Microleakage in conservative cavities varying the preparation method and surface treatment
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3819 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To assess microleakage in conservative class V cavities prepared with aluminum-oxide air abrasion or turbine and restored with self-etching or etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Materials and Methods: Forty premolars were randomly assigned to 4 groups (I and II: air abrasion; III and IV: turbine) and class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces. Conditioning approaches were: groups I/III - 37% phosphoric acid; groups II/IV - self-priming etchant (Tyrian-SPE). Cavities were restored with One Step Plus/Filtek Z250. After finishing, specimens were thermocycled, immersed in 50% silver nitrate, and serially sectioned. Microleakage at the occlusal and cervical interfaces was measured in mm and calculated by a software. Data were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). RESULTS: Marginal seal provided by air abrasion was similar to high-speed handpiece, except for group I. There was SIGNIFICANT difference between enamel and dentin/cementum margins for to group I and II: air abrasion. The etch-and-rinse adhesive system promoted a better marginal seal. At enamel and dentin/cementum margins, the highest microleakage values were found in cavities treated with the self-etching adhesive system. At dentin/cementum margins, high-speed handpiece preparations associated with etch-and-rinse system provided the least dye penetration. CONCLUSION: Marginal seal of cavities prepared with aluminum-oxide air abrasion was different from that of conventionally prepared cavities, and the etch-and-rinse system promoted higher marginal seal at both enamel and dentin margins. |
id |
USP-17_05f0ccf514bd89918b167a8ddbdd48c7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/3819 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-17 |
network_name_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Microleakage in conservative cavities varying the preparation method and surface treatment Dental air abrasionDental cavity preparationMarginal adaptationDental etching OBJECTIVE: To assess microleakage in conservative class V cavities prepared with aluminum-oxide air abrasion or turbine and restored with self-etching or etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Materials and Methods: Forty premolars were randomly assigned to 4 groups (I and II: air abrasion; III and IV: turbine) and class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces. Conditioning approaches were: groups I/III - 37% phosphoric acid; groups II/IV - self-priming etchant (Tyrian-SPE). Cavities were restored with One Step Plus/Filtek Z250. After finishing, specimens were thermocycled, immersed in 50% silver nitrate, and serially sectioned. Microleakage at the occlusal and cervical interfaces was measured in mm and calculated by a software. Data were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). RESULTS: Marginal seal provided by air abrasion was similar to high-speed handpiece, except for group I. There was SIGNIFICANT difference between enamel and dentin/cementum margins for to group I and II: air abrasion. The etch-and-rinse adhesive system promoted a better marginal seal. At enamel and dentin/cementum margins, the highest microleakage values were found in cavities treated with the self-etching adhesive system. At dentin/cementum margins, high-speed handpiece preparations associated with etch-and-rinse system provided the least dye penetration. CONCLUSION: Marginal seal of cavities prepared with aluminum-oxide air abrasion was different from that of conventionally prepared cavities, and the etch-and-rinse system promoted higher marginal seal at both enamel and dentin margins. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2010-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/381910.1590/S1678-77572010000400017Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 18 No. 4 (2010); 421-425 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 18 Núm. 4 (2010); 421-425 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 18 n. 4 (2010); 421-425 1678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3819/4509Copyright (c) 2010 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtoui, Juliana AbdallahChinelatti, Michelle AlexandraPalma-Dibb, Regina GuenkaCorona, Silmara Aparecida Milori2012-04-27T12:10:24Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/3819Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2012-04-27T12:10:24Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Microleakage in conservative cavities varying the preparation method and surface treatment |
title |
Microleakage in conservative cavities varying the preparation method and surface treatment |
spellingShingle |
Microleakage in conservative cavities varying the preparation method and surface treatment Atoui, Juliana Abdallah Dental air abrasion Dental cavity preparation Marginal adaptation Dental etching |
title_short |
Microleakage in conservative cavities varying the preparation method and surface treatment |
title_full |
Microleakage in conservative cavities varying the preparation method and surface treatment |
title_fullStr |
Microleakage in conservative cavities varying the preparation method and surface treatment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Microleakage in conservative cavities varying the preparation method and surface treatment |
title_sort |
Microleakage in conservative cavities varying the preparation method and surface treatment |
author |
Atoui, Juliana Abdallah |
author_facet |
Atoui, Juliana Abdallah Chinelatti, Michelle Alexandra Palma-Dibb, Regina Guenka Corona, Silmara Aparecida Milori |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Chinelatti, Michelle Alexandra Palma-Dibb, Regina Guenka Corona, Silmara Aparecida Milori |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Atoui, Juliana Abdallah Chinelatti, Michelle Alexandra Palma-Dibb, Regina Guenka Corona, Silmara Aparecida Milori |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental air abrasion Dental cavity preparation Marginal adaptation Dental etching |
topic |
Dental air abrasion Dental cavity preparation Marginal adaptation Dental etching |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To assess microleakage in conservative class V cavities prepared with aluminum-oxide air abrasion or turbine and restored with self-etching or etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Materials and Methods: Forty premolars were randomly assigned to 4 groups (I and II: air abrasion; III and IV: turbine) and class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces. Conditioning approaches were: groups I/III - 37% phosphoric acid; groups II/IV - self-priming etchant (Tyrian-SPE). Cavities were restored with One Step Plus/Filtek Z250. After finishing, specimens were thermocycled, immersed in 50% silver nitrate, and serially sectioned. Microleakage at the occlusal and cervical interfaces was measured in mm and calculated by a software. Data were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). RESULTS: Marginal seal provided by air abrasion was similar to high-speed handpiece, except for group I. There was SIGNIFICANT difference between enamel and dentin/cementum margins for to group I and II: air abrasion. The etch-and-rinse adhesive system promoted a better marginal seal. At enamel and dentin/cementum margins, the highest microleakage values were found in cavities treated with the self-etching adhesive system. At dentin/cementum margins, high-speed handpiece preparations associated with etch-and-rinse system provided the least dye penetration. CONCLUSION: Marginal seal of cavities prepared with aluminum-oxide air abrasion was different from that of conventionally prepared cavities, and the etch-and-rinse system promoted higher marginal seal at both enamel and dentin margins. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3819 10.1590/S1678-77572010000400017 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3819 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1678-77572010000400017 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3819/4509 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2010 Journal of Applied Oral Science info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2010 Journal of Applied Oral Science |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 18 No. 4 (2010); 421-425 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 18 Núm. 4 (2010); 421-425 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 18 n. 4 (2010); 421-425 1678-7765 1678-7757 reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
collection |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jaos@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221675523932160 |