Irreversibilidad y pluralismo ontológico
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Scientiae Studia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11107 |
Resumo: | The problem of irreversibility finds its roots at the end of 19th century and the beginning of 20th century with the works of Maxwell, Boltzmann and Gibbs. The controversy arises when trying to make compatible the irreversible macroscopic evolution of thermodynamics systems with t-invariant dynamics of its microscopic components. In the traditional approach of statistical mechanics, the irreversible evolution is explained by introducing a coarse grain on the underlying microscopic dynamics. For this reason, it is generally accepted that statistical mechanics offers a subjective description of irreversibility. The purpose of this work is to reject the traditional approaches of the problem by stressing that its only foundation is the implicit adoption of metaphysical realism that adjudges ontological priority to the microscopic world. We will argue that the problem can be addressed on the basis of an ontological pluralism of kantian roots, inspired by Putnam's internalist realism. From this philosophical framework, macroscopic irreversibility is an objective property that has not need to be explained in microscopic terms to acquire ontological legitimacy: the coarse grain is the relationship between two equally objective descriptions. |
id |
USP-16_0946549d274dd6e9f53449552a582cb5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/11107 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-16 |
network_name_str |
Scientiae Studia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Irreversibilidad y pluralismo ontológico Irreversibility and ontological pluralism IrreversibilidadMecánica estadísticaGibbsPluralismo ontológicoGrano gruesoIrreversibilityStatistical mechanicsGibbsOntological pluralismCoarse grain The problem of irreversibility finds its roots at the end of 19th century and the beginning of 20th century with the works of Maxwell, Boltzmann and Gibbs. The controversy arises when trying to make compatible the irreversible macroscopic evolution of thermodynamics systems with t-invariant dynamics of its microscopic components. In the traditional approach of statistical mechanics, the irreversible evolution is explained by introducing a coarse grain on the underlying microscopic dynamics. For this reason, it is generally accepted that statistical mechanics offers a subjective description of irreversibility. The purpose of this work is to reject the traditional approaches of the problem by stressing that its only foundation is the implicit adoption of metaphysical realism that adjudges ontological priority to the microscopic world. We will argue that the problem can be addressed on the basis of an ontological pluralism of kantian roots, inspired by Putnam's internalist realism. From this philosophical framework, macroscopic irreversibility is an objective property that has not need to be explained in microscopic terms to acquire ontological legitimacy: the coarse grain is the relationship between two equally objective descriptions. El problema de la irreversibilidad encuentra su origen a fines del siglo xix y comienzos del siglo xx con los trabajos de Maxwell, Boltzmann y Gibbs. La controversia surge al intentar compatibilizar la evolución macroscópica irreversible de los sistemas termodinámicos con la dinámica t-invariante de sus constituyentes microscópicos. En la formulación tradicional de la mecánica estadística, la evolución irreversible se explica mediante la introducción de un grano grueso sobre la dinámica microscópica subyacente. Por este motivo, suele considerarse que la mecánica estadística sólo brinda una descripción subjetiva o meramente gnoseológica de la irreversibilidad. El propósito del presente trabajo consiste en impugnar las interpretaciones tradicionales de la irreversibilidad, poniendo de manifiesto que su único fundamento es la implícita adopción de un realismo metafísico que adjudica prioridad ontológica al mundo microscópico. Argumentaremos que las dificultades se disuelven cuando el problema es abordado sobre la base de un pluralismo ontológico de raíces kantianas, inspirado en el realismo internalista de Putnam. Desde esta perspectiva filosófica, la irreversibilidad macroscópica es una propiedad objetiva que no necesita ser explicada en términos microscópicos para adquirir legitimidad ontológica: el grano grueso que vincula ambas evoluciones no es más que la relación entre dos descripciones igualmente objetivas. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas2007-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/1110710.1590/S1678-31662007000200002Scientiae Studia; v. 5 n. 2 (2007); 139-167Scientiae Studia; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2007); 139-167Scientiae Studia; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2007); 139-1672316-89941678-3166reponame:Scientiae Studia (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPspahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11107/12875Labarca, MartínLombardi, Olimpiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-09-08T11:02:44Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/11107Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1678-3166&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/oaiariconda@usp.br2316-89941678-3166opendoar:2014-09-08T11:02:44Scientiae Studia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Irreversibilidad y pluralismo ontológico Irreversibility and ontological pluralism |
title |
Irreversibilidad y pluralismo ontológico |
spellingShingle |
Irreversibilidad y pluralismo ontológico Labarca, Martín Irreversibilidad Mecánica estadística Gibbs Pluralismo ontológico Grano grueso Irreversibility Statistical mechanics Gibbs Ontological pluralism Coarse grain |
title_short |
Irreversibilidad y pluralismo ontológico |
title_full |
Irreversibilidad y pluralismo ontológico |
title_fullStr |
Irreversibilidad y pluralismo ontológico |
title_full_unstemmed |
Irreversibilidad y pluralismo ontológico |
title_sort |
Irreversibilidad y pluralismo ontológico |
author |
Labarca, Martín |
author_facet |
Labarca, Martín Lombardi, Olimpia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lombardi, Olimpia |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Labarca, Martín Lombardi, Olimpia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Irreversibilidad Mecánica estadística Gibbs Pluralismo ontológico Grano grueso Irreversibility Statistical mechanics Gibbs Ontological pluralism Coarse grain |
topic |
Irreversibilidad Mecánica estadística Gibbs Pluralismo ontológico Grano grueso Irreversibility Statistical mechanics Gibbs Ontological pluralism Coarse grain |
description |
The problem of irreversibility finds its roots at the end of 19th century and the beginning of 20th century with the works of Maxwell, Boltzmann and Gibbs. The controversy arises when trying to make compatible the irreversible macroscopic evolution of thermodynamics systems with t-invariant dynamics of its microscopic components. In the traditional approach of statistical mechanics, the irreversible evolution is explained by introducing a coarse grain on the underlying microscopic dynamics. For this reason, it is generally accepted that statistical mechanics offers a subjective description of irreversibility. The purpose of this work is to reject the traditional approaches of the problem by stressing that its only foundation is the implicit adoption of metaphysical realism that adjudges ontological priority to the microscopic world. We will argue that the problem can be addressed on the basis of an ontological pluralism of kantian roots, inspired by Putnam's internalist realism. From this philosophical framework, macroscopic irreversibility is an objective property that has not need to be explained in microscopic terms to acquire ontological legitimacy: the coarse grain is the relationship between two equally objective descriptions. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11107 10.1590/S1678-31662007000200002 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11107 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1678-31662007000200002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11107/12875 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientiae Studia; v. 5 n. 2 (2007); 139-167 Scientiae Studia; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2007); 139-167 Scientiae Studia; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2007); 139-167 2316-8994 1678-3166 reponame:Scientiae Studia (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Scientiae Studia (Online) |
collection |
Scientiae Studia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientiae Studia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ariconda@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222735763243008 |