Tensões epistemológicas na Bibliografia e na Documentação: os diferentes olhares de Otlet e Ranganathan

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Amorim, Igor Soares
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Sales, Rodrigo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: InCID
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/incid/article/view/183145
Resumo: The epistemological understanding of Bibliography and Documentation presents different perspectives regarding their natures. Seen both as activities and as disciplines, Bibliography and Documentation were approached in different ways by important thinkers in the informational field, especially by Otlet and Ranganathan. In this context, we present a study that aimed to investigate the understanding that Otlet and Ranganathan had of Bibliography and Documentation and how they both related them to Library Science. From a methodological point of view, a comparative analysis was carried out between Otlet's Traité de Documentation (1934) and Ranganathan's Social Bibliography or Physical Bibliography for Librarians (1952) and Documentation: Genesis and Development (1973). The results showed that, for Otlet, Bibliography and Documentation were different stages of an evolutionary scientific movement that had moved from a procedural dimension to a methodological-scientific dimension, disconnecting from Library Science and entering the so-called Bibliology. Ranganathan believed Documentation was a set of activities analogous to cataloging and reference service (library activities) whereas Bibliography, endowed with greater scientificity than Documentation, was focused on bibliographic production and its role in social communication, also supported by Library Science. We conclude that Otlet's emancipatory speech made way for the establishment of a document science (Documentation), while Ranganathan's speech gave scientific authority to Library Science in order to deal with both Documentation and Bibliography.
id USP-15_bfb3cd1d59594394d55ccadab3e8a6ef
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/183145
network_acronym_str USP-15
network_name_str InCID
repository_id_str
spelling Tensões epistemológicas na Bibliografia e na Documentação: os diferentes olhares de Otlet e RanganathanEpistemological tensions in Bibliography and Documentation: the different views of Otlet and RanganathanBibliographyDocumentationOtletRanganathanLibrary ScienceBibliografiaDocumentaçãoOtletRanganathanBiblioteconomiaThe epistemological understanding of Bibliography and Documentation presents different perspectives regarding their natures. Seen both as activities and as disciplines, Bibliography and Documentation were approached in different ways by important thinkers in the informational field, especially by Otlet and Ranganathan. In this context, we present a study that aimed to investigate the understanding that Otlet and Ranganathan had of Bibliography and Documentation and how they both related them to Library Science. From a methodological point of view, a comparative analysis was carried out between Otlet's Traité de Documentation (1934) and Ranganathan's Social Bibliography or Physical Bibliography for Librarians (1952) and Documentation: Genesis and Development (1973). The results showed that, for Otlet, Bibliography and Documentation were different stages of an evolutionary scientific movement that had moved from a procedural dimension to a methodological-scientific dimension, disconnecting from Library Science and entering the so-called Bibliology. Ranganathan believed Documentation was a set of activities analogous to cataloging and reference service (library activities) whereas Bibliography, endowed with greater scientificity than Documentation, was focused on bibliographic production and its role in social communication, also supported by Library Science. We conclude that Otlet's emancipatory speech made way for the establishment of a document science (Documentation), while Ranganathan's speech gave scientific authority to Library Science in order to deal with both Documentation and Bibliography.A compreensão epistemológica a respeito da Bibliografia e da Documentação apresenta perspectivas distintas quanto à natureza das mesmas. Vistas concomitantemente como atividades e como disciplinas, Bibliografia e Documentação foram abordadas de formas diferentes por importantes pensadores do campo informacional, especialmente por Otlet e Ranganathan. Neste contexto, apresentamos um estudo que teve por objetivo investigar a compreensão que Otlet e Ranganathan tiveram a respeito da Bibliografia e da Documentação e como ambos as relacionaram com a Biblioteconomia. Do ponto de vista metodológico, foi realizada uma análise comparativa entre as obras Traité de Documentation (1934), de Otlet, e os livros Social Bibliography or Phisical Bibliography for Librarians (1952) e Documentation: Genesis and Development (1973), de Ranganathan. Os resultados apontaram que, para Otlet, Bibliografia e Documentação eram diferentes estágios de um movimento científico evolutivo que avançara de uma dimensão processual para uma dimensão metodológico-científica, desligando-se da Biblioteconomia e se inserindo na chamada Bibliologia. Para Ranganathan, a Documentação era um conjunto de atividades análogas à catalogação e ao serviço de referência (atividades biblioteconômicas) e a Bibliografia, dotada de maior cientificidade que a Documentação, estava voltada à produção bibliográfica e seu papel na comunicação social, alicerçada também pela Biblioteconomia. Concluímos que o discurso emancipatório de Otlet abriu espaço para a instauração de uma ciência do documento (Documentação), ao passo que o discurso de Ranganathan conferiu autoridade científica à Biblioteconomia para lidar tanto com a Documentação quanto com a Bibliografia.