Specific conditions to help orient experts to characterize work disability caused by epilepsy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Braga, Ludmila Candida
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Gianvecchio, Victor Alexandre Percínio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Saúde, Ética & Justiça (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/sej/article/view/100094
Resumo: BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a public health problem and an important cause of work disability in Brazil and worldwide and is a condition of interest for medical assessment. OBJECTIVE: To describe what conditions should be considered to help orient experts to characterize work disability caused by epilepsy. METHODS: Literature review. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The term diagnosis of epilepsy in itself is not synonymous with work disability. Most cases have a good prognosis with control, in which there is continued work capability. However, work disability can result from this condition and, in general, is related to somatic or psychological implications, psychiatric comorbidities, side effects of antiepileptic drugs and whenever there is risk to workers’ health and/or other people. Factors related to disability are the following: frequent seizures, seizures with loss of consciousness, seizures of sudden onset without triggering factors, seizures in wakefulness, non-adherence to treatment, alcoholism or drug abuse, structural, metabolic or unknown causes of epilepsy, epilepsy resistant to treatment. Other aspects may indicate disease severity, but they should be considered in medical assessment in relation to the following: monitoring referral service, inclusion in programs for special drugs dispensation, complementary tests indication, indication of neuropsychological assessment, polytherapy in high doses, frequent interactions, persistently altered EEG, surgical treatment. All medications analyzed in this review may trigger potential side effects, especially those relating to cognitive and behavioral functions. The results of additional tests should be analyzed in association with symptoms and there are no findings or specific outcomes that are synonymous with work incapacity. Authors tend to characterize the incompatibility of certain occupations or labor situations with epilepsy, even when the disease is controlled. They are as follows: occupations involving activities with risks individuals themselves and others: airline pilots, train conductors, firemen, police officers, operators of hazardous machinery and instruments, solitary guards, swimming instructors and lifeguards, babysitters, nurses, surgeons, professional drivers, military, people responsible for providing care to disabled people, people working at heights or using stairs, near water, with exposure to high voltage electrical circuits, moving vehicles, underground or in contact with fire, furnaces and stoves. CONCLUSIONS: There are specific conditions that should be considered to help orient experts in characterizing work disability caused by epilepsy. Technical training, individualized evaluation, careful and detailed assessment all serve to guide expert judgment that is strongly supported by scientific knowledge, thereby achieving the goal of medical assessment: to see that justice is done.
id USP - 64_50ffabfa4d800ac38a3a943c37c6846d
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/100094
network_acronym_str USP - 64
network_name_str Saúde, Ética & Justiça (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Specific conditions to help orient experts to characterize work disability caused by epilepsyCondições norteadoras para caracterização de incapacidade laborativa por epilepsiaPessoas com deficiênciaEpilepsiaAvaliação da capacidade de trabalhoProva pericial.Disabled personsEpilepsyWork capacity evaluationExpert testimony.BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a public health problem and an important cause of work disability in Brazil and worldwide and is a condition of interest for medical assessment. OBJECTIVE: To describe what conditions should be considered to help orient experts to characterize work disability caused by epilepsy. METHODS: Literature review. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The term diagnosis of epilepsy in itself is not synonymous with work disability. Most cases have a good prognosis with control, in which there is continued work capability. However, work disability can result from this condition and, in general, is related to somatic or psychological implications, psychiatric comorbidities, side effects of antiepileptic drugs and whenever there is risk to workers’ health and/or other people. Factors related to disability are the following: frequent seizures, seizures with loss of consciousness, seizures of sudden onset without triggering factors, seizures in wakefulness, non-adherence to treatment, alcoholism or drug abuse, structural, metabolic or unknown causes of epilepsy, epilepsy resistant to treatment. Other aspects may indicate disease severity, but they should be considered in medical assessment in relation to the following: monitoring referral service, inclusion in programs for special drugs dispensation, complementary tests indication, indication of neuropsychological assessment, polytherapy in high doses, frequent interactions, persistently altered EEG, surgical treatment. All medications analyzed in this review may trigger potential side effects, especially those relating to cognitive and behavioral functions. The results of additional tests should be analyzed in association with symptoms and