Effect of violet LED light on in-office bleaching protocols: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kury, Matheus
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Wada, Erica Eiko, Silva, Daylana Pacheco da, Tabchoury, Cínthia Pereira Machado, Giannini, Marcelo, Cavalli, Vanessa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/190143
Resumo: Objective: This study evaluated the clinical effect of violet LED light on in-office bleaching used alone or combined with 37% carbamide peroxide (CP) or 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP). Methodology: A total of 100 patients were divided into five groups (n=20): LED, LED/CP, CP, LED/HP and HP. Colorimetric evaluation was performed using a spectrophotometer (ΔE, ΔL, Δa, Δb) and a visual shade guide (ΔSGU). Calcium (Ca)/phosphorous (P) ratio was quantified in the enamel microbiopsies. Measurements were performed at baseline (T 0 ), after bleaching (T B ) and in the 14-day follow-up (T 14 ). At each bleaching session, a visual scale determined the absolute risk (AR) and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS). Data were evaluated by one-way (ΔE, Δa, ΔL, Δb), two-way repeated measures ANOVA (Ca/P ratio), and Tukey post-hoc tests. ΔSGU and TS were evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney, and AR by Chi-Squared tests (a=5%). Results: LED produced the lowest ΔE (p<0.05), but LED/HP promoted greater ΔE, ΔSGU and Δb (T 14 ) than HP (p<0.05). No differences were observed in ΔE and ΔSGU for LED/CP and HP groups (p>0.05). ΔL and Δa were not influenced by LED activation. After bleaching, LED/CP exhibited greater Δb than CP (p>0.05), but no differences were found between these groups at T 14 (p>0.05). LED treatment promoted the lowest risk of TS (16%), while HP promoted the highest (94.4%) (p<0.05). No statistical differences of risk of TS were found for CP (44%), LED/CP (61%) and LED/HP (88%) groups (p>0.05). No differences were found in enamel Ca/P ratio among treatments, regardless of evaluation times. Conclusions: Violet LED alone produced the lowest bleaching effect, but enhanced HP bleaching results. Patients treated with LED/CP reached the same efficacy of HP, with reduced risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity and none of the bleaching protocols adversely affected enamel mineral content.
id USP-17_5b13fcf5a2b6a70c7f6d32ed656f03fa
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/190143
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Effect of violet LED light on in-office bleaching protocols: a randomized controlled clinical trialTooth bleachingHydrogen peroxideCarbamide peroxideLightDentin sensitivityObjective: This study evaluated the clinical effect of violet LED light on in-office bleaching used alone or combined with 37% carbamide peroxide (CP) or 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP). Methodology: A total of 100 patients were divided into five groups (n=20): LED, LED/CP, CP, LED/HP and HP. Colorimetric evaluation was performed using a spectrophotometer (ΔE, ΔL, Δa, Δb) and a visual shade guide (ΔSGU). Calcium (Ca)/phosphorous (P) ratio was quantified in the enamel microbiopsies. Measurements were performed at baseline (T 0 ), after bleaching (T B ) and in the 14-day follow-up (T 14 ). At each bleaching session, a visual scale determined the absolute risk (AR) and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS). Data were evaluated by one-way (ΔE, Δa, ΔL, Δb), two-way repeated measures ANOVA (Ca/P ratio), and Tukey post-hoc tests. ΔSGU and TS were evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney, and AR by Chi-Squared tests (a=5%). Results: LED produced the lowest ΔE (p<0.05), but LED/HP promoted greater ΔE, ΔSGU and Δb (T 14 ) than HP (p<0.05). No differences were observed in ΔE and ΔSGU for LED/CP and HP groups (p>0.05). ΔL and Δa were not influenced by LED activation. After bleaching, LED/CP exhibited greater Δb than CP (p>0.05), but no differences were found between these groups at T 14 (p>0.05). LED treatment promoted the lowest risk of TS (16%), while HP promoted the highest (94.4%) (p<0.05). No statistical differences of risk of TS were found for CP (44%), LED/CP (61%) and LED/HP (88%) groups (p>0.05). No differences were found in enamel Ca/P ratio among treatments, regardless of evaluation times. Conclusions: Violet LED alone produced the lowest bleaching effect, but enhanced HP bleaching results. Patients treated with LED/CP reached the same efficacy of HP, with reduced risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity and none of the bleaching protocols adversely affected enamel mineral content.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2021-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/19014310.1590/1678-7757-2019-0720Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 28 (2020); e20190720Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 28 (2020); e20190720Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 28 (2020); e201907201678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/190143/175536Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Applied Oral Sciencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKury, Matheus Wada, Erica Eiko Silva, Daylana Pacheco da Tabchoury, Cínthia Pereira MachadoGiannini, MarceloCavalli, Vanessa 2021-08-30T14:51:42Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/190143Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2021-08-30T14:51:42Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of violet LED light on in-office bleaching protocols: a randomized controlled clinical trial
