Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zuppardo, Marcelo Lelis
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Santamaria Jr, Milton, Ferreira, Camila Lopes, Longo, Mariéllen, Cirelli, Joni Augusto, Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine, Jardini, Maria Aparecida Neves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/190280
Resumo: Objective: To compare two corticotomy surgical protocols in rats to verify whether they alter conventional orthodontic movement. Methodology: Sixty Wistar rats were divided into three groups – orthodontic movement (CG), orthodontic movement and corticotomy (G1) and orthodontic movement with corticotomy and decortication (G2) – and euthanized after 7 and 14 days. Tooth movement (mm), bone volume fraction and bone volume ratio to total volume (BV/TV), and bone mineral density (BMD) were evaluated by micro-CT. The total amount of bone was measured in square millimeters and expressed as the percentage of bone area in the histomorphometry. The number of positive TRAP cells and RANK/RANKL/OPG interaction were also investigated. Results: Day 14 showed a statistically significant difference in orthodontic tooth movement in CG compared with G1 (7.52 mm; p=0.009) and G2 (7.36 mm; p=0.016). A micro-CT analysis revealed a difference between CG, G1 and G2 regarding BV/TV, with G1 and G2 presenting a lower BV/TV ratio at 14 days (0.77 and 0.73 respectively); we found no statistically significant differences regarding BMD. There was a difference in the total amount of bone in the CG group between 7 and 14 days. At 14 days, CG presented a significantly higher bone percentage than G1 and G2. Regarding TRAP, G2 had more positive cells at 7 and 14 days compared with CG and G1. Conclusion: Corticotomy accelerates orthodontic movement. Decortication does not improve corticotomy efficiency.
id USP-17_4751315bebccb9d606287dc91b055eff
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/190280
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movementCorticotomyOrthodontic movementAnimal studyObjective: To compare two corticotomy surgical protocols in rats to verify whether they alter conventional orthodontic movement. Methodology: Sixty Wistar rats were divided into three groups – orthodontic movement (CG), orthodontic movement and corticotomy (G1) and orthodontic movement with corticotomy and decortication (G2) – and euthanized after 7 and 14 days. Tooth movement (mm), bone volume fraction and bone volume ratio to total volume (BV/TV), and bone mineral density (BMD) were evaluated by micro-CT. The total amount of bone was measured in square millimeters and expressed as the percentage of bone area in the histomorphometry. The number of positive TRAP cells and RANK/RANKL/OPG interaction were also investigated. Results: Day 14 showed a statistically significant difference in orthodontic tooth movement in CG compared with G1 (7.52 mm; p=0.009) and G2 (7.36 mm; p=0.016). A micro-CT analysis revealed a difference between CG, G1 and G2 regarding BV/TV, with G1 and G2 presenting a lower BV/TV ratio at 14 days (0.77 and 0.73 respectively); we found no statistically significant differences regarding BMD. There was a difference in the total amount of bone in the CG group between 7 and 14 days. At 14 days, CG presented a significantly higher bone percentage than G1 and G2. Regarding TRAP, G2 had more positive cells at 7 and 14 days compared with CG and G1. Conclusion: Corticotomy accelerates orthodontic movement. Decortication does not improve corticotomy efficiency.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2021-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/19028010.1590/1678-7757-2019-0766Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 28 (2020); e20190766Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 28 (2020); e20190766Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 28 (2020); e201907661678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/190280/175683Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Applied Oral Sciencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZuppardo, Marcelo LelisSantamaria Jr, MiltonFerreira, Camila LopesLongo, MariéllenCirelli, Joni AugustoSantamaria, Mauro PedrineJardini, Maria Aparecida Neves2021-09-01T13:45:06Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/190280Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2021-09-01T13:45:06Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement
title Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement
spellingShingle Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement
Zuppardo, Marcelo Lelis
Corticotomy
Orthodontic movement
Animal study
title_short Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement
title_full Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement
title_fullStr Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement
title_full_unstemmed Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement
title_sort Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement
author Zuppardo, Marcelo Lelis
author_facet Zuppardo, Marcelo Lelis
Santamaria Jr, Milton
Ferreira, Camila Lopes
Longo, Mariéllen
Cirelli, Joni Augusto
Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine
Jardini, Maria Aparecida Neves
author_role author
author2 Santamaria Jr, Milton
Ferreira, Camila Lopes
Longo, Mariéllen
Cirelli, Joni Augusto
Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine
Jardini, Maria Aparecida Neves
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zuppardo, Marcelo Lelis
Santamaria Jr, Milton
Ferreira, Camila Lopes
Longo, Mariéllen
Cirelli, Joni Augusto
Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine
Jardini, Maria Aparecida Neves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Corticotomy
Orthodontic movement
Animal study
topic Corticotomy
Orthodontic movement
Animal study
description Objective: To compare two corticotomy surgical protocols in rats to verify whether they alter conventional orthodontic movement. Methodology: Sixty Wistar rats were divided into three groups – orthodontic movement (CG), orthodontic movement and corticotomy (G1) and orthodontic movement with corticotomy and decortication (G2) – and euthanized after 7 and 14 days. Tooth movement (mm), bone volume fraction and bone volume ratio to total volume (BV/TV), and bone mineral density (BMD) were evaluated by micro-CT. The total amount of bone was measured in square millimeters and expressed as the percentage of bone area in the histomorphometry. The number of positive TRAP cells and RANK/RANKL/OPG interaction were also investigated. Results: Day 14 showed a statistically significant difference in orthodontic tooth movement in CG compared with G1 (7.52 mm; p=0.009) and G2 (7.36 mm; p=0.016). A micro-CT analysis revealed a difference between CG, G1 and G2 regarding BV/TV, with G1 and G2 presenting a lower BV/TV ratio at 14 days (0.77 and 0.73 respectively); we found no statistically significant differences regarding BMD. There was a difference in the total amount of bone in the CG group between 7 and 14 days. At 14 days, CG presented a significantly higher bone percentage than G1 and G2. Regarding TRAP, G2 had more positive cells at 7 and 14 days compared with CG and G1. Conclusion: Corticotomy accelerates orthodontic movement. Decortication does not improve corticotomy efficiency.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/190280
10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0766
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/190280
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0766
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/190280/175683
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Applied Oral Science
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Applied Oral Science
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 28 (2020); e20190766
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 28 (2020); e20190766
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 28 (2020); e20190766
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1800221681973723136