Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbians
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Psico-USF (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-82712019000400673 |
Resumo: | Abstract The goal of this research was to adapt and obtain validity evidence of the Modern Homonegativity Scale (MHS), which is set by two parallel forms with 12 items, one of them referring to gays (MHS-G) and the other referring to lesbians (MHS-L). In the first study 418 heterosexuals between 18 and 58 years old (M = 24,9; SD = 7,23), mostly women (66,3%) living at João Pessoa-PB (50,5%) answered. Both scales have shown as unidimensional and containing a high degree of internal consistency. The second study had the participation of 273 heterosexuals between 18 and 55 years old (M = 23,7; SD = 6,33), mostly women (69%). The confirmatory factor analysis showed satisfactory adjustment indexes for the proposed model and the Item Response Theory (IRT) demonstrated a good degree of discrimination and variation of the difficulty parameters. Therefore, we may conclude MHS is psychometrically valid, easily applicable and can be used in research contexts. |
id |
USF-1_f94cb44c377657f0abe26e0d4d7b0f0b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1413-82712019000400673 |
network_acronym_str |
USF-1 |
network_name_str |
Psico-USF (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbiansstatistical validityhomosexualityprejudicepsychometryAbstract The goal of this research was to adapt and obtain validity evidence of the Modern Homonegativity Scale (MHS), which is set by two parallel forms with 12 items, one of them referring to gays (MHS-G) and the other referring to lesbians (MHS-L). In the first study 418 heterosexuals between 18 and 58 years old (M = 24,9; SD = 7,23), mostly women (66,3%) living at João Pessoa-PB (50,5%) answered. Both scales have shown as unidimensional and containing a high degree of internal consistency. The second study had the participation of 273 heterosexuals between 18 and 55 years old (M = 23,7; SD = 6,33), mostly women (69%). The confirmatory factor analysis showed satisfactory adjustment indexes for the proposed model and the Item Response Theory (IRT) demonstrated a good degree of discrimination and variation of the difficulty parameters. Therefore, we may conclude MHS is psychometrically valid, easily applicable and can be used in research contexts.Universidade de São Francisco, Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Psicologia2019-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-82712019000400673Psico-USF v.24 n.4 2019reponame:Psico-USF (Online)instname:Universidade São Francisco (USF)instacron:USF10.1590/1413-82712019240406info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima,Kaline da SilvaTenório,Juliana Maria VieiraRomário,FranciscoMelo,Luã Medeiros Fernandes deAndrade,Josemberg Moura deeng2019-11-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-82712019000400673Revistahttp://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1413-8271&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpedusf@saofrancisco.edu.br1413-82712175-3563opendoar:2019-11-28T00:00Psico-USF (Online) - Universidade São Francisco (USF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbians |
title |
Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbians |
spellingShingle |
Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbians Lima,Kaline da Silva statistical validity homosexuality prejudice psychometry |
title_short |
Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbians |
title_full |
Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbians |
title_fullStr |
Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbians |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbians |
title_sort |
Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbians |
author |
Lima,Kaline da Silva |
author_facet |
Lima,Kaline da Silva Tenório,Juliana Maria Vieira Romário,Francisco Melo,Luã Medeiros Fernandes de Andrade,Josemberg Moura de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tenório,Juliana Maria Vieira Romário,Francisco Melo,Luã Medeiros Fernandes de Andrade,Josemberg Moura de |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima,Kaline da Silva Tenório,Juliana Maria Vieira Romário,Francisco Melo,Luã Medeiros Fernandes de Andrade,Josemberg Moura de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
statistical validity homosexuality prejudice psychometry |
topic |
statistical validity homosexuality prejudice psychometry |
description |
Abstract The goal of this research was to adapt and obtain validity evidence of the Modern Homonegativity Scale (MHS), which is set by two parallel forms with 12 items, one of them referring to gays (MHS-G) and the other referring to lesbians (MHS-L). In the first study 418 heterosexuals between 18 and 58 years old (M = 24,9; SD = 7,23), mostly women (66,3%) living at João Pessoa-PB (50,5%) answered. Both scales have shown as unidimensional and containing a high degree of internal consistency. The second study had the participation of 273 heterosexuals between 18 and 55 years old (M = 23,7; SD = 6,33), mostly women (69%). The confirmatory factor analysis showed satisfactory adjustment indexes for the proposed model and the Item Response Theory (IRT) demonstrated a good degree of discrimination and variation of the difficulty parameters. Therefore, we may conclude MHS is psychometrically valid, easily applicable and can be used in research contexts. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-82712019000400673 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-82712019000400673 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1413-82712019240406 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Francisco, Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Psicologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Francisco, Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Psicologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Psico-USF v.24 n.4 2019 reponame:Psico-USF (Online) instname:Universidade São Francisco (USF) instacron:USF |
instname_str |
Universidade São Francisco (USF) |
instacron_str |
USF |
institution |
USF |
reponame_str |
Psico-USF (Online) |
collection |
Psico-USF (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Psico-USF (Online) - Universidade São Francisco (USF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edusf@saofrancisco.edu.br |
_version_ |
1748937788726706176 |