Time is money: optimización, identidad y cultura laboral en la sociedad deseada

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Molina, Fernando Tula
Data de Publicação: 2008
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Scientiae Studia (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11142
Resumo: Is it possible to change the culture of optimization refered by the expression "Time is Money"? Given that it is not a natural relationship, and since there are other cultural modes of organizing time and work, it is certainly possible. But how to do it from within a culture marked by such an imprint? We must rethink our collective course, primarily with regard to the criterion of optimization in labor relations. This is where technological capabilities merge with the quantitative criteria of efficiency and a certain social organization. And from the exacerbation of such a relationship we gradually lose the social gains, the value of human relations, and the collective course. The extended labour day progressively consumes our vital capital: time. This may be strange in an era where new technologies allow to perform the same tasks in less time. But in the material culture of productivity this tends to for further work, work that in our capitalist societies only serves to concentrate the revenue. In this article I draw attention to two points to steer such relationships in a different way. (a) The notion of "implication" that leads to consider inadequate the new technologies evaluation and their potential risks in technical terms: we need also to consider the social risk related to social endings. (b) On the other hand, by the concept of "epimeleia" we arrive to the point that to participate in this social construction, we need to begin establishing and manifesting the values of our identity through a internal policy, the construction and defense of our identity.
id USP-16_a47debd6539e0cdfd4410026e3b238a1
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/11142
network_acronym_str USP-16
network_name_str Scientiae Studia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Time is money: optimización, identidad y cultura laboral en la sociedad deseada Política tecnocientíficaJornada laboralCultura del trabajoCultura de la optimizaciónTechnoscience policyLabor dayLabor cultureOptimization culture Is it possible to change the culture of optimization refered by the expression "Time is Money"? Given that it is not a natural relationship, and since there are other cultural modes of organizing time and work, it is certainly possible. But how to do it from within a culture marked by such an imprint? We must rethink our collective course, primarily with regard to the criterion of optimization in labor relations. This is where technological capabilities merge with the quantitative criteria of efficiency and a certain social organization. And from the exacerbation of such a relationship we gradually lose the social gains, the value of human relations, and the collective course. The extended labour day progressively consumes our vital capital: time. This may be strange in an era where new technologies allow to perform the same tasks in less time. But in the material culture of productivity this tends to for further work, work that in our capitalist societies only serves to concentrate the revenue. In this article I draw attention to two points to steer such relationships in a different way. (a) The notion of "implication" that leads to consider inadequate the new technologies evaluation and their potential risks in technical terms: we need also to consider the social risk related to social endings. (b) On the other hand, by the concept of "epimeleia" we arrive to the point that to participate in this social construction, we need to begin establishing and manifesting the values of our identity through a internal policy, the construction and defense of our identity. ¿Es posible modificar la cultura de la optimización contenida en la expresión Time is money? En tanto no es una relación natural, y en tanto existen otros modos culturales de organizar el tiempo y el trabajo, sin duda es posible. Pero ¿cómo hacerlo desde dentro de una cultura marcada por tal impronta? La sugerencia de este trabajo es que debemos repensar nuestro rumbo colectivo, fundamentalmente en cuanto al criterio de optimización que marca las relaciones laborales. Es aquí donde se amalgaman las capacidades tecnológicas, con los criterios cuantitativos de eficiencia y un determinado modo de organización social. Y es a partir de la exacerbación de tal relación que progresivamente se van perdiendo las conquistas sociales, el valor humano de las relaciones, y el rumbo colectivo como horizonte: las jornadas laborales ampliadas progresivamente consumen mayor cantidad de nuestro capital vital: el tiempo. Esta afirmación puede resultar extraña en una época donde las nuevas tecnologías permiten efectivamente realizar las mismas tareas en un tiempo menor. Pero, es aquí donde la cultura de la optimización lo reinvierte para realizar más trabajo; trabajo que en nuestras sociedades de base capitalista sólo contribuye a concentrar el rédito. En este artículo he tratado de señalar dos puntos con los que es posible comenzar a orientar tales relaciones con un sentido diferente: (a) La noción de "implicación" que conduce a considerar insuficientes las evaluaciones técnicas y cuantitativas de las nuevas tecnologías y sus riesgos posibles: es necesario reflexionar también sobre el riesgo social en función del rumbo deseado para la sociedad a futuro. (b) Por otro lado, por medio de la noción de epimeleia se concluye que, para participar políticamente en esta construcción social, precisamos comenzar por establecer y ejercer los valores de nuestra identidad a través de un proceso de política interior, de construcción subjetiva. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas2008-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/1114210.1590/S1678-31662008000300008Scientiae Studia; Vol. 6 No. 3 (2008); 389-408Scientiae Studia; Vol. 6 Núm. 3 (2008); 389-408Scientiae Studia; v. 6 n. 3 (2008); 389-4082316-89941678-3166reponame:Scientiae Studia (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPspahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11142/12910Molina, Fernando Tulainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-09-08T11:07:09Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/11142Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1678-3166&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/oaiariconda@usp.br2316-89941678-3166opendoar:2014-09-08T11:07:09Scientiae Studia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Time is money: optimización, identidad y cultura laboral en la sociedad deseada
title Time is money: optimización, identidad y cultura laboral en la sociedad deseada
spellingShingle Time is money: optimización, identidad y cultura laboral en la sociedad deseada
Molina, Fernando Tula
Política tecnocientífica
Jornada laboral
Cultura del trabajo
Cultura de la optimización
Technoscience policy
Labor day
Labor culture
Optimization culture
title_short Time is money: optimización, identidad y cultura laboral en la sociedad deseada
title_full Time is money: optimización, identidad y cultura laboral en la sociedad deseada
title_fullStr Time is money: optimización, identidad y cultura laboral en la sociedad deseada
title_full_unstemmed Time is money: optimización, identidad y cultura laboral en la sociedad deseada
title_sort Time is money: optimización, identidad y cultura laboral en la sociedad deseada
author Molina, Fernando Tula
author_facet Molina, Fernando Tula
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Molina, Fernando Tula
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Política tecnocientífica
Jornada laboral
Cultura del trabajo
Cultura de la optimización
Technoscience policy
Labor day
Labor culture
Optimization culture
topic Política tecnocientífica
Jornada laboral
Cultura del trabajo
Cultura de la optimización
Technoscience policy
Labor day
Labor culture
Optimization culture
description Is it possible to change the culture of optimization refered by the expression "Time is Money"? Given that it is not a natural relationship, and since there are other cultural modes of organizing time and work, it is certainly possible. But how to do it from within a culture marked by such an imprint? We must rethink our collective course, primarily with regard to the criterion of optimization in labor relations. This is where technological capabilities merge with the quantitative criteria of efficiency and a certain social organization. And from the exacerbation of such a relationship we gradually lose the social gains, the value of human relations, and the collective course. The extended labour day progressively consumes our vital capital: time. This may be strange in an era where new technologies allow to perform the same tasks in less time. But in the material culture of productivity this tends to for further work, work that in our capitalist societies only serves to concentrate the revenue. In this article I draw attention to two points to steer such relationships in a different way. (a) The notion of "implication" that leads to consider inadequate the new technologies evaluation and their potential risks in technical terms: we need also to consider the social risk related to social endings. (b) On the other hand, by the concept of "epimeleia" we arrive to the point that to participate in this social construction, we need to begin establishing and manifesting the values of our identity through a internal policy, the construction and defense of our identity.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11142
10.1590/S1678-31662008000300008
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11142
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-31662008000300008
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/11142/12910
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientiae Studia; Vol. 6 No. 3 (2008); 389-408
Scientiae Studia; Vol. 6 Núm. 3 (2008); 389-408
Scientiae Studia; v. 6 n. 3 (2008); 389-408
2316-8994
1678-3166
reponame:Scientiae Studia (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientiae Studia (Online)
collection Scientiae Studia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientiae Studia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ariconda@usp.br
_version_ 1787713157186191360