title Effect of violet LED light on in-office bleaching protocols: a randomized controlled clinical trial
spellingShingle Effect of violet LED light on in-office bleaching protocols: a randomized controlled clinical trial
Kury, Matheus
Tooth bleaching
Hydrogen peroxide
Carbamide peroxide
Light
Dentin sensitivity
title_short Effect of violet LED light on in-office bleaching protocols: a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full Effect of violet LED light on in-office bleaching protocols: a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Effect of violet LED light on in-office bleaching protocols: a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of violet LED light on in-office bleaching protocols: a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort Effect of violet LED light on in-office bleaching protocols: a randomized controlled clinical trial
author Kury, Matheus
author_facet Kury, Matheus
Wada, Erica Eiko
Silva, Daylana Pacheco da
Tabchoury, Cínthia Pereira Machado
Giannini, Marcelo
Cavalli, Vanessa
author_role author
author2 Wada, Erica Eiko
Silva, Daylana Pacheco da
Tabchoury, Cínthia Pereira Machado
Giannini, Marcelo
Cavalli, Vanessa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kury, Matheus
Wada, Erica Eiko
Silva, Daylana Pacheco da
Tabchoury, Cínthia Pereira Machado
Giannini, Marcelo
Cavalli, Vanessa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tooth bleaching
Hydrogen peroxide
Carbamide peroxide
Light
Dentin sensitivity
topic Tooth bleaching
Hydrogen peroxide
Carbamide peroxide
Light
Dentin sensitivity
description Objective: This study evaluated the clinical effect of violet LED light on in-office bleaching used alone or combined with 37% carbamide peroxide (CP) or 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP). Methodology: A total of 100 patients were divided into five groups (n=20): LED, LED/CP, CP, LED/HP and HP. Colorimetric evaluation was performed using a spectrophotometer (ΔE, ΔL, Δa, Δb) and a visual shade guide (ΔSGU). Calcium (Ca)/phosphorous (P) ratio was quantified in the enamel microbiopsies. Measurements were performed at baseline (T 0 ), after bleaching (T B ) and in the 14-day follow-up (T 14 ). At each bleaching session, a visual scale determined the absolute risk (AR) and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS). Data were evaluated by one-way (ΔE, Δa, ΔL, Δb), two-way repeated measures ANOVA (Ca/P ratio), and Tukey post-hoc tests. ΔSGU and TS were evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney, and AR by Chi-Squared tests (a=5%). Results: LED produced the lowest ΔE (p<0.05), but LED/HP promoted greater ΔE, ΔSGU and Δb (T 14 ) than HP (p<0.05). No differences were observed in ΔE and ΔSGU for LED/CP and HP groups (p>0.05). ΔL and Δa were not influenced by LED activation. After bleaching, LED/CP exhibited greater Δb than CP (p>0.05), but no differences were found between these groups at T 14 (p>0.05). LED treatment promoted the lowest risk of TS (16%), while HP promoted the highest (94.4%) (p<0.05). No statistical differences of risk of TS were found for CP (44%), LED/CP (61%) and LED/HP (88%) groups (p>0.05). No differences were found in enamel Ca/P ratio among treatments, regardless of evaluation times. Conclusions: Violet LED alone produced the lowest bleaching effect, but enhanced HP bleaching results. Patients treated with LED/CP reached the same efficacy of HP, with reduced risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity and none of the bleaching protocols adversely affected enamel mineral content.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/190143
10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0720
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/190143
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0720
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/190143/175536
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Applied Oral Science
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Applied Oral Science
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 28 (2020); e20190720
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 28 (2020); e20190720
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 28 (2020); e20190720
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1800221681960091648