there are no findings or specific outcomes that are synonymous with work incapacity. Authors tend to characterize the incompatibility of certain occupations or labor situations with epilepsy, even when the disease is controlled. They are as follows: occupations involving activities with risks individuals themselves and others: airline pilots, train conductors, firemen, police officers, operators of hazardous machinery and instruments, solitary guards, swimming instructors and lifeguards, babysitters, nurses, surgeons, professional drivers, military, people responsible for providing care to disabled people, people working at heights or using stairs, near water, with exposure to high voltage electrical circuits, moving vehicles, underground or in contact with fire, furnaces and stoves. CONCLUSIONS: There are specific conditions that should be considered to help orient experts in characterizing work disability caused by epilepsy. Technical training, individualized evaluation, careful and detailed assessment all serve to guide expert judgment that is strongly supported by scientific knowledge, thereby achieving the goal of medical assessment: to see that justice is done.A epilepsia é problema de Saúde Pública e importante causa de incapacidade laborativa no Brasil e no mundo, sendo condição de interesse no contexto médico-pericial. OBJETIVO: Descrever condições nor­teadoras para caracterização de incapacidade laborativa por epilepsia. MATERIAL E MÉTODO: Revisão de literatura. RESULTADOS E DISCUSSÃO: O diagnóstico de epilepsia por si só não é sinônimo de incapacidade. Grande parte dos casos tem bom prognóstico com controle do quadro e preservação da capacidade laborativa. Entretanto, incapacidade laborativa pode advir dessa condição e, em geral, relaciona-se às suas repercussões somáticas ou psíquicas, comorbidades psiquiátricas, efeitos colaterais das drogas antiepiléticas e quando se verifica risco à saúde do trabalhador e/ou a terceiros. São fatores que favorecem a presença de incapacidade: crises frequentes, crises com perda de consciência, crises de início súbito, crises sem fatores desencadeantes, crises em vigília, não adesão ao tratamento, alcoolismo ou uso de outras drogas, epilepsia de causas estruturais, metabólicas ou desconhecidas, epilepsia refratária a tratamento. Outros aspectos podem sinalizar gravidade da doença, mas sua utilização na avaliação pericial deve ser relativizada: acompanhamento em serviço de referência, inclusão em programas de dispensação de medicamentos especiais, realização de exames complementares diferenciados, indicação de avaliação neuropsicológica, politerapia em altas doses, interações frequentes, eletroencefa­lograma persistentemente alterado, indicação de tratamento cirúrgico. Todos os medicamentos analisados nesta revisão podem desencadear efeitos potencialmente incapacitantes, com destaque para os relativos às funções cognitivas e comporta­mentais. Os resultados de exames complementares devem ser analisados à luz da clínica do periciando e não há achados ou resultados específicos que sejam sinônimo de incapacidade laborativa. Os autores tendem a caracterizar incompatibilidade entre algumas ocupações ou situações específicas no trabalho e epilepsia, mesmo quando esta se encontra controlada. São elas: profissões que envolvam atividades com riscos para si e para terceiros, tais quais piloto de avião, maquinista de trem, bombeiros, policiais, operadores de instrumentos e máquinas perigosas, vigias solitários, instrutor de natação e salva-vidas, babás, profissionais de enfermagem, cirurgiões, motoristas profissionais, militares, pessoas responsáveis por prestar cuida­dos a indivíduos vulneráveis, trabalho em altura ou com uso de escadas, próximo de água, com exposição a alta voltagem e circuitos elétricos abertos, próximo ou sobre veículos em movimento, subterrâneo, em contato com fogo, fornos e fogões. CONCLUSÕES: Existem pontos norteadores para caracterização da incapacidade laborativa por epilepsia. Preparo técni­co, avaliação individualizada, atenta e detalhada pelo perito favorecem a produção de prova técnica fortemente sustentada por conhecimento científico, alcançando-se assim o objetivo da perícia médica que é se fazer justiça.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Legal, Ética Médica e Medicina do Trabalho.2014-12-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionART.application/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sej/article/view/10009410.11606/issn.2317-2770.v19i2p67-77Saúde Ética & Justiça ; v. 19 n. 2 (2014); 67-772317-2770reponame:Saúde, Ética & Justiça (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sej/article/view/100094/98770Copyright (c) 2015 Saúde, Ética & Justiçainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBraga, Ludmila CandidaGianvecchio, Victor Alexandre Percínio2016-02-03T15:49:23Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/100094Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sej/indexPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sej/oairevistasej@fm.usp.br||2317-27701414-218Xopendoar:2016-02-03T15:49:23Saúde, Ética & Justiça (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Specific conditions to help orient experts to characterize work disability caused by epilepsy
Condições norteadoras para caracterização de incapacidade laborativa por epilepsia
title Specific conditions to help orient experts to characterize work disability caused by epilepsy
spellingShingle Specific conditions to help orient experts to characterize work disability caused by epilepsy
Braga, Ludmila Candida
Pessoas com deficiência
Epilepsia
Avaliação da capacidade de trabalho
Prova pericial.
