Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Naconecy, Marcos Michelon
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Geremia, Tomás, Cervieri, André, Teixeira, Eduardo Rolim, Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3779
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the bending moments, and compressive and tensile forces in implant-supported prostheses with three, four or five abutments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten Pd-Ag frameworks were tested over two master models with: 1) parallel vertical implants, and 2) tilted distal implants. Strain gauges were fixed on the abutments of each master model to measure the deformation when a static load of 50 N was applied on the cantilever (15 mm). The deformation values were measured when the metallic frameworks were tested over three, four or five abutments, and transformed into force and bending moment values. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test for multiple comparisons at 5% level of significance. RESULTS: Abutment #1 (adjacent to the cantilever) had the highest values of force and sagittal bending moment for all tests with three, four or five abutments. Independently from the number of abutments, axial force in abutment #1 was higher in the vertical model than in the tilted model. Total moment was higher with three abutments than with four or five abutments. Independently from the inclination of implants, the mean force with four or five abutments was lower than that with three abutments. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that in the set-ups with four or five abutments tilted distal implants reduced axial force and did not increase bending moments.
id USP-17_24c25c5781e29586efa0e9083acec9a5
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/3779
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants BiomechanicsImplant-supported prosthesesNumber of abutmentsTilted implantsStrain gauges OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the bending moments, and compressive and tensile forces in implant-supported prostheses with three, four or five abutments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten Pd-Ag frameworks were tested over two master models with: 1) parallel vertical implants, and 2) tilted distal implants. Strain gauges were fixed on the abutments of each master model to measure the deformation when a static load of 50 N was applied on the cantilever (15 mm). The deformation values were measured when the metallic frameworks were tested over three, four or five abutments, and transformed into force and bending moment values. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test for multiple comparisons at 5% level of significance. RESULTS: Abutment #1 (adjacent to the cantilever) had the highest values of force and sagittal bending moment for all tests with three, four or five abutments. Independently from the number of abutments, axial force in abutment #1 was higher in the vertical model than in the tilted model. Total moment was higher with three abutments than with four or five abutments. Independently from the inclination of implants, the mean force with four or five abutments was lower than that with three abutments. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that in the set-ups with four or five abutments tilted distal implants reduced axial force and did not increase bending moments. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2010-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/377910.1590/S1678-77572010000200013Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2010); 178-185 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 18 Núm. 2 (2010); 178-185 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 18 n. 2 (2010); 178-185 1678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3779/4469Copyright (c) 2010 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNaconecy, Marcos MichelonGeremia, TomásCervieri, AndréTeixeira, Eduardo RolimShinkai, Rosemary Sadami2012-04-27T12:08:48Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/3779Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2012-04-27T12:08:48Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants
title Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants
spellingShingle Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants
Naconecy, Marcos Michelon
Biomechanics
Implant-supported prostheses
Number of abutments
Tilted implants
Strain gauges
title_short Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants
title_full Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants
title_fullStr Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants
title_full_unstemmed Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants
title_sort Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants
author Naconecy, Marcos Michelon
author_facet Naconecy, Marcos Michelon
Geremia, Tomás
Cervieri, André
Teixeira, Eduardo Rolim
Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami
author_role author
author2 Geremia, Tomás
Cervieri, André
Teixeira, Eduardo Rolim
Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Naconecy, Marcos Michelon
Geremia, Tomás
Cervieri, André
Teixeira, Eduardo Rolim
Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biomechanics
Implant-supported prostheses
Number of abutments
Tilted implants
Strain gauges
topic Biomechanics
Implant-supported prostheses
Number of abutments
Tilted implants
Strain gauges
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the bending moments, and compressive and tensile forces in implant-supported prostheses with three, four or five abutments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten Pd-Ag frameworks were tested over two master models with: 1) parallel vertical implants, and 2) tilted distal implants. Strain gauges were fixed on the abutments of each master model to measure the deformation when a static load of 50 N was applied on the cantilever (15 mm). The deformation values were measured when the metallic frameworks were tested over three, four or five abutments, and transformed into force and bending moment values. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test for multiple comparisons at 5% level of significance. RESULTS: Abutment #1 (adjacent to the cantilever) had the highest values of force and sagittal bending moment for all tests with three, four or five abutments. Independently from the number of abutments, axial force in abutment #1 was higher in the vertical model than in the tilted model. Total moment was higher with three abutments than with four or five abutments. Independently from the inclination of implants, the mean force with four or five abutments was lower than that with three abutments. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that in the set-ups with four or five abutments tilted distal implants reduced axial force and did not increase bending moments.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3779
10.1590/S1678-77572010000200013
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3779
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-77572010000200013
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3779/4469
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2010 Journal of Applied Oral Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2010 Journal of Applied Oral Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2010); 178-185
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 18 Núm. 2 (2010); 178-185
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 18 n. 2 (2010); 178-185
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1800221675458920448