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto2021-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/incid/article/view/18314510.11606/issn.2178-2075.v12i2p4-31InCID: Revista de Ciência da Informação e Documentação; v. 12 n. 2 (2021); 4-312178-2075reponame:InCIDinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/incid/article/view/183145/177590Copyright (c) 2021 InCID: Revista de Ciência da Informação e Documentaçãohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAmorim, Igor SoaresSales, Rodrigo 2021-11-30T14:53:27ZRevistahttp://revistas.ffclrp.usp.br/incidPUB
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Tensões epistemológicas na Bibliografia e na Documentação: os diferentes olhares de Otlet e Ranganathan
Epistemological tensions in Bibliography and Documentation: the different views of Otlet and Ranganathan
title Tensões epistemológicas na Bibliografia e na Documentação: os diferentes olhares de Otlet e Ranganathan
spellingShingle Tensões epistemológicas na Bibliografia e na Documentação: os diferentes olhares de Otlet e Ranganathan
Amorim, Igor Soares
Bibliography
Documentation
Otlet
Ranganathan
Library Science
Bibliografia
Documentação
Otlet
Ranganathan
Biblioteconomia
title_short Tensões epistemológicas na Bibliografia e na Documentação: os diferentes olhares de Otlet e Ranganathan
title_full Tensões epistemológicas na Bibliografia e na Documentação: os diferentes olhares de Otlet e Ranganathan
title_fullStr Tensões epistemológicas na Bibliografia e na Documentação: os diferentes olhares de Otlet e Ranganathan
title_full_unstemmed Tensões epistemológicas na Bibliografia e na Documentação: os diferentes olhares de Otlet e Ranganathan
title_sort Tensões epistemológicas na Bibliografia e na Documentação: os diferentes olhares de Otlet e Ranganathan
author Amorim, Igor Soares
author_facet Amorim, Igor Soares
Sales, Rodrigo
author_role author
author2 Sales, Rodrigo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Amorim, Igor Soares
Sales, Rodrigo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bibliography
Documentation
Otlet
Ranganathan
Library Science
Bibliografia
Documentação
Otlet
Ranganathan
Biblioteconomia
topic Bibliography
Documentation
Otlet
Ranganathan
Library Science
Bibliografia
Documentação
Otlet
Ranganathan
Biblioteconomia
description The epistemological understanding of Bibliography and Documentation presents different perspectives regarding their natures. Seen both as activities and as disciplines, Bibliography and Documentation were approached in different ways by important thinkers in the informational field, especially by Otlet and Ranganathan. In this context, we present a study that aimed to investigate the understanding that Otlet and Ranganathan had of Bibliography and Documentation and how they both related them to Library Science. From a methodological point of view, a comparative analysis was carried out between Otlet's Traité de Documentation (1934) and Ranganathan's Social Bibliography or Physical Bibliography for Librarians (1952) and Documentation: Genesis and Development (1973). The results showed that, for Otlet, Bibliography and Documentation were different stages of an evolutionary scientific movement that had moved from a procedural dimension to a methodological-scientific dimension, disconnecting from Library Science and entering the so-called Bibliology. Ranganathan believed Documentation was a set of activities analogous to cataloging and reference service (library activities) whereas Bibliography, endowed with greater scientificity than Documentation, was focused on bibliographic production and its role in social communication, also supported by Library Science. We conclude that Otlet's emancipatory speech made way for the establishment of a document science (Documentation), while Ranganathan's speech gave scientific authority to Library Science in order to deal with both Documentation and Bibliography.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/incid/article/view/183145
10.11606/issn.2178-2075.v12i2p4-31
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/incid/article/view/183145
identifier_str_mv 10.11606/issn.2178-2075.v12i2p4-31
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/incid/article/view/183145/177590
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 InCID: Revista de Ciência da Informação e Documentação
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 InCID: Revista de Ciência da Informação e Documentação
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv InCID: Revista de Ciência da Informação e Documentação; v. 12 n. 2 (2021); 4-31
2178-2075
reponame:InCID
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str InCID
collection InCID
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1787713839602597888

Registros relacionados