The control of nature and the origins of the dichotomy between fact and value

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mariconda, Pablo Rubén
Data de Publicação: 2006
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientiae Studia (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11083
Resumo: My objective is to reflect on a distinction that is fundamental to the origin of a central aspect of current scientific practices. These practices, those which we are accustomed to call the practices of modern science, represent the development, and (as foreseen by Bacon in the New Atlantis) the complexification and specialization of a practice, a particular way of dealing with questions about nature, which arose and was consolidated in the 16th and 17th centuries. The articulation of this practice depended on the distinction between fact and value, which emerged in the first half of the 17th century in the works of Francis Bacon, Galileo Galilei, René Descartes and Blaise Pascal. I will show that the distinction between fact and value underlies the modern conception of the domination (control) of nature, a conception that, following subsequent developments, has ended up being taken to be a central value that orients scientific knowledge and technical/technological development.
id USP-16_7ccf7f71010e976805fd6a22104c967a
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/11083
network_acronym_str USP-16
network_name_str Scientiae Studia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The control of nature and the origins of the dichotomy between fact and value O controle da natureza e as origens da dicotomia entre fato e valor Dicotomia fato^i1^svaControle da naturezaCiência modernaFrancis BaconGalileu GalileiRené DescartesBlaise PascalDavid HumeFact^i2^svalue dichotControl of natureModern scienceFrancis BaconGalileo GalileiRené DescartesBlaise Pascalvid Hume My objective is to reflect on a distinction that is fundamental to the origin of a central aspect of current scientific practices. These practices, those which we are accustomed to call the practices of modern science, represent the development, and (as foreseen by Bacon in the New Atlantis) the complexification and specialization of a practice, a particular way of dealing with questions about nature, which arose and was consolidated in the 16th and 17th centuries. The articulation of this practice depended on the distinction between fact and value, which emerged in the first half of the 17th century in the works of Francis Bacon, Galileo Galilei, René Descartes and Blaise Pascal. I will show that the distinction between fact and value underlies the modern conception of the domination (control) of nature, a conception that, following subsequent developments, has ended up being taken to be a central value that orients scientific knowledge and technical/technological development. Meu objetivo será refletir sobre uma distinção que é fundamental para a origem de um aspecto central das práticas científicas atuais. Essas práticas, que costumamos chamar de práticas da ciência moderna, representam o desenvolvimento, a complexificação e a especialização (estas últimas já previstas por Bacon na utopia Nova Atlântida) de uma prática, de um modo particular de tratar das questões naturais, que surgiu e se consolidou nos séculos XVI e XVII. A articulação dessa prática depende da distinção entre fato e valor, elaborada na primeira metade do século XVII nos trabalhos de Francis Bacon, Galileu Galilei, René Descartes e Blaise Pascal. Como mostrarei, a distinção entre fato e valor está na raiz da concepção moderna de domínio (controle) da natureza, concepção que acabou sendo tomada, no desenvolvimento posterior, como um valor central que direciona o conhecimento científico e o desenvolvimento técnico/tecnológico. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas2006-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/1108310.1590/S1678-31662006000300006Scientiae Studia; Vol. 4 No. 3 (2006); 453-472Scientiae Studia; Vol. 4 Núm. 3 (2006); 453-472Scientiae Studia; v. 4 n. 3 (2006); 453-4722316-89941678-3166reponame:Scientiae Studia (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11083/12851Mariconda, Pablo Rubéninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-09-08T10:59:03Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/11083Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1678-3166&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/oaiariconda@usp.br2316-89941678-3166opendoar:2014-09-08T10:59:03Scientiae Studia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The control of nature and the origins of the dichotomy between fact and value
O controle da natureza e as origens da dicotomia entre fato e valor
title The control of nature and the origins of the dichotomy between fact and value
spellingShingle The control of nature and the origins of the dichotomy between fact and value
Mariconda, Pablo Rubén
Dicotomia fato^i1^sva
Controle da natureza
Ciência moderna
Francis Bacon
Galileu Galilei
René Descartes
Blaise Pascal
David Hume
Fact^i2^svalue dichot
Control of nature
Modern science
Francis Bacon
Galileo Galilei
René Descartes
Blaise Pascal
vid Hume
title_short The control of nature and the origins of the dichotomy between fact and value
title_full The control of nature and the origins of the dichotomy between fact and value
title_fullStr The control of nature and the origins of the dichotomy between fact and value
title_full_unstemmed The control of nature and the origins of the dichotomy between fact and value
title_sort The control of nature and the origins of the dichotomy between fact and value
author Mariconda, Pablo Rubén
author_facet Mariconda, Pablo Rubén
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mariconda, Pablo Rubén
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dicotomia fato^i1^sva
Controle da natureza
Ciência moderna
Francis Bacon
Galileu Galilei
René Descartes
Blaise Pascal
David Hume
Fact^i2^svalue dichot
Control of nature
Modern science
Francis Bacon
Galileo Galilei
René Descartes
Blaise Pascal
vid Hume
topic Dicotomia fato^i1^sva
Controle da natureza
Ciência moderna
Francis Bacon
Galileu Galilei
René Descartes
Blaise Pascal
David Hume
Fact^i2^svalue dichot
Control of nature
Modern science
Francis Bacon
Galileo Galilei
René Descartes
Blaise Pascal
vid Hume
description My objective is to reflect on a distinction that is fundamental to the origin of a central aspect of current scientific practices. These practices, those which we are accustomed to call the practices of modern science, represent the development, and (as foreseen by Bacon in the New Atlantis) the complexification and specialization of a practice, a particular way of dealing with questions about nature, which arose and was consolidated in the 16th and 17th centuries. The articulation of this practice depended on the distinction between fact and value, which emerged in the first half of the 17th century in the works of Francis Bacon, Galileo Galilei, René Descartes and Blaise Pascal. I will show that the distinction between fact and value underlies the modern conception of the domination (control) of nature, a conception that, following subsequent developments, has ended up being taken to be a central value that orients scientific knowledge and technical/technological development.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11083
10.1590/S1678-31662006000300006
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11083
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-31662006000300006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11083/12851
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientiae Studia; Vol. 4 No. 3 (2006); 453-472
Scientiae Studia; Vol. 4 Núm. 3 (2006); 453-472
Scientiae Studia; v. 4 n. 3 (2006); 453-472
2316-8994
1678-3166
reponame:Scientiae Studia (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientiae Studia (Online)
collection Scientiae Studia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientiae Studia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ariconda@usp.br
_version_ 1787713157099159552