Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3779 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the bending moments, and compressive and tensile forces in implant-supported prostheses with three, four or five abutments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten Pd-Ag frameworks were tested over two master models with: 1) parallel vertical implants, and 2) tilted distal implants. Strain gauges were fixed on the abutments of each master model to measure the deformation when a static load of 50 N was applied on the cantilever (15 mm). The deformation values were measured when the metallic frameworks were tested over three, four or five abutments, and transformed into force and bending moment values. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test for multiple comparisons at 5% level of significance. RESULTS: Abutment #1 (adjacent to the cantilever) had the highest values of force and sagittal bending moment for all tests with three, four or five abutments. Independently from the number of abutments, axial force in abutment #1 was higher in the vertical model than in the tilted model. Total moment was higher with three abutments than with four or five abutments. Independently from the inclination of implants, the mean force with four or five abutments was lower than that with three abutments. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that in the set-ups with four or five abutments tilted distal implants reduced axial force and did not increase bending moments. |
id |
USP-17_24c25c5781e29586efa0e9083acec9a5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/3779 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-17 |
network_name_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants BiomechanicsImplant-supported prosthesesNumber of abutmentsTilted implantsStrain gauges OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the bending moments, and compressive and tensile forces in implant-supported prostheses with three, four or five abutments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten Pd-Ag frameworks were tested over two master models with: 1) parallel vertical implants, and 2) tilted distal implants. Strain gauges were fixed on the abutments of each master model to measure the deformation when a static load of 50 N was applied on the cantilever (15 mm). The deformation values were measured when the metallic frameworks were tested over three, four or five abutments, and transformed into force and bending moment values. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test for multiple comparisons at 5% level of significance. RESULTS: Abutment #1 (adjacent to the cantilever) had the highest values of force and sagittal bending moment for all tests with three, four or five abutments. Independently from the number of abutments, axial force in abutment #1 was higher in the vertical model than in the tilted model. Total moment was higher with three abutments than with four or five abutments. Independently from the inclination of implants, the mean force with four or five abutments was lower than that with three abutments. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that in the set-ups with four or five abutments tilted distal implants reduced axial force and did not increase bending moments. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2010-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/377910.1590/S1678-77572010000200013Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2010); 178-185 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 18 Núm. 2 (2010); 178-185 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 18 n. 2 (2010); 178-185 1678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3779/4469Copyright (c) 2010 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNaconecy, Marcos MichelonGeremia, TomásCervieri, AndréTeixeira, Eduardo RolimShinkai, Rosemary Sadami2012-04-27T12:08:48Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/3779Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2012-04-27T12:08:48Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants |
title |
Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants |
spellingShingle |
Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants Naconecy, Marcos Michelon Biomechanics Implant-supported prostheses Number of abutments Tilted implants Strain gauges |
title_short |
Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants |
title_full |
Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants |
title_fullStr |
Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants |
title_sort |
Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants |
author |
Naconecy, Marcos Michelon |
author_facet |
Naconecy, Marcos Michelon Geremia, Tomás Cervieri, André Teixeira, Eduardo Rolim Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Geremia, Tomás Cervieri, André Teixeira, Eduardo Rolim Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Naconecy, Marcos Michelon Geremia, Tomás Cervieri, André Teixeira, Eduardo Rolim Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Biomechanics Implant-supported prostheses Number of abutments Tilted implants Strain gauges |
topic |
Biomechanics Implant-supported prostheses Number of abutments Tilted implants Strain gauges |
description |
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the bending moments, and compressive and tensile forces in implant-supported prostheses with three, four or five abutments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten Pd-Ag frameworks were tested over two master models with: 1) parallel vertical implants, and 2) tilted distal implants. Strain gauges were fixed on the abutments of each master model to measure the deformation when a static load of 50 N was applied on the cantilever (15 mm). The deformation values were measured when the metallic frameworks were tested over three, four or five abutments, and transformed into force and bending moment values. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test for multiple comparisons at 5% level of significance. RESULTS: Abutment #1 (adjacent to the cantilever) had the highest values of force and sagittal bending moment for all tests with three, four or five abutments. Independently from the number of abutments, axial force in abutment #1 was higher in the vertical model than in the tilted model. Total moment was higher with three abutments than with four or five abutments. Independently from the inclination of implants, the mean force with four or five abutments was lower than that with three abutments. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that in the set-ups with four or five abutments tilted distal implants reduced axial force and did not increase bending moments. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3779 10.1590/S1678-77572010000200013 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3779 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1678-77572010000200013 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3779/4469 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2010 Journal of Applied Oral Science info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2010 Journal of Applied Oral Science |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2010); 178-185 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 18 Núm. 2 (2010); 178-185 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 18 n. 2 (2010); 178-185 1678-7765 1678-7757 reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
collection |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jaos@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221675458920448 |