Advances and setbacks in the implementation of the Develop Rights institute in Belo Horizonte

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Magalhães de Almeida, Reginaldo
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Lamego Balbino Nizza, Juliana, Isaac Fernandes, Lucas
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: arq.urb
Texto Completo: https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/52
Resumo: Brazilian metropolises increasingly require legal and urban tools capable of promoting fairer urban development and not only for select social groups. Numerous instruments have been implemented, being of great importance for urban planning policies and in order to provide more effective public actions. Among the legal instruments available and present in Urban Law, we highlight the Solo Criado, which allows the owner of a building to build above the construction coefficients allowed for a given land, provided there are counterparts, which must, according to the City Statute, be used to achieve the goals of a city for all. The article proposes to evaluate the path of implementation of Solo Criado in Belo Horizonte, from the 1990s to the present day. In this sense, it is sought to identify if the ends intended by the public power are being effectively achieved and are being applied correctly, without possible deviations. At the end, it is concluded that, among others, the difficulties of the implementation of the Solo Criado in Belo Horizonte are due to the inefficiency of public power and the adverse pressures of the real estate market, which considers it as another tax and private enterprises
id USJT_02c799d6f391da36a36024b2d551c4c4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/52
network_acronym_str USJT
network_name_str arq.urb
repository_id_str
spelling Advances and setbacks in the implementation of the Develop Rights institute in Belo HorizonteAvanços e retrocessos da trajetória de implementação do instituto do Solo Criado em Belo HorizonteSolo criadoOutorga Onerosa do Direito de ConstruirEstatuto da CidadeDevelop RigthsOnerous Grant of the Right to BuildUrbanistic lawLegal and urbanistic instrumentsEstatuto da CidadeBrazilian metropolises increasingly require legal and urban tools capable of promoting fairer urban development and not only for select social groups. Numerous instruments have been implemented, being of great importance for urban planning policies and in order to provide more effective public actions. Among the legal instruments available and present in Urban Law, we highlight the Solo Criado, which allows the owner of a building to build above the construction coefficients allowed for a given land, provided there are counterparts, which must, according to the City Statute, be used to achieve the goals of a city for all. The article proposes to evaluate the path of implementation of Solo Criado in Belo Horizonte, from the 1990s to the present day. In this sense, it is sought to identify if the ends intended by the public power are being effectively achieved and are being applied correctly, without possible deviations. At the end, it is concluded that, among others, the difficulties of the implementation of the Solo Criado in Belo Horizonte are due to the inefficiency of public power and the adverse pressures of the real estate market, which considers it as another tax and private enterprisesAs metrópoles brasileiras exigem cada vez mais instrumentos jurídicos e urbanísticos capazes de favorecer um desenvolvimento urbano mais justo e não apenas para seletos grupos sociais. Inúmeros instrumentos vêm sendo implantados, sendo de grande importância para as políticas de planejamento urbano e afim de proporcionar ações públicas mais eficazes. Dentre os instrumentos jurídicos disponíveis e presentes no Direito Urbanístico, destaca-se o Solo Criado, que permite ao proprietário de um imóvel construir acima dos coeficientes construtivos permitidos para determinado terreno, desde que existam contrapartidas, que devem, segundo o Estatuto da Cidade, ser utilizadas para atingir os objetivos de uma cidade para todos. O artigo propõe avaliar a trajetória de implementação do Solo Criado em Belo Horizonte, da década de 1990 até os dias atuais. Nesse sentido, pretende-se identificar se os fins pretendidos pelo poder público estão sendo efetivamente alcançados e se estão sendo aplicados de forma correta, sem possíveis desvios. Ao final, conclui-se que, dentre outras, as dificuldades de efetivação do instrumento do Solo Criado em Belo Horizonte, devem-se à ineficiência do poder público e às pressões adversas do mercado imobiliário, que o considera como mais um instrumento tributário e de oneração dos empreendimentos privados.Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo2019-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/5210.37916/arq.urb.vi24.52arq.urb; No. 24 (2019): jan. - abr.; 60-78arq.urb; Núm. 24 (2019): jan. - abr.; 60-78arq.urb; n. 24 (2019): jan. - abr.; 60-781984-5766reponame:arq.urbinstname:Universidade São Judas Tadeuinstacron:USJTporhttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/52/53Magalhães de Almeida, Reginaldo Lamego Balbino Nizza, Juliana Isaac Fernandes, Lucas info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-03-26T19:30:27Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/52Revistahttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurbPRIhttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/oairevista.arq.urb@saojudas.br||1984-57661984-5766opendoar:2021-03-26T19:30:27arq.urb - Universidade São Judas Tadeufalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Advances and setbacks in the implementation of the Develop Rights institute in Belo Horizonte
Avanços e retrocessos da trajetória de implementação do instituto do Solo Criado em Belo Horizonte
title Advances and setbacks in the implementation of the Develop Rights institute in Belo Horizonte
spellingShingle Advances and setbacks in the implementation of the Develop Rights institute in Belo Horizonte
Magalhães de Almeida, Reginaldo
Solo criado
Outorga Onerosa do Direito de Construir
Estatuto da Cidade
Develop Rigths
Onerous Grant of the Right to Build
Urbanistic law
Legal and urbanistic instruments
Estatuto da Cidade
title_short Advances and setbacks in the implementation of the Develop Rights institute in Belo Horizonte
title_full Advances and setbacks in the implementation of the Develop Rights institute in Belo Horizonte
title_fullStr Advances and setbacks in the implementation of the Develop Rights institute in Belo Horizonte
title_full_unstemmed Advances and setbacks in the implementation of the Develop Rights institute in Belo Horizonte
title_sort Advances and setbacks in the implementation of the Develop Rights institute in Belo Horizonte
author Magalhães de Almeida, Reginaldo
author_facet Magalhães de Almeida, Reginaldo
Lamego Balbino Nizza, Juliana
Isaac Fernandes, Lucas
author_role author
author2 Lamego Balbino Nizza, Juliana
Isaac Fernandes, Lucas
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Magalhães de Almeida, Reginaldo
Lamego Balbino Nizza, Juliana
Isaac Fernandes, Lucas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Solo criado
Outorga Onerosa do Direito de Construir
Estatuto da Cidade
Develop Rigths
Onerous Grant of the Right to Build
Urbanistic law
Legal and urbanistic instruments
Estatuto da Cidade
topic Solo criado
Outorga Onerosa do Direito de Construir
Estatuto da Cidade
Develop Rigths
Onerous Grant of the Right to Build
Urbanistic law
Legal and urbanistic instruments
Estatuto da Cidade
description Brazilian metropolises increasingly require legal and urban tools capable of promoting fairer urban development and not only for select social groups. Numerous instruments have been implemented, being of great importance for urban planning policies and in order to provide more effective public actions. Among the legal instruments available and present in Urban Law, we highlight the Solo Criado, which allows the owner of a building to build above the construction coefficients allowed for a given land, provided there are counterparts, which must, according to the City Statute, be used to achieve the goals of a city for all. The article proposes to evaluate the path of implementation of Solo Criado in Belo Horizonte, from the 1990s to the present day. In this sense, it is sought to identify if the ends intended by the public power are being effectively achieved and are being applied correctly, without possible deviations. At the end, it is concluded that, among others, the difficulties of the implementation of the Solo Criado in Belo Horizonte are due to the inefficiency of public power and the adverse pressures of the real estate market, which considers it as another tax and private enterprises
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/52
10.37916/arq.urb.vi24.52
url https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/52
identifier_str_mv 10.37916/arq.urb.vi24.52
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/52/53
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv arq.urb; No. 24 (2019): jan. - abr.; 60-78
arq.urb; Núm. 24 (2019): jan. - abr.; 60-78
arq.urb; n. 24 (2019): jan. - abr.; 60-78
1984-5766
reponame:arq.urb
instname:Universidade São Judas Tadeu
instacron:USJT
instname_str Universidade São Judas Tadeu
instacron_str USJT
institution USJT
reponame_str arq.urb
collection arq.urb
repository.name.fl_str_mv arq.urb - Universidade São Judas Tadeu
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.arq.urb@saojudas.br||
_version_ 1809730427267579904