Epigénesis y preformacionismo: radiografía de una antinomía inconclusa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: VECCHI, Davide
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: HERNÁNDEZ, Isaac
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Scientiae Studia (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/106110
Resumo: The process of development of the embryo has inspired philosophical speculation since the advent of Western thought. Since the time of Aristotle two antithetical conceptual models have traditionally been used to understand embryogenesis: either form or structure is preformed in the embryo or it is newly formed with each generation. Our aim in this article is to show that the contrast between the pre-formationist and epigenetic positions persists despite the formidable theoretical and experimental advances of contemporary developmental biology. Pre-formationism and epigenesis have constantly refined their positions in the course of history in order to answer the conceptual challenges of each epoch. This process of continuous transformation has resulted in a partial convergence of the two positions. However, we shall argue that, despite the partial successes of this process of continuous convergence, one of the most fundamental antinomies in biology persists.
id USP-16_22d30d22d6f6340a65a71deda6db2bc3
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/106110
network_acronym_str USP-16
network_name_str Scientiae Studia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Epigénesis y preformacionismo: radiografía de una antinomía inconclusa Epigénesis y preformacionismo: radiografía de una antinomía inconclusa Epigenesis and pre-formationism: radiography of an inconclusive antinomy The process of development of the embryo has inspired philosophical speculation since the advent of Western thought. Since the time of Aristotle two antithetical conceptual models have traditionally been used to understand embryogenesis: either form or structure is preformed in the embryo or it is newly formed with each generation. Our aim in this article is to show that the contrast between the pre-formationist and epigenetic positions persists despite the formidable theoretical and experimental advances of contemporary developmental biology. Pre-formationism and epigenesis have constantly refined their positions in the course of history in order to answer the conceptual challenges of each epoch. This process of continuous transformation has resulted in a partial convergence of the two positions. However, we shall argue that, despite the partial successes of this process of continuous convergence, one of the most fundamental antinomies in biology persists. El desarrollo embriológico es un fenómeno que ha inspirado la especulación filosófica desde temprano en la historia del pensamiento. Desde los tiempos de Aristóteles dos modelos conceptuales antitéticos se han utilizado tradicionalmente para comprender la embriogénesis: o el embrión posee ya una forma o estructura, o ésta se forma de nuevo en cada generación. Nuestro objetivo en este artículo es mostrar que el contraste entre la posición preformacionista y epigenética persiste a pesar de los formidables avances teóricos y experimentales de la biología del desarrollo contemporánea. El preformacionismo y la epigénesis han perfeccionado constantemente sus posiciones en el curso de la historia con el fin de responder a los retos conceptuales de la época. Este continuo proceso de transformación ha dado lugar a una convergencia parcial entre las dos posiciones. Sin embargo, vamos a argumentar que, a pesar de los esfuerzos por conciliar ambas posturas, esta antinomia, que se erige como una de las más fundamentales de la biología, no será fácil de superar. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas2015-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/10611010.1590/S1678-31662015000300005Scientiae Studia; v. 13 n. 3 (2015); 577-597Scientiae Studia; Vol. 13 Núm. 3 (2015); 577-597Scientiae Studia; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2015); 577-5972316-89941678-3166reponame:Scientiae Studia (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPspahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/106110/104750Copyright (c) 2015 Scientiae Studiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVECCHI, DavideHERNÁNDEZ, Isaac2016-01-18T11:22:27Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/106110Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1678-3166&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/oaiariconda@usp.br2316-89941678-3166opendoar:2016-01-18T11:22:27Scientiae Studia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Epigénesis y preformacionismo: radiografía de una antinomía inconclusa
Epigénesis y preformacionismo: radiografía de una antinomía inconclusa
Epigenesis and pre-formationism: radiography of an inconclusive antinomy
title Epigénesis y preformacionismo: radiografía de una antinomía inconclusa
spellingShingle Epigénesis y preformacionismo: radiografía de una antinomía inconclusa
VECCHI, Davide
title_short Epigénesis y preformacionismo: radiografía de una antinomía inconclusa
title_full Epigénesis y preformacionismo: radiografía de una antinomía inconclusa
title_fullStr Epigénesis y preformacionismo: radiografía de una antinomía inconclusa
title_full_unstemmed Epigénesis y preformacionismo: radiografía de una antinomía inconclusa
title_sort Epigénesis y preformacionismo: radiografía de una antinomía inconclusa
author VECCHI, Davide
author_facet VECCHI, Davide
HERNÁNDEZ, Isaac
author_role author
author2 HERNÁNDEZ, Isaac
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv VECCHI, Davide
HERNÁNDEZ, Isaac
description The process of development of the embryo has inspired philosophical speculation since the advent of Western thought. Since the time of Aristotle two antithetical conceptual models have traditionally been used to understand embryogenesis: either form or structure is preformed in the embryo or it is newly formed with each generation. Our aim in this article is to show that the contrast between the pre-formationist and epigenetic positions persists despite the formidable theoretical and experimental advances of contemporary developmental biology. Pre-formationism and epigenesis have constantly refined their positions in the course of history in order to answer the conceptual challenges of each epoch. This process of continuous transformation has resulted in a partial convergence of the two positions. However, we shall argue that, despite the partial successes of this process of continuous convergence, one of the most fundamental antinomies in biology persists.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/106110
10.1590/S1678-31662015000300005
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/106110
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-31662015000300005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/106110/104750
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Scientiae Studia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Scientiae Studia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientiae Studia; v. 13 n. 3 (2015); 577-597
Scientiae Studia; Vol. 13 Núm. 3 (2015); 577-597
Scientiae Studia; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2015); 577-597
2316-8994
1678-3166
reponame:Scientiae Studia (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientiae Studia (Online)
collection Scientiae Studia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientiae Studia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ariconda@usp.br
_version_ 1800222737131634688