Avaliação de dois métodos de traçados para implantes em radiografias panorâmicas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Freitas, Deborah Queiroz de
Data de Publicação: 2004
Outros Autores: Montebello Filho, Agenor
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3181
Resumo: In the last years, computer programs have appeared in order to help dental practitioners in implants planning. These programs aim to facilitate the acquisition of adequate measures in digitalized radiographs. The aims of this study were: to evaluate the intra-examiner agreement in the acquisition of measures using two methods (manual and computer program - Radioimp), comparing their performances. Three examiners analyzed twenty-one panoramic radiographs. They used the two methods in two occasions. In the manual method, the examiners made a tracing on a paper fixed to the images and measured nine regions with a caliper. The images were digitalized and showed in a computer screen to be analyzed in the computer program. The examiners acquired measures of the same regions by the manual method. Vertical measures of spheres in the images were acquired in order to discount the magnifying factor of the technique. Through statistics analysis (p=.05), it was possible to conclude that there were differences in intra-examiner agreement and the examiners had greater difficulty in reproducing the measures when they used the computer program; the measures acquired by the manual method were closer to the real ones.
id USP-17_117d13cf2f5fab3114ffb263536c75d4
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/3181
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Avaliação de dois métodos de traçados para implantes em radiografias panorâmicas Evaluation of two methods of tracings for implants in panoramic radiographs Radiografia panorâmicaProgramas de computadorImplante dentário endoósseoPanoramic radiographySoftwareDental implantation endosseous In the last years, computer programs have appeared in order to help dental practitioners in implants planning. These programs aim to facilitate the acquisition of adequate measures in digitalized radiographs. The aims of this study were: to evaluate the intra-examiner agreement in the acquisition of measures using two methods (manual and computer program - Radioimp), comparing their performances. Three examiners analyzed twenty-one panoramic radiographs. They used the two methods in two occasions. In the manual method, the examiners made a tracing on a paper fixed to the images and measured nine regions with a caliper. The images were digitalized and showed in a computer screen to be analyzed in the computer program. The examiners acquired measures of the same regions by the manual method. Vertical measures of spheres in the images were acquired in order to discount the magnifying factor of the technique. Through statistics analysis (p=.05), it was possible to conclude that there were differences in intra-examiner agreement and the examiners had greater difficulty in reproducing the measures when they used the computer program; the measures acquired by the manual method were closer to the real ones. Nos últimos anos, surgiram, na Odontologia, programas de computador para auxiliar o profissional no planejamento de implantes. Esses programas visam facilitar a obtenção de medidas adequadas em exames radiográficos digitalizados. Os objetivos desse trabalho foram: avaliar a concordância intra-examinador na obtenção de medidas por dois métodos (o manual e o com um programa de computador - Radioimp); e comparar o desempenho dos dois métodos. Para isso, 21 radiografias panorâmicas foram analisadas por três avaliadores, pelos dois métodos, em duas ocasiões. No método manual, os avaliadores realizaram um traçado sobre papel acetato fixado às imagens, e, com um paquímetro, obtiveram medidas de nove regiões. Para a análise das imagens no programa de computador, essas foram digitalizadas e exibidas em uma tela de computador. Os avaliadores obtiveram medidas das mesmas regiões analisadas pelo método manual. Para desconto da ampliação inerente à técnica, foram obtidas medidas verticais de esferas presentes nas imagens. Os resultados foram submetidos à análise estatística (p=0.05). Houve diferenças entre os avaliadores na concordância intra-examinador, sendo que esses apresentaram maior dificuldade na reprodução das medidas, quando utilizaram o programa de computador; a maioria das medidas que apresentaram falta de exatidão foi obtida ao se utilizar o mesmo programa. Dessa forma, os programas destinados ao planejamento de implantes devem ser utilizados com cautela por pessoas treinadas. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2004-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/318110.1590/S1678-77572004000100015Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2004); 84-88 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2004); 84-88 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 12 n. 1 (2004); 84-88 1678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3181/3870Copyright (c) 2004 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFreitas, Deborah Queiroz deMontebello Filho, Agenor2012-04-27T11:47:05Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/3181Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2012-04-27T11:47:05Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Avaliação de dois métodos de traçados para implantes em radiografias panorâmicas
Evaluation of two methods of tracings for implants in panoramic radiographs
title Avaliação de dois métodos de traçados para implantes em radiografias panorâmicas
spellingShingle Avaliação de dois métodos de traçados para implantes em radiografias panorâmicas
Freitas, Deborah Queiroz de
Radiografia panorâmica
Programas de computador
Implante dentário endoósseo
Panoramic radiography
Software
Dental implantation endosseous
title_short Avaliação de dois métodos de traçados para implantes em radiografias panorâmicas
title_full Avaliação de dois métodos de traçados para implantes em radiografias panorâmicas
title_fullStr Avaliação de dois métodos de traçados para implantes em radiografias panorâmicas
title_full_unstemmed Avaliação de dois métodos de traçados para implantes em radiografias panorâmicas
title_sort Avaliação de dois métodos de traçados para implantes em radiografias panorâmicas
author Freitas, Deborah Queiroz de
author_facet Freitas, Deborah Queiroz de
Montebello Filho, Agenor
author_role author
author2 Montebello Filho, Agenor
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Freitas, Deborah Queiroz de
Montebello Filho, Agenor
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Radiografia panorâmica
Programas de computador
Implante dentário endoósseo
Panoramic radiography
Software
Dental implantation endosseous
topic Radiografia panorâmica
Programas de computador
Implante dentário endoósseo
Panoramic radiography
Software
Dental implantation endosseous
description In the last years, computer programs have appeared in order to help dental practitioners in implants planning. These programs aim to facilitate the acquisition of adequate measures in digitalized radiographs. The aims of this study were: to evaluate the intra-examiner agreement in the acquisition of measures using two methods (manual and computer program - Radioimp), comparing their performances. Three examiners analyzed twenty-one panoramic radiographs. They used the two methods in two occasions. In the manual method, the examiners made a tracing on a paper fixed to the images and measured nine regions with a caliper. The images were digitalized and showed in a computer screen to be analyzed in the computer program. The examiners acquired measures of the same regions by the manual method. Vertical measures of spheres in the images were acquired in order to discount the magnifying factor of the technique. Through statistics analysis (p=.05), it was possible to conclude that there were differences in intra-examiner agreement and the examiners had greater difficulty in reproducing the measures when they used the computer program; the measures acquired by the manual method were closer to the real ones.
publishDate 2004
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2004-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3181
10.1590/S1678-77572004000100015
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3181
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-77572004000100015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3181/3870
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2004 Journal of Applied Oral Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2004 Journal of Applied Oral Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2004); 84-88
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2004); 84-88
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 12 n. 1 (2004); 84-88
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1800221671334871040