Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till system

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kraft, Elston
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Oliveira Filho, Luís Carlos Iuñes de, Carneiro, Mayara Costa, Klauberg-Filho, Osmar, Baretta, Carolina Riviera Duarte Maluche, Baretta, Dilmar
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/183243
Resumo: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship of edaphic fauna under a no-tillage system with different levels of soybean productivity [High (NTH), Medium (NTM) and Low (NTL)] in the west of Santa Catarina (Brazil), identifying which chemical and physical variables most affect them, and the best indicators that can be used. Native forest (NF) areas were used as a reference. A total of 207 samples of soil fauna were collected by soil monolith and pitfall trap methods over two years of evaluation in four municipalities. Based on edaphic fauna data, Shannon-Wiener (H’), Pielou (J), Dominance (D), Margalef and Fisher Alpha (α) indices were generated, in addition to the average richness and abundance. Data from NTs were submitted to analysis of variance and compared by Tukey’s test (p > 0.05). The NF was used as a reference and compared with the agriculture system by Dunnett test (p > 0.05), and regressions between soybean productivity and diversity indices. The H’, Margalef, α indices, and average richness for soil fauna sampled by soil monoliths followed the productivity gradient NTH > NTM > NTL, showing a positive correlation with the increase of soybean productivity. NTH has a diversity index similar to that of NF. Soybean productivity is affected by the richness and diversity of edaphic fauna, but abundance was not sensitive in predicting treatments under no-tillage; Fisher’s alpha index was more sensitive in treatment separation with soil monoliths. The environmental variables aluminum, organic matter, phosphorus, potassium and penetration resistance affect the fauna edaphic.
id USP-18_01158f6eff9b7021a3f8190ecaa13d40
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/183243
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till systemsoil qualitysoil biologyagricultural sustainabilityconservation systemThis study aimed to evaluate the relationship of edaphic fauna under a no-tillage system with different levels of soybean productivity [High (NTH), Medium (NTM) and Low (NTL)] in the west of Santa Catarina (Brazil), identifying which chemical and physical variables most affect them, and the best indicators that can be used. Native forest (NF) areas were used as a reference. A total of 207 samples of soil fauna were collected by soil monolith and pitfall trap methods over two years of evaluation in four municipalities. Based on edaphic fauna data, Shannon-Wiener (H’), Pielou (J), Dominance (D), Margalef and Fisher Alpha (α) indices were generated, in addition to the average richness and abundance. Data from NTs were submitted to analysis of variance and compared by Tukey’s test (p > 0.05). The NF was used as a reference and compared with the agriculture system by Dunnett test (p > 0.05), and regressions between soybean productivity and diversity indices. The H’, Margalef, α indices, and average richness for soil fauna sampled by soil monoliths followed the productivity gradient NTH > NTM > NTL, showing a positive correlation with the increase of soybean productivity. NTH has a diversity index similar to that of NF. Soybean productivity is affected by the richness and diversity of edaphic fauna, but abundance was not sensitive in predicting treatments under no-tillage; Fisher’s alpha index was more sensitive in treatment separation with soil monoliths. The environmental variables aluminum, organic matter, phosphorus, potassium and penetration resistance affect the fauna edaphic.Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2021-01-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/18324310.1590/1678-992X-2019-0137Scientia Agricola; v. 78 n. 2 (2021); e20190137Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 Núm. 2 (2021); e20190137Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 No. 2 (2021); e201901371678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/183243/169925Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Agricolahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKraft, Elston Oliveira Filho, Luís Carlos Iuñes de Carneiro, Mayara Costa Klauberg-Filho, Osmar Baretta, Carolina Riviera Duarte Maluche Baretta, Dilmar 2021-03-18T18:32:17Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/183243Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2021-03-18T18:32:17Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till system
title Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till system
spellingShingle Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till system
Kraft, Elston
soil quality
soil biology
agricultural sustainability
conservation system
title_short Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till system
title_full Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till system
title_fullStr Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till system
title_full_unstemmed Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till system
title_sort Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till system
author Kraft, Elston
author_facet Kraft, Elston
Oliveira Filho, Luís Carlos Iuñes de
Carneiro, Mayara Costa
Klauberg-Filho, Osmar
Baretta, Carolina Riviera Duarte Maluche
Baretta, Dilmar
author_role author
author2 Oliveira Filho, Luís Carlos Iuñes de
Carneiro, Mayara Costa
Klauberg-Filho, Osmar
Baretta, Carolina Riviera Duarte Maluche
Baretta, Dilmar
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kraft, Elston
Oliveira Filho, Luís Carlos Iuñes de
Carneiro, Mayara Costa
Klauberg-Filho, Osmar
Baretta, Carolina Riviera Duarte Maluche
Baretta, Dilmar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv soil quality
soil biology
agricultural sustainability
conservation system
topic soil quality
soil biology
agricultural sustainability
conservation system
description This study aimed to evaluate the relationship of edaphic fauna under a no-tillage system with different levels of soybean productivity [High (NTH), Medium (NTM) and Low (NTL)] in the west of Santa Catarina (Brazil), identifying which chemical and physical variables most affect them, and the best indicators that can be used. Native forest (NF) areas were used as a reference. A total of 207 samples of soil fauna were collected by soil monolith and pitfall trap methods over two years of evaluation in four municipalities. Based on edaphic fauna data, Shannon-Wiener (H’), Pielou (J), Dominance (D), Margalef and Fisher Alpha (α) indices were generated, in addition to the average richness and abundance. Data from NTs were submitted to analysis of variance and compared by Tukey’s test (p > 0.05). The NF was used as a reference and compared with the agriculture system by Dunnett test (p > 0.05), and regressions between soybean productivity and diversity indices. The H’, Margalef, α indices, and average richness for soil fauna sampled by soil monoliths followed the productivity gradient NTH > NTM > NTL, showing a positive correlation with the increase of soybean productivity. NTH has a diversity index similar to that of NF. Soybean productivity is affected by the richness and diversity of edaphic fauna, but abundance was not sensitive in predicting treatments under no-tillage; Fisher’s alpha index was more sensitive in treatment separation with soil monoliths. The environmental variables aluminum, organic matter, phosphorus, potassium and penetration resistance affect the fauna edaphic.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/183243
10.1590/1678-992X-2019-0137
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/183243
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-992X-2019-0137
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/183243/169925
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Agricola
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Agricola
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola; v. 78 n. 2 (2021); e20190137
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 Núm. 2 (2021); e20190137
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 No. 2 (2021); e20190137
1678-992X
0103-9016
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1800222794513907712