Efficacy of three conditions of radiographic interpretation for assessment root canal length
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3254 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of three conditions of image interpretation for radiographic root measurements and calculating the intra-observer reproducibility of the measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty intra-operative periapical radiographs of maxillary central and lateral incisors were measured, in mm, from the tip of the file to the radiographic apex, using a caliper. Three separate measurements were made of the 30 radiographs. The three measurements for each tooth were averaged and the mean used for further calculations. After a 12-day period, the measurements were repeated. The three experimental viewing conditions used: 1) standard viewbox without masking of background light around the radiograph and without magnification (Visual); 2) standard viewbox with use of a magnifying lens of 2.5x and with background light masked (Magnification); and 3) viewer device that restricts room lighting and enlarges the image by a magnifying lens of 1.75x (Viewer). The mean and standard deviation of the measurements were calculated and used for descriptive analysis. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate intra-observer and inter-method agreement of the measurements. The measurement error was estimated by Dalhberg's formula. RESULTS: The ANOVA showed no significant differences between measurement sessions, viewing methods, or interaction between observation session and method (p>;0.05). The intra-observer measurement error was 0.02 mm for Visual and the Magnification methods and 0.01 mm for the Viewer. CONCLUSION: There does not seem to be any advantage in using viewbox masking or magnification for measuring the distance between the end of the endodontic file and the root apex in maxillary incisors. |
id |
USP-17_901493124a3a9fa691eb01967ac7393e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/3254 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-17 |
network_name_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Efficacy of three conditions of radiographic interpretation for assessment root canal length Eficácia de três condições de interpretação radiográfica em odontometria Interpretação radiográficaMagnificaçãoOdontometriaReprodutibilidadeOdontometryRadiographic image interpretationRadiographic magnificationReproducibility of results OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of three conditions of image interpretation for radiographic root measurements and calculating the intra-observer reproducibility of the measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty intra-operative periapical radiographs of maxillary central and lateral incisors were measured, in mm, from the tip of the file to the radiographic apex, using a caliper. Three separate measurements were made of the 30 radiographs. The three measurements for each tooth were averaged and the mean used for further calculations. After a 12-day period, the measurements were repeated. The three experimental viewing conditions used: 1) standard viewbox without masking of background light around the radiograph and without magnification (Visual); 2) standard viewbox with use of a magnifying lens of 2.5x and with background light masked (Magnification); and 3) viewer device that restricts room lighting and enlarges the image by a magnifying lens of 1.75x (Viewer). The mean and standard deviation of the measurements were calculated and used for descriptive analysis. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate intra-observer and inter-method agreement of the measurements. The measurement error was estimated by Dalhberg's formula. RESULTS: The ANOVA showed no significant differences between measurement sessions, viewing methods, or interaction between observation session and method (p>;0.05). The intra-observer measurement error was 0.02 mm for Visual and the Magnification methods and 0.01 mm for the Viewer. CONCLUSION: There does not seem to be any advantage in using viewbox masking or magnification for measuring the distance between the end of the endodontic file and the root apex in maxillary incisors. OBJETIVO: Comparar a eficácia de três condições de interpretação radiográfica em odontometria e avaliar a concordância intra-observador. MATERIAL E MÉTODO: Trinta radiografias periapicais de incisivos central e lateral superiores, de arquivos foram medidas, em mm, da extremidade da lima ao ápice radiográfico, com a utilização de um paquímetro digital. Foram feitas três medidas em cada radiografia e em seguida foi calculada a média. Após um período de 12 dias, as medidas foram repetidas. As três condições experimentais de interpretação radiográfica foram: negatoscópio sem máscara e sem magnificação (Visual); 2) negatoscópio com lente de aumento de 2,5 X e com máscara (Magnificação) e 3) bloqueador de luz e lente de aumento de 1,75 X (Bloqueador). As médias e os desvios-padrão das medidas foram calculados e realizada uma análise descritiva. Foi utilizada a análise de variância a dois critérios (ANOVA) para avaliar a concordância intra-observador e intramétodo. O erro das medidas foi calculado pela fórmula de Dalhberg. RESULTADOS: O teste ANOVA não mostrou diferenças significantes entre as duas sessões de observação, métodos de interpretação ou interação entre as sessões de interpretação e método (p>;0,05). A medida intra-observador foi 0,02 mm para os métodos Visual e Magnificação e 0,01 mm para o Bloqueador. CONCLUSÃO: Parece não haver qualquer vantagem realizar medidas da distância entre o ápice radicular e o extremo da lima endodôntica em dentes incisivos superiores utilizando máscara ou magnificação da imagem. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2005-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/325410.1590/S1678-77572005000100017Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2005); 83-86 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2005); 83-86 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 13 n. 1 (2005); 83-86 1678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3254/3944Copyright (c) 2005 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOgata, MitsuruLoffredo, Leonor de Castro MonteiroKuga, Milton CarlosScaf, Gulnara2012-04-27T11:49:48Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/3254Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2012-04-27T11:49:48Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Efficacy of three conditions of radiographic interpretation for assessment root canal length Eficácia de três condições de interpretação radiográfica em odontometria |
title |
Efficacy of three conditions of radiographic interpretation for assessment root canal length |
spellingShingle |
Efficacy of three conditions of radiographic interpretation for assessment root canal length Ogata, Mitsuru Interpretação radiográfica Magnificação Odontometria Reprodutibilidade Odontometry Radiographic image interpretation Radiographic magnification Reproducibility of results |
title_short |
Efficacy of three conditions of radiographic interpretation for assessment root canal length |
title_full |
Efficacy of three conditions of radiographic interpretation for assessment root canal length |
title_fullStr |
Efficacy of three conditions of radiographic interpretation for assessment root canal length |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficacy of three conditions of radiographic interpretation for assessment root canal length |
title_sort |
Efficacy of three conditions of radiographic interpretation for assessment root canal length |
author |
Ogata, Mitsuru |
author_facet |
Ogata, Mitsuru Loffredo, Leonor de Castro Monteiro Kuga, Milton Carlos Scaf, Gulnara |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Loffredo, Leonor de Castro Monteiro Kuga, Milton Carlos Scaf, Gulnara |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ogata, Mitsuru Loffredo, Leonor de Castro Monteiro Kuga, Milton Carlos Scaf, Gulnara |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Interpretação radiográfica Magnificação Odontometria Reprodutibilidade Odontometry Radiographic image interpretation Radiographic magnification Reproducibility of results |
topic |
Interpretação radiográfica Magnificação Odontometria Reprodutibilidade Odontometry Radiographic image interpretation Radiographic magnification Reproducibility of results |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of three conditions of image interpretation for radiographic root measurements and calculating the intra-observer reproducibility of the measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty intra-operative periapical radiographs of maxillary central and lateral incisors were measured, in mm, from the tip of the file to the radiographic apex, using a caliper. Three separate measurements were made of the 30 radiographs. The three measurements for each tooth were averaged and the mean used for further calculations. After a 12-day period, the measurements were repeated. The three experimental viewing conditions used: 1) standard viewbox without masking of background light around the radiograph and without magnification (Visual); 2) standard viewbox with use of a magnifying lens of 2.5x and with background light masked (Magnification); and 3) viewer device that restricts room lighting and enlarges the image by a magnifying lens of 1.75x (Viewer). The mean and standard deviation of the measurements were calculated and used for descriptive analysis. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate intra-observer and inter-method agreement of the measurements. The measurement error was estimated by Dalhberg's formula. RESULTS: The ANOVA showed no significant differences between measurement sessions, viewing methods, or interaction between observation session and method (p>;0.05). The intra-observer measurement error was 0.02 mm for Visual and the Magnification methods and 0.01 mm for the Viewer. CONCLUSION: There does not seem to be any advantage in using viewbox masking or magnification for measuring the distance between the end of the endodontic file and the root apex in maxillary incisors. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3254 10.1590/S1678-77572005000100017 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3254 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1678-77572005000100017 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3254/3944 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2005 Journal of Applied Oral Science info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2005 Journal of Applied Oral Science |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2005); 83-86 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2005); 83-86 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 13 n. 1 (2005); 83-86 1678-7765 1678-7757 reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
collection |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jaos@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221672012251136 |