Bacterial endotoxin adhesion to different types of orthodontic adhesives
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572017000400436 |
Resumo: | Abstract Bacterial endotoxin (LPS) adhesion to orthodontic brackets is a known contributing factor to inflammation of the adjacent gingival tissues. Objective The aim of this study was to assess whether LPS adheres to orthodontic adhesive systems, comparing two commercial brands. Material and Methods Forty specimens were fabricated from Transbond XT and Light Bond composite and bonding agent components (n=10/component), then contaminated by immersion in a bacterial endotoxin solution. Contaminated and non-contaminated acrylic resin samples were used as positive and negative control groups, respectively. LPS quantification was performed by the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate QCL-1000™ test. Data obtained were scored and subjected to the Chi-square test using a significance level of 5%. Results There was endotoxin adhesion to all materials (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between composites/bonding agents and acrylic resin (p>0.05). There was no significant difference (p>0.05) among commercial brands. Affinity of endotoxin was significantly greater for the bonding agents (p=0.0025). Conclusions LPS adhered to both orthodontic adhesive systems. Regardless of the brand, the endotoxin had higher affinity for the bonding agents than for the composites. There is no previous study assessing the affinity of LPS for orthodontic adhesive systems. This study revealed that LPS adheres to orthodontic adhesive systems. Therefore, additional care is recommended to orthodontic applications of these materials. |
id |
USP-17_dcb221e805989d51858580fa3f9f2cf4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1678-77572017000400436 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-17 |
network_name_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Bacterial endotoxin adhesion to different types of orthodontic adhesivesCorrective orthodonticsComposite resinsEndotoxinsAbstract Bacterial endotoxin (LPS) adhesion to orthodontic brackets is a known contributing factor to inflammation of the adjacent gingival tissues. Objective The aim of this study was to assess whether LPS adheres to orthodontic adhesive systems, comparing two commercial brands. Material and Methods Forty specimens were fabricated from Transbond XT and Light Bond composite and bonding agent components (n=10/component), then contaminated by immersion in a bacterial endotoxin solution. Contaminated and non-contaminated acrylic resin samples were used as positive and negative control groups, respectively. LPS quantification was performed by the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate QCL-1000™ test. Data obtained were scored and subjected to the Chi-square test using a significance level of 5%. Results There was endotoxin adhesion to all materials (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between composites/bonding agents and acrylic resin (p>0.05). There was no significant difference (p>0.05) among commercial brands. Affinity of endotoxin was significantly greater for the bonding agents (p=0.0025). Conclusions LPS adhered to both orthodontic adhesive systems. Regardless of the brand, the endotoxin had higher affinity for the bonding agents than for the composites. There is no previous study assessing the affinity of LPS for orthodontic adhesive systems. This study revealed that LPS adheres to orthodontic adhesive systems. Therefore, additional care is recommended to orthodontic applications of these materials.Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572017000400436Journal of Applied Oral Science v.25 n.4 2017reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0434info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessROMUALDO,Priscilla CoutinhoGUERRA,Thaís RodriguesROMANO,Fábio LourençoSILVA,Raquel Assed Bezerra daBRANDÃO,Izaíra TincaniSILVA,Célio LopesSILVA,Lea Assed Bezerra daNELSON-FILHO,Pauloeng2017-09-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-77572017000400436Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2017-09-04T00:00Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bacterial endotoxin adhesion to different types of orthodontic adhesives |
title |
Bacterial endotoxin adhesion to different types of orthodontic adhesives |
spellingShingle |
Bacterial endotoxin adhesion to different types of orthodontic adhesives ROMUALDO,Priscilla Coutinho Corrective orthodontics Composite resins Endotoxins |
title_short |
Bacterial endotoxin adhesion to different types of orthodontic adhesives |
title_full |
Bacterial endotoxin adhesion to different types of orthodontic adhesives |
title_fullStr |
Bacterial endotoxin adhesion to different types of orthodontic adhesives |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bacterial endotoxin adhesion to different types of orthodontic adhesives |
title_sort |
Bacterial endotoxin adhesion to different types of orthodontic adhesives |
author |
ROMUALDO,Priscilla Coutinho |
author_facet |
ROMUALDO,Priscilla Coutinho GUERRA,Thaís Rodrigues ROMANO,Fábio Lourenço SILVA,Raquel Assed Bezerra da BRANDÃO,Izaíra Tincani SILVA,Célio Lopes SILVA,Lea Assed Bezerra da NELSON-FILHO,Paulo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
GUERRA,Thaís Rodrigues ROMANO,Fábio Lourenço SILVA,Raquel Assed Bezerra da BRANDÃO,Izaíra Tincani SILVA,Célio Lopes SILVA,Lea Assed Bezerra da NELSON-FILHO,Paulo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
ROMUALDO,Priscilla Coutinho GUERRA,Thaís Rodrigues ROMANO,Fábio Lourenço SILVA,Raquel Assed Bezerra da BRANDÃO,Izaíra Tincani SILVA,Célio Lopes SILVA,Lea Assed Bezerra da NELSON-FILHO,Paulo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Corrective orthodontics Composite resins Endotoxins |
topic |
Corrective orthodontics Composite resins Endotoxins |
description |
Abstract Bacterial endotoxin (LPS) adhesion to orthodontic brackets is a known contributing factor to inflammation of the adjacent gingival tissues. Objective The aim of this study was to assess whether LPS adheres to orthodontic adhesive systems, comparing two commercial brands. Material and Methods Forty specimens were fabricated from Transbond XT and Light Bond composite and bonding agent components (n=10/component), then contaminated by immersion in a bacterial endotoxin solution. Contaminated and non-contaminated acrylic resin samples were used as positive and negative control groups, respectively. LPS quantification was performed by the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate QCL-1000™ test. Data obtained were scored and subjected to the Chi-square test using a significance level of 5%. Results There was endotoxin adhesion to all materials (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between composites/bonding agents and acrylic resin (p>0.05). There was no significant difference (p>0.05) among commercial brands. Affinity of endotoxin was significantly greater for the bonding agents (p=0.0025). Conclusions LPS adhered to both orthodontic adhesive systems. Regardless of the brand, the endotoxin had higher affinity for the bonding agents than for the composites. There is no previous study assessing the affinity of LPS for orthodontic adhesive systems. This study revealed that LPS adheres to orthodontic adhesive systems. Therefore, additional care is recommended to orthodontic applications of these materials. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572017000400436 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572017000400436 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0434 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science v.25 n.4 2017 reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
collection |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jaos@usp.br |
_version_ |
1748936439452663808 |