Effectiveness of a new toothbrush design versus a conventional tongue scraper in improving breath odor and reducing tongue microbiota

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Casemiro,Luciana Assirati
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Martins,Carlos Henrique Gomes, Carvalho,Tatiane Cruz de, Panzeri,Heitor, Lavrador,Marco Aurélio Sichirolli, Pires-de-Souza,Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572008000400008
Resumo: For centuries, specific instruments or regular toothbrushes have routinely been used to remove tongue biofilm and improve breath odor. Toothbrushes with a tongue scraper on the back of their head have recently been introduced to the market. The present study compared the effectiveness of a manual toothbrush with this new design, i.e., possessing a tongue scraper, and a commercial tongue scraper in improving breath odor and reducing the aerobic and anaerobic microbiota of tongue surface. The evaluations occurred at 4 moments, when the participants (n=30) had their halitosis quantified with a halimeter and scored according to a 4-point scoring system corresponding to different levels of intensity. Saliva was collected for counts of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms. Data were analyzed statistically by Friedman's test (p<0.05). When differences were detected, the Wilcoxon test adjusted for Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparisons (group to group). The results confirmed the importance of mechanical cleaning of the tongue, since this procedure provided an improvement in halitosis and reduction of aerobe and anaerobe counts. Regarding the evaluated methods, the toothbrush's tongue scraper and conventional tongue scraper had a similar performance in terms of breath improvement and reduction of tongue microbiota, and may be indicated as effective methods for tongue cleaning.
id USP-17_ab58758b44dcf6ecd385169b26cc77a4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1678-77572008000400008
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Effectiveness of a new toothbrush design versus a conventional tongue scraper in improving breath odor and reducing tongue microbiotaTongue biofilmTongue scraperToothbrushSalivary bacterial countHalimeterFor centuries, specific instruments or regular toothbrushes have routinely been used to remove tongue biofilm and improve breath odor. Toothbrushes with a tongue scraper on the back of their head have recently been introduced to the market. The present study compared the effectiveness of a manual toothbrush with this new design, i.e., possessing a tongue scraper, and a commercial tongue scraper in improving breath odor and reducing the aerobic and anaerobic microbiota of tongue surface. The evaluations occurred at 4 moments, when the participants (n=30) had their halitosis quantified with a halimeter and scored according to a 4-point scoring system corresponding to different levels of intensity. Saliva was collected for counts of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms. Data were analyzed statistically by Friedman's test (p<0.05). When differences were detected, the Wilcoxon test adjusted for Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparisons (group to group). The results confirmed the importance of mechanical cleaning of the tongue, since this procedure provided an improvement in halitosis and reduction of aerobe and anaerobe counts. Regarding the evaluated methods, the toothbrush's tongue scraper and conventional tongue scraper had a similar performance in terms of breath improvement and reduction of tongue microbiota, and may be indicated as effective methods for tongue cleaning.Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP2008-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572008000400008Journal of Applied Oral Science v.16 n.4 2008reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S1678-77572008000400008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCasemiro,Luciana AssiratiMartins,Carlos Henrique GomesCarvalho,Tatiane Cruz dePanzeri,HeitorLavrador,Marco Aurélio SichirolliPires-de-Souza,Fernanda de Carvalho Panzerieng2008-07-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-77572008000400008Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2008-07-14T00:00Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effectiveness of a new toothbrush design versus a conventional tongue scraper in improving breath odor and reducing tongue microbiota
title Effectiveness of a new toothbrush design versus a conventional tongue scraper in improving breath odor and reducing tongue microbiota
spellingShingle Effectiveness of a new toothbrush design versus a conventional tongue scraper in improving breath odor and reducing tongue microbiota
Casemiro,Luciana Assirati
Tongue biofilm
Tongue scraper
Toothbrush
Salivary bacterial count
Halimeter
title_short Effectiveness of a new toothbrush design versus a conventional tongue scraper in improving breath odor and reducing tongue microbiota
title_full Effectiveness of a new toothbrush design versus a conventional tongue scraper in improving breath odor and reducing tongue microbiota
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a new toothbrush design versus a conventional tongue scraper in improving breath odor and reducing tongue microbiota
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a new toothbrush design versus a conventional tongue scraper in improving breath odor and reducing tongue microbiota
title_sort Effectiveness of a new toothbrush design versus a conventional tongue scraper in improving breath odor and reducing tongue microbiota
author Casemiro,Luciana Assirati
author_facet Casemiro,Luciana Assirati
Martins,Carlos Henrique Gomes
Carvalho,Tatiane Cruz de
Panzeri,Heitor
Lavrador,Marco Aurélio Sichirolli
Pires-de-Souza,Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri
author_role author
author2 Martins,Carlos Henrique Gomes
Carvalho,Tatiane Cruz de
Panzeri,Heitor
Lavrador,Marco Aurélio Sichirolli
Pires-de-Souza,Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Casemiro,Luciana Assirati
Martins,Carlos Henrique Gomes
Carvalho,Tatiane Cruz de
Panzeri,Heitor
Lavrador,Marco Aurélio Sichirolli
Pires-de-Souza,Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tongue biofilm
Tongue scraper
Toothbrush
Salivary bacterial count
Halimeter
topic Tongue biofilm
Tongue scraper
Toothbrush
Salivary bacterial count
Halimeter
description For centuries, specific instruments or regular toothbrushes have routinely been used to remove tongue biofilm and improve breath odor. Toothbrushes with a tongue scraper on the back of their head have recently been introduced to the market. The present study compared the effectiveness of a manual toothbrush with this new design, i.e., possessing a tongue scraper, and a commercial tongue scraper in improving breath odor and reducing the aerobic and anaerobic microbiota of tongue surface. The evaluations occurred at 4 moments, when the participants (n=30) had their halitosis quantified with a halimeter and scored according to a 4-point scoring system corresponding to different levels of intensity. Saliva was collected for counts of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms. Data were analyzed statistically by Friedman's test (p<0.05). When differences were detected, the Wilcoxon test adjusted for Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparisons (group to group). The results confirmed the importance of mechanical cleaning of the tongue, since this procedure provided an improvement in halitosis and reduction of aerobe and anaerobe counts. Regarding the evaluated methods, the toothbrush's tongue scraper and conventional tongue scraper had a similar performance in terms of breath improvement and reduction of tongue microbiota, and may be indicated as effective methods for tongue cleaning.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572008000400008
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572008000400008
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-77572008000400008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science v.16 n.4 2008
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1748936435169230848