Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: MONTEIRO, Maria Regina Guerra
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: SILVA, Licinio Esmeraldo da, ELIAS, Carlos Nelson, VILELLA, Oswaldo de Vasconcellos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/84006
Resumo: Objective: To compare the influence of archwire material (NiTi, beta-Ti and stainless steel) and brackets design (self-ligating and conventional) on the frictional force resistance. Material and Methods: Two types of brackets (self-ligating brackets - Smartclip, 3M/Unitek - and conventional brackets - Gemini, 3M/Unitek) with three (0, 5, and 10 degrees) slot angulation attached with elastomeric ligatures (TP Orthodontics) were tested. All brackets were tested with archwire 0.019"x0.025" nickel-titanium, beta-titanium, and stainless steel (Unitek/3M). The mechanical testing was performed with a universal testing machine eMIC DL 10000 (eMIC Co, Brazil). The wires were pulled from the bracket slots at a cross-head speed of 3 mm/min until 2 mm displacement. Results: Self-ligating brackets produced significantly lower friction values compared with those of conventional brackets. Frictional force resistance values were directly proportional to the increase in the bracket/ wire angulation. With regard to conventional brackets, stainless steel wires had the lowest friction force values, followed by nickel-titanium and beta-titanium ones. With regard to self-ligating brackets, the nickel-titanium wires had the lowest friction values, significantly lower than those of other materials. Conclusion: even at different angulations, the self-ligating brackets showed significantly lower friction force values than the conventional brackets. Combined with nickel-titanium wires, the self-ligating brackets exhibit much lower friction, possibly due to the contact between nickel-titanium clips and wires of the same material.
id USP-17_b94c020674b31656badd4651bfa0954a
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/84006
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations Objective: To compare the influence of archwire material (NiTi, beta-Ti and stainless steel) and brackets design (self-ligating and conventional) on the frictional force resistance. Material and Methods: Two types of brackets (self-ligating brackets - Smartclip, 3M/Unitek - and conventional brackets - Gemini, 3M/Unitek) with three (0, 5, and 10 degrees) slot angulation attached with elastomeric ligatures (TP Orthodontics) were tested. All brackets were tested with archwire 0.019"x0.025" nickel-titanium, beta-titanium, and stainless steel (Unitek/3M). The mechanical testing was performed with a universal testing machine eMIC DL 10000 (eMIC Co, Brazil). The wires were pulled from the bracket slots at a cross-head speed of 3 mm/min until 2 mm displacement. Results: Self-ligating brackets produced significantly lower friction values compared with those of conventional brackets. Frictional force resistance values were directly proportional to the increase in the bracket/ wire angulation. With regard to conventional brackets, stainless steel wires had the lowest friction force values, followed by nickel-titanium and beta-titanium ones. With regard to self-ligating brackets, the nickel-titanium wires had the lowest friction values, significantly lower than those of other materials. Conclusion: even at different angulations, the self-ligating brackets showed significantly lower friction force values than the conventional brackets. Combined with nickel-titanium wires, the self-ligating brackets exhibit much lower friction, possibly due to the contact between nickel-titanium clips and wires of the same material. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2014-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/8400610.1590/1678-775720130665Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 22 No. 3 (2014); 228-234Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 22 Núm. 3 (2014); 228-234Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 22 n. 3 (2014); 228-2341678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/84006/86853Copyright (c) 2014 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMONTEIRO, Maria Regina Guerra SILVA, Licinio Esmeraldo da ELIAS, Carlos Nelson VILELLA, Oswaldo de Vasconcellos 2014-08-26T23:50:42Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/84006Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2014-08-26T23:50:42Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
title Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
spellingShingle Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
MONTEIRO, Maria Regina Guerra
title_short Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
title_full Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
title_fullStr Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
title_full_unstemmed Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
title_sort Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
author MONTEIRO, Maria Regina Guerra
author_facet MONTEIRO, Maria Regina Guerra
SILVA, Licinio Esmeraldo da
ELIAS, Carlos Nelson
VILELLA, Oswaldo de Vasconcellos
author_role author
author2 SILVA, Licinio Esmeraldo da
ELIAS, Carlos Nelson
VILELLA, Oswaldo de Vasconcellos
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv MONTEIRO, Maria Regina Guerra
SILVA, Licinio Esmeraldo da
ELIAS, Carlos Nelson
VILELLA, Oswaldo de Vasconcellos
description Objective: To compare the influence of archwire material (NiTi, beta-Ti and stainless steel) and brackets design (self-ligating and conventional) on the frictional force resistance. Material and Methods: Two types of brackets (self-ligating brackets - Smartclip, 3M/Unitek - and conventional brackets - Gemini, 3M/Unitek) with three (0, 5, and 10 degrees) slot angulation attached with elastomeric ligatures (TP Orthodontics) were tested. All brackets were tested with archwire 0.019"x0.025" nickel-titanium, beta-titanium, and stainless steel (Unitek/3M). The mechanical testing was performed with a universal testing machine eMIC DL 10000 (eMIC Co, Brazil). The wires were pulled from the bracket slots at a cross-head speed of 3 mm/min until 2 mm displacement. Results: Self-ligating brackets produced significantly lower friction values compared with those of conventional brackets. Frictional force resistance values were directly proportional to the increase in the bracket/ wire angulation. With regard to conventional brackets, stainless steel wires had the lowest friction force values, followed by nickel-titanium and beta-titanium ones. With regard to self-ligating brackets, the nickel-titanium wires had the lowest friction values, significantly lower than those of other materials. Conclusion: even at different angulations, the self-ligating brackets showed significantly lower friction force values than the conventional brackets. Combined with nickel-titanium wires, the self-ligating brackets exhibit much lower friction, possibly due to the contact between nickel-titanium clips and wires of the same material.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/84006
10.1590/1678-775720130665
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/84006
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-775720130665
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/84006/86853
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Journal of Applied Oral Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Journal of Applied Oral Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 22 No. 3 (2014); 228-234
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 22 Núm. 3 (2014); 228-234
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 22 n. 3 (2014); 228-234
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1800221678151663616