Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121818 |
Resumo: | Soil bulk density (ρb) data are needed for a wide range of environmental studies. However, ρb is rarely reported in soil surveys. An alternative to obtain ρb for data-scarce regions, such as the Rio Doce basin in southeastern Brazil, is indirect estimation from less costly covariates using pedotransfer functions (PTF). This study primarily aims to develop region-specific PTFs for ρb using multiple linear regressions (MLR) and random forests (RF). Secondly, it assessed the accuracy of PTFs for data grouped into soil horizons and soil classes. For that purpose, we compared the performance of PTFs compiled from the literature with those developed here. Two groups of data were evaluated as covariates: 1) readily available soil properties and 2) maps derived from a digital elevation model and MODIS satellite imagery, jointly with lithological and pedological maps. The MLR model was applied step-wise to select significant predictors and its accuracy assessed by means of cross-validation. The PTFs developed using all data estimated ρb from soil properties by MLR and RF, with R2 of 0.41 and 0.51, respectively. Alternatively, using environmental covariates, RF predicted ρb with R2 of 0.41. Grouping criteria did not lead to a significant increase in the estimates of ρb. The accuracy of the ‘regional’ PTFs developed for this study was greater than that found with the ‘compiled’ PTFs. The best PTF will be firstly used to assess soil carbon stocks and changes in the Rio Doce basin. |
id |
USP-18_8c2802eb4aa7ab0ac19032e2ef8ad62a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/121818 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-18 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin Soil bulk density (ρb) data are needed for a wide range of environmental studies. However, ρb is rarely reported in soil surveys. An alternative to obtain ρb for data-scarce regions, such as the Rio Doce basin in southeastern Brazil, is indirect estimation from less costly covariates using pedotransfer functions (PTF). This study primarily aims to develop region-specific PTFs for ρb using multiple linear regressions (MLR) and random forests (RF). Secondly, it assessed the accuracy of PTFs for data grouped into soil horizons and soil classes. For that purpose, we compared the performance of PTFs compiled from the literature with those developed here. Two groups of data were evaluated as covariates: 1) readily available soil properties and 2) maps derived from a digital elevation model and MODIS satellite imagery, jointly with lithological and pedological maps. The MLR model was applied step-wise to select significant predictors and its accuracy assessed by means of cross-validation. The PTFs developed using all data estimated ρb from soil properties by MLR and RF, with R2 of 0.41 and 0.51, respectively. Alternatively, using environmental covariates, RF predicted ρb with R2 of 0.41. Grouping criteria did not lead to a significant increase in the estimates of ρb. The accuracy of the ‘regional’ PTFs developed for this study was greater than that found with the ‘compiled’ PTFs. The best PTF will be firstly used to assess soil carbon stocks and changes in the Rio Doce basin. Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/12181810.1590/0103-9016-2015-0485Scientia Agricola; v. 73 n. 6 (2016); 525-534Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 Núm. 6 (2016); 525-534Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 No. 6 (2016); 525-5341678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121818/118679Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Agricolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, Eliana deFernandes Filho, Elpídio InácioSchaefer, Carlos Ernesto Gonçalves ReynaudBatjes, Niels H.Santos, Gerson Rodrigues dosPontes, Lucas Machado2016-10-10T20:08:27Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/121818Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2016-10-10T20:08:27Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin |
title |
Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin |
spellingShingle |
Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin Souza, Eliana de |
title_short |
Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin |
title_full |
Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin |
title_fullStr |
Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin |
title_sort |
Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin |
author |
Souza, Eliana de |
author_facet |
Souza, Eliana de Fernandes Filho, Elpídio Inácio Schaefer, Carlos Ernesto Gonçalves Reynaud Batjes, Niels H. Santos, Gerson Rodrigues dos Pontes, Lucas Machado |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fernandes Filho, Elpídio Inácio Schaefer, Carlos Ernesto Gonçalves Reynaud Batjes, Niels H. Santos, Gerson Rodrigues dos Pontes, Lucas Machado |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Eliana de Fernandes Filho, Elpídio Inácio Schaefer, Carlos Ernesto Gonçalves Reynaud Batjes, Niels H. Santos, Gerson Rodrigues dos Pontes, Lucas Machado |
description |
Soil bulk density (ρb) data are needed for a wide range of environmental studies. However, ρb is rarely reported in soil surveys. An alternative to obtain ρb for data-scarce regions, such as the Rio Doce basin in southeastern Brazil, is indirect estimation from less costly covariates using pedotransfer functions (PTF). This study primarily aims to develop region-specific PTFs for ρb using multiple linear regressions (MLR) and random forests (RF). Secondly, it assessed the accuracy of PTFs for data grouped into soil horizons and soil classes. For that purpose, we compared the performance of PTFs compiled from the literature with those developed here. Two groups of data were evaluated as covariates: 1) readily available soil properties and 2) maps derived from a digital elevation model and MODIS satellite imagery, jointly with lithological and pedological maps. The MLR model was applied step-wise to select significant predictors and its accuracy assessed by means of cross-validation. The PTFs developed using all data estimated ρb from soil properties by MLR and RF, with R2 of 0.41 and 0.51, respectively. Alternatively, using environmental covariates, RF predicted ρb with R2 of 0.41. Grouping criteria did not lead to a significant increase in the estimates of ρb. The accuracy of the ‘regional’ PTFs developed for this study was greater than that found with the ‘compiled’ PTFs. The best PTF will be firstly used to assess soil carbon stocks and changes in the Rio Doce basin. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121818 10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0485 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121818 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0485 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121818/118679 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Agricola info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Agricola |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Agricola; v. 73 n. 6 (2016); 525-534 Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 Núm. 6 (2016); 525-534 Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 No. 6 (2016); 525-534 1678-992X 0103-9016 reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222792900149248 |