Disabled persons
Epilepsy
Work capacity evaluation
Expert testimony.
title_short Specific conditions to help orient experts to characterize work disability caused by epilepsy
title_full Specific conditions to help orient experts to characterize work disability caused by epilepsy
title_fullStr Specific conditions to help orient experts to characterize work disability caused by epilepsy
title_full_unstemmed Specific conditions to help orient experts to characterize work disability caused by epilepsy
title_sort Specific conditions to help orient experts to characterize work disability caused by epilepsy
author Braga, Ludmila Candida
author_facet Braga, Ludmila Candida
Gianvecchio, Victor Alexandre Percínio
author_role author
author2 Gianvecchio, Victor Alexandre Percínio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Braga, Ludmila Candida
Gianvecchio, Victor Alexandre Percínio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pessoas com deficiência
Epilepsia
Avaliação da capacidade de trabalho
Prova pericial.
Disabled persons
Epilepsy
Work capacity evaluation
Expert testimony.
topic Pessoas com deficiência
Epilepsia
Avaliação da capacidade de trabalho
Prova pericial.
Disabled persons
Epilepsy
Work capacity evaluation
Expert testimony.
description BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a public health problem and an important cause of work disability in Brazil and worldwide and is a condition of interest for medical assessment. OBJECTIVE: To describe what conditions should be considered to help orient experts to characterize work disability caused by epilepsy. METHODS: Literature review. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The term diagnosis of epilepsy in itself is not synonymous with work disability. Most cases have a good prognosis with control, in which there is continued work capability. However, work disability can result from this condition and, in general, is related to somatic or psychological implications, psychiatric comorbidities, side effects of antiepileptic drugs and whenever there is risk to workers’ health and/or other people. Factors related to disability are the following: frequent seizures, seizures with loss of consciousness, seizures of sudden onset without triggering factors, seizures in wakefulness, non-adherence to treatment, alcoholism or drug abuse, structural, metabolic or unknown causes of epilepsy, epilepsy resistant to treatment. Other aspects may indicate disease severity, but they should be considered in medical assessment in relation to the following: monitoring referral service, inclusion in programs for special drugs dispensation, complementary tests indication, indication of neuropsychological assessment, polytherapy in high doses, frequent interactions, persistently altered EEG, surgical treatment. All medications analyzed in this review may trigger potential side effects, especially those relating to cognitive and behavioral functions. The results of additional tests should be analyzed in association with symptoms and there are no findings or specific outcomes that are synonymous with work incapacity. Authors tend to characterize the incompatibility of certain occupations or labor situations with epilepsy, even when the disease is controlled. They are as follows: occupations involving activities with risks individuals themselves and others: airline pilots, train conductors, firemen, police officers, operators of hazardous machinery and instruments, solitary guards, swimming instructors and lifeguards, babysitters, nurses, surgeons, professional drivers, military, people responsible for providing care to disabled people, people working at heights or using stairs, near water, with exposure to high voltage electrical circuits, moving vehicles, underground or in contact with fire, furnaces and stoves. CONCLUSIONS: There are specific conditions that should be considered to help orient experts in characterizing work disability caused by epilepsy. Technical training, individualized evaluation, careful and detailed assessment all serve to guide expert judgment that is strongly supported by scientific knowledge, thereby achieving the goal of medical assessment: to see that justice is done.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
ART.
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sej/article/view/100094
10.11606/issn.2317-2770.v19i2p67-77
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/sej/article/view/100094
identifier_str_mv 10.11606/issn.2317-2770.v19i2p67-77
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sej/article/view/100094/98770
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Saúde, Ética & Justiça
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Saúde, Ética & Justiça
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Legal, Ética Médica e Medicina do Trabalho.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Legal, Ética Médica e Medicina do Trabalho.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Saúde Ética & Justiça ; v. 19 n. 2 (2014); 67-77
2317-2770
reponame:Saúde, Ética & Justiça (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Saúde, Ética & Justiça (Online)
collection Saúde, Ética & Justiça (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Saúde, Ética & Justiça (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistasej@fm.usp.br||
_version_ 1797053621459746816