Iron sources for citrus rootstock development grown on pine bark/vermiculite mixed substrate

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferrarezi,Rhuanito Soranz
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Bataglia,Ondino Cleante, Furlani,Pedro Roberto, Schammass,Eliana Aparecida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162007000500010
Resumo: For high technology seedling production systems, nutrition plays an important role, mainly the fertigation with iron chelates to prevent its deficiency. This study had the goal of searching for alternative iron sources with the same nutrient efficiency but lower cost in relation to nutrient solution total cost. An experiment was carried out in 56 cm³-conic-containers tilled with a pine bark/ vermiculite mixed substrate using Fe-DTPA, Fe-EDDHA, Fe-EDDHMA, Fe-EDTA, Fe-HEDTA, FeCl3, FeSO4, FeSO4+citric acid plus a control, and the rootstocks Swingle, Rangpur, Trifoliata and Cleopatra, in a randomized complete block design, with four replicates. Seedlings were evaluated for height, relative chlorophyll index, total and soluble iron leaf concentrations. Cleopatra was the only rootstock observed without visual iron chlorosis symptoms. There was a low relative chlorophyll index for Rangpur, Swingle and Trifoliata rootstocks in the control plots, in agreement with the observed symptoms. High total iron concentrations were found in the control and Fe-EDTA plots, whereas soluble iron represented only a low percent of the total iron. The economical analysis showed the following cost values of iron sources in relation to the nutrient solution total costs: Fe-HEDTA (37.25%) > FeCl3 (4.61%) > Fe-EDDHMA (4.53%) > Fe-EDDHA (3.35%) > Fe-DTPA (2.91%) > Fe-EDTA (1.08%) > FeSO4+citric acid (0.78%) > FeSO4 (0.25%). However, only plants from Fe-EDDHA and Fe-EDDHMA treatments did not present any deficiency visual symptoms. The relative cost of Fe-EDDHA application is low, its efficiency in maintaining iron available in solution resulted in high plant heights, making it recommendable for citric rootstock production in nurseries.
id USP-18_62dd1a403c31f33b0056a5960f161777
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-90162007000500010
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Iron sources for citrus rootstock development grown on pine bark/vermiculite mixed substrateseedling productionchelatesfertigationeconomical analysisFor high technology seedling production systems, nutrition plays an important role, mainly the fertigation with iron chelates to prevent its deficiency. This study had the goal of searching for alternative iron sources with the same nutrient efficiency but lower cost in relation to nutrient solution total cost. An experiment was carried out in 56 cm³-conic-containers tilled with a pine bark/ vermiculite mixed substrate using Fe-DTPA, Fe-EDDHA, Fe-EDDHMA, Fe-EDTA, Fe-HEDTA, FeCl3, FeSO4, FeSO4+citric acid plus a control, and the rootstocks Swingle, Rangpur, Trifoliata and Cleopatra, in a randomized complete block design, with four replicates. Seedlings were evaluated for height, relative chlorophyll index, total and soluble iron leaf concentrations. Cleopatra was the only rootstock observed without visual iron chlorosis symptoms. There was a low relative chlorophyll index for Rangpur, Swingle and Trifoliata rootstocks in the control plots, in agreement with the observed symptoms. High total iron concentrations were found in the control and Fe-EDTA plots, whereas soluble iron represented only a low percent of the total iron. The economical analysis showed the following cost values of iron sources in relation to the nutrient solution total costs: Fe-HEDTA (37.25%) > FeCl3 (4.61%) > Fe-EDDHMA (4.53%) > Fe-EDDHA (3.35%) > Fe-DTPA (2.91%) > Fe-EDTA (1.08%) > FeSO4+citric acid (0.78%) > FeSO4 (0.25%). However, only plants from Fe-EDDHA and Fe-EDDHMA treatments did not present any deficiency visual symptoms. The relative cost of Fe-EDDHA application is low, its efficiency in maintaining iron available in solution resulted in high plant heights, making it recommendable for citric rootstock production in nurseries.Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"2007-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162007000500010Scientia Agricola v.64 n.5 2007reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S0103-90162007000500010info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerrarezi,Rhuanito SoranzBataglia,Ondino CleanteFurlani,Pedro RobertoSchammass,Eliana Aparecidaeng2007-10-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-90162007000500010Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2007-10-05T00:00Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Iron sources for citrus rootstock development grown on pine bark/vermiculite mixed substrate
title Iron sources for citrus rootstock development grown on pine bark/vermiculite mixed substrate
spellingShingle Iron sources for citrus rootstock development grown on pine bark/vermiculite mixed substrate
Ferrarezi,Rhuanito Soranz
seedling production
chelates
fertigation
economical analysis
title_short Iron sources for citrus rootstock development grown on pine bark/vermiculite mixed substrate
title_full Iron sources for citrus rootstock development grown on pine bark/vermiculite mixed substrate
title_fullStr Iron sources for citrus rootstock development grown on pine bark/vermiculite mixed substrate
title_full_unstemmed Iron sources for citrus rootstock development grown on pine bark/vermiculite mixed substrate
title_sort Iron sources for citrus rootstock development grown on pine bark/vermiculite mixed substrate
author Ferrarezi,Rhuanito Soranz
author_facet Ferrarezi,Rhuanito Soranz
Bataglia,Ondino Cleante
Furlani,Pedro Roberto
Schammass,Eliana Aparecida
author_role author
author2 Bataglia,Ondino Cleante
Furlani,Pedro Roberto
Schammass,Eliana Aparecida
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferrarezi,Rhuanito Soranz
Bataglia,Ondino Cleante
Furlani,Pedro Roberto
Schammass,Eliana Aparecida
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv seedling production
chelates
fertigation
economical analysis
topic seedling production
chelates
fertigation
economical analysis
description For high technology seedling production systems, nutrition plays an important role, mainly the fertigation with iron chelates to prevent its deficiency. This study had the goal of searching for alternative iron sources with the same nutrient efficiency but lower cost in relation to nutrient solution total cost. An experiment was carried out in 56 cm³-conic-containers tilled with a pine bark/ vermiculite mixed substrate using Fe-DTPA, Fe-EDDHA, Fe-EDDHMA, Fe-EDTA, Fe-HEDTA, FeCl3, FeSO4, FeSO4+citric acid plus a control, and the rootstocks Swingle, Rangpur, Trifoliata and Cleopatra, in a randomized complete block design, with four replicates. Seedlings were evaluated for height, relative chlorophyll index, total and soluble iron leaf concentrations. Cleopatra was the only rootstock observed without visual iron chlorosis symptoms. There was a low relative chlorophyll index for Rangpur, Swingle and Trifoliata rootstocks in the control plots, in agreement with the observed symptoms. High total iron concentrations were found in the control and Fe-EDTA plots, whereas soluble iron represented only a low percent of the total iron. The economical analysis showed the following cost values of iron sources in relation to the nutrient solution total costs: Fe-HEDTA (37.25%) > FeCl3 (4.61%) > Fe-EDDHMA (4.53%) > Fe-EDDHA (3.35%) > Fe-DTPA (2.91%) > Fe-EDTA (1.08%) > FeSO4+citric acid (0.78%) > FeSO4 (0.25%). However, only plants from Fe-EDDHA and Fe-EDDHMA treatments did not present any deficiency visual symptoms. The relative cost of Fe-EDDHA application is low, its efficiency in maintaining iron available in solution resulted in high plant heights, making it recommendable for citric rootstock production in nurseries.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162007000500010
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162007000500010
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-90162007000500010
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola v.64 n.5 2007
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1748936460600344576