Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbians

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima,Kaline da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Tenório,Juliana Maria Vieira, Romário,Francisco, Melo,Luã Medeiros Fernandes de, Andrade,Josemberg Moura de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Psico-USF (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-82712019000400673
Resumo: Abstract The goal of this research was to adapt and obtain validity evidence of the Modern Homonegativity Scale (MHS), which is set by two parallel forms with 12 items, one of them referring to gays (MHS-G) and the other referring to lesbians (MHS-L). In the first study 418 heterosexuals between 18 and 58 years old (M = 24,9; SD = 7,23), mostly women (66,3%) living at João Pessoa-PB (50,5%) answered. Both scales have shown as unidimensional and containing a high degree of internal consistency. The second study had the participation of 273 heterosexuals between 18 and 55 years old (M = 23,7; SD = 6,33), mostly women (69%). The confirmatory factor analysis showed satisfactory adjustment indexes for the proposed model and the Item Response Theory (IRT) demonstrated a good degree of discrimination and variation of the difficulty parameters. Therefore, we may conclude MHS is psychometrically valid, easily applicable and can be used in research contexts.
id USF-1_f94cb44c377657f0abe26e0d4d7b0f0b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-82712019000400673
network_acronym_str USF-1
network_name_str Psico-USF (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbiansstatistical validityhomosexualityprejudicepsychometryAbstract The goal of this research was to adapt and obtain validity evidence of the Modern Homonegativity Scale (MHS), which is set by two parallel forms with 12 items, one of them referring to gays (MHS-G) and the other referring to lesbians (MHS-L). In the first study 418 heterosexuals between 18 and 58 years old (M = 24,9; SD = 7,23), mostly women (66,3%) living at João Pessoa-PB (50,5%) answered. Both scales have shown as unidimensional and containing a high degree of internal consistency. The second study had the participation of 273 heterosexuals between 18 and 55 years old (M = 23,7; SD = 6,33), mostly women (69%). The confirmatory factor analysis showed satisfactory adjustment indexes for the proposed model and the Item Response Theory (IRT) demonstrated a good degree of discrimination and variation of the difficulty parameters. Therefore, we may conclude MHS is psychometrically valid, easily applicable and can be used in research contexts.Universidade de São Francisco, Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Psicologia2019-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-82712019000400673Psico-USF v.24 n.4 2019reponame:Psico-USF (Online)instname:Universidade São Francisco (USF)instacron:USF10.1590/1413-82712019240406info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima,Kaline da SilvaTenório,Juliana Maria VieiraRomário,FranciscoMelo,Luã Medeiros Fernandes deAndrade,Josemberg Moura deeng2019-11-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-82712019000400673Revistahttp://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1413-8271&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpedusf@saofrancisco.edu.br1413-82712175-3563opendoar:2019-11-28T00:00Psico-USF (Online) - Universidade São Francisco (USF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbians
title Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbians
spellingShingle Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbians
Lima,Kaline da Silva
statistical validity
homosexuality
prejudice
psychometry
title_short Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbians
title_full Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbians
title_fullStr Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbians
title_full_unstemmed Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbians
title_sort Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbians
author Lima,Kaline da Silva
author_facet Lima,Kaline da Silva
Tenório,Juliana Maria Vieira
Romário,Francisco
Melo,Luã Medeiros Fernandes de
Andrade,Josemberg Moura de
author_role author
author2 Tenório,Juliana Maria Vieira
Romário,Francisco
Melo,Luã Medeiros Fernandes de
Andrade,Josemberg Moura de
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima,Kaline da Silva
Tenório,Juliana Maria Vieira
Romário,Francisco
Melo,Luã Medeiros Fernandes de
Andrade,Josemberg Moura de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv statistical validity
homosexuality
prejudice
psychometry
topic statistical validity
homosexuality
prejudice
psychometry
description Abstract The goal of this research was to adapt and obtain validity evidence of the Modern Homonegativity Scale (MHS), which is set by two parallel forms with 12 items, one of them referring to gays (MHS-G) and the other referring to lesbians (MHS-L). In the first study 418 heterosexuals between 18 and 58 years old (M = 24,9; SD = 7,23), mostly women (66,3%) living at João Pessoa-PB (50,5%) answered. Both scales have shown as unidimensional and containing a high degree of internal consistency. The second study had the participation of 273 heterosexuals between 18 and 55 years old (M = 23,7; SD = 6,33), mostly women (69%). The confirmatory factor analysis showed satisfactory adjustment indexes for the proposed model and the Item Response Theory (IRT) demonstrated a good degree of discrimination and variation of the difficulty parameters. Therefore, we may conclude MHS is psychometrically valid, easily applicable and can be used in research contexts.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-82712019000400673
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-82712019000400673
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1413-82712019240406
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Francisco, Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Psicologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Francisco, Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Psicologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psico-USF v.24 n.4 2019
reponame:Psico-USF (Online)
instname:Universidade São Francisco (USF)
instacron:USF
instname_str Universidade São Francisco (USF)
instacron_str USF
institution USF
reponame_str Psico-USF (Online)
collection Psico-USF (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psico-USF (Online) - Universidade São Francisco (USF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edusf@saofrancisco.edu.br
_version_ 1748937788726706176