Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Eliana de
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Fernandes Filho, Elpídio Inácio, Schaefer, Carlos Ernesto Gonçalves Reynaud, Batjes, Niels H., Santos, Gerson Rodrigues dos, Pontes, Lucas Machado
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121818
Resumo: Soil bulk density (ρb) data are needed for a wide range of environmental studies. However, ρb is rarely reported in soil surveys. An alternative to obtain ρb for data-scarce regions, such as the Rio Doce basin in southeastern Brazil, is indirect estimation from less costly covariates using pedotransfer functions (PTF). This study primarily aims to develop region-specific PTFs for ρb using multiple linear regressions (MLR) and random forests (RF). Secondly, it assessed the accuracy of PTFs for data grouped into soil horizons and soil classes. For that purpose, we compared the performance of PTFs compiled from the literature with those developed here. Two groups of data were evaluated as covariates: 1) readily available soil properties and 2) maps derived from a digital elevation model and MODIS satellite imagery, jointly with lithological and pedological maps. The MLR model was applied step-wise to select significant predictors and its accuracy assessed by means of cross-validation. The PTFs developed using all data estimated ρb from soil properties by MLR and RF, with R2 of 0.41 and 0.51, respectively. Alternatively, using environmental covariates, RF predicted ρb with R2 of 0.41. Grouping criteria did not lead to a significant increase in the estimates of ρb. The accuracy of the ‘regional’ PTFs developed for this study was greater than that found with the ‘compiled’ PTFs. The best PTF will be firstly used to assess soil carbon stocks and changes in the Rio Doce basin.
id USP-18_8c2802eb4aa7ab0ac19032e2ef8ad62a
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/121818
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin Soil bulk density (ρb) data are needed for a wide range of environmental studies. However, ρb is rarely reported in soil surveys. An alternative to obtain ρb for data-scarce regions, such as the Rio Doce basin in southeastern Brazil, is indirect estimation from less costly covariates using pedotransfer functions (PTF). This study primarily aims to develop region-specific PTFs for ρb using multiple linear regressions (MLR) and random forests (RF). Secondly, it assessed the accuracy of PTFs for data grouped into soil horizons and soil classes. For that purpose, we compared the performance of PTFs compiled from the literature with those developed here. Two groups of data were evaluated as covariates: 1) readily available soil properties and 2) maps derived from a digital elevation model and MODIS satellite imagery, jointly with lithological and pedological maps. The MLR model was applied step-wise to select significant predictors and its accuracy assessed by means of cross-validation. The PTFs developed using all data estimated ρb from soil properties by MLR and RF, with R2 of 0.41 and 0.51, respectively. Alternatively, using environmental covariates, RF predicted ρb with R2 of 0.41. Grouping criteria did not lead to a significant increase in the estimates of ρb. The accuracy of the ‘regional’ PTFs developed for this study was greater than that found with the ‘compiled’ PTFs. The best PTF will be firstly used to assess soil carbon stocks and changes in the Rio Doce basin. Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/12181810.1590/0103-9016-2015-0485Scientia Agricola; v. 73 n. 6 (2016); 525-534Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 Núm. 6 (2016); 525-534Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 No. 6 (2016); 525-5341678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121818/118679Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Agricolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, Eliana deFernandes Filho, Elpídio InácioSchaefer, Carlos Ernesto Gonçalves ReynaudBatjes, Niels H.Santos, Gerson Rodrigues dosPontes, Lucas Machado2016-10-10T20:08:27Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/121818Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2016-10-10T20:08:27Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin
title Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin
spellingShingle Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin
Souza, Eliana de
title_short Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin
title_full Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin
title_fullStr Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin
title_full_unstemmed Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin
title_sort Pedotransfer functions to estimate bulk density from soil properties and environmental covariates: Rio Doce basin
author Souza, Eliana de
author_facet Souza, Eliana de
Fernandes Filho, Elpídio Inácio
Schaefer, Carlos Ernesto Gonçalves Reynaud
Batjes, Niels H.
Santos, Gerson Rodrigues dos
Pontes, Lucas Machado
author_role author
author2 Fernandes Filho, Elpídio Inácio
Schaefer, Carlos Ernesto Gonçalves Reynaud
Batjes, Niels H.
Santos, Gerson Rodrigues dos
Pontes, Lucas Machado
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Eliana de
Fernandes Filho, Elpídio Inácio
Schaefer, Carlos Ernesto Gonçalves Reynaud
Batjes, Niels H.
Santos, Gerson Rodrigues dos
Pontes, Lucas Machado
description Soil bulk density (ρb) data are needed for a wide range of environmental studies. However, ρb is rarely reported in soil surveys. An alternative to obtain ρb for data-scarce regions, such as the Rio Doce basin in southeastern Brazil, is indirect estimation from less costly covariates using pedotransfer functions (PTF). This study primarily aims to develop region-specific PTFs for ρb using multiple linear regressions (MLR) and random forests (RF). Secondly, it assessed the accuracy of PTFs for data grouped into soil horizons and soil classes. For that purpose, we compared the performance of PTFs compiled from the literature with those developed here. Two groups of data were evaluated as covariates: 1) readily available soil properties and 2) maps derived from a digital elevation model and MODIS satellite imagery, jointly with lithological and pedological maps. The MLR model was applied step-wise to select significant predictors and its accuracy assessed by means of cross-validation. The PTFs developed using all data estimated ρb from soil properties by MLR and RF, with R2 of 0.41 and 0.51, respectively. Alternatively, using environmental covariates, RF predicted ρb with R2 of 0.41. Grouping criteria did not lead to a significant increase in the estimates of ρb. The accuracy of the ‘regional’ PTFs developed for this study was greater than that found with the ‘compiled’ PTFs. The best PTF will be firstly used to assess soil carbon stocks and changes in the Rio Doce basin.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121818
10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0485
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121818
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0485
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121818/118679
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Agricola
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Agricola
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola; v. 73 n. 6 (2016); 525-534
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 Núm. 6 (2016); 525-534
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 No. 6 (2016); 525-534
1678-992X
0103-9016
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1800222792900149248