Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/80475 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To compare the static frictional forces generated at the bracket/wire interface of stainless steel brackets with different geometries and angulations, combined with orthodontic wires of different diameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The frictional forces were evaluated with three different types of metal brackets: a passive self-ligating (SmartClipTM, 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA), with a modified slot design (Mini Uni TwinTM, 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA) and conventional (Kirium, Abzil, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil). The samples were mounted in a testing device with three different angulations and tested with 0.014" and 0.018" stainless steel wires (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, USA). The static frictional force was measured using a universal testing machine (DL 500, EMIC®, São José dos Pinhais, Brazil) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. RESULTS: There was a significant difference (p |
id |
USP-17_2a6db97fbd8dfb10849e0ab4d2008dc2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/80475 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-17 |
network_name_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets OBJECTIVE: To compare the static frictional forces generated at the bracket/wire interface of stainless steel brackets with different geometries and angulations, combined with orthodontic wires of different diameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The frictional forces were evaluated with three different types of metal brackets: a passive self-ligating (SmartClipTM, 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA), with a modified slot design (Mini Uni TwinTM, 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA) and conventional (Kirium, Abzil, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil). The samples were mounted in a testing device with three different angulations and tested with 0.014" and 0.018" stainless steel wires (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, USA). The static frictional force was measured using a universal testing machine (DL 500, EMIC®, São José dos Pinhais, Brazil) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. RESULTS: There was a significant difference (pUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2013-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/8047510.1590/1678-775720130097Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 21 No. 4 (2013); 314-319Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 21 Núm. 4 (2013); 314-319Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 21 n. 4 (2013); 314-3191678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/80475/84138Copyright (c) 2013 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCastro, Raquel Morais Smith Neto, Perrin Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello Pithon, Matheus Melo Oliveira, Dauro Douglas 2014-05-08T13:24:25Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/80475Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2014-05-08T13:24:25Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets |
title |
Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets Castro, Raquel Morais |
title_short |
Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets |
title_full |
Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets |
title_sort |
Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets |
author |
Castro, Raquel Morais |
author_facet |
Castro, Raquel Morais Smith Neto, Perrin Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello Pithon, Matheus Melo Oliveira, Dauro Douglas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Smith Neto, Perrin Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello Pithon, Matheus Melo Oliveira, Dauro Douglas |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Castro, Raquel Morais Smith Neto, Perrin Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello Pithon, Matheus Melo Oliveira, Dauro Douglas |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To compare the static frictional forces generated at the bracket/wire interface of stainless steel brackets with different geometries and angulations, combined with orthodontic wires of different diameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The frictional forces were evaluated with three different types of metal brackets: a passive self-ligating (SmartClipTM, 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA), with a modified slot design (Mini Uni TwinTM, 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA) and conventional (Kirium, Abzil, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil). The samples were mounted in a testing device with three different angulations and tested with 0.014" and 0.018" stainless steel wires (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, USA). The static frictional force was measured using a universal testing machine (DL 500, EMIC®, São José dos Pinhais, Brazil) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. RESULTS: There was a significant difference (p |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/80475 10.1590/1678-775720130097 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/80475 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1678-775720130097 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/80475/84138 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 Journal of Applied Oral Science info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 Journal of Applied Oral Science |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 21 No. 4 (2013); 314-319 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 21 Núm. 4 (2013); 314-319 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 21 n. 4 (2013); 314-319 1678-7765 1678-7757 reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
collection |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jaos@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221677591724032 |