Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Grecca,Fabiana Soares
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Kopper,Patrícia Maria Poli, Santos,Régis Burmeister dos, Fossati,Anna Christina, Carrard,Vinicius Coelho, Acasigua,Gerson Arison Xavier, Figueiredo,José Antônio Poli de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000100011
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: This study tested rat connective tissue response to RealSeal, RealSeal primer or AH Plus after 7, 15, 30, 60 and 90 days of implantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty Wistar rats had subcutaneous sockets created on their back and received four implants each of polyethylene tubes containing one of the materials tested according to the groups: AH (AH Plus Sealer); RS (RealSeal Sealer); RP (RealSeal Primer); CG (control group - empty tube). After histological processing, sections were analyzed to identify the presence of neutrophils, lymphocytes and plasma cells, eosinophils, macrophages and giant cells, as well as fibrous capsule and abscesses, by an examiner using light microscope. Kruskal-Wallis and multiple-comparisons test were used for statistical analysis. Significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: Lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate scores significantly higher than those of the control group were observed at 14 and 60 days in AH group, and at 90 days in RS group (p<0.05). There were no differences in terms of presence of macrophages, giant cells, eosinophils, neutrophils or fibrosis. AH Plus group scored higher for abscesses at 7 days than after any other period (p=0.031). RP group scored higher for lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate at 14 days than at 90 days (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: The main contribution of this study was to demonstrate that issues involved with tissue tolerance of a Resilon-containing sealer, RealSeal Sealer, cannot be attributed to its primer content.
id USP-17_eafdee709021119beac18197aada1ab9
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1678-77572011000100011
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of ratsBiocompatible materialsRoot canal filling materialsSubcutaneous tissueEndodonticsOBJECTIVE: This study tested rat connective tissue response to RealSeal, RealSeal primer or AH Plus after 7, 15, 30, 60 and 90 days of implantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty Wistar rats had subcutaneous sockets created on their back and received four implants each of polyethylene tubes containing one of the materials tested according to the groups: AH (AH Plus Sealer); RS (RealSeal Sealer); RP (RealSeal Primer); CG (control group - empty tube). After histological processing, sections were analyzed to identify the presence of neutrophils, lymphocytes and plasma cells, eosinophils, macrophages and giant cells, as well as fibrous capsule and abscesses, by an examiner using light microscope. Kruskal-Wallis and multiple-comparisons test were used for statistical analysis. Significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: Lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate scores significantly higher than those of the control group were observed at 14 and 60 days in AH group, and at 90 days in RS group (p<0.05). There were no differences in terms of presence of macrophages, giant cells, eosinophils, neutrophils or fibrosis. AH Plus group scored higher for abscesses at 7 days than after any other period (p=0.031). RP group scored higher for lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate at 14 days than at 90 days (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: The main contribution of this study was to demonstrate that issues involved with tissue tolerance of a Resilon-containing sealer, RealSeal Sealer, cannot be attributed to its primer content.Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP2011-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000100011Journal of Applied Oral Science v.19 n.1 2011reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S1678-77572011000100011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGrecca,Fabiana SoaresKopper,Patrícia Maria PoliSantos,Régis Burmeister dosFossati,Anna ChristinaCarrard,Vinicius CoelhoAcasigua,Gerson Arison XavierFigueiredo,José Antônio Poli deeng2011-03-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-77572011000100011Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2011-03-14T00:00Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats
title Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats
spellingShingle Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats
Grecca,Fabiana Soares
Biocompatible materials
Root canal filling materials
Subcutaneous tissue
Endodontics
title_short Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats
title_full Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats
title_fullStr Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats
title_full_unstemmed Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats
title_sort Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats
author Grecca,Fabiana Soares
author_facet Grecca,Fabiana Soares
Kopper,Patrícia Maria Poli
Santos,Régis Burmeister dos
Fossati,Anna Christina
Carrard,Vinicius Coelho
Acasigua,Gerson Arison Xavier
Figueiredo,José Antônio Poli de
author_role author
author2 Kopper,Patrícia Maria Poli
Santos,Régis Burmeister dos
Fossati,Anna Christina
Carrard,Vinicius Coelho
Acasigua,Gerson Arison Xavier
Figueiredo,José Antônio Poli de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Grecca,Fabiana Soares
Kopper,Patrícia Maria Poli
Santos,Régis Burmeister dos
Fossati,Anna Christina
Carrard,Vinicius Coelho
Acasigua,Gerson Arison Xavier
Figueiredo,José Antônio Poli de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biocompatible materials
Root canal filling materials
Subcutaneous tissue
Endodontics
topic Biocompatible materials
Root canal filling materials
Subcutaneous tissue
Endodontics
description OBJECTIVE: This study tested rat connective tissue response to RealSeal, RealSeal primer or AH Plus after 7, 15, 30, 60 and 90 days of implantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty Wistar rats had subcutaneous sockets created on their back and received four implants each of polyethylene tubes containing one of the materials tested according to the groups: AH (AH Plus Sealer); RS (RealSeal Sealer); RP (RealSeal Primer); CG (control group - empty tube). After histological processing, sections were analyzed to identify the presence of neutrophils, lymphocytes and plasma cells, eosinophils, macrophages and giant cells, as well as fibrous capsule and abscesses, by an examiner using light microscope. Kruskal-Wallis and multiple-comparisons test were used for statistical analysis. Significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: Lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate scores significantly higher than those of the control group were observed at 14 and 60 days in AH group, and at 90 days in RS group (p<0.05). There were no differences in terms of presence of macrophages, giant cells, eosinophils, neutrophils or fibrosis. AH Plus group scored higher for abscesses at 7 days than after any other period (p=0.031). RP group scored higher for lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate at 14 days than at 90 days (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: The main contribution of this study was to demonstrate that issues involved with tissue tolerance of a Resilon-containing sealer, RealSeal Sealer, cannot be attributed to its primer content.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000100011
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000100011
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-77572011000100011
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science v.19 n.1 2011
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1748936436214661120