Formas de autonomia da ciência

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Marcos Barbosa de
Data de Publicação: 2011
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientiae Studia (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11231
Resumo: In the first part of this article, three forms that the autonomy of science has assumed in the course of its history are distinguished: the Galilean one, the Vannevarian one, and the neoliberal one. The Galilean form was claimed by Galileo in his conflict with the Catholic Church. The term "Vannevarian" comes from Vannevar Bush, responsible for the report, Science, the endless frontier, which played a crucial role in the configuration of scientific practices in the post World War II period. Vannevarian autonomy has to do with the directions of scientific research. Neoliberal autonomy consists in each scientist's freedom to search for funds for the research he intends to carry out from any source, public or private, in view only of his self-interest (intellectual or economic). In the second part of the article, the conceptual and historic frameworks provided by those distinctions are used to discuss the question: "what form of autonomy should be claimed by science today?" The procedure consists in determining, for each of the three forms, what should be maintained, and what should be abandoned. The conclusion arrived at is that neoliberal autonomy should be discarded, the Vannevarian one restricted, and the Galilean one preserved.
id USP-16_328987aed8526acc18bc86ae5c2082de
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/11231
network_acronym_str USP-16
network_name_str Scientiae Studia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Formas de autonomia da ciência Autonomia da ciênciaGalileuSerendipidadeNeoliberalismoMercantilizaçãoInovaçãoResponsabilidade social da ciênciaÉthos científicoMertonConflito de interessesAutonomy of scienceGalileoSerendipityNeoliberalismCommodificationInnovationSocial responsibility in scienceScientific éthosMertonConflict of interests In the first part of this article, three forms that the autonomy of science has assumed in the course of its history are distinguished: the Galilean one, the Vannevarian one, and the neoliberal one. The Galilean form was claimed by Galileo in his conflict with the Catholic Church. The term "Vannevarian" comes from Vannevar Bush, responsible for the report, Science, the endless frontier, which played a crucial role in the configuration of scientific practices in the post World War II period. Vannevarian autonomy has to do with the directions of scientific research. Neoliberal autonomy consists in each scientist's freedom to search for funds for the research he intends to carry out from any source, public or private, in view only of his self-interest (intellectual or economic). In the second part of the article, the conceptual and historic frameworks provided by those distinctions are used to discuss the question: "what form of autonomy should be claimed by science today?" The procedure consists in determining, for each of the three forms, what should be maintained, and what should be abandoned. The conclusion arrived at is that neoliberal autonomy should be discarded, the Vannevarian one restricted, and the Galilean one preserved. Na primeira parte deste ensaio, distinguimos três formas que a autonomia da ciência assume ao longo de sua história: a galileana, a vannevariana e a neoliberal. A galileana foi reivindicada por Galileu em seu conflito com a Igreja Católica. O termo "vannevariana" vem de Vannevar Bush, responsável pelo relatório Science, the endless frontier, que teve um papel fundamental na conformação das práticas científicas no período pós Segunda Guerra. A autonomia vannevariana diz respeito aos rumos da pesquisa científica. A autonomia neoliberal consiste na liberdade de cada cientista procurar financiamento para as pesquisas que deseja realizar em qualquer fonte, pública ou privada, tendo em vista apenas seu auto-interesse (intelectual e/ou econômico). Na segunda parte do ensaio, utilizamos o arcabouço conceitual e histórico proporcionado por essas distinções para discutir a questão: que forma de autonomia deve ser reivindicada pela ciência nos dias de hoje? O procedimento consiste em determinar, para cada uma das três formas, o que deve ser mantido e o que deve ser abandonado. A conclusão a que se chega é a de que a autonomia neoliberal deve ser descartada, a vannevariana restringida, e a galileana preservada. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/1123110.1590/S1678-31662011000300005Scientiae Studia; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2011); 527-561Scientiae Studia; Vol. 9 Núm. 3 (2011); 527-561Scientiae Studia; v. 9 n. 3 (2011); 527-5612316-89941678-3166reponame:Scientiae Studia (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11231/12999Oliveira, Marcos Barbosa deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-09-08T11:26:55Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/11231Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1678-3166&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/oaiariconda@usp.br2316-89941678-3166opendoar:2014-09-08T11:26:55Scientiae Studia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Formas de autonomia da ciência
title Formas de autonomia da ciência
spellingShingle Formas de autonomia da ciência
Oliveira, Marcos Barbosa de
Autonomia da ciência
Galileu
Serendipidade
Neoliberalismo
Mercantilização
Inovação
Responsabilidade social da ciência
Éthos científico
Merton
Conflito de interesses
Autonomy of science
Galileo
Serendipity
Neoliberalism
Commodification
Innovation
Social responsibility in science
Scientific éthos
Merton
Conflict of interests
title_short Formas de autonomia da ciência
title_full Formas de autonomia da ciência
title_fullStr Formas de autonomia da ciência
title_full_unstemmed Formas de autonomia da ciência
title_sort Formas de autonomia da ciência
author Oliveira, Marcos Barbosa de
author_facet Oliveira, Marcos Barbosa de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Marcos Barbosa de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Autonomia da ciência
Galileu
Serendipidade
Neoliberalismo
Mercantilização
Inovação
Responsabilidade social da ciência
Éthos científico
Merton
Conflito de interesses
Autonomy of science
Galileo
Serendipity
Neoliberalism
Commodification
Innovation
Social responsibility in science
Scientific éthos
Merton
Conflict of interests
topic Autonomia da ciência
Galileu
Serendipidade
Neoliberalismo
Mercantilização
Inovação
Responsabilidade social da ciência
Éthos científico
Merton
Conflito de interesses
Autonomy of science
Galileo
Serendipity
Neoliberalism
Commodification
Innovation
Social responsibility in science
Scientific éthos
Merton
Conflict of interests
description In the first part of this article, three forms that the autonomy of science has assumed in the course of its history are distinguished: the Galilean one, the Vannevarian one, and the neoliberal one. The Galilean form was claimed by Galileo in his conflict with the Catholic Church. The term "Vannevarian" comes from Vannevar Bush, responsible for the report, Science, the endless frontier, which played a crucial role in the configuration of scientific practices in the post World War II period. Vannevarian autonomy has to do with the directions of scientific research. Neoliberal autonomy consists in each scientist's freedom to search for funds for the research he intends to carry out from any source, public or private, in view only of his self-interest (intellectual or economic). In the second part of the article, the conceptual and historic frameworks provided by those distinctions are used to discuss the question: "what form of autonomy should be claimed by science today?" The procedure consists in determining, for each of the three forms, what should be maintained, and what should be abandoned. The conclusion arrived at is that neoliberal autonomy should be discarded, the Vannevarian one restricted, and the Galilean one preserved.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11231
10.1590/S1678-31662011000300005
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11231
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-31662011000300005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11231/12999
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientiae Studia; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2011); 527-561
Scientiae Studia; Vol. 9 Núm. 3 (2011); 527-561
Scientiae Studia; v. 9 n. 3 (2011); 527-561
2316-8994
1678-3166
reponame:Scientiae Studia (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientiae Studia (Online)
collection Scientiae Studia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientiae Studia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ariconda@usp.br
_version_ 1787713157579407360