Evaluating noise in digitized radiographic images by means of histogram

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rubira-Bullen,Izabel Regina Fischer
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Escarpinati,Maurício Cunha, Schiabel,Homero, Vieira,Marcelo Andrade da Costa, Rubira,Fischer, Lauris,José Roberto Pereira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572006000600005
Resumo: To evaluate the performance of three digital devices regarding the noise added to digital radiographic images containing different optical densities. METHODS: A radiographic image was digitized repeatedly ten times using two scanners (HP 4c/T and HP 5370C) and a digital camera (Nikon 990). A histogram tool measured a mean pixel value and the standard deviation of the region of interest in each image. Both values were used to calculate the image noise at the different optical densities. RESULTS: The noise values found were different for all devices and optical densities. There was a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the scanner HP 4c/T and the digital camera regarding the noise values. There was a significant correlation (p<0.05) between the noise values found for the HP 4c/T scanner and the digital camera and between both scanners (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The noise added to the image was higher for scanner HP 4c/T and less for the digital camera. The noise was higher at the lower optical densities for the scanners. It seems that depending on the equipment and the optical density, a variable amount of noise can be incorporated to the images.
id USP-17_648dc263c3b12565e9048aa3a988aa45
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1678-77572006000600005
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluating noise in digitized radiographic images by means of histogramDigital imageRadiographic imageScannersDigital cameraCharge-coupled deviceNoiseTo evaluate the performance of three digital devices regarding the noise added to digital radiographic images containing different optical densities. METHODS: A radiographic image was digitized repeatedly ten times using two scanners (HP 4c/T and HP 5370C) and a digital camera (Nikon 990). A histogram tool measured a mean pixel value and the standard deviation of the region of interest in each image. Both values were used to calculate the image noise at the different optical densities. RESULTS: The noise values found were different for all devices and optical densities. There was a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the scanner HP 4c/T and the digital camera regarding the noise values. There was a significant correlation (p<0.05) between the noise values found for the HP 4c/T scanner and the digital camera and between both scanners (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The noise added to the image was higher for scanner HP 4c/T and less for the digital camera. The noise was higher at the lower optical densities for the scanners. It seems that depending on the equipment and the optical density, a variable amount of noise can be incorporated to the images.Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP2006-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572006000600005Journal of Applied Oral Science v.14 n.6 2006reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S1678-77572006000600005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRubira-Bullen,Izabel Regina FischerEscarpinati,Maurício CunhaSchiabel,HomeroVieira,Marcelo Andrade da CostaRubira,FischerLauris,José Roberto Pereiraeng2007-02-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-77572006000600005Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2007-02-08T00:00Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluating noise in digitized radiographic images by means of histogram
title Evaluating noise in digitized radiographic images by means of histogram
spellingShingle Evaluating noise in digitized radiographic images by means of histogram
Rubira-Bullen,Izabel Regina Fischer
Digital image
Radiographic image
Scanners
Digital camera
Charge-coupled device
Noise
title_short Evaluating noise in digitized radiographic images by means of histogram
title_full Evaluating noise in digitized radiographic images by means of histogram
title_fullStr Evaluating noise in digitized radiographic images by means of histogram
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating noise in digitized radiographic images by means of histogram
title_sort Evaluating noise in digitized radiographic images by means of histogram
author Rubira-Bullen,Izabel Regina Fischer
author_facet Rubira-Bullen,Izabel Regina Fischer
Escarpinati,Maurício Cunha
Schiabel,Homero
Vieira,Marcelo Andrade da Costa
Rubira,Fischer
Lauris,José Roberto Pereira
author_role author
author2 Escarpinati,Maurício Cunha
Schiabel,Homero
Vieira,Marcelo Andrade da Costa
Rubira,Fischer
Lauris,José Roberto Pereira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rubira-Bullen,Izabel Regina Fischer
Escarpinati,Maurício Cunha
Schiabel,Homero
Vieira,Marcelo Andrade da Costa
Rubira,Fischer
Lauris,José Roberto Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Digital image
Radiographic image
Scanners
Digital camera
Charge-coupled device
Noise
topic Digital image
Radiographic image
Scanners
Digital camera
Charge-coupled device
Noise
description To evaluate the performance of three digital devices regarding the noise added to digital radiographic images containing different optical densities. METHODS: A radiographic image was digitized repeatedly ten times using two scanners (HP 4c/T and HP 5370C) and a digital camera (Nikon 990). A histogram tool measured a mean pixel value and the standard deviation of the region of interest in each image. Both values were used to calculate the image noise at the different optical densities. RESULTS: The noise values found were different for all devices and optical densities. There was a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the scanner HP 4c/T and the digital camera regarding the noise values. There was a significant correlation (p<0.05) between the noise values found for the HP 4c/T scanner and the digital camera and between both scanners (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The noise added to the image was higher for scanner HP 4c/T and less for the digital camera. The noise was higher at the lower optical densities for the scanners. It seems that depending on the equipment and the optical density, a variable amount of noise can be incorporated to the images.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572006000600005
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572006000600005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-77572006000600005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science v.14 n.6 2006
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1748936434351341568