Soil compaction on traffic lane due to soil tillage and sugarcane mechanical harvesting operations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guimarães Júnnyor, Wellingthon da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: De Maria, Isabella Clerici, Araujo-Junior, Cezar Francisco, Lima, Camila Cassante de, Vitti, André César, Figueiredo, Getulio Coutinho, Dechen, Sonia Carmela Falci
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/160644
Resumo: Mechanical sugarcane harvesting increases soil compaction due to the intense traffic of agricultural machinery, reducing longevity of sugarcane crops. In order to mitigate the harmful effects caused by agricultural traffic on the soil structure in sugarcane fields, this study evaluated impacts of mechanical sugarcane harvesting on traffic lane under two soil tillage systems based on load bearing capacity models. The experiment was carried out in the region of Piracicaba, state of São Paulo, Brazil, on a Rhodic Nitisol, under conventional tillage (CT) and deep strip-tillage (DST). For CT soil tillage was applied to the entire area with a heavy disk harrow, at operating depths from 0.20 to 0.30 m followed by a leveling harrow at a depth of 0.15 m. For DST, soil tillage was performed in part of the area at a depth of 0.80 m, forming strip beds for sugarcane planting, while the traffic lanes were not disturbed. Undisturbed soil samples from traffic lanes were used in the uniaxial compression test to quantify preconsolidation pressure and to model the soil load bearing capacity. The surface layer (0.00-0.10 m) was most susceptible to compaction, regardless of the tillage system (CT or DST) used. In the DST, the traffic lane maintained the previous soil stress history and presented higher load bearing capacity (LBC) than the traffic lane in the CT. As in CT the soil was tilled, the stress history was discontinued. This larger LBC in DTS minimized the impacts of the sugarcane harvest. Under CT, additional soil compaction due to mechanical sugarcane harvesting in the traffic lane was observed after the second sugarcane harvest. There was a reduction in load bearing capacity from 165 kPa to 68 kPa under CT and from 230 kPa to 108 kPa under DST, from the first to the second harvest at surface layer. Water content at mechanical harvesting was the most relevant factor to maximize impacts on the soil structure in traffic lanes, for both tillage systems.
id USP-18_75072959a1cbb8666d2c01026b93c86d
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/160644
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Soil compaction on traffic lane due to soil tillage and sugarcane mechanical harvesting operationsload bearing capacitysoil stress distributionpreconsolidation pressuremodeling, environmental sustainabilityMechanical sugarcane harvesting increases soil compaction due to the intense traffic of agricultural machinery, reducing longevity of sugarcane crops. In order to mitigate the harmful effects caused by agricultural traffic on the soil structure in sugarcane fields, this study evaluated impacts of mechanical sugarcane harvesting on traffic lane under two soil tillage systems based on load bearing capacity models. The experiment was carried out in the region of Piracicaba, state of São Paulo, Brazil, on a Rhodic Nitisol, under conventional tillage (CT) and deep strip-tillage (DST). For CT soil tillage was applied to the entire area with a heavy disk harrow, at operating depths from 0.20 to 0.30 m followed by a leveling harrow at a depth of 0.15 m. For DST, soil tillage was performed in part of the area at a depth of 0.80 m, forming strip beds for sugarcane planting, while the traffic lanes were not disturbed. Undisturbed soil samples from traffic lanes were used in the uniaxial compression test to quantify preconsolidation pressure and to model the soil load bearing capacity. The surface layer (0.00-0.10 m) was most susceptible to compaction, regardless of the tillage system (CT or DST) used. In the DST, the traffic lane maintained the previous soil stress history and presented higher load bearing capacity (LBC) than the traffic lane in the CT. As in CT the soil was tilled, the stress history was discontinued. This larger LBC in DTS minimized the impacts of the sugarcane harvest. Under CT, additional soil compaction due to mechanical sugarcane harvesting in the traffic lane was observed after the second sugarcane harvest. There was a reduction in load bearing capacity from 165 kPa to 68 kPa under CT and from 230 kPa to 108 kPa under DST, from the first to the second harvest at surface layer. Water content at mechanical harvesting was the most relevant factor to maximize impacts on the soil structure in traffic lanes, for both tillage systems.Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2019-08-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/16064410.1590/1678-992x-2018-0052Scientia Agricola; v. 76 n. 6 (2019); 509-517Scientia Agricola; Vol. 76 Núm. 6 (2019); 509-517Scientia Agricola; Vol. 76 No. 6 (2019); 509-5171678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/160644/154894Copyright (c) 2019 Scientia Agricolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGuimarães Júnnyor, Wellingthon da SilvaDe Maria, Isabella ClericiAraujo-Junior, Cezar FranciscoLima, Camila Cassante deVitti, André CésarFigueiredo, Getulio CoutinhoDechen, Sonia Carmela Falci2019-08-02T17:12:54Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/160644Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2019-08-02T17:12:54Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Soil compaction on traffic lane due to soil tillage and sugarcane mechanical harvesting operations
