Longitudinal bond strength of a universal adhesive and chemical dentin characterization under different acid etching protocols

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gonçalves, Lucélia Lemes
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Prakki, Anuradha, Silva, Tânia Mara da, Bafail, Arwa, Bortolatto, Janaína, Stavroullakis, Alexander Terry, Gonçalves, Sérgio Eduardo de Paiva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/223320
Resumo: This study aimed to analyze the longitudinal bond strength of a universal adhesive and chemically characterize the dentin substrate under different acid etching protocols. Methodology: Dentin samples were etched with polyacrylic acid 25% (PAA) for 10 seconds (n=3) and phosphoric acid 32% (PA) for 15 seconds (n=3) and analyzed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy – attenuated total reflectance (FTIR-ATR) before and after treatment. For collagen degradation, samples (n=12) were divided into 3 groups: PAA, PA, and Deionized water (control), and analyzed by the quantity of solubilized type I collagen C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides and solubilized C-terminal peptide in relation to total protein concentration (ICTPtp and CTXtp) and by their ultimate tensile strength (UTS). For the adhesive interface analysis, dentin samples (n=72) were divided into 3 groups: PAA, PA, and Self-etch (SE), and subdivided into 2 groups: 24 h (baseline) and 1 year. The following tests were performed: microtensile bond strength (μTBS) (n=48), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (n=12), and nanoleakage (n=12). Results: The FTIR of PAA showed lower reduction of the peaks in the phosphate group when compared to PA. For ICTPtp, PA showed a significantly higher value. For CTXtp, PA and PAA groups failed to statically differ from each other. UTS was significantly lower for PA. For μTBS, storage time significantly affected bond strength. The results were unaffected by the etching protocol. For SEM, after 1 year, PA had little evidence of degradation in the upper third of the adhesive interface in comparison to the other groups. Nanoleakage showed no considerable silver impregnation after 1 year in the SE group. Conclusion: The use of PAA prior to a universal adhesive (when compared to PA) represents a less aggressive type of etching to dentin. However, self-etching still seems to be the best option for universal adhesive systems that have functional monomers in their composition.
id USP-17_93a8aff71aeeaa8008b6d14ec303fa0d
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/223320
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Longitudinal bond strength of a universal adhesive and chemical dentin characterization under different acid etching protocolsDentinAcid etchingAdhesivesMatrix metalloproteinasesCollagenThis study aimed to analyze the longitudinal bond strength of a universal adhesive and chemically characterize the dentin substrate under different acid etching protocols. Methodology: Dentin samples were etched with polyacrylic acid 25% (PAA) for 10 seconds (n=3) and phosphoric acid 32% (PA) for 15 seconds (n=3) and analyzed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy – attenuated total reflectance (FTIR-ATR) before and after treatment. For collagen degradation, samples (n=12) were divided into 3 groups: PAA, PA, and Deionized water (control), and analyzed by the quantity of solubilized type I collagen C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides and solubilized C-terminal peptide in relation to total protein concentration (ICTPtp and CTXtp) and by their ultimate tensile strength (UTS). For the adhesive interface analysis, dentin samples (n=72) were divided into 3 groups: PAA, PA, and Self-etch (SE), and subdivided into 2 groups: 24 h (baseline) and 1 year. The following tests were performed: microtensile bond strength (μTBS) (n=48), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (n=12), and nanoleakage (n=12). Results: The FTIR of PAA showed lower reduction of the peaks in the phosphate group when compared to PA. For ICTPtp, PA showed a significantly higher value. For CTXtp, PA and PAA groups failed to statically differ from each other. UTS was significantly lower for PA. For μTBS, storage time significantly affected bond strength. The results were unaffected by the etching protocol. For SEM, after 1 year, PA had little evidence of degradation in the upper third of the adhesive interface in comparison to the other groups. Nanoleakage showed no considerable silver impregnation after 1 year in the SE group. Conclusion: The use of PAA prior to a universal adhesive (when compared to PA) represents a less aggressive type of etching to dentin. However, self-etching still seems to be the best option for universal adhesive systems that have functional monomers in their composition.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2024-03-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/22332010.1590/1678-7757-2023-0359Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 32 (2024); e20230359Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 32 (2024); e20230359Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 32 (2024); e202303591678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/223320/203453Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Applied Oral Sciencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonçalves, Lucélia LemesPrakki, AnuradhaSilva, Tânia Mara daBafail, ArwaBortolatto, JanaínaStavroullakis, Alexander TerryGonçalves, Sérgio Eduardo de Paiva2025-01-14T14:19:46Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/223320Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2025-01-14T14:19:46Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Longitudinal bond strength of a universal adhesive and chemical dentin characterization under different acid etching protocols
