Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till system
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/183243 |
Resumo: | This study aimed to evaluate the relationship of edaphic fauna under a no-tillage system with different levels of soybean productivity [High (NTH), Medium (NTM) and Low (NTL)] in the west of Santa Catarina (Brazil), identifying which chemical and physical variables most affect them, and the best indicators that can be used. Native forest (NF) areas were used as a reference. A total of 207 samples of soil fauna were collected by soil monolith and pitfall trap methods over two years of evaluation in four municipalities. Based on edaphic fauna data, Shannon-Wiener (H’), Pielou (J), Dominance (D), Margalef and Fisher Alpha (α) indices were generated, in addition to the average richness and abundance. Data from NTs were submitted to analysis of variance and compared by Tukey’s test (p > 0.05). The NF was used as a reference and compared with the agriculture system by Dunnett test (p > 0.05), and regressions between soybean productivity and diversity indices. The H’, Margalef, α indices, and average richness for soil fauna sampled by soil monoliths followed the productivity gradient NTH > NTM > NTL, showing a positive correlation with the increase of soybean productivity. NTH has a diversity index similar to that of NF. Soybean productivity is affected by the richness and diversity of edaphic fauna, but abundance was not sensitive in predicting treatments under no-tillage; Fisher’s alpha index was more sensitive in treatment separation with soil monoliths. The environmental variables aluminum, organic matter, phosphorus, potassium and penetration resistance affect the fauna edaphic. |
id |
USP-18_01158f6eff9b7021a3f8190ecaa13d40 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/183243 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-18 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till systemsoil qualitysoil biologyagricultural sustainabilityconservation systemThis study aimed to evaluate the relationship of edaphic fauna under a no-tillage system with different levels of soybean productivity [High (NTH), Medium (NTM) and Low (NTL)] in the west of Santa Catarina (Brazil), identifying which chemical and physical variables most affect them, and the best indicators that can be used. Native forest (NF) areas were used as a reference. A total of 207 samples of soil fauna were collected by soil monolith and pitfall trap methods over two years of evaluation in four municipalities. Based on edaphic fauna data, Shannon-Wiener (H’), Pielou (J), Dominance (D), Margalef and Fisher Alpha (α) indices were generated, in addition to the average richness and abundance. Data from NTs were submitted to analysis of variance and compared by Tukey’s test (p > 0.05). The NF was used as a reference and compared with the agriculture system by Dunnett test (p > 0.05), and regressions between soybean productivity and diversity indices. The H’, Margalef, α indices, and average richness for soil fauna sampled by soil monoliths followed the productivity gradient NTH > NTM > NTL, showing a positive correlation with the increase of soybean productivity. NTH has a diversity index similar to that of NF. Soybean productivity is affected by the richness and diversity of edaphic fauna, but abundance was not sensitive in predicting treatments under no-tillage; Fisher’s alpha index was more sensitive in treatment separation with soil monoliths. The environmental variables aluminum, organic matter, phosphorus, potassium and penetration resistance affect the fauna edaphic.Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2021-01-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/18324310.1590/1678-992X-2019-0137Scientia Agricola; v. 78 n. 2 (2021); e20190137Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 Núm. 2 (2021); e20190137Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 No. 2 (2021); e201901371678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/183243/169925Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Agricolahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKraft, Elston Oliveira Filho, Luís Carlos Iuñes de Carneiro, Mayara Costa Klauberg-Filho, Osmar Baretta, Carolina Riviera Duarte Maluche Baretta, Dilmar 2021-03-18T18:32:17Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/183243Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2021-03-18T18:32:17Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till system |
title |
Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till system |
spellingShingle |
Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till system Kraft, Elston soil quality soil biology agricultural sustainability conservation system |
title_short |
Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till system |
title_full |
Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till system |
title_fullStr |
Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till system |
title_full_unstemmed |
Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till system |
title_sort |
Edaphic fauna affects soybean productivity under no-till system |
author |
Kraft, Elston |
author_facet |
Kraft, Elston Oliveira Filho, Luís Carlos Iuñes de Carneiro, Mayara Costa Klauberg-Filho, Osmar Baretta, Carolina Riviera Duarte Maluche Baretta, Dilmar |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira Filho, Luís Carlos Iuñes de Carneiro, Mayara Costa Klauberg-Filho, Osmar Baretta, Carolina Riviera Duarte Maluche Baretta, Dilmar |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kraft, Elston Oliveira Filho, Luís Carlos Iuñes de Carneiro, Mayara Costa Klauberg-Filho, Osmar Baretta, Carolina Riviera Duarte Maluche Baretta, Dilmar |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
soil quality soil biology agricultural sustainability conservation system |
topic |
soil quality soil biology agricultural sustainability conservation system |
description |
This study aimed to evaluate the relationship of edaphic fauna under a no-tillage system with different levels of soybean productivity [High (NTH), Medium (NTM) and Low (NTL)] in the west of Santa Catarina (Brazil), identifying which chemical and physical variables most affect them, and the best indicators that can be used. Native forest (NF) areas were used as a reference. A total of 207 samples of soil fauna were collected by soil monolith and pitfall trap methods over two years of evaluation in four municipalities. Based on edaphic fauna data, Shannon-Wiener (H’), Pielou (J), Dominance (D), Margalef and Fisher Alpha (α) indices were generated, in addition to the average richness and abundance. Data from NTs were submitted to analysis of variance and compared by Tukey’s test (p > 0.05). The NF was used as a reference and compared with the agriculture system by Dunnett test (p > 0.05), and regressions between soybean productivity and diversity indices. The H’, Margalef, α indices, and average richness for soil fauna sampled by soil monoliths followed the productivity gradient NTH > NTM > NTL, showing a positive correlation with the increase of soybean productivity. NTH has a diversity index similar to that of NF. Soybean productivity is affected by the richness and diversity of edaphic fauna, but abundance was not sensitive in predicting treatments under no-tillage; Fisher’s alpha index was more sensitive in treatment separation with soil monoliths. The environmental variables aluminum, organic matter, phosphorus, potassium and penetration resistance affect the fauna edaphic. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/183243 10.1590/1678-992X-2019-0137 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/183243 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1678-992X-2019-0137 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/183243/169925 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Agricola http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Agricola http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Agricola; v. 78 n. 2 (2021); e20190137 Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 Núm. 2 (2021); e20190137 Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 No. 2 (2021); e20190137 1678-992X 0103-9016 reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br |
_version_ |
1824324452759896064 |