Do commercial whitening dentifrices increase enamel erosive tooth wear?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572020000100423 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective This in vitro study evaluated the effect of commercial whitening dentifrices on erosive tooth wear (ETW) of bovine enamel samples, in comparison with commercial regular dentifrices. Methodology Sixty bovine crowns were embedded in acrylic resin, polished and then had their baseline profile determined. They were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=12/group), according to the type of commercial dentifrice to be tested: GI – Crest Anti-cavity Regular; GII – Crest 3D White; GIII – Colgate Total 12 Clean Mint; GIV – Colgate Optic White; GV – Placebo (negative control, fluoride-free dentifrice). The samples were submitted to daily erosive and abrasive challenges for 3 days. The erosive challenges were performed 3 times a day by immersing the specimens in 0.1% citric acid solution (pH 2.5) for 90 s. Each day after the first and last erosive challenges, the specimens were subjected to the abrasive challenge for 15 s, using a toothbrushing machine (Biopdi, São Carlos, SP, Brazil), soft toothbrushes and slurry (1:3 g/ml) of the tested toothpastes (1.5 N). The specimens were kept in artificial saliva between the challenges. The final profile was obtained and the ETW (µm) was calculated. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s tests (p<0.05). Results All dentifrices tested significantly reduced the enamel wear in comparison with the Placebo, except GIII. The median (95% CI) ETW was 1.35 (1.25-1.46)bc for GI, 1.17 (1.01-1.34)cd for GII, 1.36 (1.28-1.45)ab for GIII, 1.08 (1.04-1.14)d for GIV and 2.28 (2.18-2.39)a for GV. Conclusion When dentifrices from the same manufacturer were compared, the whitening dentifrices led to similar or less wear than the regular ones. |
id |
USP-17_1159ee28addf7a35aae5cb466fa1b19b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1678-77572020000100423 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-17 |
network_name_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Do commercial whitening dentifrices increase enamel erosive tooth wear?Tooth erosionToothpastesTooth bleaching agentsIn vitro techniquesAbstract Objective This in vitro study evaluated the effect of commercial whitening dentifrices on erosive tooth wear (ETW) of bovine enamel samples, in comparison with commercial regular dentifrices. Methodology Sixty bovine crowns were embedded in acrylic resin, polished and then had their baseline profile determined. They were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=12/group), according to the type of commercial dentifrice to be tested: GI – Crest Anti-cavity Regular; GII – Crest 3D White; GIII – Colgate Total 12 Clean Mint; GIV – Colgate Optic White; GV – Placebo (negative control, fluoride-free dentifrice). The samples were submitted to daily erosive and abrasive challenges for 3 days. The erosive challenges were performed 3 times a day by immersing the specimens in 0.1% citric acid solution (pH 2.5) for 90 s. Each day after the first and last erosive challenges, the specimens were subjected to the abrasive challenge for 15 s, using a toothbrushing machine (Biopdi, São Carlos, SP, Brazil), soft toothbrushes and slurry (1:3 g/ml) of the tested toothpastes (1.5 N). The specimens were kept in artificial saliva between the challenges. The final profile was obtained and the ETW (µm) was calculated. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s tests (p<0.05). Results All dentifrices tested significantly reduced the enamel wear in comparison with the Placebo, except GIII. The median (95% CI) ETW was 1.35 (1.25-1.46)bc for GI, 1.17 (1.01-1.34)cd for GII, 1.36 (1.28-1.45)ab for GIII, 1.08 (1.04-1.14)d for GIV and 2.28 (2.18-2.39)a for GV. Conclusion When dentifrices from the same manufacturer were compared, the whitening dentifrices led to similar or less wear than the regular ones.Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572020000100423Journal of Applied Oral Science v.28 2020reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0163info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSIMÕES,Ana Clara Correa DuarteDIONIZIO,AlineCÂMARA,João Victor FrazãoSABINO-ARIAS,Isabela TomaziniLEVY,Flávia MauadVENTURA,Talita Mendes OliveiraBUZALAF,Nathalia RabeloBATISTA,Thiago Beltrami DiasMAGALHÃES,Ana CarolinaGROISMAN,SoniaBUZALAF,Marília Afonso Rabeloeng2020-03-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-77572020000100423Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2020-03-24T00:00Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Do commercial whitening dentifrices increase enamel erosive tooth wear? |