title Longitudinal bond strength of a universal adhesive and chemical dentin characterization under different acid etching protocols
spellingShingle Longitudinal bond strength of a universal adhesive and chemical dentin characterization under different acid etching protocols
Gonçalves, Lucélia Lemes
Dentin
Acid etching
Adhesives
Matrix metalloproteinases
Collagen
title_short Longitudinal bond strength of a universal adhesive and chemical dentin characterization under different acid etching protocols
title_full Longitudinal bond strength of a universal adhesive and chemical dentin characterization under different acid etching protocols
title_fullStr Longitudinal bond strength of a universal adhesive and chemical dentin characterization under different acid etching protocols
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal bond strength of a universal adhesive and chemical dentin characterization under different acid etching protocols
title_sort Longitudinal bond strength of a universal adhesive and chemical dentin characterization under different acid etching protocols
author Gonçalves, Lucélia Lemes
author_facet Gonçalves, Lucélia Lemes
Prakki, Anuradha
Silva, Tânia Mara da
Bafail, Arwa
Bortolatto, Janaína
Stavroullakis, Alexander Terry
Gonçalves, Sérgio Eduardo de Paiva
author_role author
author2 Prakki, Anuradha
Silva, Tânia Mara da
Bafail, Arwa
Bortolatto, Janaína
Stavroullakis, Alexander Terry
Gonçalves, Sérgio Eduardo de Paiva
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gonçalves, Lucélia Lemes
Prakki, Anuradha
Silva, Tânia Mara da
Bafail, Arwa
Bortolatto, Janaína
Stavroullakis, Alexander Terry
Gonçalves, Sérgio Eduardo de Paiva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dentin
Acid etching
Adhesives
Matrix metalloproteinases
Collagen
topic Dentin
Acid etching
Adhesives
Matrix metalloproteinases
Collagen
description This study aimed to analyze the longitudinal bond strength of a universal adhesive and chemically characterize the dentin substrate under different acid etching protocols. Methodology: Dentin samples were etched with polyacrylic acid 25% (PAA) for 10 seconds (n=3) and phosphoric acid 32% (PA) for 15 seconds (n=3) and analyzed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy – attenuated total reflectance (FTIR-ATR) before and after treatment. For collagen degradation, samples (n=12) were divided into 3 groups: PAA, PA, and Deionized water (control), and analyzed by the quantity of solubilized type I collagen C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides and solubilized C-terminal peptide in relation to total protein concentration (ICTPtp and CTXtp) and by their ultimate tensile strength (UTS). For the adhesive interface analysis, dentin samples (n=72) were divided into 3 groups: PAA, PA, and Self-etch (SE), and subdivided into 2 groups: 24 h (baseline) and 1 year. The following tests were performed: microtensile bond strength (μTBS) (n=48), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (n=12), and nanoleakage (n=12). Results: The FTIR of PAA showed lower reduction of the peaks in the phosphate group when compared to PA. For ICTPtp, PA showed a significantly higher value. For CTXtp, PA and PAA groups failed to statically differ from each other. UTS was significantly lower for PA. For μTBS, storage time significantly affected bond strength. The results were unaffected by the etching protocol. For SEM, after 1 year, PA had little evidence of degradation in the upper third of the adhesive interface in comparison to the other groups. Nanoleakage showed no considerable silver impregnation after 1 year in the SE group. Conclusion: The use of PAA prior to a universal adhesive (when compared to PA) represents a less aggressive type of etching to dentin. However, self-etching still seems to be the best option for universal adhesive systems that have functional monomers in their composition.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/223320
10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0359
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/223320
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0359
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/223320/203453
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Applied Oral Science
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Applied Oral Science
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 32 (2024); e20230359
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 32 (2024); e20230359
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 32 (2024); e20230359
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1824324390788005888