Conventional dual-cure versus self-adhesive resin cements in dentin bond integrity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Renata Andreza Talaveira da
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Coutinho, Margareth, Cardozo, Pedro Igor, Silva, Larissa Alves da, Zorzatto, José Roberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3921
Resumo: During post preparation, the root canal is exposed to the oral cavity, and endodontic treatment may fail because of coronal leakage, bacterial infection and sealing inability of the luting cement. OBJECTIVE: this study quantified the interfacial continuity produced with conventional dual-cure and self-adhesive resin cements in the cervical (C), medium (M) and apical (A) thirds of the root. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty single-rooted human teeth were restored using Reforpost # 01 conical glass-fiber posts and different materials (N=10 per group): group AC=Adper™ ScotchBond™ Multi-purpose Plus + AllCem; group ARC=Adper™ ScotchBond™ Multi-purpose Plus + RelyX ARC; group U100=RelyX U100; and group MXC=Maxcem Elite. After being kept in 100% humidity at 37°C for 72 hours, the samples were sectioned parallel to their longitudinal axis and positive epoxy resin replicas were made. The scanning electron micrographs of each third section of the teeth were combined using Image Analyst software and measured with AutoCAD-2002. We obtained percentage values of the interfacial continuity. RESULTS: Interfacial continuity was similar in the apical, medium and cervical thirds of the roots within the groups (Friedman test, p>0.05). Comparison of the different cements in a same root third showed that interfacial continuity was lower in MXC (C=45.5%; M=48.5%; A=47.3%) than in AC (C=85.9%, M=81.8% and A=76.0%), ARC (C=83.8%, M=82.4% and A=75.0%) and U100 (C=84.1%, M=82.4% and A=77.3%) (Kruskal-Wallis test, p
id USP-17_0b7612bf96c7023144ce32f2e4d86a4d
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/3921
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Conventional dual-cure versus self-adhesive resin cements in dentin bond integrity Post and core techniqueResin cementsDental marginal adaptationDentinbonding agents During post preparation, the root canal is exposed to the oral cavity, and endodontic treatment may fail because of coronal leakage, bacterial infection and sealing inability of the luting cement. OBJECTIVE: this study quantified the interfacial continuity produced with conventional dual-cure and self-adhesive resin cements in the cervical (C), medium (M) and apical (A) thirds of the root. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty single-rooted human teeth were restored using Reforpost # 01 conical glass-fiber posts and different materials (N=10 per group): group AC=Adper™ ScotchBond™ Multi-purpose Plus + AllCem; group ARC=Adper™ ScotchBond™ Multi-purpose Plus + RelyX ARC; group U100=RelyX U100; and group MXC=Maxcem Elite. After being kept in 100% humidity at 37°C for 72 hours, the samples were sectioned parallel to their longitudinal axis and positive epoxy resin replicas were made. The scanning electron micrographs of each third section of the teeth were combined using Image Analyst software and measured with AutoCAD-2002. We obtained percentage values of the interfacial continuity. RESULTS: Interfacial continuity was similar in the apical, medium and cervical thirds of the roots within the groups (Friedman test, p>0.05). Comparison of the different cements in a same root third showed that interfacial continuity was lower in MXC (C=45.5%; M=48.5%; A=47.3%) than in AC (C=85.9%, M=81.8% and A=76.0%), ARC (C=83.8%, M=82.4% and A=75.0%) and U100 (C=84.1%, M=82.4% and A=77.3%) (Kruskal-Wallis test, pUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2011-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/392110.1590/S1678-77572011005000010Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 19 No. 4 (2011); 355-362 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 19 Núm. 4 (2011); 355-362 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 19 n. 4 (2011); 355-362 1678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3921/4611Copyright (c) 2011 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Renata Andreza Talaveira daCoutinho, MargarethCardozo, Pedro IgorSilva, Larissa Alves daZorzatto, José Roberto2012-04-27T12:14:27Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/3921Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2012-04-27T12:14:27Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Conventional dual-cure versus self-adhesive resin cements in dentin bond integrity
title Conventional dual-cure versus self-adhesive resin cements in dentin bond integrity
spellingShingle Conventional dual-cure versus self-adhesive resin cements in dentin bond integrity
Silva, Renata Andreza Talaveira da
Post and core technique
Resin cements
Dental marginal adaptation
Dentinbonding agents
title_short Conventional dual-cure versus self-adhesive resin cements in dentin bond integrity
title_full Conventional dual-cure versus self-adhesive resin cements in dentin bond integrity
title_fullStr Conventional dual-cure versus self-adhesive resin cements in dentin bond integrity
title_full_unstemmed Conventional dual-cure versus self-adhesive resin cements in dentin bond integrity
title_sort Conventional dual-cure versus self-adhesive resin cements in dentin bond integrity
author Silva, Renata Andreza Talaveira da
author_facet Silva, Renata Andreza Talaveira da
Coutinho, Margareth
Cardozo, Pedro Igor
Silva, Larissa Alves da
Zorzatto, José Roberto
author_role author
author2 Coutinho, Margareth
Cardozo, Pedro Igor
Silva, Larissa Alves da
Zorzatto, José Roberto
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Renata Andreza Talaveira da
Coutinho, Margareth
Cardozo, Pedro Igor
Silva, Larissa Alves da
Zorzatto, José Roberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Post and core technique
Resin cements
Dental marginal adaptation
Dentinbonding agents
topic Post and core technique
Resin cements
Dental marginal adaptation
Dentinbonding agents
description During post preparation, the root canal is exposed to the oral cavity, and endodontic treatment may fail because of coronal leakage, bacterial infection and sealing inability of the luting cement. OBJECTIVE: this study quantified the interfacial continuity produced with conventional dual-cure and self-adhesive resin cements in the cervical (C), medium (M) and apical (A) thirds of the root. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty single-rooted human teeth were restored using Reforpost # 01 conical glass-fiber posts and different materials (N=10 per group): group AC=Adper™ ScotchBond™ Multi-purpose Plus + AllCem; group ARC=Adper™ ScotchBond™ Multi-purpose Plus + RelyX ARC; group U100=RelyX U100; and group MXC=Maxcem Elite. After being kept in 100% humidity at 37°C for 72 hours, the samples were sectioned parallel to their longitudinal axis and positive epoxy resin replicas were made. The scanning electron micrographs of each third section of the teeth were combined using Image Analyst software and measured with AutoCAD-2002. We obtained percentage values of the interfacial continuity. RESULTS: Interfacial continuity was similar in the apical, medium and cervical thirds of the roots within the groups (Friedman test, p>0.05). Comparison of the different cements in a same root third showed that interfacial continuity was lower in MXC (C=45.5%; M=48.5%; A=47.3%) than in AC (C=85.9%, M=81.8% and A=76.0%), ARC (C=83.8%, M=82.4% and A=75.0%) and U100 (C=84.1%, M=82.4% and A=77.3%) (Kruskal-Wallis test, p
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3921
10.1590/S1678-77572011005000010
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3921
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-77572011005000010
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3921/4611
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2011 Journal of Applied Oral Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2011 Journal of Applied Oral Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 19 No. 4 (2011); 355-362
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 19 Núm. 4 (2011); 355-362
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 19 n. 4 (2011); 355-362
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1800221676275761152