title |
Do commercial whitening dentifrices increase enamel erosive tooth wear? |
spellingShingle |
Do commercial whitening dentifrices increase enamel erosive tooth wear? SIMÕES,Ana Clara Correa Duarte Tooth erosion Toothpastes Tooth bleaching agents In vitro techniques |
title_short |
Do commercial whitening dentifrices increase enamel erosive tooth wear? |
title_full |
Do commercial whitening dentifrices increase enamel erosive tooth wear? |
title_fullStr |
Do commercial whitening dentifrices increase enamel erosive tooth wear? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Do commercial whitening dentifrices increase enamel erosive tooth wear? |
title_sort |
Do commercial whitening dentifrices increase enamel erosive tooth wear? |
author |
SIMÕES,Ana Clara Correa Duarte |
author_facet |
SIMÕES,Ana Clara Correa Duarte DIONIZIO,Aline CÂMARA,João Victor Frazão SABINO-ARIAS,Isabela Tomazini LEVY,Flávia Mauad VENTURA,Talita Mendes Oliveira BUZALAF,Nathalia Rabelo BATISTA,Thiago Beltrami Dias MAGALHÃES,Ana Carolina GROISMAN,Sonia BUZALAF,Marília Afonso Rabelo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
DIONIZIO,Aline CÂMARA,João Victor Frazão SABINO-ARIAS,Isabela Tomazini LEVY,Flávia Mauad VENTURA,Talita Mendes Oliveira BUZALAF,Nathalia Rabelo BATISTA,Thiago Beltrami Dias MAGALHÃES,Ana Carolina GROISMAN,Sonia BUZALAF,Marília Afonso Rabelo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
SIMÕES,Ana Clara Correa Duarte DIONIZIO,Aline CÂMARA,João Victor Frazão SABINO-ARIAS,Isabela Tomazini LEVY,Flávia Mauad VENTURA,Talita Mendes Oliveira BUZALAF,Nathalia Rabelo BATISTA,Thiago Beltrami Dias MAGALHÃES,Ana Carolina GROISMAN,Sonia BUZALAF,Marília Afonso Rabelo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Tooth erosion Toothpastes Tooth bleaching agents In vitro techniques |
topic |
Tooth erosion Toothpastes Tooth bleaching agents In vitro techniques |
description |
Abstract Objective This in vitro study evaluated the effect of commercial whitening dentifrices on erosive tooth wear (ETW) of bovine enamel samples, in comparison with commercial regular dentifrices. Methodology Sixty bovine crowns were embedded in acrylic resin, polished and then had their baseline profile determined. They were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=12/group), according to the type of commercial dentifrice to be tested: GI – Crest Anti-cavity Regular; GII – Crest 3D White; GIII – Colgate Total 12 Clean Mint; GIV – Colgate Optic White; GV – Placebo (negative control, fluoride-free dentifrice). The samples were submitted to daily erosive and abrasive challenges for 3 days. The erosive challenges were performed 3 times a day by immersing the specimens in 0.1% citric acid solution (pH 2.5) for 90 s. Each day after the first and last erosive challenges, the specimens were subjected to the abrasive challenge for 15 s, using a toothbrushing machine (Biopdi, São Carlos, SP, Brazil), soft toothbrushes and slurry (1:3 g/ml) of the tested toothpastes (1.5 N). The specimens were kept in artificial saliva between the challenges. The final profile was obtained and the ETW (µm) was calculated. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s tests (p<0.05). Results All dentifrices tested significantly reduced the enamel wear in comparison with the Placebo, except GIII. The median (95% CI) ETW was 1.35 (1.25-1.46)bc for GI, 1.17 (1.01-1.34)cd for GII, 1.36 (1.28-1.45)ab for GIII, 1.08 (1.04-1.14)d for GIV and 2.28 (2.18-2.39)a for GV. Conclusion When dentifrices from the same manufacturer were compared, the whitening dentifrices led to similar or less wear than the regular ones. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572020000100423 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572020000100423 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0163 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science v.28 2020 reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
collection |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jaos@usp.br |
_version_ |
1748936440490754048 |