Architecture, Radical Criticism and Revolution in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | arq.urb |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/484 |
Resumo: | Since the 1950s, it became a national commonplace to remark the misery of architectural criticism in Brazil, as if the international magnetism of local modern architecture would have blocked any possibility to evade either apologetic or admonitory perspectives. This article aims at sketching a genealogy of radical architectural criticism in the country by connecting a few intellectual and political challenges to the emergence, development and decline (or persistence) of modern architecture among us. In order to do so, I will return to two different critical projects: first, the writings on architecture by art critic Mario Pedrosa (1900-1981), whom, in the 1950s and 60s, was in search of a cultural framework to modern architecture in Brazil; secondly, a more professionally committed discourse raised from the 1960s to the 1970s by architect Sergio Ferro (1938-) to whom the socio-technical role of design should be tested in face of Brasilian material modernization. By doing so, I hope to be able to touch some of the contemporary critical dilemmas in face of the discipline, its history and its intellectual and political topicality. |
id |
USJT_9815dab824ffff31502e9c185bc649b6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/484 |
network_acronym_str |
USJT |
network_name_str |
arq.urb |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Architecture, Radical Criticism and Revolution in BrazilArquitetura, Crítica Radical e Revolução no BrasilMário PedrosaSérgio FerroModernidadeCríticaMário PedrosaSérgio FerroModernityCriticismSince the 1950s, it became a national commonplace to remark the misery of architectural criticism in Brazil, as if the international magnetism of local modern architecture would have blocked any possibility to evade either apologetic or admonitory perspectives. This article aims at sketching a genealogy of radical architectural criticism in the country by connecting a few intellectual and political challenges to the emergence, development and decline (or persistence) of modern architecture among us. In order to do so, I will return to two different critical projects: first, the writings on architecture by art critic Mario Pedrosa (1900-1981), whom, in the 1950s and 60s, was in search of a cultural framework to modern architecture in Brazil; secondly, a more professionally committed discourse raised from the 1960s to the 1970s by architect Sergio Ferro (1938-) to whom the socio-technical role of design should be tested in face of Brasilian material modernization. By doing so, I hope to be able to touch some of the contemporary critical dilemmas in face of the discipline, its history and its intellectual and political topicality.Desde os anos 1950, tornou-se um lugar-comum nacional assinalar a miséria da crítica arquitetônica no Brasil, como se o magnetismo internacional da arquitetura moderna local tivesse bloqueado qualquer possibilidade de escapar de perspectivas ora apologéticas, ora de censura. Este artigo tem como objetivo traçar uma genealogia da crítica arquitetônica radical no Brasil, conectando alguns desafios intelectuais e políticos ao surgimento, desenvolvimento e declínio (ou persistência) da arquitetura moderna entre nós. Para tanto, retornarei a dois projetos críticos distintos: primeiro, os escritos sobre arquitetura do crítico de arte Mário Pedrosa (1900-1981), que, nas décadas de 1950 e 1960, buscava compreender o lastro cultural da arquitetura moderna no Brasil; em segundo lugar, um discurso mais comprometido profissionalmente, levantado entre os anos 1960 e 1970 pelo arquiteto Sérgio Ferro (1938-), para quem o papel sociotécnico do projeto deveria ser testado diante da modernização material brasileira. Ao fazer isso, espero poder tocar alguns dos dilemas críticos contemporâneos em face da disciplina, sua história e sua atualidade intelectual e política.Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo2020-12-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/48410.37916/arq.urb.vi29.484arq.urb; No. 29 (2020): set. - dez.; 20-30arq.urb; Núm. 29 (2020): set. - dez.; 20-30arq.urb; n. 29 (2020): set. - dez.; 20-301984-5766reponame:arq.urbinstname:Universidade São Judas Tadeuinstacron:USJTporenghttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/484/399https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/484/400Copyright (c) 2020 José T. C. Lirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Lira, José Tavares Correia de2021-12-06T19:57:32Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/484Revistahttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurbPRIhttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/oairevista.arq.urb@saojudas.br||1984-57661984-5766opendoar:2021-12-06T19:57:32arq.urb - Universidade São Judas Tadeufalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Architecture, Radical Criticism and Revolution in Brazil Arquitetura, Crítica Radical e Revolução no Brasil |
title |
Architecture, Radical Criticism and Revolution in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Architecture, Radical Criticism and Revolution in Brazil Lira, José Tavares Correia de Mário Pedrosa Sérgio Ferro Modernidade Crítica Mário Pedrosa Sérgio Ferro Modernity Criticism |
title_short |
Architecture, Radical Criticism and Revolution in Brazil |
title_full |
Architecture, Radical Criticism and Revolution in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Architecture, Radical Criticism and Revolution in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Architecture, Radical Criticism and Revolution in Brazil |
title_sort |
Architecture, Radical Criticism and Revolution in Brazil |
author |
Lira, José Tavares Correia de |
author_facet |
Lira, José Tavares Correia de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lira, José Tavares Correia de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Mário Pedrosa Sérgio Ferro Modernidade Crítica Mário Pedrosa Sérgio Ferro Modernity Criticism |
topic |
Mário Pedrosa Sérgio Ferro Modernidade Crítica Mário Pedrosa Sérgio Ferro Modernity Criticism |
description |
Since the 1950s, it became a national commonplace to remark the misery of architectural criticism in Brazil, as if the international magnetism of local modern architecture would have blocked any possibility to evade either apologetic or admonitory perspectives. This article aims at sketching a genealogy of radical architectural criticism in the country by connecting a few intellectual and political challenges to the emergence, development and decline (or persistence) of modern architecture among us. In order to do so, I will return to two different critical projects: first, the writings on architecture by art critic Mario Pedrosa (1900-1981), whom, in the 1950s and 60s, was in search of a cultural framework to modern architecture in Brazil; secondly, a more professionally committed discourse raised from the 1960s to the 1970s by architect Sergio Ferro (1938-) to whom the socio-technical role of design should be tested in face of Brasilian material modernization. By doing so, I hope to be able to touch some of the contemporary critical dilemmas in face of the discipline, its history and its intellectual and political topicality. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/484 10.37916/arq.urb.vi29.484 |
url |
https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/484 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.37916/arq.urb.vi29.484 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/484/399 https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/484/400 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 José T. C. Lira https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 José T. C. Lira https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
arq.urb; No. 29 (2020): set. - dez.; 20-30 arq.urb; Núm. 29 (2020): set. - dez.; 20-30 arq.urb; n. 29 (2020): set. - dez.; 20-30 1984-5766 reponame:arq.urb instname:Universidade São Judas Tadeu instacron:USJT |
instname_str |
Universidade São Judas Tadeu |
instacron_str |
USJT |
institution |
USJT |
reponame_str |
arq.urb |
collection |
arq.urb |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
arq.urb - Universidade São Judas Tadeu |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.arq.urb@saojudas.br|| |
_version_ |
1809730428731392000 |