Modifications for the tukey test procedure and evaluation of the power and efficiency of multiple comparison procedures

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Conagin,Armando
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Barbin,Décio, Demétrio,Clarice Garcia Borges
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162008000400016
Resumo: Multiple pairwise comparison tests of treatment means are of great interest in applied research. Two modifications for the Tukey test were proposed. The power of unilateral and bilateral Student, Waller-Duncan, Duncan, SNK, REGWF, REGWQ, Tukey, Bonferroni, Sidak, unilateral Dunnet statistical tests and the modified tests, Sidak, Bonferroni 1 and 2, Tukey 1 and 2, has been compared using the Monte Carlo method. Data were generated for 600 experiments with eight treatments in a randomized block design, of which 400 had four and 200 eight blocks. The differences between the treatment means in relation to the control were 30%, 20%, 15%, 10%, 5%. Two extra treatments did not differ from the control. A coefficient of variation of 10% and a probability Type I error of α = 0.05 were adopted. The power of all the tests decreased when the differences to the control, decreased. The unilateral and bilateral Student t, Waller-Duncan and Duncan tests showed greater number of significative differences, followed by unilateral Dunnett, modified Sidak, modified Bonferroni 1 and 2, modified Tukey 1, SNK, REGWF, REGWQ, modified Tukey 2, Tukey, Sidak and Bonferroni. There is great loss of efficiency for all tests in relation to the unilateral Student t test for each difference of the treatment to the control, when the differences between means decrease. The modified tests were always more efficient than their original ones.
id USP-18_8770018321c498c34e8e6a0ef772b094
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-90162008000400016
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Modifications for the tukey test procedure and evaluation of the power and efficiency of multiple comparison proceduresmultiple comparison statistical teststype I errorsMonte Carlo methodpower of testsMultiple pairwise comparison tests of treatment means are of great interest in applied research. Two modifications for the Tukey test were proposed. The power of unilateral and bilateral Student, Waller-Duncan, Duncan, SNK, REGWF, REGWQ, Tukey, Bonferroni, Sidak, unilateral Dunnet statistical tests and the modified tests, Sidak, Bonferroni 1 and 2, Tukey 1 and 2, has been compared using the Monte Carlo method. Data were generated for 600 experiments with eight treatments in a randomized block design, of which 400 had four and 200 eight blocks. The differences between the treatment means in relation to the control were 30%, 20%, 15%, 10%, 5%. Two extra treatments did not differ from the control. A coefficient of variation of 10% and a probability Type I error of α = 0.05 were adopted. The power of all the tests decreased when the differences to the control, decreased. The unilateral and bilateral Student t, Waller-Duncan and Duncan tests showed greater number of significative differences, followed by unilateral Dunnett, modified Sidak, modified Bonferroni 1 and 2, modified Tukey 1, SNK, REGWF, REGWQ, modified Tukey 2, Tukey, Sidak and Bonferroni. There is great loss of efficiency for all tests in relation to the unilateral Student t test for each difference of the treatment to the control, when the differences between means decrease. The modified tests were always more efficient than their original ones.Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"2008-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162008000400016Scientia Agricola v.65 n.4 2008reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S0103-90162008000400016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessConagin,ArmandoBarbin,DécioDemétrio,Clarice Garcia Borgeseng2008-07-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-90162008000400016Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2008-07-21T00:00Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Modifications for the tukey test procedure and evaluation of the power and efficiency of multiple comparison procedures
title Modifications for the tukey test procedure and evaluation of the power and efficiency of multiple comparison procedures
spellingShingle Modifications for the tukey test procedure and evaluation of the power and efficiency of multiple comparison procedures
Conagin,Armando
multiple comparison statistical tests
type I errors
Monte Carlo method
power of tests
title_short Modifications for the tukey test procedure and evaluation of the power and efficiency of multiple comparison procedures
title_full Modifications for the tukey test procedure and evaluation of the power and efficiency of multiple comparison procedures
title_fullStr Modifications for the tukey test procedure and evaluation of the power and efficiency of multiple comparison procedures
title_full_unstemmed Modifications for the tukey test procedure and evaluation of the power and efficiency of multiple comparison procedures
title_sort Modifications for the tukey test procedure and evaluation of the power and efficiency of multiple comparison procedures
author Conagin,Armando
author_facet Conagin,Armando
Barbin,Décio
Demétrio,Clarice Garcia Borges
author_role author
author2 Barbin,Décio
Demétrio,Clarice Garcia Borges
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Conagin,Armando
Barbin,Décio
Demétrio,Clarice Garcia Borges
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv multiple comparison statistical tests
type I errors
Monte Carlo method
power of tests
topic multiple comparison statistical tests
type I errors
Monte Carlo method
power of tests
description Multiple pairwise comparison tests of treatment means are of great interest in applied research. Two modifications for the Tukey test were proposed. The power of unilateral and bilateral Student, Waller-Duncan, Duncan, SNK, REGWF, REGWQ, Tukey, Bonferroni, Sidak, unilateral Dunnet statistical tests and the modified tests, Sidak, Bonferroni 1 and 2, Tukey 1 and 2, has been compared using the Monte Carlo method. Data were generated for 600 experiments with eight treatments in a randomized block design, of which 400 had four and 200 eight blocks. The differences between the treatment means in relation to the control were 30%, 20%, 15%, 10%, 5%. Two extra treatments did not differ from the control. A coefficient of variation of 10% and a probability Type I error of α = 0.05 were adopted. The power of all the tests decreased when the differences to the control, decreased. The unilateral and bilateral Student t, Waller-Duncan and Duncan tests showed greater number of significative differences, followed by unilateral Dunnett, modified Sidak, modified Bonferroni 1 and 2, modified Tukey 1, SNK, REGWF, REGWQ, modified Tukey 2, Tukey, Sidak and Bonferroni. There is great loss of efficiency for all tests in relation to the unilateral Student t test for each difference of the treatment to the control, when the differences between means decrease. The modified tests were always more efficient than their original ones.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162008000400016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162008000400016
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-90162008000400016
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola v.65 n.4 2008
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1748936461010337792