Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues Junior,Sinval Adalberto
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Pin,Lúcio Fernando da Silva, Machado,Giovanna, Della Bona,Álvaro, Demarco,Flávio Fernando
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000100008
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the gingival marginal seal in class II composite restorations using different restorative techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Class II box cavities were prepared in both proximal faces of 32 sound human third molars with gingival margins located in either enamel or dentin/cementum. Restorations were performed as follows: G1 (control): composite, conventional light curing technique; G2: composite, soft-start technique; G3: amalgam/composite association (amalcomp); and G4: resin-modified glass ionomer cement/composite, open sandwich technique. The restored specimens were thermocycled. Epoxy resin replicas were made and coated for scanning electron microscopy examination. For microleakage evaluation, teeth were coated with nail polish and immersed in dye solution. Teeth were cut in 3 slices and dye penetration was recorded (mm), digitized and analyzed with Image Tool software. Microleakage data were analyzed statistically by non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: Leakage in enamel was lower than in dentin (p<0.001). G2 exhibited the lowest leakage values (p<0.05) in enamel margins, with no differences between the other groups. In dentin margins, groups G1 and G2 had similar behavior and both showed less leakage (p<0.05) than groups G3 and G4. SEM micrographs revealed different marginal adaptation patterns for the different techniques and for the different substrates. CONCLUSION: The soft-start technique showed no leakage in enamel margins and produced similar values to those of the conventional (control) technique for dentin margins.
id USP-17_de97a9b746f2d9ec3f39c46daa885083
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1678-77572010000100008
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorationsRestorationComposite resinOpen sandwich techniqueAmalgamMicroleakageOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the gingival marginal seal in class II composite restorations using different restorative techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Class II box cavities were prepared in both proximal faces of 32 sound human third molars with gingival margins located in either enamel or dentin/cementum. Restorations were performed as follows: G1 (control): composite, conventional light curing technique; G2: composite, soft-start technique; G3: amalgam/composite association (amalcomp); and G4: resin-modified glass ionomer cement/composite, open sandwich technique. The restored specimens were thermocycled. Epoxy resin replicas were made and coated for scanning electron microscopy examination. For microleakage evaluation, teeth were coated with nail polish and immersed in dye solution. Teeth were cut in 3 slices and dye penetration was recorded (mm), digitized and analyzed with Image Tool software. Microleakage data were analyzed statistically by non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: Leakage in enamel was lower than in dentin (p<0.001). G2 exhibited the lowest leakage values (p<0.05) in enamel margins, with no differences between the other groups. In dentin margins, groups G1 and G2 had similar behavior and both showed less leakage (p<0.05) than groups G3 and G4. SEM micrographs revealed different marginal adaptation patterns for the different techniques and for the different substrates. CONCLUSION: The soft-start technique showed no leakage in enamel margins and produced similar values to those of the conventional (control) technique for dentin margins.Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP2010-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000100008Journal of Applied Oral Science v.18 n.1 2010reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S1678-77572010000100008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues Junior,Sinval AdalbertoPin,Lúcio Fernando da SilvaMachado,GiovannaDella Bona,ÁlvaroDemarco,Flávio Fernandoeng2010-04-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-77572010000100008Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2010-04-01T00:00Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations
title Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations
spellingShingle Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations
Rodrigues Junior,Sinval Adalberto
Restoration
Composite resin
Open sandwich technique
Amalgam
Microleakage
title_short Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations
title_full Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations
title_fullStr Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations
title_full_unstemmed Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations
title_sort Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations
author Rodrigues Junior,Sinval Adalberto
author_facet Rodrigues Junior,Sinval Adalberto
Pin,Lúcio Fernando da Silva
Machado,Giovanna
Della Bona,Álvaro
Demarco,Flávio Fernando
author_role author
author2 Pin,Lúcio Fernando da Silva
Machado,Giovanna
Della Bona,Álvaro
Demarco,Flávio Fernando
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues Junior,Sinval Adalberto
Pin,Lúcio Fernando da Silva
Machado,Giovanna
Della Bona,Álvaro
Demarco,Flávio Fernando
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Restoration
Composite resin
Open sandwich technique
Amalgam
Microleakage
topic Restoration
Composite resin
Open sandwich technique
Amalgam
Microleakage
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the gingival marginal seal in class II composite restorations using different restorative techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Class II box cavities were prepared in both proximal faces of 32 sound human third molars with gingival margins located in either enamel or dentin/cementum. Restorations were performed as follows: G1 (control): composite, conventional light curing technique; G2: composite, soft-start technique; G3: amalgam/composite association (amalcomp); and G4: resin-modified glass ionomer cement/composite, open sandwich technique. The restored specimens were thermocycled. Epoxy resin replicas were made and coated for scanning electron microscopy examination. For microleakage evaluation, teeth were coated with nail polish and immersed in dye solution. Teeth were cut in 3 slices and dye penetration was recorded (mm), digitized and analyzed with Image Tool software. Microleakage data were analyzed statistically by non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: Leakage in enamel was lower than in dentin (p<0.001). G2 exhibited the lowest leakage values (p<0.05) in enamel margins, with no differences between the other groups. In dentin margins, groups G1 and G2 had similar behavior and both showed less leakage (p<0.05) than groups G3 and G4. SEM micrographs revealed different marginal adaptation patterns for the different techniques and for the different substrates. CONCLUSION: The soft-start technique showed no leakage in enamel margins and produced similar values to those of the conventional (control) technique for dentin margins.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000100008
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000100008
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-77572010000100008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science v.18 n.1 2010
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1748936435735461888