Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000100011 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: This study tested rat connective tissue response to RealSeal, RealSeal primer or AH Plus after 7, 15, 30, 60 and 90 days of implantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty Wistar rats had subcutaneous sockets created on their back and received four implants each of polyethylene tubes containing one of the materials tested according to the groups: AH (AH Plus Sealer); RS (RealSeal Sealer); RP (RealSeal Primer); CG (control group - empty tube). After histological processing, sections were analyzed to identify the presence of neutrophils, lymphocytes and plasma cells, eosinophils, macrophages and giant cells, as well as fibrous capsule and abscesses, by an examiner using light microscope. Kruskal-Wallis and multiple-comparisons test were used for statistical analysis. Significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: Lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate scores significantly higher than those of the control group were observed at 14 and 60 days in AH group, and at 90 days in RS group (p<0.05). There were no differences in terms of presence of macrophages, giant cells, eosinophils, neutrophils or fibrosis. AH Plus group scored higher for abscesses at 7 days than after any other period (p=0.031). RP group scored higher for lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate at 14 days than at 90 days (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: The main contribution of this study was to demonstrate that issues involved with tissue tolerance of a Resilon-containing sealer, RealSeal Sealer, cannot be attributed to its primer content. |
id |
USP-17_eafdee709021119beac18197aada1ab9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1678-77572011000100011 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-17 |
network_name_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of ratsBiocompatible materialsRoot canal filling materialsSubcutaneous tissueEndodonticsOBJECTIVE: This study tested rat connective tissue response to RealSeal, RealSeal primer or AH Plus after 7, 15, 30, 60 and 90 days of implantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty Wistar rats had subcutaneous sockets created on their back and received four implants each of polyethylene tubes containing one of the materials tested according to the groups: AH (AH Plus Sealer); RS (RealSeal Sealer); RP (RealSeal Primer); CG (control group - empty tube). After histological processing, sections were analyzed to identify the presence of neutrophils, lymphocytes and plasma cells, eosinophils, macrophages and giant cells, as well as fibrous capsule and abscesses, by an examiner using light microscope. Kruskal-Wallis and multiple-comparisons test were used for statistical analysis. Significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: Lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate scores significantly higher than those of the control group were observed at 14 and 60 days in AH group, and at 90 days in RS group (p<0.05). There were no differences in terms of presence of macrophages, giant cells, eosinophils, neutrophils or fibrosis. AH Plus group scored higher for abscesses at 7 days than after any other period (p=0.031). RP group scored higher for lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate at 14 days than at 90 days (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: The main contribution of this study was to demonstrate that issues involved with tissue tolerance of a Resilon-containing sealer, RealSeal Sealer, cannot be attributed to its primer content.Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP2011-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000100011Journal of Applied Oral Science v.19 n.1 2011reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S1678-77572011000100011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGrecca,Fabiana SoaresKopper,Patrícia Maria PoliSantos,Régis Burmeister dosFossati,Anna ChristinaCarrard,Vinicius CoelhoAcasigua,Gerson Arison XavierFigueiredo,José Antônio Poli deeng2011-03-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-77572011000100011Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2011-03-14T00:00Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats |
title |
Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats |
spellingShingle |
Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats Grecca,Fabiana Soares Biocompatible materials Root canal filling materials Subcutaneous tissue Endodontics |
title_short |
Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats |
title_full |
Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats |
title_fullStr |
Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats |
title_sort |
Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats |
author |
Grecca,Fabiana Soares |
author_facet |
Grecca,Fabiana Soares Kopper,Patrícia Maria Poli Santos,Régis Burmeister dos Fossati,Anna Christina Carrard,Vinicius Coelho Acasigua,Gerson Arison Xavier Figueiredo,José Antônio Poli de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kopper,Patrícia Maria Poli Santos,Régis Burmeister dos Fossati,Anna Christina Carrard,Vinicius Coelho Acasigua,Gerson Arison Xavier Figueiredo,José Antônio Poli de |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Grecca,Fabiana Soares Kopper,Patrícia Maria Poli Santos,Régis Burmeister dos Fossati,Anna Christina Carrard,Vinicius Coelho Acasigua,Gerson Arison Xavier Figueiredo,José Antônio Poli de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Biocompatible materials Root canal filling materials Subcutaneous tissue Endodontics |
topic |
Biocompatible materials Root canal filling materials Subcutaneous tissue Endodontics |
description |
OBJECTIVE: This study tested rat connective tissue response to RealSeal, RealSeal primer or AH Plus after 7, 15, 30, 60 and 90 days of implantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty Wistar rats had subcutaneous sockets created on their back and received four implants each of polyethylene tubes containing one of the materials tested according to the groups: AH (AH Plus Sealer); RS (RealSeal Sealer); RP (RealSeal Primer); CG (control group - empty tube). After histological processing, sections were analyzed to identify the presence of neutrophils, lymphocytes and plasma cells, eosinophils, macrophages and giant cells, as well as fibrous capsule and abscesses, by an examiner using light microscope. Kruskal-Wallis and multiple-comparisons test were used for statistical analysis. Significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: Lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate scores significantly higher than those of the control group were observed at 14 and 60 days in AH group, and at 90 days in RS group (p<0.05). There were no differences in terms of presence of macrophages, giant cells, eosinophils, neutrophils or fibrosis. AH Plus group scored higher for abscesses at 7 days than after any other period (p=0.031). RP group scored higher for lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate at 14 days than at 90 days (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: The main contribution of this study was to demonstrate that issues involved with tissue tolerance of a Resilon-containing sealer, RealSeal Sealer, cannot be attributed to its primer content. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000100011 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000100011 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1678-77572011000100011 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science v.19 n.1 2011 reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
collection |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jaos@usp.br |
_version_ |
1748936436214661120 |