Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: TÜRK, Ayşe Gözde
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: SABUNCU, Metin, ÜNAL, Sena, ÖNAL, Banu, ULUSOY, Mübin
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/119862
Resumo: Objective The purpose of the study was to use the photonic imaging modality of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to compare the marginal adaptation of composite inlays fabricated by direct and indirect techniques. Material and Methods Class II cavities were prepared on 34 extracted human molar teeth. The cavities were randomly divided into two groups according to the inlay fabrication technique. The first group was directly restored on cavities with a composite (Esthet X HD, Dentsply, Germany) after isolating. The second group was indirectly restored with the same composite material. Marginal adaptations were scanned before cementation with an invisible infrared light beam of OCT (Thorlabs), allowing measurement in 200 µm intervals. Restorations were cemented with a self-adhesive cement resin (SmartCem2, Dentsply), and then marginal adaptations were again measured with OCT. Mean values were statistically compared by using independent-samples t-test and paired samples t-test (p
id USP-17_94eff6f9a67fb25294f847a1927da4f9
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/119862
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography Objective The purpose of the study was to use the photonic imaging modality of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to compare the marginal adaptation of composite inlays fabricated by direct and indirect techniques. Material and Methods Class II cavities were prepared on 34 extracted human molar teeth. The cavities were randomly divided into two groups according to the inlay fabrication technique. The first group was directly restored on cavities with a composite (Esthet X HD, Dentsply, Germany) after isolating. The second group was indirectly restored with the same composite material. Marginal adaptations were scanned before cementation with an invisible infrared light beam of OCT (Thorlabs), allowing measurement in 200 µm intervals. Restorations were cemented with a self-adhesive cement resin (SmartCem2, Dentsply), and then marginal adaptations were again measured with OCT. Mean values were statistically compared by using independent-samples t-test and paired samples t-test (pUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/11986210.1590/1678-775720160012Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 24 No. 4 (2016); 383-390Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 24 Núm. 4 (2016); 383-390Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 24 n. 4 (2016); 383-3901678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/119862/117150Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTÜRK, Ayşe GözdeSABUNCU, MetinÜNAL, SenaÖNAL, BanuULUSOY, Mübin2016-08-29T16:11:48Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/119862Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2016-08-29T16:11:48Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography
title Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography
spellingShingle Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography
TÜRK, Ayşe Gözde
title_short Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography
title_full Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography
title_fullStr Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography
title_sort Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography
author TÜRK, Ayşe Gözde
author_facet TÜRK, Ayşe Gözde
SABUNCU, Metin
ÜNAL, Sena
ÖNAL, Banu
ULUSOY, Mübin
author_role author
author2 SABUNCU, Metin
ÜNAL, Sena
ÖNAL, Banu
ULUSOY, Mübin
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv TÜRK, Ayşe Gözde
SABUNCU, Metin
ÜNAL, Sena
ÖNAL, Banu
ULUSOY, Mübin
description Objective The purpose of the study was to use the photonic imaging modality of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to compare the marginal adaptation of composite inlays fabricated by direct and indirect techniques. Material and Methods Class II cavities were prepared on 34 extracted human molar teeth. The cavities were randomly divided into two groups according to the inlay fabrication technique. The first group was directly restored on cavities with a composite (Esthet X HD, Dentsply, Germany) after isolating. The second group was indirectly restored with the same composite material. Marginal adaptations were scanned before cementation with an invisible infrared light beam of OCT (Thorlabs), allowing measurement in 200 µm intervals. Restorations were cemented with a self-adhesive cement resin (SmartCem2, Dentsply), and then marginal adaptations were again measured with OCT. Mean values were statistically compared by using independent-samples t-test and paired samples t-test (p
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/119862
10.1590/1678-775720160012
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/119862
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-775720160012
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/119862/117150
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Applied Oral Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Applied Oral Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 24 No. 4 (2016); 383-390
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 24 Núm. 4 (2016); 383-390
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 24 n. 4 (2016); 383-390
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1800221679668953088