Substitution of rumen degradable nitrogen with urea in sheep fed low quality Eragrostis curvula hay

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mynhardt, Herman
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Niekerk, Willem Adriaan Van, Erasmus, Lourens Johannes, Hassen, Abubeker, Coertze, Roelf Johannes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121814
Resumo: The aim of the present study was to determine whether sunflower meal (SFM), a highly rumen degradable protein (RDP) source, can be substituted with non-protein nitrogen (NPN, urea) without impacting negatively on intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation and microbial nitrogen (N) synthesis (MNS) in wethers consuming low quality Eragrostis curvula hay. Five wethers were fed ad libitum, low quality hay and supplemented twice-daily in equal proportions, via the rumen cannulae, one of five iso-nitrogenous and iso-energetic supplements in a 5 × 5 Latin square design experiment. The supplements differed in the ratios of rumen degradable N (RDN) supplied by either SFM and/or urea and is presented as percentage of RDN supplied by urea: T0 (100 % SFM, 0 % urea); T15 (85 % SFM, 15 % urea); T30 (70 % SFM, 30 % urea); T45 (55 % SFM, 45 % urea) and T60 (40 % SFM, 60 % urea). Forage intake and total tract dry matter (DM) digestibility did not differ; however, higher forage neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibilities were observed in the sheep supplemented with the higher urea-treatments (T45 and T60) compared to T15. Neither rumen pH nor total rumen volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentraions differed. The mean rumen ammonia nitrogen (RAN) concentration of the sheep supplemented with T60 was higher than T30 (9.35 mg dL−1 vs. 7.41 mg dL−1); however, no differences were observed in MNS or efficiency of MNS among treatments. Results suggest that up to 60 % of RDN supplied by SFM can be substituted with urea, without affecting intake, digestibility or MNS in wethers fed a low quality tropical hay.
id USP-18_9cd3903fdfccb126c2e72421f53c018d
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/121814
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Substitution of rumen degradable nitrogen with urea in sheep fed low quality Eragrostis curvula hayThe aim of the present study was to determine whether sunflower meal (SFM), a highly rumen degradable protein (RDP) source, can be substituted with non-protein nitrogen (NPN, urea) without impacting negatively on intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation and microbial nitrogen (N) synthesis (MNS) in wethers consuming low quality Eragrostis curvula hay. Five wethers were fed ad libitum, low quality hay and supplemented twice-daily in equal proportions, via the rumen cannulae, one of five iso-nitrogenous and iso-energetic supplements in a 5 × 5 Latin square design experiment. The supplements differed in the ratios of rumen degradable N (RDN) supplied by either SFM and/or urea and is presented as percentage of RDN supplied by urea: T0 (100 % SFM, 0 % urea); T15 (85 % SFM, 15 % urea); T30 (70 % SFM, 30 % urea); T45 (55 % SFM, 45 % urea) and T60 (40 % SFM, 60 % urea). Forage intake and total tract dry matter (DM) digestibility did not differ; however, higher forage neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibilities were observed in the sheep supplemented with the higher urea-treatments (T45 and T60) compared to T15. Neither rumen pH nor total rumen volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentraions differed. The mean rumen ammonia nitrogen (RAN) concentration of the sheep supplemented with T60 was higher than T30 (9.35 mg dL−1 vs. 7.41 mg dL−1); however, no differences were observed in MNS or efficiency of MNS among treatments. Results suggest that up to 60 % of RDN supplied by SFM can be substituted with urea, without affecting intake, digestibility or MNS in wethers fed a low quality tropical hay.Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/12181410.1590/0103-9016-2015-0277Scientia Agricola; v. 73 n. 6 (2016); 498-504Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 Núm. 6 (2016); 498-504Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 No. 6 (2016); 498-5041678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121814/118676Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Agricolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMynhardt, HermanNiekerk, Willem Adriaan VanErasmus, Lourens JohannesHassen, AbubekerCoertze, Roelf Johannes2016-10-10T20:08:27Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/121814Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2016-10-10T20:08:27Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Substitution of rumen degradable nitrogen with urea in sheep fed low quality Eragrostis curvula hay
title Substitution of rumen degradable nitrogen with urea in sheep fed low quality Eragrostis curvula hay
spellingShingle Substitution of rumen degradable nitrogen with urea in sheep fed low quality Eragrostis curvula hay
Mynhardt, Herman
title_short Substitution of rumen degradable nitrogen with urea in sheep fed low quality Eragrostis curvula hay
title_full Substitution of rumen degradable nitrogen with urea in sheep fed low quality Eragrostis curvula hay
title_fullStr Substitution of rumen degradable nitrogen with urea in sheep fed low quality Eragrostis curvula hay
title_full_unstemmed Substitution of rumen degradable nitrogen with urea in sheep fed low quality Eragrostis curvula hay
title_sort Substitution of rumen degradable nitrogen with urea in sheep fed low quality Eragrostis curvula hay
author Mynhardt, Herman
author_facet Mynhardt, Herman
Niekerk, Willem Adriaan Van
Erasmus, Lourens Johannes
Hassen, Abubeker
Coertze, Roelf Johannes
author_role author
author2 Niekerk, Willem Adriaan Van
Erasmus, Lourens Johannes
Hassen, Abubeker
Coertze, Roelf Johannes
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mynhardt, Herman
Niekerk, Willem Adriaan Van
Erasmus, Lourens Johannes
Hassen, Abubeker
Coertze, Roelf Johannes
description The aim of the present study was to determine whether sunflower meal (SFM), a highly rumen degradable protein (RDP) source, can be substituted with non-protein nitrogen (NPN, urea) without impacting negatively on intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation and microbial nitrogen (N) synthesis (MNS) in wethers consuming low quality Eragrostis curvula hay. Five wethers were fed ad libitum, low quality hay and supplemented twice-daily in equal proportions, via the rumen cannulae, one of five iso-nitrogenous and iso-energetic supplements in a 5 × 5 Latin square design experiment. The supplements differed in the ratios of rumen degradable N (RDN) supplied by either SFM and/or urea and is presented as percentage of RDN supplied by urea: T0 (100 % SFM, 0 % urea); T15 (85 % SFM, 15 % urea); T30 (70 % SFM, 30 % urea); T45 (55 % SFM, 45 % urea) and T60 (40 % SFM, 60 % urea). Forage intake and total tract dry matter (DM) digestibility did not differ; however, higher forage neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibilities were observed in the sheep supplemented with the higher urea-treatments (T45 and T60) compared to T15. Neither rumen pH nor total rumen volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentraions differed. The mean rumen ammonia nitrogen (RAN) concentration of the sheep supplemented with T60 was higher than T30 (9.35 mg dL−1 vs. 7.41 mg dL−1); however, no differences were observed in MNS or efficiency of MNS among treatments. Results suggest that up to 60 % of RDN supplied by SFM can be substituted with urea, without affecting intake, digestibility or MNS in wethers fed a low quality tropical hay.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121814
10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0277
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121814
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0277
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121814/118676
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Agricola
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Agricola
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola; v. 73 n. 6 (2016); 498-504
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 Núm. 6 (2016); 498-504
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 No. 6 (2016); 498-504
1678-992X
0103-9016
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1800222792892809216