Effect of photodynamic therapy and non-thermal plasma on root canal filling: analysis of adhesion and sealer penetration

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: MENEZES,Marilia
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: PRADO,Maíra, GOMES,Brenda, GUSMAN,Heloisa, SIMÃO,Renata
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572017000400396
Resumo: Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and non-thermal plasma (NTP) on adhesion and sealer penetration in root canals. Material and Methods Sixty single-rooted premolars were used. The teeth were prepared using a crown-down technique. NaOCl and EDTA were used for irrigation and smear layer removal, respectively. The root canals were divided into three groups: control, PDT, and NTP. After treatments, the roots were filled using gutta-percha and either AH Plus (AHP) or MTA Fillapex (MTAF) sealers. Samples were sectioned at 4, 8, and 12 mm from the apex (1-mm slices)and analyzed by the push-out bond strength test (adhesion) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (sealer penetration). Data were statistically evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn’s, and Spearman’s tests. Results Regarding AHP, bond strength was similar in the NTP group and in the control group, but significantly lower in the PDT group. As to MTAF, both therapies showed lower values than the control group. In the confocal analysis of AHP, maximum and mean penetration, and penetrated area were statistically higher in the control group than in the PDT and NTP groups. Penetrated perimeter was similar among groups. Regarding MTAF, all parameters yielded better results in the NTP than in the control group. The PDT and control groups showed similar results except for penetrated area. Conclusion PDT and plasma therapy affected the adhesion and sealer penetration of root canals filled with AH Plus and MTA Fillapex and there is no positive correlation between adhesion and sealer penetration.
id USP-17_f983d694772837d59b568d09017edaa5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1678-77572017000400396
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Effect of photodynamic therapy and non-thermal plasma on root canal filling: analysis of adhesion and sealer penetrationConfocal microscopyPhotochemotherapyPlasma gasesRoot canal filling materialsAbstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and non-thermal plasma (NTP) on adhesion and sealer penetration in root canals. Material and Methods Sixty single-rooted premolars were used. The teeth were prepared using a crown-down technique. NaOCl and EDTA were used for irrigation and smear layer removal, respectively. The root canals were divided into three groups: control, PDT, and NTP. After treatments, the roots were filled using gutta-percha and either AH Plus (AHP) or MTA Fillapex (MTAF) sealers. Samples were sectioned at 4, 8, and 12 mm from the apex (1-mm slices)and analyzed by the push-out bond strength test (adhesion) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (sealer penetration). Data were statistically evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn’s, and Spearman’s tests. Results Regarding AHP, bond strength was similar in the NTP group and in the control group, but significantly lower in the PDT group. As to MTAF, both therapies showed lower values than the control group. In the confocal analysis of AHP, maximum and mean penetration, and penetrated area were statistically higher in the control group than in the PDT and NTP groups. Penetrated perimeter was similar among groups. Regarding MTAF, all parameters yielded better results in the NTP than in the control group. The PDT and control groups showed similar results except for penetrated area. Conclusion PDT and plasma therapy affected the adhesion and sealer penetration of root canals filled with AH Plus and MTA Fillapex and there is no positive correlation between adhesion and sealer penetration.Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572017000400396Journal of Applied Oral Science v.25 n.4 2017reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0498info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMENEZES,MariliaPRADO,MaíraGOMES,BrendaGUSMAN,HeloisaSIMÃO,Renataeng2017-09-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-77572017000400396Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2017-09-04T00:00Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of photodynamic therapy and non-thermal plasma on root canal filling: analysis of adhesion and sealer penetration
title Effect of photodynamic therapy and non-thermal plasma on root canal filling: analysis of adhesion and sealer penetration
spellingShingle Effect of photodynamic therapy and non-thermal plasma on root canal filling: analysis of adhesion and sealer penetration
MENEZES,Marilia
Confocal microscopy
Photochemotherapy
Plasma gases
Root canal filling materials
title_short Effect of photodynamic therapy and non-thermal plasma on root canal filling: analysis of adhesion and sealer penetration
title_full Effect of photodynamic therapy and non-thermal plasma on root canal filling: analysis of adhesion and sealer penetration
title_fullStr Effect of photodynamic therapy and non-thermal plasma on root canal filling: analysis of adhesion and sealer penetration
title_full_unstemmed Effect of photodynamic therapy and non-thermal plasma on root canal filling: analysis of adhesion and sealer penetration
title_sort Effect of photodynamic therapy and non-thermal plasma on root canal filling: analysis of adhesion and sealer penetration
author MENEZES,Marilia
author_facet MENEZES,Marilia
PRADO,Maíra
GOMES,Brenda
GUSMAN,Heloisa
SIMÃO,Renata
author_role author
author2 PRADO,Maíra
GOMES,Brenda
GUSMAN,Heloisa
SIMÃO,Renata
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv MENEZES,Marilia
PRADO,Maíra
GOMES,Brenda
GUSMAN,Heloisa
SIMÃO,Renata
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Confocal microscopy
Photochemotherapy
Plasma gases
Root canal filling materials
topic Confocal microscopy
Photochemotherapy
Plasma gases
Root canal filling materials
description Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and non-thermal plasma (NTP) on adhesion and sealer penetration in root canals. Material and Methods Sixty single-rooted premolars were used. The teeth were prepared using a crown-down technique. NaOCl and EDTA were used for irrigation and smear layer removal, respectively. The root canals were divided into three groups: control, PDT, and NTP. After treatments, the roots were filled using gutta-percha and either AH Plus (AHP) or MTA Fillapex (MTAF) sealers. Samples were sectioned at 4, 8, and 12 mm from the apex (1-mm slices)and analyzed by the push-out bond strength test (adhesion) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (sealer penetration). Data were statistically evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn’s, and Spearman’s tests. Results Regarding AHP, bond strength was similar in the NTP group and in the control group, but significantly lower in the PDT group. As to MTAF, both therapies showed lower values than the control group. In the confocal analysis of AHP, maximum and mean penetration, and penetrated area were statistically higher in the control group than in the PDT and NTP groups. Penetrated perimeter was similar among groups. Regarding MTAF, all parameters yielded better results in the NTP than in the control group. The PDT and control groups showed similar results except for penetrated area. Conclusion PDT and plasma therapy affected the adhesion and sealer penetration of root canals filled with AH Plus and MTA Fillapex and there is no positive correlation between adhesion and sealer penetration.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572017000400396
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572017000400396
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0498
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science v.25 n.4 2017
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1748936439443226624