Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in Mexico
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | arq.urb |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/291 |
Resumo: | It is not common that two monumental architectural works are facing each other, and exemplify much of what we think is desirable or downright reprehensible. Analyze the Soumaya, by Fernando Romero, and Jumex Museum, by David Chiperffield, museums interested because both manifest different ways of conceiving and realizing architecture. Therefore, while the first, as organic architecture, demonstrates an excessive interest in form, the second as classical architecture shows that it is possible to balance the outside with proper and refined work indoors where the central task of a museum appears: display art. We hope that this first approximation, standing to continue reviewing and agreeing the factors and elements that really matter. |
id |
USJT_7b3735811ea740793b98efee5e4746b7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/291 |
network_acronym_str |
USJT |
network_name_str |
arq.urb |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in MexicoDe perfecciones y percepciones. Dos museos recientes de la ciudad de MéxicoArchitectureContemporaryCriticismPerceptionPerfectionMuseumArquitecturaContemporáneoCríticaPercepciónPerfecciónMuseoIt is not common that two monumental architectural works are facing each other, and exemplify much of what we think is desirable or downright reprehensible. Analyze the Soumaya, by Fernando Romero, and Jumex Museum, by David Chiperffield, museums interested because both manifest different ways of conceiving and realizing architecture. Therefore, while the first, as organic architecture, demonstrates an excessive interest in form, the second as classical architecture shows that it is possible to balance the outside with proper and refined work indoors where the central task of a museum appears: display art. We hope that this first approximation, standing to continue reviewing and agreeing the factors and elements that really matter.No es frecuente que dos obras de arquitectura monumentales estén frente a frente y además ejemplifiquen mucho de lo que nos parece deseable o francamente condenable. Analizar los museos Soumaya, de Fernando Romero, y Museo Jumex, de David Chiperffield, interesa en cuanto ambos manifiestan formas diferenciadas de concebir y materializar la arquitectura. Así, mientras la primera, como arquitectura orgánica, evidencia un interés desmesurado por la forma, la segunda, como arquitectura clásica, demuestra que es posible equilibrar el exterior con el adecuado y refinado trabajo de los espacios interiores donde se cumple la función central de todo museo: exhibir arte. Confiamos en que esta primera aproximación de pie a seguir revisando y consensuando los factores y elementos que de verdad importan.Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo2014-07-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/291arq.urb; No. 12 (2014): jul. - dez.; 148-165arq.urb; Núm. 12 (2014): jul. - dez.; 148-165arq.urb; n. 12 (2014): jul. - dez.; 148-1651984-5766reponame:arq.urbinstname:Universidade São Judas Tadeuinstacron:USJTspahttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/291/266Copyright (c) 2014 Alejandro Ochoa Vega, Carlos Caballero Lazzerihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOchoa Vega, Alejandro Caballero Lazzeri, Carlos 2021-03-26T19:31:35Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/291Revistahttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurbhttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/oairevista.arq.urb@saojudas.br||1984-57661984-5766opendoar:2021-03-26T19:31:35arq.urb - Universidade São Judas Tadeufalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in Mexico De perfecciones y percepciones. Dos museos recientes de la ciudad de México |
title |
Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in Mexico |
spellingShingle |
Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in Mexico Ochoa Vega, Alejandro Architecture Contemporary Criticism Perception Perfection Museum Arquitectura Contemporáneo Crítica Percepción Perfección Museo |
title_short |
Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in Mexico |
title_full |
Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in Mexico |
title_fullStr |
Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in Mexico |
title_full_unstemmed |
Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in Mexico |
title_sort |
Perfections and perceptions. Recent museums in Mexico |
author |
Ochoa Vega, Alejandro |
author_facet |
Ochoa Vega, Alejandro Caballero Lazzeri, Carlos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Caballero Lazzeri, Carlos |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ochoa Vega, Alejandro Caballero Lazzeri, Carlos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Architecture Contemporary Criticism Perception Perfection Museum Arquitectura Contemporáneo Crítica Percepción Perfección Museo |
topic |
Architecture Contemporary Criticism Perception Perfection Museum Arquitectura Contemporáneo Crítica Percepción Perfección Museo |
description |
It is not common that two monumental architectural works are facing each other, and exemplify much of what we think is desirable or downright reprehensible. Analyze the Soumaya, by Fernando Romero, and Jumex Museum, by David Chiperffield, museums interested because both manifest different ways of conceiving and realizing architecture. Therefore, while the first, as organic architecture, demonstrates an excessive interest in form, the second as classical architecture shows that it is possible to balance the outside with proper and refined work indoors where the central task of a museum appears: display art. We hope that this first approximation, standing to continue reviewing and agreeing the factors and elements that really matter. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-07-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/291 |
url |
https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/291 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/291/266 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 Alejandro Ochoa Vega, Carlos Caballero Lazzeri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 Alejandro Ochoa Vega, Carlos Caballero Lazzeri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
arq.urb; No. 12 (2014): jul. - dez.; 148-165 arq.urb; Núm. 12 (2014): jul. - dez.; 148-165 arq.urb; n. 12 (2014): jul. - dez.; 148-165 1984-5766 reponame:arq.urb instname:Universidade São Judas Tadeu instacron:USJT |
instname_str |
Universidade São Judas Tadeu |
instacron_str |
USJT |
institution |
USJT |
reponame_str |
arq.urb |
collection |
arq.urb |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
arq.urb - Universidade São Judas Tadeu |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.arq.urb@saojudas.br|| |
_version_ |
1797067631107244032 |