The effect of various kinematics on postoperative pain after instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Arslan,Hakan
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Khalilov,Ruslan, Doğanay,Ezgi, Karatas,Ertugrul
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572016000500503
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate various kinematic movements on postoperative pain using a Reciproc system. Material and Methods: Fifty-six molar teeth were divided into four groups according to kinematics as follows: continuous rotation, 360° CCW – 30° CW, 270° CCW – 30° CW, and 150° CCW – 30° CW. Preoperative and postoperative pain levels using visual analogue scale (VAS), percussion pain, and analgesic intake were recorded for each subject. Postoperative pain levels at 1, 3, 5, and 7 d were evaluated. Data were analyzed statistically using the Kruskal-Walis, Mann-Whitney-U, one-way analysis of variance, and chi-square tests (p=0.05). Results: Continuous rotation resulted in more pain at Day 1 when compared with the reciprocating groups (360° CCW – 30° CW and 270° CCW – 30° C) (p<0.05). Conclusions: Continuous rotation resulted in more postoperative pain at Day 1 than in reciprocating groups, and thereafter no significant pain was found among the groups.
id USP-17_25e7f8c0a83d56ce4f65bb4873af8dca
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1678-77572016000500503
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The effect of various kinematics on postoperative pain after instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical studyApically extruded debrisReciprocMotionEndodontic treatmentPostoperative painABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate various kinematic movements on postoperative pain using a Reciproc system. Material and Methods: Fifty-six molar teeth were divided into four groups according to kinematics as follows: continuous rotation, 360° CCW – 30° CW, 270° CCW – 30° CW, and 150° CCW – 30° CW. Preoperative and postoperative pain levels using visual analogue scale (VAS), percussion pain, and analgesic intake were recorded for each subject. Postoperative pain levels at 1, 3, 5, and 7 d were evaluated. Data were analyzed statistically using the Kruskal-Walis, Mann-Whitney-U, one-way analysis of variance, and chi-square tests (p=0.05). Results: Continuous rotation resulted in more pain at Day 1 when compared with the reciprocating groups (360° CCW – 30° CW and 270° CCW – 30° C) (p<0.05). Conclusions: Continuous rotation resulted in more postoperative pain at Day 1 than in reciprocating groups, and thereafter no significant pain was found among the groups.Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP2016-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572016000500503Journal of Applied Oral Science v.24 n.5 2016reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/1678-775720160136info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessArslan,HakanKhalilov,RuslanDoğanay,EzgiKaratas,Ertugruleng2016-10-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-77572016000500503Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2016-10-28T00:00Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The effect of various kinematics on postoperative pain after instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study
title The effect of various kinematics on postoperative pain after instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study
spellingShingle The effect of various kinematics on postoperative pain after instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study
Arslan,Hakan
Apically extruded debris
Reciproc
Motion
Endodontic treatment
Postoperative pain
title_short The effect of various kinematics on postoperative pain after instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study
title_full The effect of various kinematics on postoperative pain after instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study
title_fullStr The effect of various kinematics on postoperative pain after instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study
title_full_unstemmed The effect of various kinematics on postoperative pain after instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study
title_sort The effect of various kinematics on postoperative pain after instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study
author Arslan,Hakan
author_facet Arslan,Hakan
Khalilov,Ruslan
Doğanay,Ezgi
Karatas,Ertugrul
author_role author
author2 Khalilov,Ruslan
Doğanay,Ezgi
Karatas,Ertugrul
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Arslan,Hakan
Khalilov,Ruslan
Doğanay,Ezgi
Karatas,Ertugrul
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Apically extruded debris
Reciproc
Motion
Endodontic treatment
Postoperative pain
topic Apically extruded debris
Reciproc
Motion
Endodontic treatment
Postoperative pain
description ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate various kinematic movements on postoperative pain using a Reciproc system. Material and Methods: Fifty-six molar teeth were divided into four groups according to kinematics as follows: continuous rotation, 360° CCW – 30° CW, 270° CCW – 30° CW, and 150° CCW – 30° CW. Preoperative and postoperative pain levels using visual analogue scale (VAS), percussion pain, and analgesic intake were recorded for each subject. Postoperative pain levels at 1, 3, 5, and 7 d were evaluated. Data were analyzed statistically using the Kruskal-Walis, Mann-Whitney-U, one-way analysis of variance, and chi-square tests (p=0.05). Results: Continuous rotation resulted in more pain at Day 1 when compared with the reciprocating groups (360° CCW – 30° CW and 270° CCW – 30° C) (p<0.05). Conclusions: Continuous rotation resulted in more postoperative pain at Day 1 than in reciprocating groups, and thereafter no significant pain was found among the groups.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572016000500503
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572016000500503
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-775720160136
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science v.24 n.5 2016
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1748936439045816320