Comparison of TW2 and TW3 skeletal age differences in a Brazilian population

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ortega, Ana Isabel
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Haiter-Neto, Francisco, Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi, Bóscolo, Frab Norberto, Almeida, Solange Maria, Casanova, Marcia Spinelli
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3358
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the differences between the skeletal ages estimated by TW2 and TW3 methods through their RUS and Carpal systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample of two hundred and forty hand and wrist radiographs of male and female Brazilian children aged 84-199 months was evaluated by five observers. The Dunnet test was performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Results showed higher skeletal ages estimated by TW2RUS than TW3RUS and Carpal for both genders. For girls a statistically significant difference (p
id USP-17_41baa03a1a97e3b5684fc880189e1620
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/3358
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of TW2 and TW3 skeletal age differences in a Brazilian population Estudo comparativo das idades ósseas estimadas pelos métodos TW2 e TW3 numa população brasileira Maturação esqueléticaIdade ósseaRadiografia de mão e punhoSkeletal maturitySkeletal ageHand and wrist radiograph OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the differences between the skeletal ages estimated by TW2 and TW3 methods through their RUS and Carpal systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample of two hundred and forty hand and wrist radiographs of male and female Brazilian children aged 84-199 months was evaluated by five observers. The Dunnet test was performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Results showed higher skeletal ages estimated by TW2RUS than TW3RUS and Carpal for both genders. For girls a statistically significant difference (p OBJETIVO: O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar as diferenças entre as idades esqueletais estimadas pelos métodos TW2 e TW3, usando os sistemas RUS e Carpal. MATERIAL E MÉTODOS: Uma amostra de 240 radiografias de mão e punho de crianças brasileiras de ambos os sexos com idade cronológica entre 84 e 199 meses foram avaliadas por cinco observadores. Para análise estatística dos dados foi aplicado o Teste de Dunnet. RESULTADOS: Os resultados demonstraram que as idades esqueletais estimadas pelo método TW2RUS foram mais avançadas que aquelas estimadas pelos métodos TW3RUS e Carpal, para ambos os sexos. Para o sexo feminino, uma diferença estatisticamente significante (pUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2006-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/335810.1590/S1678-77572006000200014Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2006); 142-146 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2006); 142-146 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 14 n. 2 (2006); 142-146 1678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3358/4048Copyright (c) 2006 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOrtega, Ana IsabelHaiter-Neto, FranciscoAmbrosano, Gláucia Maria BoviBóscolo, Frab NorbertoAlmeida, Solange MariaCasanova, Marcia Spinelli2012-04-27T11:53:40Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/3358Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2012-04-27T11:53:40Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of TW2 and TW3 skeletal age differences in a Brazilian population
Estudo comparativo das idades ósseas estimadas pelos métodos TW2 e TW3 numa população brasileira
title Comparison of TW2 and TW3 skeletal age differences in a Brazilian population
spellingShingle Comparison of TW2 and TW3 skeletal age differences in a Brazilian population
Ortega, Ana Isabel
Maturação esquelética
Idade óssea
Radiografia de mão e punho
Skeletal maturity
Skeletal age
Hand and wrist radiograph
title_short Comparison of TW2 and TW3 skeletal age differences in a Brazilian population
title_full Comparison of TW2 and TW3 skeletal age differences in a Brazilian population
title_fullStr Comparison of TW2 and TW3 skeletal age differences in a Brazilian population
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of TW2 and TW3 skeletal age differences in a Brazilian population
title_sort Comparison of TW2 and TW3 skeletal age differences in a Brazilian population
author Ortega, Ana Isabel
author_facet Ortega, Ana Isabel
Haiter-Neto, Francisco
Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi
Bóscolo, Frab Norberto
Almeida, Solange Maria
Casanova, Marcia Spinelli
author_role author
author2 Haiter-Neto, Francisco
Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi
Bóscolo, Frab Norberto
Almeida, Solange Maria
Casanova, Marcia Spinelli
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ortega, Ana Isabel
Haiter-Neto, Francisco
Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi
Bóscolo, Frab Norberto
Almeida, Solange Maria
Casanova, Marcia Spinelli
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Maturação esquelética
Idade óssea
Radiografia de mão e punho
Skeletal maturity
Skeletal age
Hand and wrist radiograph
topic Maturação esquelética
Idade óssea
Radiografia de mão e punho
Skeletal maturity
Skeletal age
Hand and wrist radiograph
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the differences between the skeletal ages estimated by TW2 and TW3 methods through their RUS and Carpal systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample of two hundred and forty hand and wrist radiographs of male and female Brazilian children aged 84-199 months was evaluated by five observers. The Dunnet test was performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Results showed higher skeletal ages estimated by TW2RUS than TW3RUS and Carpal for both genders. For girls a statistically significant difference (p
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3358
10.1590/S1678-77572006000200014
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3358
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-77572006000200014
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3358/4048
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2006 Journal of Applied Oral Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2006 Journal of Applied Oral Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2006); 142-146
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2006); 142-146
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 14 n. 2 (2006); 142-146
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1800221672723185664

Registros relacionados