Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in Mexico

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ochoa Vega, Alejandro
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Caballero Lazzeri, Carlos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: arq.urb
Texto Completo: https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/291
Resumo: It is not common that two monumental architectural works are facing each other, and exemplify much of what we think is desirable or downright reprehensible. Analyze the Soumaya, by Fernando Romero, and Jumex Museum, by David Chiperffield, museums interested because both manifest different ways of conceiving and realizing architecture. Therefore, while the first, as organic architecture, demonstrates an excessive interest in form, the second as classical architecture shows that it is possible to balance the outside with proper and refined work indoors where the central task of a museum appears: display art. We hope that this first approximation, standing to continue reviewing and agreeing the factors and elements that really matter.
id USJT_7b3735811ea740793b98efee5e4746b7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/291
network_acronym_str USJT
network_name_str arq.urb
repository_id_str
spelling Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in MexicoDe perfecciones y percepciones. Dos museos recientes de la ciudad de MéxicoArchitectureContemporaryCriticismPerceptionPerfectionMuseumArquitecturaContemporáneoCríticaPercepciónPerfecciónMuseoIt is not common that two monumental architectural works are facing each other, and exemplify much of what we think is desirable or downright reprehensible. Analyze the Soumaya, by Fernando Romero, and Jumex Museum, by David Chiperffield, museums interested because both manifest different ways of conceiving and realizing architecture. Therefore, while the first, as organic architecture, demonstrates an excessive interest in form, the second as classical architecture shows that it is possible to balance the outside with proper and refined work indoors where the central task of a museum appears: display art. We hope that this first approximation, standing to continue reviewing and agreeing the factors and elements that really matter.No es frecuente que dos obras de arquitectura monumentales estén frente a frente y además ejemplifiquen mucho de lo que nos parece deseable o francamente condenable. Analizar los museos Soumaya, de Fernando Romero, y Museo Jumex, de David Chiperffield, interesa en cuanto ambos manifiestan formas diferenciadas de concebir y materializar la arquitectura. Así, mientras la primera, como arquitectura orgánica, evidencia un interés desmesurado por la forma, la segunda, como arquitectura clásica, demuestra que es posible equilibrar el exterior con el adecuado y refinado trabajo de los espacios interiores donde se cumple la función central de todo museo: exhibir arte. Confiamos en que esta primera aproximación de pie a seguir revisando y consensuando los factores y elementos que de verdad importan.Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo2014-07-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/291arq.urb; No. 12 (2014): jul. - dez.; 148-165arq.urb; Núm. 12 (2014): jul. - dez.; 148-165arq.urb; n. 12 (2014): jul. - dez.; 148-1651984-5766reponame:arq.urbinstname:Universidade São Judas Tadeuinstacron:USJTspahttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/291/266Copyright (c) 2014 Alejandro Ochoa Vega, Carlos Caballero Lazzerihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOchoa Vega, Alejandro Caballero Lazzeri, Carlos 2021-03-26T19:31:35Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/291Revistahttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurbhttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/oairevista.arq.urb@saojudas.br||1984-57661984-5766opendoar:2021-03-26T19:31:35arq.urb - Universidade São Judas Tadeufalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in Mexico
De perfecciones y percepciones. Dos museos recientes de la ciudad de México
title Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in Mexico
spellingShingle Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in Mexico
Ochoa Vega, Alejandro
Architecture
Contemporary
Criticism
Perception
Perfection
Museum
Arquitectura
Contemporáneo
Crítica
Percepción
Perfección
Museo
title_short Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in Mexico
title_full Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in Mexico
title_fullStr Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in Mexico
title_full_unstemmed Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in Mexico
title_sort Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in Mexico
author Ochoa Vega, Alejandro
author_facet Ochoa Vega, Alejandro
Caballero Lazzeri, Carlos
author_role author
author2 Caballero Lazzeri, Carlos
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ochoa Vega, Alejandro
Caballero Lazzeri, Carlos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Architecture
Contemporary
Criticism
Perception
Perfection
Museum
Arquitectura
Contemporáneo
Crítica
Percepción
Perfección
Museo
topic Architecture
Contemporary
Criticism
Perception
Perfection
Museum
Arquitectura
Contemporáneo
Crítica
Percepción
Perfección
Museo
description It is not common that two monumental architectural works are facing each other, and exemplify much of what we think is desirable or downright reprehensible. Analyze the Soumaya, by Fernando Romero, and Jumex Museum, by David Chiperffield, museums interested because both manifest different ways of conceiving and realizing architecture. Therefore, while the first, as organic architecture, demonstrates an excessive interest in form, the second as classical architecture shows that it is possible to balance the outside with proper and refined work indoors where the central task of a museum appears: display art. We hope that this first approximation, standing to continue reviewing and agreeing the factors and elements that really matter.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-07-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/291
url https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/291
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/291/266
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Alejandro Ochoa Vega, Carlos Caballero Lazzeri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Alejandro Ochoa Vega, Carlos Caballero Lazzeri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv arq.urb; No. 12 (2014): jul. - dez.; 148-165
arq.urb; Núm. 12 (2014): jul. - dez.; 148-165
arq.urb; n. 12 (2014): jul. - dez.; 148-165
1984-5766
reponame:arq.urb
instname:Universidade São Judas Tadeu
instacron:USJT
instname_str Universidade São Judas Tadeu
instacron_str USJT
institution USJT
reponame_str arq.urb
collection arq.urb
repository.name.fl_str_mv arq.urb - Universidade São Judas Tadeu
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.arq.urb@saojudas.br||
_version_ 1797067631107244032