Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: FERNANDES, Thais Maria Freire
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: ADAMCZYK, Julie, POLETI, Marcelo Lupion, HENRIQUES, José Fernando Castanha, FRIEDLAND, Bernard, GARIB, Daniela Gamba
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/100945
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy and reliability of two methods of measurements of linear distances (multiplanar 2D and tridimensional reconstruction 3D) obtained from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with different voxel sizes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten dry human mandibles were scanned at voxel sizes of 0.2 and 0.4 mm. Craniometric anatomical landmarks were identified twice by two independent operators on the multiplanar reconstructed and on volume rendering images that were generated by the software Dolphin®. Subsequently, physical measurements were performed using a digital caliper. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman were used for evaluating accuracy and reliability (p
id USP-17_23c8565aba51b376a53f68e9fc172879
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/100945
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy and reliability of two methods of measurements of linear distances (multiplanar 2D and tridimensional reconstruction 3D) obtained from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with different voxel sizes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten dry human mandibles were scanned at voxel sizes of 0.2 and 0.4 mm. Craniometric anatomical landmarks were identified twice by two independent operators on the multiplanar reconstructed and on volume rendering images that were generated by the software Dolphin®. Subsequently, physical measurements were performed using a digital caliper. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman were used for evaluating accuracy and reliability (pUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2015-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/10094510.1590/1678-775720130445Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 23 No. 1 (2015); 56-63Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 23 Núm. 1 (2015); 56-63Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 23 n. 1 (2015); 56-631678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/100945/99613Copyright (c) 2015 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFERNANDES, Thais Maria Freire ADAMCZYK, Julie POLETI, Marcelo Lupion HENRIQUES, José Fernando Castanha FRIEDLAND, Bernard GARIB, Daniela Gamba 2015-07-28T17:08:40Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/100945Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2015-07-28T17:08:40Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study
title Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study
spellingShingle Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study
FERNANDES, Thais Maria Freire
title_short Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study
title_full Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study
title_sort Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study
author FERNANDES, Thais Maria Freire
author_facet FERNANDES, Thais Maria Freire
ADAMCZYK, Julie
POLETI, Marcelo Lupion
HENRIQUES, José Fernando Castanha
FRIEDLAND, Bernard
GARIB, Daniela Gamba
author_role author
author2 ADAMCZYK, Julie
POLETI, Marcelo Lupion
HENRIQUES, José Fernando Castanha
FRIEDLAND, Bernard
GARIB, Daniela Gamba
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv FERNANDES, Thais Maria Freire
ADAMCZYK, Julie
POLETI, Marcelo Lupion
HENRIQUES, José Fernando Castanha
FRIEDLAND, Bernard
GARIB, Daniela Gamba
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy and reliability of two methods of measurements of linear distances (multiplanar 2D and tridimensional reconstruction 3D) obtained from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with different voxel sizes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten dry human mandibles were scanned at voxel sizes of 0.2 and 0.4 mm. Craniometric anatomical landmarks were identified twice by two independent operators on the multiplanar reconstructed and on volume rendering images that were generated by the software Dolphin®. Subsequently, physical measurements were performed using a digital caliper. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman were used for evaluating accuracy and reliability (p
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/100945
10.1590/1678-775720130445
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/100945
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-775720130445
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/100945/99613
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Journal of Applied Oral Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Journal of Applied Oral Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 23 No. 1 (2015); 56-63
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 23 Núm. 1 (2015); 56-63
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 23 n. 1 (2015); 56-63
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1800221678718943232

Registros relacionados