title Soil compaction on traffic lane due to soil tillage and sugarcane mechanical harvesting operations
spellingShingle Soil compaction on traffic lane due to soil tillage and sugarcane mechanical harvesting operations
Guimarães Júnnyor, Wellingthon da Silva
load bearing capacity
soil stress distribution
preconsolidation pressure
modeling, environmental sustainability
title_short Soil compaction on traffic lane due to soil tillage and sugarcane mechanical harvesting operations
title_full Soil compaction on traffic lane due to soil tillage and sugarcane mechanical harvesting operations
title_fullStr Soil compaction on traffic lane due to soil tillage and sugarcane mechanical harvesting operations
title_full_unstemmed Soil compaction on traffic lane due to soil tillage and sugarcane mechanical harvesting operations
title_sort Soil compaction on traffic lane due to soil tillage and sugarcane mechanical harvesting operations
author Guimarães Júnnyor, Wellingthon da Silva
author_facet Guimarães Júnnyor, Wellingthon da Silva
De Maria, Isabella Clerici
Araujo-Junior, Cezar Francisco
Lima, Camila Cassante de
Vitti, André César
Figueiredo, Getulio Coutinho
Dechen, Sonia Carmela Falci
author_role author
author2 De Maria, Isabella Clerici
Araujo-Junior, Cezar Francisco
Lima, Camila Cassante de
Vitti, André César
Figueiredo, Getulio Coutinho
Dechen, Sonia Carmela Falci
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guimarães Júnnyor, Wellingthon da Silva
De Maria, Isabella Clerici
Araujo-Junior, Cezar Francisco
Lima, Camila Cassante de
Vitti, André César
Figueiredo, Getulio Coutinho
Dechen, Sonia Carmela Falci
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv load bearing capacity
soil stress distribution
preconsolidation pressure
modeling, environmental sustainability
topic load bearing capacity
soil stress distribution
preconsolidation pressure
modeling, environmental sustainability
description Mechanical sugarcane harvesting increases soil compaction due to the intense traffic of agricultural machinery, reducing longevity of sugarcane crops. In order to mitigate the harmful effects caused by agricultural traffic on the soil structure in sugarcane fields, this study evaluated impacts of mechanical sugarcane harvesting on traffic lane under two soil tillage systems based on load bearing capacity models. The experiment was carried out in the region of Piracicaba, state of São Paulo, Brazil, on a Rhodic Nitisol, under conventional tillage (CT) and deep strip-tillage (DST). For CT soil tillage was applied to the entire area with a heavy disk harrow, at operating depths from 0.20 to 0.30 m followed by a leveling harrow at a depth of 0.15 m. For DST, soil tillage was performed in part of the area at a depth of 0.80 m, forming strip beds for sugarcane planting, while the traffic lanes were not disturbed. Undisturbed soil samples from traffic lanes were used in the uniaxial compression test to quantify preconsolidation pressure and to model the soil load bearing capacity. The surface layer (0.00-0.10 m) was most susceptible to compaction, regardless of the tillage system (CT or DST) used. In the DST, the traffic lane maintained the previous soil stress history and presented higher load bearing capacity (LBC) than the traffic lane in the CT. As in CT the soil was tilled, the stress history was discontinued. This larger LBC in DTS minimized the impacts of the sugarcane harvest. Under CT, additional soil compaction due to mechanical sugarcane harvesting in the traffic lane was observed after the second sugarcane harvest. There was a reduction in load bearing capacity from 165 kPa to 68 kPa under CT and from 230 kPa to 108 kPa under DST, from the first to the second harvest at surface layer. Water content at mechanical harvesting was the most relevant factor to maximize impacts on the soil structure in traffic lanes, for both tillage systems.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/160644
10.1590/1678-992x-2018-0052
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/160644
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-992x-2018-0052
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/160644/154894
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Scientia Agricola
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Scientia Agricola
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola; v. 76 n. 6 (2019); 509-517
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 76 Núm. 6 (2019); 509-517
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 76 No. 6 (2019); 509-517
1678-992X
0103-9016
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1800222794013736960