Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/190280 |
Resumo: | Objective: To compare two corticotomy surgical protocols in rats to verify whether they alter conventional orthodontic movement. Methodology: Sixty Wistar rats were divided into three groups – orthodontic movement (CG), orthodontic movement and corticotomy (G1) and orthodontic movement with corticotomy and decortication (G2) – and euthanized after 7 and 14 days. Tooth movement (mm), bone volume fraction and bone volume ratio to total volume (BV/TV), and bone mineral density (BMD) were evaluated by micro-CT. The total amount of bone was measured in square millimeters and expressed as the percentage of bone area in the histomorphometry. The number of positive TRAP cells and RANK/RANKL/OPG interaction were also investigated. Results: Day 14 showed a statistically significant difference in orthodontic tooth movement in CG compared with G1 (7.52 mm; p=0.009) and G2 (7.36 mm; p=0.016). A micro-CT analysis revealed a difference between CG, G1 and G2 regarding BV/TV, with G1 and G2 presenting a lower BV/TV ratio at 14 days (0.77 and 0.73 respectively); we found no statistically significant differences regarding BMD. There was a difference in the total amount of bone in the CG group between 7 and 14 days. At 14 days, CG presented a significantly higher bone percentage than G1 and G2. Regarding TRAP, G2 had more positive cells at 7 and 14 days compared with CG and G1. Conclusion: Corticotomy accelerates orthodontic movement. Decortication does not improve corticotomy efficiency. |
id |
USP-17_4751315bebccb9d606287dc91b055eff |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/190280 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-17 |
network_name_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movementCorticotomyOrthodontic movementAnimal studyObjective: To compare two corticotomy surgical protocols in rats to verify whether they alter conventional orthodontic movement. Methodology: Sixty Wistar rats were divided into three groups – orthodontic movement (CG), orthodontic movement and corticotomy (G1) and orthodontic movement with corticotomy and decortication (G2) – and euthanized after 7 and 14 days. Tooth movement (mm), bone volume fraction and bone volume ratio to total volume (BV/TV), and bone mineral density (BMD) were evaluated by micro-CT. The total amount of bone was measured in square millimeters and expressed as the percentage of bone area in the histomorphometry. The number of positive TRAP cells and RANK/RANKL/OPG interaction were also investigated. Results: Day 14 showed a statistically significant difference in orthodontic tooth movement in CG compared with G1 (7.52 mm; p=0.009) and G2 (7.36 mm; p=0.016). A micro-CT analysis revealed a difference between CG, G1 and G2 regarding BV/TV, with G1 and G2 presenting a lower BV/TV ratio at 14 days (0.77 and 0.73 respectively); we found no statistically significant differences regarding BMD. There was a difference in the total amount of bone in the CG group between 7 and 14 days. At 14 days, CG presented a significantly higher bone percentage than G1 and G2. Regarding TRAP, G2 had more positive cells at 7 and 14 days compared with CG and G1. Conclusion: Corticotomy accelerates orthodontic movement. Decortication does not improve corticotomy efficiency.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2021-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/19028010.1590/1678-7757-2019-0766Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 28 (2020); e20190766Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 28 (2020); e20190766Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 28 (2020); e201907661678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/190280/175683Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Applied Oral Sciencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZuppardo, Marcelo LelisSantamaria Jr, MiltonFerreira, Camila LopesLongo, MariéllenCirelli, Joni AugustoSantamaria, Mauro PedrineJardini, Maria Aparecida Neves2021-09-01T13:45:06Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/190280Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2021-09-01T13:45:06Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement |
title |
Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement |
spellingShingle |
Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement Zuppardo, Marcelo Lelis Corticotomy Orthodontic movement Animal study |
title_short |
Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement |
title_full |
Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement |
title_fullStr |
Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement |
title_sort |
Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement |
author |
Zuppardo, Marcelo Lelis |
author_facet |
Zuppardo, Marcelo Lelis Santamaria Jr, Milton Ferreira, Camila Lopes Longo, Mariéllen Cirelli, Joni Augusto Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine Jardini, Maria Aparecida Neves |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santamaria Jr, Milton Ferreira, Camila Lopes Longo, Mariéllen Cirelli, Joni Augusto Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine Jardini, Maria Aparecida Neves |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zuppardo, Marcelo Lelis Santamaria Jr, Milton Ferreira, Camila Lopes Longo, Mariéllen Cirelli, Joni Augusto Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine Jardini, Maria Aparecida Neves |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Corticotomy Orthodontic movement Animal study |
topic |
Corticotomy Orthodontic movement Animal study |
description |
Objective: To compare two corticotomy surgical protocols in rats to verify whether they alter conventional orthodontic movement. Methodology: Sixty Wistar rats were divided into three groups – orthodontic movement (CG), orthodontic movement and corticotomy (G1) and orthodontic movement with corticotomy and decortication (G2) – and euthanized after 7 and 14 days. Tooth movement (mm), bone volume fraction and bone volume ratio to total volume (BV/TV), and bone mineral density (BMD) were evaluated by micro-CT. The total amount of bone was measured in square millimeters and expressed as the percentage of bone area in the histomorphometry. The number of positive TRAP cells and RANK/RANKL/OPG interaction were also investigated. Results: Day 14 showed a statistically significant difference in orthodontic tooth movement in CG compared with G1 (7.52 mm; p=0.009) and G2 (7.36 mm; p=0.016). A micro-CT analysis revealed a difference between CG, G1 and G2 regarding BV/TV, with G1 and G2 presenting a lower BV/TV ratio at 14 days (0.77 and 0.73 respectively); we found no statistically significant differences regarding BMD. There was a difference in the total amount of bone in the CG group between 7 and 14 days. At 14 days, CG presented a significantly higher bone percentage than G1 and G2. Regarding TRAP, G2 had more positive cells at 7 and 14 days compared with CG and G1. Conclusion: Corticotomy accelerates orthodontic movement. Decortication does not improve corticotomy efficiency. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/190280 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0766 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/190280 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0766 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/190280/175683 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Applied Oral Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Applied Oral Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 28 (2020); e20190766 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 28 (2020); e20190766 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 28 (2020); e20190766 1678-7765 1678-7757 reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
collection |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jaos@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221681973723136 |