predadores chave representando diferentes hábitos alimentar e grupos de presas atacadas (Chrysoperla externa, Eriopis connexa, Orius insidiosus e Podisus nigrispinus), expostos aos resíduos secos de inseticidas seletivos e não seletivos usados em campo. A mortalidade das presas sentinelas foi superior nos tratamentos com inseticida seletivo comparado ao não seletivo e, na maioria dos casos, similar ao tratamento sem pulverização. Áreas tratadas com inseticidas não seletivos, além da baixa ação de inimigos naturais no momento da pulverização, também apresentaram efeito residual. A abundância de predadores foi superior (2x) nos tratamentos sem pulverização e pulverização com inseticida seletivo, apesar das variações observadas ao longo de 15 semanas. A sobrevivência das espécies predadoras expostas aos resíduos dos inseticidas nos intervalos de 0, 5, 10 e 15 dias após a pulverização suportam os resultados de campo. Os inseticidas seletivos pimetrozina, clorantraniliprole, piripoxifem e ciantraniliprole permitiram maior sobrevivência dos predadores em relação aos não seletivos lambda-cialotrina, malationa, dimetoato e tiametoxam. Entre os não seletivos, malationa e dimetoato tiveram menor residual que tiametoxam e lambda+tiametoxam. Podemos concluir que a recomendação de inseticidas seletivos traz benefícios ao manejo de pragas do algodoeiro por preservar a comunidade de predadores que naturalmente ocorre nesse agroecossistema.Submitted by Mario BC (mario@bc.ufrpe.br) on 2019-11-25T15:07:04Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Anderson Vinnicius de Arruda Machado.pdf: 956153 bytes, checksum: a3699f3999a2be81b7b1b32635464a9f (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2019-11-25T15:07:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Anderson Vinnicius de Arruda Machado.pdf: 956153 bytes, checksum: a3699f3999a2be81b7b1b32635464a9f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-02-28Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia AgrícolaUFRPEBrasilDepartamento de AgronomiaAlgodãoControle de pragaInseticidaInseticida seletivoFITOSSANIDADE::ENTOMOLOGIA AGRICOLAAção de inimigos naturais em presas sentinelas no agrossistema algodoeiro em função do inseticida recomendadoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis1292500575037930971600600600600-680055387997222920519080153008238414002075167498588264571info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPEinstname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)instacron:UFRPEORIGINALAnderson Vinnicius de Arruda Machado.pdfAnderson Vinnicius de Arruda Machado.pdfapplication/pdf956153http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8368/2/Anderson+Vinnicius+de+Arruda+Machado.pdfa3699f3999a2be81b7b1b32635464a9fMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8368/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede2/83682019-11-25 12:07:04.845oai:tede2: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede/PUBhttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/oai/requestbdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.bropendoar:2024-05-28T12:36:52.708166Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Ação de inimigos naturais em presas sentinelas no agrossistema algodoeiro em função do inseticida recomendado |
title |
Ação de inimigos naturais em presas sentinelas no agrossistema algodoeiro em função do inseticida recomendado |
spellingShingle |
Ação de inimigos naturais em presas sentinelas no agrossistema algodoeiro em função do inseticida recomendado MACHADO, Anderson Vinnicius de Arruda Algodão Controle de praga Inseticida Inseticida seletivo FITOSSANIDADE::ENTOMOLOGIA AGRICOLA |
title_short |
Ação de inimigos naturais em presas sentinelas no agrossistema algodoeiro em função do inseticida recomendado |
title_full |
Ação de inimigos naturais em presas sentinelas no agrossistema algodoeiro em função do inseticida recomendado |
title_fullStr |
Ação de inimigos naturais em presas sentinelas no agrossistema algodoeiro em função do inseticida recomendado |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ação de inimigos naturais em presas sentinelas no agrossistema algodoeiro em função do inseticida recomendado |
title_sort |
Ação de inimigos naturais em presas sentinelas no agrossistema algodoeiro em função do inseticida recomendado |
author |
MACHADO, Anderson Vinnicius de Arruda |
author_facet |
MACHADO, Anderson Vinnicius de Arruda |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
TORRES, Jorge Braz |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
TORRES, Christian Sherley Araújo da Silva |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
BARBOSA, Paulo Roberto Ramos |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
TORRES, Christian Sherley Araújo da Silva |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9673024022810693 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
MACHADO, Anderson Vinnicius de Arruda |
contributor_str_mv |
TORRES, Jorge Braz TORRES, Christian Sherley Araújo da Silva BARBOSA, Paulo Roberto Ramos TORRES, Christian Sherley Araújo da Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Algodão Controle de praga Inseticida Inseticida seletivo |
topic |
Algodão Controle de praga Inseticida Inseticida seletivo FITOSSANIDADE::ENTOMOLOGIA AGRICOLA |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
FITOSSANIDADE::ENTOMOLOGIA AGRICOLA |
description |
Cotton ecosystem in Brazil hosts an array species of herbivores. Some of these regularly reach population densities requiring curative control decisions. Nonethless, a large diversity of natural is associated with these herbivores and brings contribution to the integrated pest management (IPM). To furnish the cotton IPM is recommended the use of selective insecticides, but few data show how this decision bring benefits relative to the action of conserved natural enemies. Thus, the impact of recommending selective and non-selective insecticides against cotton pests on the action of naturally occurring natural enemies was measured: (i) using sentinel prey set up in the field; and (ii) impact of dried residues of field recommended insecticides on survival of four key predatory insects representing different feeding habits and prey attacked (Chrysoperla externa, Eriopis connexa, Orius insidiosus and Podisus nigrispinus). The mortality of the sentinel prey itens was higher in the field under selective recommendation relative to the non-selective, and most of time, similar to the untreated fields. Further, non-selective insecticides maintained the impact between spray decisions depending on the insecticide recommended and time between sprays. Seasonal abundance of predatory insects from cotton plants was 2x greater in the fields under selective and non-spray decisions, despite the variation observed across the 15 weeks surveyed. The survival of assayed predators exposed to the dried insecticide residues within the intervals 0, 5, 10 and 15 days after spray supports the field outcome. The selective insecticides pymetrozin, chlorantraniliprole, pyripoxifen and cyantraniliprole promoted greater predator survival relative to the non-selectives lambda-cyhalothrin, malathion, dimethoate and thiamethoxam. In general, among the non-selective insecticides, malathion and dimethoate exhibited shorter residual compared to the thiamethoxam and lambda+thiamethoxam. Therefore, we can conclude that the recommendation of selective insecticides brings benefits for cotton IPM by conserving the action of the natural enemy community in the local. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-25T15:07:04Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2019-02-28 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
MACHADO, Anderson Vinnicius de Arruda. Ação de inimigos naturais em presas sentinelas no agrossistema algodoeiro em função do inseticida recomendado. 2019. 72 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia Agrícola) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8368 |
identifier_str_mv |
MACHADO, Anderson Vinnicius de Arruda. Ação de inimigos naturais em presas sentinelas no agrossistema algodoeiro em função do inseticida recomendado. 2019. 72 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia Agrícola) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife. |
url |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8368 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
1292500575037930971 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-6800553879972229205 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
1908015300823841400 |
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv |
2075167498588264571 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia Agrícola |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFRPE |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Agronomia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) instacron:UFRPE |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
instacron_str |
UFRPE |
institution |
UFRPE |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8368/2/Anderson+Vinnicius+de+Arruda+Machado.pdf http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8368/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
a3699f3999a2be81b7b1b32635464a9f bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.br |
_version_ |
1810102262371975168 |