Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Castro, Raquel Morais
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Smith Neto, Perrin, Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello, Pithon, Matheus Melo, Oliveira, Dauro Douglas
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/80475
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To compare the static frictional forces generated at the bracket/wire interface of stainless steel brackets with different geometries and angulations, combined with orthodontic wires of different diameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The frictional forces were evaluated with three different types of metal brackets: a passive self-ligating (SmartClipTM, 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA), with a modified slot design (Mini Uni TwinTM, 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA) and conventional (Kirium, Abzil, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil). The samples were mounted in a testing device with three different angulations and tested with 0.014" and 0.018" stainless steel wires (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, USA). The static frictional force was measured using a universal testing machine (DL 500, EMIC®, São José dos Pinhais, Brazil) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. RESULTS: There was a significant difference (p
id USP-17_2a6db97fbd8dfb10849e0ab4d2008dc2
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/80475
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets OBJECTIVE: To compare the static frictional forces generated at the bracket/wire interface of stainless steel brackets with different geometries and angulations, combined with orthodontic wires of different diameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The frictional forces were evaluated with three different types of metal brackets: a passive self-ligating (SmartClipTM, 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA), with a modified slot design (Mini Uni TwinTM, 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA) and conventional (Kirium, Abzil, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil). The samples were mounted in a testing device with three different angulations and tested with 0.014" and 0.018" stainless steel wires (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, USA). The static frictional force was measured using a universal testing machine (DL 500, EMIC®, São José dos Pinhais, Brazil) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. RESULTS: There was a significant difference (pUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2013-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/8047510.1590/1678-775720130097Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 21 No. 4 (2013); 314-319Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 21 Núm. 4 (2013); 314-319Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 21 n. 4 (2013); 314-3191678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/80475/84138Copyright (c) 2013 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCastro, Raquel Morais Smith Neto, Perrin Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello Pithon, Matheus Melo Oliveira, Dauro Douglas 2014-05-08T13:24:25Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/80475Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2014-05-08T13:24:25Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets
title Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets
spellingShingle Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets
Castro, Raquel Morais
title_short Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets
title_full Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets
title_fullStr Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets
title_sort Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets
author Castro, Raquel Morais
author_facet Castro, Raquel Morais
Smith Neto, Perrin
Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello
Pithon, Matheus Melo
Oliveira, Dauro Douglas
author_role author
author2 Smith Neto, Perrin
Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello
Pithon, Matheus Melo
Oliveira, Dauro Douglas
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Castro, Raquel Morais
Smith Neto, Perrin
Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello
Pithon, Matheus Melo
Oliveira, Dauro Douglas
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the static frictional forces generated at the bracket/wire interface of stainless steel brackets with different geometries and angulations, combined with orthodontic wires of different diameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The frictional forces were evaluated with three different types of metal brackets: a passive self-ligating (SmartClipTM, 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA), with a modified slot design (Mini Uni TwinTM, 3M/Unitek, Monrovia, USA) and conventional (Kirium, Abzil, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil). The samples were mounted in a testing device with three different angulations and tested with 0.014" and 0.018" stainless steel wires (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, USA). The static frictional force was measured using a universal testing machine (DL 500, EMIC®, São José dos Pinhais, Brazil) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. RESULTS: There was a significant difference (p
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/80475
10.1590/1678-775720130097
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/80475
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-775720130097
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/80475/84138
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 Journal of Applied Oral Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 Journal of Applied Oral Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 21 No. 4 (2013); 314-319
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 21 Núm. 4 (2013); 314-319
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 21 n. 4 (2013); 314-319
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1800221677591724032